Distribution and accumulation of Cy5.5-labeled thermally cross-linked superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles in the tissues of ICR mice

Jin Joo Hue; Hu-Jang Lee; Sangyong Jon; Sang Yoon Nam; Young Won Yun; Jong-Soo Kim; Beom Jun Lee

doi:10.4142/jvs.2013.14.4.473

Journal List > J Vet Sci > v.14(4) > 1041263

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

TOOLS

Hue, Lee, Jon, Nam, Yun, Kim, and Lee: Distribution and accumulation of Cy5.5-labeled thermally cross-linked superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles in the tissues of ICR mice

Original Article

Journal of Veterinary Science 2013; 14(4): 473-479.

Published online: 19 December 2013

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4142/jvs.2013.14.4.473

Distribution and accumulation of Cy5.5-labeled thermally cross-linked superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles in the tissues of ICR mice

Jin Joo Hue^1,^†, Hu-Jang Lee^2,^†, Sangyong Jon³, Sang Yoon Nam¹, Young Won Yun¹, Jong-Soo Kim¹, Beom Jun Lee¹

¹College of Veterinary Medicine and Research Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 361-763, Korea.

²College of Veterinary Medicine and Institute of Life Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 600-701, Korea.

³School of Life Science, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Gwangju 500-712, Korea.

Corresponding author: Tel: +82-43-261-3357; Fax: +82-43-267-2595; beomjun@cbu.ac.kr

Equal contributor:

†The first two authors contributed equally to this work.

Received 17 July 2013 Revised 27 August 2013 Accepted 28 August 2013

(open-access):

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Free Cy5.5 dye and Cy5.5-labeled thermally cross-linked superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (TCL-SPION) have been routinely used for in vivo optical imaging. However, there is little information about the distribution and accumulation of free Cy5.5 dye and Cy5.5-labeled TCL-SPION in the tissues of mice. Free Cy5.5 dye (0.1 mg/kg body weight) and Cy5.5-labeled TCL-SPION (15 mg/kg body weight) were intravenously injected into the tail vein of ICR mice. The biodistribution and accumulation of the TCL-SPION and Cy5.5 were observed by ex vivo optical imaging and fluorescence signal generation at various time points over 28 days. Cy5.5 dye fluorescence in various organs was rapidly eliminated from 0.5 to 24 h post-injection. Fluorescence intensity of Cy5.5 dye in the liver, lung, kidney, and stomach was fairly strong at the early time points within 1 day post-injection. Cy5.5-labeled TCL-SPION had the highest fluorescence density in the lung at 0.5 h post-injection and decreased rapidly over time. Fluorescence density in liver and spleen was maintained over 28 days. These results suggest that TCL-SPION can be useful as a carrier of therapeutic reagents to treat diseases by persisting for long periods of time in the body.

Keywords: accumulation, biodistribution, Cy5.5 dye, thermally cross-linked superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles, toxicity

Introduction

Iron oxide nanoparticles, such as thermally cross-linked superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (TCL-SPION) and ultra SPION have been extensively studied for biomedical purposes due to their excellent biocompatibility [10]. These particles are produced by a variety of synthesis processes ranging from traditional wet chemistry solution-based methods to more exotic techniques such as laser pyrolysis or chemical vapor deposition [11,29,34]. In particular, the field of magnetic nanoparticle probe technology has been promoted by efforts devoted to developing its potential as a central tool for efficient, cross-application, molecular imaging [31]. Many previous studies have been performed to investigate the potential of magnetic nanoparticles as drug delivery vehicles [1,2,15,18,25,33,36]. The characteristic of magnetic nanoparticles makes them attractive for many applications ranging from contrast enhancing agents for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to drug delivery systems [12,14,16].

SPION research has demonstrated that these nanoparticles may be an important tool for enhancing magnetic resonance contrast [26]. For this, the nanoparticles must have high magnetization values, a size smaller than 100 nm, and a narrow particle size distribution [12]. Magnetic nanoparticles have many advantages including laser-induced thermal therapy, the ability to target specific sites, and relatively low toxicity [36]. Biological applications of magnetic nanoparticles also need magnetic particles with peculiar surface coating that has to be nontoxic and biocompatible, and must permit targetable delivery with particle localization in a specific area. Such magnetic nanoparticles can bind to drugs, proteins, enzymes, antibodies, or nucleotides and can be directed to an organ, tissue, or tumor using an external magnetic field [6].

