Abstract
The goal of nipple-areolar reconstruction is to create a nipple that is appropriately located on the breast mound and has adequate projection, shape, color and texture to match the contralateral nipple-areolar complex. Despite various reports of techniques, no single technique is considered as an established method. The common methods of nipple reconstruction consist of composite grafts and local flaps, and the areolar is usually reconstructed by skin graft and tattooing. The authors introduce a systematic approach to select the appropriate reconstructive techniques for nipple-areolar complex reconstruction. If the patient has sufficient projection of the contralateral nipple and is willing to use it as a donor site, the composite graft of nipple is primarily considered. When the composite graft is not indicated, the methods using local flap such as skate flap and CV flap are proposed. Skate flap is best suited to maintain the contour of reconstructed breast mound. Although CV flap may distort the shape of breast mound, the method is popular for its simplicity. For creation of areolar, tattooing is widely performed to minimize the donor site morbidity rather than skin graft. Despite the algorithm of reconstructive techniques, it is important for the surgeon to choose the most familiar technique for superior outcomes. The nipple-areolar complex reconstruction is an integral step in the long treatment journey. Although the techniques of nipple reconstruction seem simplistic, they play a major role and demand meticulous attention to achieve good aesthetic outcomes.
References
1. Yun IS, Lew DH, Tark KC. Nipple reconstruction with modified C-V flap: C-U flap. J Korean Soc Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2008. 14:75–78.
2. Losken A, Mackay GJ, Bostwick J 3rd. Nipple reconstruction using the C-V flap technique: a long-term evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001. 108:361–369.
3. Shestak KC, Gabriel A, Landecker A, Peters S, Shestak A, Kim J. Assessment of long-term nipple projection: a comparison of three techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002. 110:780–786.
4. Banducci DR, Le TK, Hughes KC. Long-term follow-up of a modified Anton-Hartrampf nipple reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 1999. 43:467–469.
5. Few JW, Marcus JR, Casas LA, Aitken ME, Redding J. Long-term predictable nipple projection following reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999. 104:1321–1324.
6. Jabor MA, Shayani P, Collins DR Jr, Karas T, Cohen BE. Nipple-areola reconstruction: satisfaction and clinical determinants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002. 110:457–463.
7. Kroll SS, Reece GP, Miller MJ, Evans GR, Robb GL, Baldwin BJ, Wang BG, Schusterman MA. Comparison of nipple projection with the modified double-opposing tab and star flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997. 99:1602–1605.
8. Guerra AB, Khoobehi K, Metzinger SE, Allen RJ. New technique for nipple areola reconstruction: arrow flap and rib cartilage graft for long-lasting nipple projection. Ann Plast Surg. 2003. 50:31–37.
9. Beckenstein MS. Thorne CH, Beasley RW, Aston SJ, Bartlett SP, Gurtner GC, Spear SL, editors. Nipple reconstruction. Grabb and Smith's plastic surgery. 2007. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;676–680.
11. Delay E, Mojallal A, Vasseur C, Delaporte T. Immediate nipple reconstruction during immediate autologous latissimus breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006. 118:1303–1312.
12. Mathes SJ, Ueno CM. Mathes SJ, Hentz VR, editors. Reconstruction of the nipple-areolar complex. Plastic surgery. 2006. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier;791–818.
13. Ahn ST. Ahn ST, editor. Algorithm for nipple-areolar reconstruction. Aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. 2010. Seoul: Koonja Publishing Co.;491–513.