Abstract
Osteoporotic vertebral fractures suspected at clinical evaluation require radiological confirmation. Most radiologists make the diagnosis of vertebral fracture on the basis of a qualitative impression. However, unlike other fractures, vertebral fractures are commonly found on radiographs obtained for other reasons in patients who do not show signs or symptoms suggestive of fractures. Radiologists qualitatively analyze radiographs of the thoracolumbar spine to identify vertebral fractures in patients whose clinical indications suggest trauma, osteoporosis, malignancy, or acute back pain. The accuracy of decision-making process can be enhanced by additional radiographic projections or by complementary examinations including DXA (Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry) morphometry, bone scan, CT, or MRI. The importance of imaging is highlighted by the fact that only about one in four vertebral fractures is recognized on the basis of clinical evaluations without radiographs. Radiographs may include lateral and AP (anterior/posterior) X-rays of the affected spinal segments. The physician may request bone scan and/or CT to help identify the location of the fracture, its status (stable versus unstable). Furthermore, an MRI scan may be performed if neurologic deficit, soft tissue trauma or hematoma are suspected.
Figures and Tables
![]() | Figure 2Various type of vertebral compression fractures: From left, wedge type, biconcave type, and pancake-like crushed vertebral fracture. |
![]() | Figure 3Semiquantitative method to assess vertebral fractures. (Genant HK, et al. J Bone Mineral Res 1993; 8(9):1137-1148). |
![]() | Figure 5Compression fracture of the 1st lumbar vertebral body by bone scan (left) and sacral insufficiency fracture by bone SPECT (right). |
![]() | Figure 6CT sagittal reconstructed image and 3 D reformation of L2 vertebral fracture in 62 year-old male. |
![]() | Figure 7MRI finding of benign vertebral fracture: T2 WI, T1 WI, T1 contrast enhanced image (from left). |
![]() | Figure 8MRI finding of malignant vertebral fracture: T2 WI, T1 WI, T1 contrast enhanced image (from left). Note the exophytic soft tissue mass and signal changes in the whole spine. |
![]() | Figure 9MRI finding of sacral insufficiency fracture: Fat suppressed sagittal T2 WI, axial T1 WI, axial fat suppressed T1 WI (from left). |
![]() | Figure 10Simple radiographs of two cases with multiple myeloma: Heterogenous osteolytic bone loss and biconcave fractures. |
References
1. Saville PD. A quantitative approach to simple radiographic diagnosis of osteoporosis: Its application to the osteoporosis of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1967. 10:416–422.


2. Rogers LF, Lenchik L. Juhl JH, Crummy AB, Kuhlman JE, editors. Metabolic, endocrine, and related bone disease. Essentials of radiologic imaging. 1998. 7th ed. Lippincot-Raven;199–236.
3. Yang SO, Choi MY. Diagnositic imaging features of osteoporosis. Korean J Osteoporosis. 2004. 2:1–8.
4. Cook GJ, Hannaford E, See M, Clarke SE, Fogelman I. The value of bone scintigraphy in the evaluation of osteoporotic patients with back pain. Scand J Rheumatol. 2002. 31:245–248.


5. Schousboe JT, DeBold CR, Bowles C, Glickstein S, Rubino RK. Prevalence of vertebral compression fracture deformity by X-ray absorptiometry of lateral thoracic and lumbar spines in a population referred for bone densitometry. J Clin Densitom. 2002. 5:239–248.


6. Mayo-Smith W, Rosenthal DI. Radiographic appearance of osteopenia. Radiol Clin North Am. 1991. 29:37–47.
7. Genant HK, Wu CY, van Kuijk C, Nevitt MC. Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique. J Bone Mineral Res. 1993. 8:1137–1148.


8. Yang SO. Clinical use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Korean J Bone Metab. 1996. 3:128–135.
9. Schousboe JT, Vokes T, Broy SB, Ferrar L, McKiernan F, Roux C, Binkly N. Vertebral fracture assessment: The ISCD official positions. J Clin Densitom. 2008. 11:92–108.
10. Haller J, André MP, Resnick D, Miller C, Howard BA, Mitchell MJ, Schils JP, Sartoris DJ, Trudell D. Detection of thoracolumbar vertebral body destruction with lateral spine radiography. Part II. Clinical investigation with computed tomography. Invest Radiol. 1990. 25:523–532.


11. Kim JI, Yang SO, Choi JC. MRI findings of vertebral compression fractures. J Korean Radiol Soc. 1995. 33:667–672.
12. Cuénod CA, Laredo JD, Chevret S, Hamze B, Naouri JF, Chapaux X, Bondeville JM, Tubiana JM. Acute vertebral collapse due to osteoporosis or malignancy: appearance on unenhanced and gadolinium-enhanced MR images. Radiology. 1996. 199:541–459.


13. Baur A, Stabler A, Arbogast S, Duerr HR, Bartl R, Reiser M. Acute osteoporotic and neoplastic vertebral compression fractures: fluid sign at MR imaging. Radiology. 2002. 225:730–735.


14. Yamato M, Nishimura G, Kuramochi E, Saiki N, Fujioka M. MR appearance at different ages of osteoporotic compression fracture of the vertebrae. Radiat Med. 1998. 16:329–334.
15. Kong JH, Park JS, Ryu KN. Osteoporotic compression fracture of the thoracolumbar spine and sacral insufficiency fracture: incidence and analysis of the relationship according to the clinical factors. J Korean Radiol Soc. 2006. 55:495–500.


16. McAfee JG. Radionuclide imaging in metabolic and systemic skeletal disease. Semin Nucl Med. 1987. 17:334–349.
17. Karchevsky M, Babb JS, Schweitzer ME. Can diffusion-weighted imaging be used to differentiate benign from pathologic fractures? A meta-analysis. Skeletal Radiol. 2008. 37:791–795.


18. Favus MJ. Primer on the metabolic bone diseases and disorders of mineral metabolism. 1996. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven;152–163.
19. Dass B, Puet TA, Watanakunakorn C. Tuberculosis of the spine (Pott's disease) presenting as 'compression fractures'. Spinal Cord. 2002. 40:604–608.


20. Korean Soc of Bone and Mineral Metabolism. Osteoporosis. 2006. Hanmi Publishing Company;134–147.