Cyanine (Cy) is a synthetic dye belonging to the polymethine group and has been recently used in biotechnology (for labeling and analysis) [32]. Cyanines have many uses as fluorescent dyes, particularly for biomedical imaging, that increase the range of wavelengths which form images on film [5]. Cyanine labeling is done for visualization and quantification purposes [9]. Cy5.5 N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) ester is a reactive dye used for labeling amino groups in peptides, proteins, and oligonucleotides [20]. Cy5.5 emits a far-red (and near-infrared) signal that is ideal for fluorescence measurements for which background fluorescence is a concern [28]. The present study was conducted to evaluate the distribution and accumulation of free Cy5.5 dye and Cy5.5-labeled TCL-SPION in tissues of mice. The optical imaging method performed with an in vivo imaging system (IVIS) has been routinely used for assessing the tissue distribution of polymer-coated nanoparicles.

Materials and Methods

Drugs

Cy5.5 mono NHS ester was purchased from Amersham Biosciences (UK), and Cy5.5-labeled TCL-SPION was obtained from the Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (Korea). Cy5.5-labeled TCL-SPION consisted of three components: an iron oxide core, a hydrophilic coating, and optical imaging detection Cy5.5 dye. Mean size of the hydrodynamic particles was about 35 nm and the zeta potential intensity was -25.13 mV.

Animals and treatments

All animal experiments were performed in accordance with standard procedures for laboratory animals approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Chungbuk National University (Korea). A total of 120 male, 5-week old ICR mice (body weight, 21.3 ± 1.7 g) were purchased from Koatec Inc. (Korea). Upon arrival, the mice were housed in a temperature- and humidity-controlled environment with a reversed 12/12 h light/dark cycle, and had free access to food and water. After 1 week of acclimation, the mice were randomly divided into a normal group (n = 5), a Cy5.5-treated group (n = 60), and a Cy5.5-labeled TCL-SPION-treated group (n = 60). Fifty µL of saline, a Cy5.5 suspension (0.1 mg/kg body weight), or a Cy5.5-labeled TCL-SPION suspension (15 mg of Fe/kg body weight) were injected into the tail vein of the mice according to a modified method by Lee et al. [22].

Kinetic evaluate of free Cy5.5 and Cy5.5-labeled TCL-SPION

For the kinetic study of free Cy5.5, the mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation at 0.5, 1, and 4 h as well as 1, 4, 7, 14, and 28 days following injection of the compound. For the kinetic study of Cy5.5-labeled TCL-SPION, the animals were also sacrificed at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 h as well as 1, 2, 4, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days following exposure. During necropsy, the major organs (brain, lymph node, thymus, heart, lung, liver, spleen, kidney, epididymis, and testis) of each animal were collected for relative quantitation of fluorescence signals.

Monitoring the in vivo characteristics of free Cy5.5 and Cy5.5-labeled TCL-SPION

Twenty-eight days after treatment, optical imaging was performed using an IVIS 200 imaging system (Xenogen, USA). Near-infrared fluorescence (NIR) images of various organs (brain, lymph node, thymus, heart, lung, liver, spleen, kidney, epididymis, and testis) were obtained with a Cy5.5 filter channel. Organ distribution of the nanoparticles was quantified by measuring the ratio of NIR intensity of Cy5.5-labeled TCL-SPION and free Cy5.5 and comparing the data to that of the normal group. All results were measured using the region of interest (ROI) function of analysis workstation software (Living Image, Caliper Life Sciences, USA).

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed with a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a two-tailed Student's t test when the ANOVA indicated statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). All statistical analyses were performed using Stat View J-5.0 software (SAS Institute, USA). The results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD).

Results

Ex vivo kinetic study of free Cy5.5

Fig. 1 shows the location of free Cy5.5 in various murine organs. Fig. 2 presents the florescence images of free Cy5.5 dye in different organs of the mice observed 24 days post-injection. Cy5.5 dye in the different organs was rapidly eliminated from 0.5 to 24 h post-injection. However, a low level of Cy5.5 dye was constantly maintained for 28 days in certain organs such as the stomach, thymus, lymph node, brain, and epididymis. In particular, fluorescence intensity of the Cy5.5 dye was fairly strong in the liver, lung, kidney, and stomach within 1 day post-treatment (Fig. 2). Other organs including the brain, spleen, heart, lymph node, thymus, adrenal gland, epididymis, and testis contained a low level of fluorescence intensity throughout the experiment.

