Journal List > J Vet Sci > v.7(2) > 1041644

Reis, Pardo, Oba, Kronka, and Frazatti-Gallina: Matricaria chamomilla CH12 decreases handling stress in Nelore calves

Abstract

Matricaria chamomilla CH12 is a phytotherapeutic or homeopathic product, which has been used to reduce stress. Here, we examined its effect on preventing handling stress in bovines. Sixty Nelore calves were randomly distributed into two equal groups. One group was administered Matricaria chamomilla CH12 in diet and the other the 'control' was not. Animals in both groups were maintained unstressed for 30 days to adjust to the feeding system and pasture, and were then stressed by constraint on the 31th, 38th, 45th and 60th experimental days. Blood samples were taken on these days after animals had been immobilization in a trunk contention for 5 min. Stress was followed by analyzing serum cortisol levels. These peaked on the 45th day and then decreased, but not to baseline, on the 60th day. On the 45th day cortisol levels were significantly lower in animals fed Matricaria chamomilla CH12, suggesting that this product reduces stress. These effects may be a consequence of its inhibiting cortisol production and its calming and anxiolytic effects.

Introduction

Neuroendocrine stress responses are regulated by the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPA), which promotes plasmatic cortisol release [38,26]. This response is vital to an organism that has to cope with a challenging environment [19].
Bovine stressors may be either physical or psychological. The most referenced stressors are vaccination [30], immobilization [19], handling in a corral [37], installation [5], fear [28], presence of unfamiliar people [23], transportation [7], food and water deprivation [37], hot or cold environment [5], cirurgical procedures [6], crowding [7], isolation [9], confinement [11] and natural physiological changes (parturition, lactation, weaning) [37].
The effects of stress on bovine economy and production are remarkable. For example, in Argentina it has been estimated to account for losses of 50 million dollars per year [7]. Moreover, the effects of the above stressors are increased when bovines are held in modern regimes, such as, intensive systems that impose severe stress [37] and require higher investments [11]. Under such conditions, stress impairs cattle growth, weight gains, milk production, and meat quality [11,10,26,37].
Phytotherapy or homeopathic products, such as, the chamomile Matricaria chamomilla, have been used to decrease stress. Moreover, apigenin the active principle of chamomile, decreases cortisol plasma concentrations [41] and has sedative [39], analgesic [3], anxiolytic [39], anti inflammatory [33] and immunomodulatory effects [1].
Although the phytotherapeutic effects of chamomile are well documented, its anti-stress effect on bovines is not as well known. Thus, in the present study, we evaluated whether the chamomile-based product, Matricaria chamomilla CH12, prevents or reduces handling stress response in Nelore bovines.

Materials and Methods

Animals

Sixty Nelore calves (Bos indicus), about 12 months old, belonging to a farm situated in Lutecia, SP, Brazil, were studied. Animals were fed Brachiaria decumbens from an extensive pasture system and supplemented with commercial mineral salt in an ad libitum manner.
The experiment was carried out during the spring (September to October) of 2003 in a tropical area, which is characterized by a rainy season from October to April and a dry season from May to September, with an annual precipitation of about 1300 mm, a relative humidity of approximately 64%, a mean temperature 25℃, and an altitude of 602 m. Nelore cattle adapt well to these conditions.

Matricaria chamomilla CH12

Matricaria chamomilla CH12 (Fator Estresse; Arenales Fauna & Flora, Brazil) is composed of Matricaria chamomilla CH12, milk CH12, Bixa orellana (0.75 g) and sucrose (100 g).

Matricaria chamomilla CH12 administration

The animals were randomly distributed into two groups (30 animals/group): one received feed with mineral salt supplemented with Matricaria chamomilla CH12 and the other group without this supplement (control). In both groups the animals were maintained unstressed for 30 days to adjust to the feeding system and adaptation to pasture, and were then stressed on the 31th, 38th, 45th, and 60th days of the experiment. Each animal in the Matricaria chamomilla CH12 group ingested about 2 g of Matricaria chamomilla CH12 daily. The quantity of this supplement consumed by the animals was estimated by incorporating Matricaria chamomilla CH12 into mineral salt every day and calculating the mean individual salt consumption (daily difference between salt weight offered and amount left after 24 h divided by the number of animals).
Blood samples were taken on days 31th, 38th, 45th, and 60th after immobilization, which was performed by leading animals to a corral in the morning of the sampling day, and restraining each animal in a trunk contention for 5 min immobilization blood samples were taken (10 ml) from the jugular vein and stored in vacuum tubes not containing anticoagulant. These tubes were kept in an insulated container in ice and soon centrifuged 2,500 rpm by 10min. Serum samples were stored at -20℃ for subsequent serum cortisol determination.

