Journal List > J Vet Sci > v.13(2) > 1041163

Choi, Keh, Kim, Jang, Kim, and Yoon: Ultrasonographic findings of pylorogastric intussusceptions in two dogs

Abstract

A Yorkshire terrier (case 1) and a Miniature Schnauzer (case 2) were diagnosed with pylorogastric intussusceptions (PGIs). Both cases showed acute vomiting and had previous histories of laparotomy. In case 1, the invaginated pyloric wall was thickened unevenly containing multiple hypoechoic areas and had indistinct wall layering on ultrasonography. PGI with diffuse gastric edema and necrosis was confirmed on laparotomy. The dog recovered completely after gastrectomy and a Y-U plasty. Case 2 had uniformly thickened walls of invaginated gastric pylorus with the distinct wall layering. PGI was reduced spontaneously the next day.

Pylorogastric intussusception (PGI) is a retrograde intussusception, which is an uncommon condition [2,3,5-7]. Ultrasonographic examination is a fairly useful modality for the diagnosis of intussusception with high sensitivity and specificity, however only a maltese dog with a PGI diagnosed by ultrasonography was described [6,8,9].
A 15 year-old, spayed female, Yorkshire terrier (case 1) presented with acute, severe vomiting and hematemesis for 1 day. Blood tests revealed neutrophilia, elevated amylase and decreased potassium and chloride. In transverse ultrasonographic view, a target-like mass (38 × 31 mm) with multiple concentric rings occupied the body of the stomach (Fig. 1). Multiple hyperechoic and hypoechoic parallel lines in longitudinal view were shown and connected with the descending duodenum. The stomach was dilated with anechoic fluid. The mass represented the invagination of the pylorus and the proximal duodenum into the body of the stomach. The pyloric wall was swollen to 7.1 mm thickness and showed indistinct wall layering with multiple hypoechoic regions. The adjacent mesentery was edematous with hyperechoic change. The pancreas was not involved in invagination. A PGI and pyloric wall necrosis were diagnosed. On laparotomy, the pylorus and the proximal duodenum were invaginated into the body of the stomach (Fig. 2). The pyloric wall was extremely congested and necrotic, and manual reduction was impossible, even after a gastrotomy incision was made in the body of the stomach. The necrotic pyloric wall and the invaginated pylorus were removed through a partial gastrectomy, leaving only about 25% of the gastric pylorus and then a Y-U pyloroplasty was adopted. The extensive hemorrhage and necrosis in muscular layer of the removed pylorus were found in histopathologic examination. After surgery, the dog was recovered from anesthesia uneventfully and vomiting disappeared.
A 9 year-old, female, Miniature Schnauzer (case 2) presented with chronic, intermittent vomiting, abdominal pain and depression for 6 days. Blood tests revealed decreased potassium, sodium and chloride. Survey abdominal radiography revealed that a mass with soft tissue opacity was located in the stomach and the pyloric lumen was filled with gas. Ultrasonography showed a mass consisted of concentric multiple, hyperechoic and hypoechoic rings in the body of the stomach, which was identified as the invaginated pylorus into the gastric body, and it was connected with the descending duodenum (Fig. 3). The pyloric wall was swollen to 13 mm thickness and had homogeneous, distinguishable wall layers. The pancreas was not involved in invagination. A PGI was diagnosed. During conservative therapy, vomiting decreased and a PGI was reduced spontaneously ultrasonographically.
PGIs can result in necrosis of gastric wall in cases with blood vessels compromised in intussusceptions or with chronic condition and eventually cause poor prognosis [3,7]. A prompt diagnosis and treatment would be mandatory. However, a previous maltese dog of PGI had chronic progress of clinical signs and resolved spontaneously [6]. In this study, a PGI in case 1 was required prompt surgical correction because of gastric congestion and necrosis, but a PGI in case 2 resolved spontaneously. It is difficult to estimate even if there are the predictive ultrasonographic factors to the suitable treatments and prognosis of PGIs, because PGIs in most previous cases which underwent surgery were diagnosed through only radiography and exploratory laparotomy [2,3,5,7]. Radiography in PGIs may demonstrate the gastric outflow obstruction with soft tissue density masses, which can be shown in gastric foreign body, pyloric hyperplasia and stenosis, or gastric neoplasia [2,3,5,7]. The previous maltese dog diagnosed by ultrasonography and our case 2 showed homogeneous hypoechoic mucosal and muscular layers with even thickness and distinct wall layering in the invaginated gastric wall. In case 1, the every layers of the invaginated pyloric wall were thickened unevenly and indistinguishable. Multiple hypoechoic lesions were observed in the pyloric wall, which represented severe edema and diffuse necrosis of the gastric wall, as confirmed during laparotomy. The gastric necrosis may be an evidence of vascular compromise, although the vascular supply adjacent to the mesentery around the PGI was not evaluated in our cases. Evaluation of the vascular supply to the associated tissue is critical to evaluate the risk of subsequent gastric necrosis or perforation, and the acuity and severity of clinical signs in intussusceptions are directly associated vascular compromise [1]. The invagination of the pancreas into the intussusceptions was assumed as an exacerbating factor for severe necrosis of the gastric wall in a previous report [3]. In the maltese case and our cases, the pancreas was not involved the PGIs, so we couldn't estimate the relationship between the invagination of pancreas and the progress of the PGIs. In addition to these preoperative factors, we speculated that the surgical method would influence on the prognosis of dogs with PGIs. Among previous 4 cases underwent the laparotomies, one dog was euthanized because the necrotic gastric wall could not reduced and another dog was died by sepsis after surgery. Despite our case 1 had profound necrosis of the gastric wall, the resection of the extensive necrotic wall could reduce the possibility of sepsis after surgery and a Y-U pyloroplasty supported the dog's recovery by increasing the diameter of the pyloric outflow tract [4].
Because only a few cases of PGI have been reported in veterinary medicine, it is difficult to speculate on the etiology of PGIs. Previous surgery and anesthesia, and acute gastroenteritis have been suggested as predisposing factors of PGIs [9]. Case 1 had a history of intestinal resection and anastomosis due to an intestinal foreign body and perforation and case 2 underwent nephrectomy for pyonephrosis and peritonitis before PGI developed.