Table 1 shows the relative intensities in different organs 28 days after the injection of Cy5.5 (0.1 mg/kg). At 0.5 h post-injection, the relative fluorescence intensity in liver was the highest compared to the other organs (p < 0.05). However, the relative fluorescence intensity in liver rapidly decreased 1 day post-injection. Until 7 days post-injection, the relative fluorescence intensity in liver, lung, and stomach was significantly high compared to the other organs (p < 0.05). At 28 day post-injection, the relative fluorescence intensity in stomach was the highest compared to the other organs (p < 0.05). Other organs including blood, spleen, thymus, epidiymis, and brain contained a low level of fluorescence throughout the experimental period (data did not show).

Ex vivo kinetic study of Cy5.5-labeled TCL-SPION

Fig. 3 shows the florescence images of Cy5.5-labeled TCL-SPION in different organs of the mice 24 days post-injection. Similar to the pattern of free Cy5.5, Cy5.5-labeled TCL-SPION in the various organs was rapidly eliminated from 0.5 to 24 h post-injection. Optical imaging density in the liver rapidly decreased until 28 days post-injection. In addition, optical imaging density in the lung gradually decreased over time. Optical imaging density in the kidney and lymph node was constantly maintained for 28 days. In the liver, the fluorescence intensity of Cy5.5-labeled TCL-SPION was the strongest and persisted at high levels throughout the whole experimental period. Other organs including the brain, heart, thymus, adrenal gland, epididymis, and testis had a slightly lower fluorescence intensity during the experimental period.

Table 2 shows relative intensities observed in different organs 28 days after injection of 15 mg/kg Cy5.5-labeled TCL-SPION. The relative fluorescence intensity in most organs peaked at 2 h while the peak time of the relative fluorescence intensity in the lung (0.5 h), thymus (14 days), liver (28 days) and spleen (28 days) diverged from this average. Until 3 days after injection, relative fluorescence intensity in the liver, spleen, kidney, and lung was significantly higher than that in the other organs (p < 0.05). However, relative fluorescence intensity in the lung and kidney rapidly decreased 4 h post-injection. During the 28-day post-injection period, relative fluorescence intensity in the liver and spleen was significantly higher than that observed in other organs except for lung until 1 day after injection (p < 0.05). In particular, relative fluorescence intensity in the liver and spleen gradually decreased at 7 and 14 days post-injection, respectively, while that in liver and spleen increased at 14 and 28-day post-treatment, respectively. At 28-day post-injection, the relative fluorescence intensity was the highest compared to the other organs (p < 0.05).

Discussion

Recently, the potential of magnetic nanoparticles as drug delivery vehicles has been extensively investigated [1,2,15,18,25,33,36]. Magnetic nanoparticles have been used as contrast agents and in thermal therapy for treating cancer and to target sites using an external magnetic field. Paramagnetic or modified dextran-coated SPION have been used to label cells ex vivo, providing researchers with the ability to monitor cell migration with MRI [4,17,24].

The purpose of the present research was to monitor the distribution and accumulation of Cy5.5-labeled nanoparticles, and measure the in vivo kinetics of free Cy5.5 and Cy5.5-labeled TCL-SPION. Cy5.5-labeled TCL-SPION are stable under biological conditions. The Cy5.5 dye is slowly released from Cy5.5-labeled TCL-SPION and the percentage of released Cy5.5 dye is less than 10% [7]. This indicates that the nanoparticles resist dissolution, resulting from the covalent conjugation of Cy5.5 to the TCL-SPION [21-23,35]. In the present investigation, Cy5.5 dye injected into mice was distributed in various organs and rapidly eliminated from 0.5 to 24 h post-injection. Low fluorescence intensities of free Cy5.5 remained in different organs until 28 days. In contrast, Cy5.5-labeled TCL-SPION were distributed in various organs and slowly eliminated from 0.5 h to 28-day post-injection. Thus, the intensities of signals generated by Cy5.5-labeled TCL-SPION were higher than those of free Cy5.5 for 28 days. These results indicated that the intravenously injected Cy5.5-labeled TCL-SPION entered into the systemic circulation and were stored for certain periods of time in the different organs, especially liver.