Stressors imposed on cattle

The stressors imposed on calves are: handling pen, presence of unfamiliar people during handling, immobilization in a trunk contention for 5 min and harvesting blood sampling.

Serum cortisol determination

Serum cortisol levels were determined using a commercial solid-phase radioimmunoassay kit (Diagnostic Products, USA) and counted using an Auto-Gamma Count Cobra II (Packard Bio Sciences, USA).

Statistical analysis

Data were normalized by [(x + 0.5)1/2] and significant effects were detected by repeated measures ANOVA and then compared using the Tukey test. The error probability was set at 5% [4].

Results

Animals in both groups showed increased serum cortisol from the beginning of the experiment and peak values were reached on the 45th day. Cortisol levels then decreased gradually but did not reach basal values on the 60th day (Fig. 1). Highest serum cortisol levels were observed in both groups on day 45, but this was significantly lower in animals treated with Matricaria chamomilla CH12 (ANOVA, F = 8.54; p < 0.01).

Discussion

The handling procedures imposed on cattle in holding pens are stressful, and increase serum cortisol levels, although these levels are almost completely reestablished after animals have adjusted. Cattle stress is attenuated by the chamomile-based product Matricaria chamomilla CH12, possibly because this material reduces serum levels of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and has sedative, anxiolytic, and miorelaxing properties.
On the 31th experiment day after animals had adjusted to the feeding system and before or after applying constraint stress for 1 h, serum cortisol levels were 3.16 µg/dl in animals fed Matricaria chamomilla CH12 and 3.68 µg/dl in controls. These values are close to the basal cortisol levels of 3.29 µg/dl found in Zebu cattle by Aragón et al. [2] and by Vásquez and Herrera [37].
In this experiment, many factors may have caused the cortisol increase. In fact, handling a primary stressor in farm animals and is known to impair animal welfare [5,9,21,28]. Moreover, leading cattle to a holding pen is a forced physical exercise [12,22,34], as is restraint in a 'Brete' chute [19,35]. In addition, blood sampling [28] and the presence of unfamiliar people during handling [9,16,17,23] impose additional stress. The handling pen is a novelty for animals [20,29,38], and shouting and physical aggression by handling [16,32], and fear caused by the conditions mentioned above [5,14,28] also acted as stressors in the present study.
Neuroendocrine stress response consists of the activation of the hypothalamic pituitary axis, which results in the secretion of cortisol by the adrenal gland [8,26,38]. This is a possible explanation the results obtained from the 38th day to the end of the experiment in both the control group and the group treated with Matricaria chamomilla CH12. Moreover, although no statistical difference was found, serum cortisol levels were higher than the basal concentrations obtained by Aragón et al. [2] and Vásquez and Herrera [37], thus supporting the notion that the animals were slight stressed.
On the 45th day of this experiment, control animals showed cortisol levels 38.4% higher than those of animals treated with chamomile. This response is in agreement with the results reported by Ohno et al. [31], who found that Matricaria chamomilla reduces cortisol production by about 47.5% in human adreno-cortical H295R cells. In other mammals, the flavonoid apigenin contained in Matricaria chamomilla [25,33,40,42] was found to act on the nervous system by diverse and complex mechanisms [27,13].
On the 60th day of the experiment, cortisol levels had dropped off in treated and control animals, and almost reached basal levels. This reduction can be attributed to adjustment to handling procedures [18,28,36]. Adjustments to stressors are caused by changes in the central nervous system at different levels, i.e., effects on hypothalamus and pituitary function; on neurosteroids and neurotransmitters; on the limbic system (mainly the amygdala and hippocampus) and on the hypothalamic pituitary axis [6], which decrease axis response to stressors [19]. The capacity of bovines to adjust to stress differs among individual animals due to genetic [15,19] and temperament features, i.e., docile animals adjust more easily [15].
The results of the present study provide evidence that Matricaria chamomilla CH12 decreased stress in bovines. We hypothesize that the mechanisms involved are the inhibition of cortisol production and the calming and anxiolytic effects of this material.

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1
Effect of Matricaria Chamomilla CH12 on calf serum cortisol. Mean cortisol levels (±SD) of treated and control groups (30 animals/group). Means with the dotted box are statistically different from each other (p < 0.05). Means with at least common lower case letter are similar within the given group.
jvs-7-189-g001

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Homeopathic Laboratory Arenales Fauna & Flora Ltd., Brazil.