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1
Ultrasonography of a pylorogastric intussusception in case 1. (A) A mass (m), 38 × 31 mm in size, connected with the descending duodenum (d). The mass occupied the body of the stomach (s). (B) Concentric multiple rings (arrow heads) represent an intussusception. The pyloric wall (double-headed arrow and W) is thickened (7.1 mm) with indistinct layering. Short arrows are multiple hypoechoic regions in the pyloric wall. Note the edematous change of mesentery (o).
jvs-13-215-g001
Fig. 2
Gross examination of a pylorogastric intussusception in case 1. The invaginated proximal duodenum (d), within the stomach (s).
jvs-13-215-g002
Fig. 3
Ultrasonography a pylorogastric intussusception in case 2. (A) In the transverse view, a concentric, multiple ring (arrow) and edematous mesentery (o) was observed in the gastric body. (B) In longitudinal image of the ring, the invaginated pylorus showed thickened muscular layer (*) with distinct layering. The stomach (s) was dilated with fluid.
jvs-13-215-g003

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Research Institute for Veterinary Science at Seoul National University, Korea.

References

1. Applewhite AA, Cornell KK, Selcer BA. Diagnosis and treatment of intussusceptions in dogs. Compend Contin Educ Vet. 2002. 24:110–126.
2. Applewhite AA, Cornell KK, Selcer BA. Pylorogastric intussusception in the dog: A case report and literature review. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 2001. 37:238–243.
crossref
3. Bowersox TS, Caywood DD, Hayden DW. Idiopathic, duodenogastric intussusception in an adult dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1991. 199:1608–1609.
4. Bright RM, Richardson DC, Stanton ME. Y-U antral flap advancement pyloroplasty in dogs. Compend Contin Educ Vet. 1988. 10:139–144.
5. Huml RA, Konde LJ, Sellon RK, Forrest LJ. Gastrogastric intussusception in a dog. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 1992. 33:150–153.
crossref
6. Lee H, Yeon S, Lee H, Chang D, Eom K, Yoon J, Choi H, Lee Y. Ultrasonographic diagnosis-pylorogastric intussusceptions in a dog. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2005. 46:317–318.
7. Marks DL. Canine pylorogastric intussusception. Vet Med Small Anim Clin. 1983. 78:677–680.
8. Patsikas MN, Jakovljevic S, Moustardas N, Papazoglou LG, Kazakos GM, Dessiris AK. Ultrasonographic signs of intestinal intussusception associated with acute enteritis or gastroenteritis in 19 young dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 2003. 39:57–66.
crossref
9. Shum JS, Lo SS, Ka SY, Yeung CW, Ho JT. Gastroduodenal intussusception. Abdom Imaging. 2007. 32:698–700.
crossref
TOOLS
Similar articles