Journal List > J Vet Sci > v.14(4) > 1041266

García, Martínez, Benitez-Medina, Risco, García, Rey, Alonso, and de Mendoza: Development of a real-time SYBR Green PCR assay for the rapid detection of Dermatophilus congolensis

Abstract

Methods such as real time (RT)-PCR have not been developed for the rapid detection and diagnosis of Dermatophilus (D.) congolensis infection. In the present study, a D. congolensis-specific SYBR Green RT-PCR assay was evaluated. The detection limit of the RT-PCR assay was 1 pg of DNA per PCR reaction. No cross-reaction with nucleic acids extracted from Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Staphylococcus aureus, or Austwickia chelonae was observed. Finally, the RT-PCR assay was used to evaluate clinical samples collected from naturally infected animals with D. congolensis. The results showed that this assay is a fast and reliable method for diagnosing dermatophilosis.

Dermatophilus (D.) congolensis is a filamentous branching actinomycete that causes dermatophilosis, a disease characterized by exudative and proliferative dermatitis that affects a wide range of animals and occasionally humans. Clinical characteristics of the disease include matted hair or wool, scab and crust formation, and sometimes, generalized massive crust formation in chronic cases. Chronic infection tends to result in hair loss and even local loss of the upper skin layers that predisposes the patient to secondary infection by Staphylococcus spp. or Pseudomonas aeruginosa [18]. In some instances, D. congolensis may reach the lymph nodes, resulting in a granulomatous response [5]. In a recent report, this organism was also found to be associated with placentitis, funisitis, and abortion in a horse [14].
Dermatophilosis is an economically important disease of cattle in tropical and sub-tropical regions as well as sheep in areas with high rainfall. This disease causes significantly reduced meat, milk, and hide production; failure to thrive in livestock-dependent communities, and increased culling and death [9, 17]. Human infection is rare and most reported cases involve skin infections due to contact with animals. However, D. congolensis has also been associated with infection of the human esophagus [12].
Detection of animals affected by dermatophilosis is frequently difficult and susceptible to confusion with clinically similar diseases such as orf and mange. Direct microscopic examination of stained smears from the lesions or exudates beneath the scabs in acute cases enables visualization of the characteristic branched filaments [15]. However, stained smears taken from dried scabs collected from chronic cases tend to contain low numbers of this pathogen and the characteristic appearance of D. congonlensis is not so obvious [2]. On the other hand, isolation of the infectious agent by culturing is often difficult due to contamination. For this, special techniques involving filtration, chemotaxis, or selective media are necessary. Immunofluorescence techniques have also proven to be useful and sensitive methods for diagnosing D. congolensis infection. However, laboratories must manufacture their own antisera for diagnostic tests because of the lack of a commercial one [11].
Sensitive and routine laboratory techniques for rapid and accurate dermatophilosis diagnosis are highly desirable. The aim of this study was to develop a rapid, and sensitive technique for detecting D. congolensis in cultures and clinical samples. For this investigation, a specific SYBR Green real-time (RT)-PCR assay for detecting D. congolensis DNA was developed.
Twenty D. congolensis isolates were used for this study. The host species and geographic origin are listed in Table 1. The isolates were grown in 20 mL of 2% (w/v) brain heart infusion (Oxoid, UK) supplemented with 1.7% (w/v) neutralized soya peptone (Oxoid) in glass McCartney bottles (Fisher, UK) at 37℃ in air for 48 h. A dense growth of hyphae and filaments with a clear supernatant were typically observed in the cultures.
Genomic DNA was extracted from the cultures using a previously described method [8]. The final DNA pellet was suspended in 25 µL of ultrapure water (Life technologies, Spain) and stored at -20℃ until further use. Concentration of the genomic DNA was calculated based on the absorbance measured at 260 nm with a Synergy HT Multi-Mode Microplate Reader (BioTek, USA) using Gen 5TM 182 V1.09 data analysis software (BioTek). Genomic DNA samples with 260/280 ratios between 1.7 and 1.9 were considered to be pure and of high quality.
To determine the detection limit of the RT-PCR assay, D. congolensis DNA from a reference strain (DSM 43037) (kindly provided by Dr. Alex Morrow, Centre for Tropical Veterinary Medicine, UK) was used. In order to estimate the analytical specificity of the D. congolensis-specific RT-PCR assay, DNA from Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Staphylococcus aureus, and Austwickia chelonae (formerly Dermatophilus chelonae) [6] from in vitro cultures (Table 1) were also used. Primers were designed with the help of an online primer design program, Primer3 [13], based on the nucleotide sequence of the agac gene (GenBank accession no. AJ496026.1) encoding an alkaline ceramidase protein [4]. The resulting primer set named DermaF 5'-TGGCAGCTCTGATGA GTACCACAA-3' (Tm 60.1℃) and DermaR 5'-AATGTG CCGGGAACGGAAATCAAC-3' (Tm 60.3℃) amplified a 127-bp fragment between the locus positions 930 and 1065. To evaluate their potential annealing specificity, the primer sequences were analyzed with the BLAST search homology database [1].