References

1. Amirghofran Z, Azadbakht M, Karimi MH. Evaluation of the immunomodulatory effects of five herbal plants. J Ethnopharmacol. 2000. 72:167–172.
crossref
2. Aragón VEF, Graca DS, Norte AL, Santiago GS, Paula OJ. Suplementação com cromo e desempenho reprodutivo de vacas zebu primíparas mantidas a pasto. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec. 2001. 53:624–628.
crossref
3. Avallone R, Zanoli P, Puia G, Kleinschnitz M, Schreier P, Baraldi M. Pharmacological profile of apigenin, a flavonoid isolated from Matricaria chamomilla. Biochem Pharmacol. 2000. 59:1387–1394.
crossref
4. Banzatto DA, Kronka SN. Experimentação agrícola. 1995. 3rd ed. Jaboticabal: FUNEP;247.
5. Borell EH. The biology of stress and its application to livestock housing and transportation assessment. J Anim Sci. 2001. 79:E. Suppl.E260–E267.
6. Cook CJ, Mellor DJ, Harris PJ, Ingram JR, Matthews LR. Morberg GP, Mench JA, editors. Hands-on and hands-off measurement of stress. The Biology of Animals Stress: Basic Principles And Implications for Animal Welfare. 2000. New York: CABI Publishing;123–146.
crossref
7. Coppo JA, Mussart NB, Revidatti MA, Capellari A. Absence of biochemically demonstrable stress in early weaned half-bred zebu calves. Cien e Inv Agr. 2003. 30:97–105.
crossref
8. Dickerson SS, Kemeny ME. Acute stressors and cortisol responses: a theoretical integration and synthesis of laboratory research. Psychol Bull. 2004. 130:355–391.
crossref
9. Eicher SD. Transportation of cattle in the dairy industry: current research and future directions. J Anim Sci. 2001. 84:E. Suppl.E19–E23.
crossref
10. Elsasser TH, Klasing KC, Filipov N, Thompson F. Morberg GP, Mench JA, editors. The metabolic consequences of stress: Targets for stress and proprieties of nutrient use. The Biology of Animals Stress: Basic Principles And Implications for Animal Welfare. 2000. New York: CABI Publishing;77–100.
11. Encarnação RO. Costa MJRP, editor. Estresse e produção animal. 1° Ciclo internacional de palestras sobre bioclimatologia animal. 1989. Jaboticabal: FUNEP;111–129.
12. Garcia-Belenguer S, Palacio J, Gascón M, Aceña C, Revilla R, Mormède P. Differences in the biological stress responses of two cattle breeds to walking up to mountain pastures in the Pyrenees. Vet Res. 1996. 27:515–526.
13. Goutman JD, Waxemberg MD, Doñate-Oliver F, Pomata PE, Calvo DJ. Flavonoid modulation of ionic currants mediated by GABAA and GABAC receptors. Eur J Pharmacol. 2003. 461:79–87.
crossref
14. Grandin T. Evaluación del estrés durante el manejo y transporte. J Anim Sci. 1997. 75:249–257.
15. Grandin T. Handling methods and facilities to reduce stress on cattle. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 1998. 14:325–342.
crossref
16. Hemsworth PH, Coleman GJ, Barnett JL, Borg S. Relationships between human-animal interactions and productivity of commercial dairy cows. J Anim Sci. 2000. 78:2821–2831.
crossref
17. Hemsworth PH, Coleman GJ, Barnett JL, Borg S, Dowling S. The effects of cognitive behavioral intervention on the attitude and behavior of stockpersons and the behavior and productivity of commercial dairy cows. J Anim Sci. 2002. 80:68–78.
crossref
18. Hickey MC, Drennan M, Earley B. The effect of abrupt weaning of suckler calves on the plasma concentrations of cortisol, catecholamines, leukocytes, acute-phase proteins and in vitro interferon-gamma production. J Anim Sci. 2003. 81:2847–2855.
crossref
19. Hopster H, van der Werf JTN, Erkens JHF, Blokhuis HJ. Effects of repeated jugular puncture on plasma cortisol concentrations in loose-housed dairy cows. J Anim Sci. 1999. 77:708–714.
crossref
20. Joca SRL, Padovan CM, Guimarães FS. Estresse, depressão e hipocampo. Rev Bras Psiquiatr. 2003. 25:Suppl. 2. 46–51.
crossref
21. Knowles TG, Warriss PD. Grandin T, editor. Stress physiology during transport. Livestock Handling and Transport. 2000. 2nd ed. Wallingford: CAB International;385–407.
22. Kurosawa M, Nagata S, Takeda F, Mima K, Hiraga A, Kai M, Taya K. Plasma catecholamine, adrenocorticotropin and cortisol responses to exhaustive incremental treadmill exercise of the Thoroughbred horse. J Equi Sci. 1998. 9:9–18.
crossref