When nanoparticles are intravenously or intraperitoneally injected, inorganic and organic nanoparticles are mainly sequestered in the liver and spleen [27]. Quantum dots accumulate in the liver, spleen, and kidneys after intravenous injection in mice [8,35]. Gold nanoparticles accumulate in the liver and spleen after intravenous injection in mice [7]. When poly lactide glycolide (PLGA) nanospheres are placed in rat lung, they rapidly enter the systemic circulation and are distributed to the liver, kidney, brain, spleen, and pancreas [13]. In addition, fluorescent magnetic nanoparticles are distributed to various organs including the liver, spleen, testis, and brain of rats after 4 weeks of inhalation [19]. Depending on the routes of exposure, the toxicity and kinetic properties of nanoparticles can be completely different. When intravenously injected, nanoparticles directly enter the systemic circulation while intraperitoneally injected nanoparticles enter the liver via the first-pass effect and then are then redistributed from the liver to other organs [19]. The kinetic study conduced in the present investigation indicated that intravenously injected Cy5.5-labeled TCL-SPION directly entered the systemic circulation and were eliminated. However, particle elimination was slower in the liver compared to other organs. In another study, it was suggested that Kupffer cells in the liver can degrade iron oxide nanoparticles and convert most of the iron into ferritin [3]. The TCL-SPION could be stored in the form of ferritin after degradation of the nanoparticles. In addition, the size of iron oxide nanoparticles plays a major role in target cell uptake and elimination from the body. Spleen and liver capture nanoparticles of more than 150 nm in diameter whereas particles having sizes below 10 nm are selectively filtered by the renal system and eliminated from body [30]. In the current study, the relative fluorescence intensity of Cy5.5-labeled TCL-SPION in the liver and spleen 28-day post-injection may have been higher than that of the other organs.

We conclude that Cy5.5-labeled TCL-SPION can be useful as a carrier of therapeutic reagents to treat diseases, thereby persisting for long periods of time and maintaining the fluorescence density in certain tissues after intravenous injection.

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1

The location of various organs used for kinetic studies of free Cy5.5 and Cy5.5-labeled thermally cross-linked superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (TCL-SPION). B: brain, Ly: lymph node, Th: thymus, H: heart, Lu: lung, LI: large intestine, Li: liver, SI: small intestine, Sp: spleen, St: stomach, K: kidney, AG: adrenal gland, Te: testis, Ep: epididymis.

Fig. 2

Florescence images showing the biodistribution and accumulation of fluorescence in various organs for 28 days after the injection of 0.1 mg/kg Cy5.5. Yellow indicates a higher intensity at 615~707 nm. Images were acquired with an exposure time of 1 sec using the Cy5.5 filter channel. Left: organs of a normal mouse; Middle and right: organs of mice injected with Cy5.5.

Fig. 3

Florescence images showing the biodistribution and accumulation of fluorescence in various organs over a 28-day period after the injection of 15 mg/kg Cy5.5-labeled TCL-SPION. Yellow indicates higher intensity at 615~707 nm. Images were acquired with an exposure time of 1 sec using the Cy5.5 filter channel. Left: organs of a normal mouse; Middle and right: organs of mice injected with Cy5.5-labeled TCL-SPION.

Table 1

Relative fluorescence intensity measured during a 28-day period in various organs of mice injected with Cy5.5

Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. Images were acquired with an exposure time of 1 sec using the Cy5.5 filter channel (615~707 nm). The value means ROI densities in various organs of each mouse. ^a-gMean values with different letters in the same column are significantly different (p < 0.05).

Table 2

Relative fluorescence intensity measured during a 28-day period in various organs of mice injected with Cy5.5-labeled TCL-SPION

Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. Images were acquired with an exposure time of 1 sec using the Cy5.5 filter channel (615~707 nm). The value means ROI densities of various organs in each mouse. ^a-gMean values with different letters in the same column are significantly different (p < 0.05).

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Priority Research Centers Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2011-0031403) and by a grant (08162-nanotoxicity-554) from the Korea Food and Drug Administration.

