Journal List > J Korean Med Assoc > v.50(12) > 1041845

Lim: Anesthesia and Sedation

Abstract

Anesthetic care is usually provided for patients undergoing surgical procedures to make them unconscious and painless during surgery. Nowadays there are increasing therapeutic or diagnostic procedures performed outside operating room. Sedation is more frequently provided as healthcare during procedures for patient's comfort and safety by non-anesthesiologist or anesthesiologist. Early in 1999, ASA (the American Society of Anesthesiologists defined "sedation and analgesia" and established 4 states: minimal sedation, moderate sedation, deep sedation, and general anesthesia. Monitored anesthetic care implies the potential for a deep sedation and is always administered by an anesthesiologist. It is not always possible to predict how an individual patient will respond by nature of being a continuum of sedation. Hence, practitioners intending to induce a given level of sedation should be able to rescue patients whose level of sedation becomes deeper than initially intended. The standards for preoperative evaluation, intraoperative monitoring, anesthetic care, etc. are not different from those for general anesthesia.

Figures and Tables

Table 1
Continuum of depth of sedation: Definition of general anesthesia and levels of sedation / analgesia
jkma-50-1065-i001

References

1. American Society of Anesthesiologists. Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non-anesthesiologists. Anesthesiology. 1996. 84:459–471.
2. American Society of Anesthesiologists, Task Force on Sedation and Analgesia by Non-Anesthesiologists. Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non-anesthesiologists. Anesthesiology. 2002. 96:1004–1017.
3. Hiller SC. Barash PG, Gullen BF, Stoelting RK, editors. Monitored anesthesia care Clinical anesthesia. Clinical anesthesia. 2001. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincot Williams & Wilkins;1239–1254.
4. Epstein BS. The american society of anesthesiologists efforts in developing guidelines for sedation and analgesia for non-anesthesiologist. Anesthesiology. 2003. 98:1261–1268.
crossref
5. Kim ST. KSIVA. Anesthesiologist-controlled sedation and patient-controlled sedation. Sedation. 2004. Seoul: Eui-Hak Publishing & Printing;19–29.
6. Irwin MG, Thompson N, Kenny NC. Patient-maintained propofol sedation. Anaesthesa. 1997. 52:525–530.
crossref
7. Newson C, Joshi GP, Victory R, White PF. Comparison of propofol administration techniques for sedation during monitored anesthesia care. Anesth Analg. 1995. 81:486–491.
crossref
8. Leslie K, Absalom A, Kenny GN. Closed loop control of sedation for colonoscopy using bispectral index. Anesthesia. 2002. 57:693–697.
9. Milne SE, Kenny GNC. Future applications for TCI systems. Anesthesia. 1998. 53:S. 56–60.
crossref
10. Saunders BP, Fukumoto M, Halligan S, Masaki T, Love S, Williams CB. Patient-administered nitrous oxide/oxygen inhalation provides effective sedation and analgesia for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1994. 40:418–421.
crossref
11. Oei-Lim VLB, Kalkman CI, Makkes PC, Ooms WG. Patient-controlled versus anesthesiologist-controlled conscious sedation with propofol for dental treatment in anxious patients. Anesth Analg. 1998. 86:967–972.
crossref
12. Herrick IA, Gelb AW, Tseng PS, Kirkby J. Patient-controlled sedation using propofol during interventional neuroradiologic procedures. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 1997. 9:237–241.
crossref
13. Cook LB, Lockwood GG, Moore CM, Whitwarm JG. True patient-controlled sedation. Anaesthesia. 1993. 48:1039–1044.
crossref
14. Rudkin GE, Osborne GA, Finn BP, Jarvis DA, Vickers D. Intraoperative patient-controlled sedation. Comparison of patientcontrolled propofol with patient-controlled midazolam. Anaesthesia. 1992. 47:376–381.
15. White PF, Negus JB. Sedative infusions during local and regional anesthesia: A comparison of midazolam and propofol. J Clin Anesth. 1991. 3:32–39.
crossref
TOOLS
Similar articles