23. Lensink BJ, Fernandez X, Boivin X, Pradel P, Le Neindre P, Veissier I. The impact of gentle contacts on ease of handling, welfare, and growth of calves and on quality of veal meat. J Anim Sci. 2000. 78:1219–1226.
crossref
24. Marder M, Paladini AC. GABA(A)-receptor ligands of flavonoid structure. Curr Top Med Chem. 2002. 2:853–867.
crossref
25. Marder M, Viola H, Wasowski C, Fernández S, Medina JH, Paladini AC. 6-methylapigenin and hesperidin: new valeriana flavonoids with activity on the CNS. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2003. 75:537–545.
crossref
26. Matteri RL, Carroll JA, Dyer CJ. Morberg GP, Mench JA, editors. Neuroendocrine responses to stress. The Biology of Animals Stress: Basic Principles and Implications for Animal Welfare. 2000. New York: CABI Publishing;43–76.
crossref
27. Medina JH, Viola H, Wolfman C, Marder M, Wasowski C, Calvo D, Paladini AC. new ligands for the benzodiazepine receptors. Phytomedicine. 1998. 5:235–243.
28. Mellor DJ, Stafford KJ, Todd SE, Lowe TE, Gregory NG, Bruce RA, Ward RN. A comparison of catecholamine and cortisol responses of young lambs and calves to painful husbandry procedures. Aust Vet J. 2002. 80:228–233.
crossref
29. Morrow CJ, Kolver ES, Verkerk GA, Matthews LR. Fecal glucocorticoid metabolites as a measure of adrenal activity in dairy cattle. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2002. 126:229–241.
crossref
30. Nockels CF, Odde KG, Craig AM. Vitamin E supplementation and stress affect tissue á-tocopherol content of beef heifers. J Anim Sci. 1996. 74:672–677.
crossref
31. Ohno S, Shinoda S, Toyoshima S, Nakazawa H, Makino T, Nakajin S. Effects of flavonoid phytochemicals on cortisol production and on activities of steroidogenic enzymes in human adrenocortical H295R cells. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2002. 80:355–363.
crossref
32. Pajor EA, Rushen J, de Passile AMB. Aversion learning techniques to evaluate dairy cattle handling practices. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2000. 69:89–102.
crossref
33. Paladini AC, Marder M, Viola H, Wolfman C, Wasowski C, Medina JH. Flavonoids and the central nervous system: from forgotten factors to potent anxiolytic compounds. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1999. 51:519–526.
crossref
34. Paludo GR, McManus C, Melo RQ, Cardoso AG, Mello FPS, Moreira M, Fuck BH. Efeito do estresse térmico e do exercício sobre pârametros fisiológicos de cavalos do exército brasileiro. R Bras Zootec. 2002. 31:1130–1142.
crossref
35. Sánchez JM, Castro MJ, Alonso ME, Gaudioso VR. Adaptive metabolic responses in females of the fighting breed submitted to different sequences of stress stimuli. Physiol Behav. 1996. 60:1047–1052.
crossref
36. Solano J, Galindo F, Qrihuela A, Galina CS. The effect of social rank on the physiological response during repeated stressful handling in Zebu cattle (Bos indicus). Physiol Behav. 2004. 82:679–683.
crossref
37. Vásquez EFA, Herrera APN. Concentração plasmática de cortisol, uréia, cálcio e fósforo em vacas de corte mantidas a pasto suplementadas com levedura de cromo durante a estação de monta. Ciência Rural (Santa Maria). 2003. 33:743–747.
crossref
38. Veissier I, Reenen CG, Andanson S, Leushuis IE. Adrenocorticotropic hormone and cortisol in calves after corticotropin-releasing hormone. J Anim Sci. 1999. 77:2047–2053.
crossref
39. Viola H, Wasowski C, Levi de Stein M, Wolfman C, Silveira R, Dajas F, Medina JH, Paladini AC. Apigenin, a component of Matricaria recutita flowers, is a central benzodiazepine receptors-ligand with anxiolytic effects. Planta Med. 1995. 61:213–216.
crossref
40. Wasowski C, Marder M, Viola H, Medina JH, Paladini AC. Isolation and identification of 6-methylapigenin, a competitive ligand for the brain GABAA receptors, from Valeriana wallichii. Planta Med. 2002. 68:934–936.
crossref
41. Yamada K, Miura T, Mimaki Y, Sashida Y. Effect of inhalation of Chamomilla oil vapour on plasma ACTH level in ovariectomized-rat under restriction stress. Biol Pharm Bull. 1996. 19:1244–1246.
crossref
42. Zanoli P, Avaloni R, Baraldi M. Behavioral characterization of the flavonoids apigenin and chrysin. Fitoterapia. 2000. 71:Suppl. 1. S117–S123.
TOOLS
Similar articles