References

1. Alexiou C, Arnold W, Klein RJ, Parak FG, Hulin P, Bergemann C, Erhardt W, Wagenpfeil S, Lübbe AS. Locoregional cancer treatment with magnetic drug targeting. Cancer Res. 2000; 60:6641–6648.

2. Alexiou C, Schmid RJ, Jurgons R, Kremer M, Wanner G, Bergemann C, Huenges E, Nawroth T, Arnold W, Parak FG. Targeting cancer cells: magnetic nanoparticles as drug carriers. Eur Biophys J. 2006; 35:446–450.

3. Briley-Saebo KC, Johansson LO, Hustvedt SO, Haldorsen AG, Bjørnerud A, Fayad ZA, Ahlstrom HK. Clearance of iron oxide particles in rat liver: effect of hydrated particle size and coating material on liver metabolism. Invest Radiol. 2006; 41:560–571.

4. Bulte JWM, Zhang SC, van Gelderen P, Herynek V, Jordan EK, Duncan ID, Frank JA. Neurotransplantation of magnetically labeled oligodendrocyte progenitors: magnetic resonance tracking of cell migration and myelination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999; 96:15256–15261.

5. Chapman G, Henary M, Patonay G. The effect of varying short-chain alkyl substitution on the molar absorptivity and quantum yield of cyanine dyes. Anal Chem Insights. 2011; 6:29–36.

6. Chastellain M, Petri A, Gupta A, Rao KV, Hofmann H. Super paramagnetic silica-iron oxide nanocomposites for application in hyperthermia. Adv Eng Mater. 2004; 6:235–241.

7. Cho WS, Cho M, Jeong J, Choi M, Cho HY, Han BS, Kim SH, Kim HO, Lim YT, Chung BH, Jeong J. Acute toxicity and pharmacokinetics of 13 nm-sized PEG-coated gold nanoparticles. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2009; 236:16–24.

8. Choi HS, Liu W, Misra P, Tanaka E, Zimmer JP, Ipe BI, Bawendi MG, Frangioni JV. Renal clearance of quantum dots. Nat Biotechnol. 2007; 25:1165–1170.

9. Cunningham BT. Photonic crystal surfaces as a general purpose platform for label-free and fluorescent assays. JALA Charlottesv Va. 2010; 15:120–135.

10. Ferrari M. Cancer nanotechnology: opportunities and challenges. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005; 5:161–171.

11. Gupta AK, Curtis ASG. Surface modified superparamagnetic nanoparticles for drug delivery: interaction studies with human fibroblasts in culture. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2004; 15:493–496.

12. Gupta AK, Gupta M. Synthesis and surface engineering of iron oxide nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Biomaterials. 2005; 26:3995–4021.

13. Hara K, Tsujimoto H, Tsukada Y, Huang CC, Kawashima Y, Tsutsumi M. Histological examination of PLGA nanospheres for intratracheal drug administration. Int J Pharm. 2008; 356:267–273.

14. Horák D, Rittich B, Španová A, Beneš MJ. Magnetic microparticulate carriers with immobilized selective ligands in DNA diagnostics. Polymer. 2005; 46:1245–1255.

15. Jain KK. Role of nanobiotechnology in developing personalized medicine for cancer. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2005; 4:645–650.

16. Jordan A, Scholz R, Maier-Hauff K, Johannsen M, Wust P, Nadobny J, Schirra H, Schmidt H, Deger S, Loening S, Lanksch W, Felix R. Presentation of a new magnetic field therapy system for the the treatment of human solid tumors with magnetic fluid hyperthermia. J Magn Magn Mater. 2001; 225:118–126.

17. Josephson L, Tung CH, Moore A, Weissleder R. High-efficiency intracellular magnetic labeling with novel superparamagnetic-tat peptide conjugates. Bioconjug Chem. 1999; 10:186–191.

18. Kohler N, Sun C, Fichtenholtz A, Gunn J, Fang C, Zhang M. Methotrexate-immobilized poly(ethylene glycol) magnetic nanoparticles for MR imaging and drug delivery. Small. 2006; 2:785–792.

19. Kwon JT, Hwang SK, Jin H, Kim DS, Minai-Tehrani A, Yoon HJ, Choi M, Yoon TJ, Han DY, Kang YW, Yoon BI, Lee JK, Cho MH. Body distribution of inhaled fluorescent magnetic nanoparticles in the mice. J Occup Health. 2008; 50:1–6.