Purified DNA templates were amplified in an iCycler iQ real-time detection system (BioRad, USA). Briefly, a 25-µL PCR mixture was prepared containing 1 µL of DNA, 12.5 µL SensiMix SYBR and fluorescein (Quantance, UK), and 200 nM of each primer. Amplification was carried out with one cycle at 50℃ for 2 min and one cycle at 95℃ for 2 min followed by 35 cycles of 95℃ for 30 sec, 60℃ for 30 sec, and 72℃ for 1 min. The plate reading was taken after extension at 72℃ and a melting curve was obtained using temperatures between 65℃ and 95℃ that increased at a rate of 0.5℃/s.
Duplicate positive and negative controls were included in all tests and at least two separate experiments were performed. Negative controls contained all components of the reaction mixture except for template DNA. The PCR products were analyzed with ethidium bromide-stained 2% agarose gels (Pronadisa, Spain).
Genomic DNA from the reference D. congolensis strain (DSM 43037) was serial diluted 10-fold (from 10 ng to 1.10-4 ng) and used to test the sensitivity of the RT-PCR assay. The resultant data were used to generate a standard curve by plotting threshold cycle (Ct) values against the logarithmic values of the starting DNA quantities. Amplification efficiency and coefficient of determination (R2) were automatically calculated using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences 15.0 for Windows (SPSS, USA).
In order to test the efficacy of the RT-PCR assay, eight tissue specimens (skin scabs) were collected. Six of the samples (two from cattle, two from horses, and two from sheep) were obtained from dermatophilosis naturally infected animals diagnosed by direct smears and cultures. Additionally, two samples from non-infected cattle (negative according to direct smears and cultures) were used as the negative control. DNA extraction was carried out using an UltraClean Tissue DNA kit (MoBio, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. All samples were stored at -20℃ until use and were allowed to thaw at room temperature before testing. RT-PCR was performed as described above except that the volume of DNA template per reaction was 5 µL. Positive controls with D. congolensis DNA were also routinely included. All experiments were repeated at least twice for reproducibility.
All 20 D. congolensis strains tested produced positive results while no positive signal was detected for DNA templates from other bacteria. Specificity of the primers and the absence of nonspecific products were also observed based on the analysis of the melting curve. It was discovered that the melting temperature (Tm) was 84.5℃ ± 0.5 for all laboratory strains and D. congolensis-positive skin samples.
In addition, PCR amplicons were also analyzed on 2% agarose gels. A fragment of the expected length (127 bp) for D. congolensis was observed. Moreover, no nonspecific PCR products were detected.
A standard curve based on the dilutions of purified D. congolensis DNA showed a linear relationship between the initial amounts of DNA template and the Ct values (R2 = 0.96), indicating that the test was highly precise (Fig. 1). Additionally, the minimum level of detection was 1 pg of DNA per PCR reaction. As expected, we obtained positive results for all the infected samples tested with an increase of fluorescence and consequently low Ct values. The assay was also tested with DNA extracted from non-D. congolensis-infected cattle scabs as negative controls. No cross-reaction with skin DNA was observed, thus providing a clear distinction between positive and negative samples (Fig. 1).
In most laboratories, dermatophilosis is routinely diagnosed using conventional methods such as direct smear and isolation of the causative agent. However, there is a consensus among experts that skin samples submitted to the laboratory for D. congolensis isolation are usually contaminated with different species of bacteria [3]. This can made culturing unsuccessful due to the faster growth of commensal skin bacteria that inhibits the growth of D. congolensis.
Although there are some conventional PCR assays for detecting D. congolensis [7,16], they require gel electrophoresis to confirm the presence of PCR products, which makes them laborious and time-consuming processes. The present study is the first to describe the use of RT-PCR to detect D. congolensis DNA in both cultures and clinical animal samples. Nowadays, RT-PCR assays are becoming widely used as a major diagnostic tool since they can quantify and detect a pathogen more rapidly than conventional PCR. In addition, the risk of contamination is considerably reduced with RT-PCR compared to conventional PCR [10]. For all these reasons, conventional PCR assays are now gradually being replaced with more convenient and rapid RT-PCR assays. Furthermore, SYBR Green is one of the most inexpensive fluorescence dyes used for RT-PCR, which helps limit the cost of testing large numbers of samples. In conclusion, the real-time PCR assay developed in this study is a fast and reliable method for detecting DNA from D. congolensis in clinical samples.

