Journal List > J Korean Med Assoc > v.53(1) > 1042294

Lee and Chon: Labor Analgesia

Abstract

We discuss recent advances in the administration of labor analgesia aimed at a more effective birthing experience for parturient women. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) is the most effective method of labor pain relief in medical practice. It also provides more consistent and predictable labor analgesia. When a parturient women has a contraindication to epidural analgesia, systemic analgesia techniques are provided as a guide to effective analgesia. PCEA of "low-dose" or "light mixtures" of local anesthetics and lipophilic opioids has allowed anesthesiologists to provide reasonable pain relief for most parturient women while decreasing the total dose of local anesthetics and opioids, thus minimizing the side effects of each agent. Fentanyl analgesia utilizing patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA), may provide effective self-titrated pain relief, although they are not as effective as the epidural method. Recently, remifentanil was suggested as the opioid of choice for labor analgesia. Potential advantages of remifentanil include better titration of analgesia and neonatal outcome. However, all systemic opioids rapidly cross the placenta. These drugs may cause neonatal respiratory and neurobehavioral depression. In order to reduce the incidence of breakthrough pain, more research on computer-integrated patient-controlled analgesia technology may be necessary. The study of a new local anesthetic drug that has less motor blockade and cardiotoxicity than ropivacaine is desirable, while PCEA is the most effective form of labor analgesia currently available. If epidural analgesia is contraindicated, PCI remifentanil bolus alone may be a suitable systemic analgesia for labor pain.

Figures and Tables

Table 1
Absolute contraindications to epidural labor analgesia
jkma-53-59-i001
Table 2
Systemic opioids used for labor analgesia
jkma-53-59-i002

IV; intravenous, IM; intramuscular, SQ; subcutaneous

Table 3
Opioids used for intravenous patient-controlled analgesia during labor
jkma-53-59-i003
Table 4
Characteristics of the ideal labor analgesic
jkma-53-59-i004

References

1. Hawkins JL, Gibbs CP, Orleans M, Martin-Salvaj G, Beaty B. Obstetric anesthesia work force survey, 1981 versus 1992. Anesthesiology. 1997. 87:135–143.
crossref
2. Wong CA. Labor analgesia. is there an ideal technique? Anesth Analg. 2009. 109:296–298.
crossref
3. Wilson MJ, Cooper G, MacArthur C, Shennan A. Randomized controlled trial comparing traditional with two "mobile" epidural techniques: anesthetic and analgesic efficacy. Anesthesiology. 2002. 97:1567–1575.
4. Chestnut DH, Owen CL, Bates JN, Ostman LG, Choi WW, Geiger MW. Continuous infusion epidural analgesia during labor: a randomized, double-blind comparison of 0.0625% bupivacaine/0.0002% fentanyl versus 0.125% bupivacaine. Anesthesiology. 1988. 68:754–759.
5. Sharma SK, Leveno KJ. Regional analgesia and progress of labor. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2003. 46:633–645.
crossref
6. Halpern SH, Carvalho B. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia for labor. Anesth Analg. 2009. 108:921–928.
crossref
7. Wong CA, Ratliff JT, Sullivan JT, Scavone BM, Toledo P, McCarthy RJ. A randomized comparison of programmed intermittent epidural bolus with continuous epidural infusion for labor analgesia. Anesth Analg. 2006. 102:904–909.
crossref
8. Sia AT, Lim Y, Ocampo C. A comparison of a basal infusion with automated mandatory boluses in parturient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor. Anesth Analg. 2007. 104:673–678.
crossref
9. Howell CJ, Dean T, Lucking L, Dziedzic K, Jones PW, Johanson RB. Randomised study of long term outcome after epidural versus non-epidural analgesia during labour. BMJ. 2002. 325:357.
crossref
10. Rayburn WF, Smith CV, Parriott JE, Woods RE. Randomized comparison of meperidine and fentanyl during labor. Obstet Gynecol. 1989. 74:604–606.
crossref
11. Nikkola EM, Ekblad UU, Kero PO, Alihanka JJ, Salonen MA. Intravenous fentanyl PCA during labour. Can J Anaesth. 1997. 44:1248–1255.
crossref
12. Jordan S, Emery S, Bradshaw C, Watkins A, Friswell W. The impact of intrapartum analgesia on infant feeding. BJOG. 2005. 112:927–934.
crossref
13. Jones R, Pegrum A, Stacey RG. Patient-controlled analgesia using remifentanil in the parturient with thrombocytopaenia. Anaesthesia. 1999. 54:461–465.
crossref
14. Thurlow JA, Waterhouse P. Patient-controlled analgesia in labour using remifentanil in two parturients with platelet abnormalities. Br J Anaesth. 2000. 84:411–413.
crossref
15. Olufolabi AJ, Booth JV, Wakeling HG, Glass PS, Penning DH, Reynolds JD. A preliminary investigation of remifentanil as a labor analgesic. Anesth Analg. 2000. 91:606–608.
16. Blair JM, Dobson GT, Hill DA, McCracken GR, Fee JP. Patient controlled analgesia for labour: a comparison of remifentanil with pethidine. Anaesthesia. 2005. 60:22–27.
crossref
17. Volikas I, Butwick A, Wilkinson C, Pleming A, Nicholson G. Maternal and neonatal side-effects of remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia in labour. Br J Anaesth. 2005. 95:504–509.
crossref
TOOLS
Similar articles