20. Lee CM, Jeong HJ, Yun KN, Kim DW, Sohn MH, Lee JK, Jeong J, Lim ST. Optical imaging to trace near infrared fluorescent zinc oxide nanoparticles following oral exposure. Int J Nanomedicine. 2012; 7:3203–3209.

21. Lee H, Lee E, Kim DK, Jang NK, Jeong YY, Jon S. Antibiofouling polymer-coated superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles as potential magnetic resonance contrast agents for in vivo cancer imaging. J Am Chem Soc. 2006; 128:7383–7389.

22. Lee H, Yu MK, Park S, Moon S, Min JJ, Jeong YY, Kang HW, Jon S. Thermally cross-linked superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: synthesis and application as a dual imaging probe for cancer in vivo. J Am Chem Soc. 2007; 129:12739–12745.

23. Lee JH, Huh YM, Jun Y, Seo J, Jang J, Song HT, Kim S, Cho EJ, Yoon HG, Suh JS, Cheon J. Artificially engineered magnetic nanoparticles for ultra-sensitive molecular imaging. Nat Med. 2007; 13:95–99.

24. Lewin M, Carlesso N, Tung CH, Tang XW, Cory D, Scadden DT, Weissleder R. Tat peptide-derivatized magnetic nanoparticles allow in vivo tracking and recovery of progenitor cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2000; 18:410–414.

25. Lübbe AS, Bergemann C, Riess H, Schriever F, Reichardt P, Possinger K, Matthias M, Dörken B, Herrmann F, Gürtler R, Hohenberger P, Haas N, Sohr R, Sander B, Lemke AJ, Ohlendorf D, Huhnt W, Huhn D. Clinical experiences with magnetic drug targeting: a phase I study with 4'-epidoxorubicin in 14 patients with advanced solid tumors. Cancer Res. 1996; 56:4686–4693.

26. Neuberger T, Schöpf B, Hofmann H, Hofmann M, von Rechenberg B. Superparamagnetic nanoparticles for biomedical applications: possibilities and limitations of a new drug delivery system. J Magn Magn Mater. 2005; 293:483–496.

27. Rosenholm JM, Mamaeva V, Sahlgren C, Lindén M. Nanoparticles in targeted cancer therapy: mesoporous silica nanoparticles entering preclinical development stage. Nanomedicine (Lond). 2012; 7:111–120.

28. Snoeks TJA, Löwik CWGM, Kaijzel EL. 'In vivo' optical approaches to angiogenesis imaging. Angiogenesis. 2010; 13:135–147.

29. Tartaj P, Morales MP, Veintemillas-Verdaguer S, González-Carreño T, Serna CJ. The preparation of magnetic nanoparticles for applications in biomedicine. J Phys D appl Phys. 2003; 36:R182–R197.

30. Thomas R, Park IK, Jeong YY. Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for multimodal imaging and therapy of cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2013; 14:15910–15930.

31. Thorek DLJ, Chen AK, Czupryna J, Tsourkas A. Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle probes for molecular imaging. Ann Biomed Eng. 2006; 34:23–38.

32. Wang F, Tan WB, Zhang Y, Fan X, Wang M. Luminescent nanomaterials for biological labeling. Nanotechnology. 2006; 17:R1–R13.

33. Wang X, Zhang R, Wu C, Dai Y, Song M, Gutmann S, Gao F, Lv G, Li J, Li X, Guan Z, Fu D, Chen B. The application of Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles in cancer research: a new strategy to inhibit drug resistance. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2007; 80:852–860.

34. Willard MA, Kurihara LK, Carpenter EE, Calvin S, Harris VG. Chemically prepared magnetic nanoparticles. Int Mater Rev. 2004; 49:125–170.

35. Yang RSH, Chang LW, Wu JP, Tsai MH, Wang HJ, Kuo YC, Yeh TK, Yang CS, Lin P. Persistent tissue kinetics and redistribution of nanoparticles, quantum dot 705, in mice: ICP-MS quantitative assessment. Environ Health Perspect. 2007; 115:1339–1343.

36. Yu MK, Jeong YY, Park J, Park S, Kim JW, Min JJ, Kim K, Jon S. Drugloaded superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for combined cancer imaging and therapy in vivo. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2008; 47:5362–5365.

TOOLS

Similar articles