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1
(A) The linear standard curve obtained for the dilution series of D. congolensis DNA ranging from 10 ng to 1.10-4 ng. (B) Real time (RT)-PCR results for the clinical samples.
jvs-14-491-g001
Table 1
Available data of the strains used for assay development and assessment of primer specificities
jvs-14-491-i001

Acknowledgments

Alfredo García received a research contract from the INIA-CCAA (Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agrarias - Comunidades Autónomas) program (ref. DR07-0027).

References

1. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990; 215:403–410.
crossref
2. Awad WS, Nadra-Elwgoud MIA, El-Sayed AA. Diagnosis and treatment of bovine, ovine and equine dermatophilosis. J Appl Sci Res. 2008; 4:367–374.
3. Dalis JS, Kazeem HM, Makinde AA, Fatihu MY. Bacteria associated with bovine dermatophilosis in Zaria, Nigeria. Afr J Microbiol Res. 2010; 4:1475–1479.
4. García-Sánchez A, Cerrato R, Larrasa J, Ambrose NC, Parra A, Alonso JM, Hermoso-de-Mendoza M, Rey JM, Hermoso-de-Mendoza J. Identification of an alkaline ceramidase gene from Dermatophilus congolensis. Vet Microbiol. 2004; 99:67–74.
5. Gibson JA, Thomas RJ, Domjahn RL. Subcutaneous and lymph node granulomas due to Dermatophilus congolensis in a steer. Vet Pathol. 1983; 20:120–122.
crossref
6. Hamada M, Iino T, Iwami T, Harayama S, Tamura T, Suzuki K. Mobilicoccus pelagius gen. nov., sp. nov. and Piscicoccus intestinalis gen. nov., sp. nov., two new members of the family Dermatophilaceae, and reclassification of Dermatophilus chelonae (Masters et al. 1995) as Austwickia chelonae gen. nov., comb. nov. J Gen Appl Microbiol. 2010; 56:427–436.
crossref
7. Han W, Chen Y, Wang J, Wang Y, Yan G. Establishment of polymerase chain reaction assay for detection of dermatophilosis in sheep. Chin J Vet Sci. 2009; 29:49–51.
8. Larrasa J, Garcia A, Ambrose NC, Alonso JM, Parra A, Hermoso de Mendoza M, Salazar J, Rey J, Hermoso de Mendoza J. A simple random amplified polymorphic DNA genotyping method for field isolates of Dermatophilus congolensis. J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health. 2002; 49:135–141.
crossref
9. Makinde AA. Dermatophilosis in animals and man: recent studies on Dermatophilus congolensis. Vom J Vet Sci. 2004; 1:87–102.
10. Niesters HG. Clinical virology in real time. J Clin Virol. 2002; 25:Suppl 3. S3–S12.
crossref
11. OIE. OIE Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals 2009. 6th ed. Paris: Office International des Epizooties;2010. p. 725–728.
12. Ramanathan VS, Jahng AW, Shlopov B, Pham BV. Dermatophilus congolensis infection of the esophagus. Gastroenterology Res. 2010; 3:173–174.
13. Rozen S, Skaletsky H. Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. Methods Mol Biol. 2000; 132:365–386.
crossref
14. Sebastian MM, Giles RC, Donahu JM, Sells SF, Fallon L, Vickers ML. Dermatophilus congolensis-associated placentitis, funisitis and abortion in a horse. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2008; 55:183–185.
crossref
15. Seifert HSH. Tropical Animal Health. 1st ed. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers;1996. p. 352–355.
16. Shaibu SJ, Kazeem HM, Abdullahi US, Fatihu MY. The use of polimerase chain reaction in the diagnosis of dermatophilosis from cattle, sheep and goat in Nigeria. J Anim Vet Adv. 2010; 9:1034–1036.
crossref
17. Yeruham I, Elad D, Perl S. Economic aspects of outbreaks of dermatophilosis in first-calving cows in nine herds of dairy cattle in Israel. Vet Rec. 2000; 146:695–698.
crossref
18. Zaria LT. Dermatophilus congolensis infection (Dermatophilosis) in animals and man! an update. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 1993; 16:179–222.
crossref
TOOLS
Similar articles