Effect of German chamomile oil application on alleviating atopic dermatitis-like immune alterations in mice

Soon-Hee Lee; Yong Heo; Young-Chul Kim

doi:10.4142/jvs.2010.11.1.35

Journal List > J Vet Sci > v.11(1) > 1041066

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

TOOLS

Lee, Heo, and Kim: Effect of German chamomile oil application on alleviating atopic dermatitis-like immune alterations in mice

Original Article

Journal of Veterinary Science

Journal of Veterinary Science 2010; 11(1): 35-41.

Published online: 3 March 2010

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4142/jvs.2010.11.1.35

Effect of German chamomile oil application on alleviating atopic dermatitis-like immune alterations in mice

Soon-Hee Lee¹, Yong Heo², Young-Chul Kim³

¹Department of Beauty Art, Howon University, Gunsan 573-718, Korea.

²Department of Occupational Health, Catholic University of Daegu, Gyeongsan 712-702, Korea.

³Department of Public Health, Keimyung University, Daegu 704-701, Korea.

Corresponding author: Tel: +82-53-580-5931; Fax: +82-53-588-5233, yckim@kmu.ac.kr

Abstract

Historically, German chamomile (GC) oil has been used for treatment of skin disorders. BALB/c mice were sensitized twice a week with 100 µL of 1% 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB) and challenged twice the following week with 100 µL of 0.2% DNCB for atopic dermatitis induction. Thereafter, 3% GC oil was applied daily (70 µL, 6 times week) on the dorsal skin for 4 weeks. Saline or jojoba oil was used for the control mice. Blood was collected after second DNCB challenge, and at 2 and 4 weeks after initiating oil application. Serum IgE levels were significantly lowered in the GC oil application group at the end of the 4-week application period. The GC oil application for 4 weeks resulted in reduction in serum IgG1 level compared with that after 2-week application. The GC oil application group showed a significantly lower serum histamine level than the control group 2 weeks after oil application. Scratching frequency of the GC oil application group was significantly lower than either control groups. This study is to demonstrate GC oil's immunoregulatory potential for alleviating atopic dermatitis through influencing of Th2 cell activation.

Keywords: atopic dermatitis, cytokine, German chamomile oil, IgE, mice

Introduction

In general, atopic dermatitis occurs mainly from dysregulation in helper T (Th) cell reactivities [1,4]. The Th cell is classified into two types, types 1 and 2, depending on type of cytokine secreted by the cell and immunoregulatory functions driven by the secreted cytokine [11,22,29]. Any disruption of the balance between these two types of Th cells may cause a variety of immunological diseases, such as allergic asthma and allergic rhinitis. Atopic dermatitis is an immunologic disease induced from an imbalance favoring type-2 helper T (Th2) cell [3].

Interleukin-4 (IL-4) production from Th2 cells, mast cells, or other immune components cells is known to trigger isotype-switching to IgE and IgG1 in B cells [18]. Evaluation of IL-4 production from splenic T cells is a tool for investigating the predominance of Th2 reactivity [13]. Hyper IgE production is a hallmark of atopic dermatitis in humans [1,4], and well documented in transgenic mice or NC/Nga mice suffering from atopic dermatitis-like skin lesions [8,26,33]. IFNγ from type-1 helper T (Th1) cells, natural killer cells, other immune cells induces isotype-switching to IgG2a in mice [17,31]. Therefore, analysis of the serum IgG1 or IgG2a levels could reflect the alteration of homeostasis between type-1 and type-2 immune responses. Since histamine is immediately released following allergen exposure, increase in serum histamine level is often considered as a parameter for diagnosing the onset of allergic diseases. Previous studies also showed that eosinophils play an important role in atopic dermatitis, characterized by elevated blood eosinophil counts [17,30].

Atopic dermatitis is a chronic skin disorder and has been medically treated using steroids, antihistamines, immunosuppressive agents, and other medications. But many studies have reported that long-term use or even abuse of these agents may cause various side effects, so relevant recent studies have focused upon complementary therapies based on alternative medicine [9,28].

Aromatic oils are natural essential oils consisting of volatile organic compounds containing original scents and therapeutic substances. It is well known for positive effects in insomnia, relief from anxiety and stress, recovery from fatigue, muscular relaxation, anti-histaminic or anti-allergic actions [5,7,27]. German chamomile (GC) oil, an aromatic oil, has been reported to help relieve physical or mental stress or fatigue through its sedative or alleviating effects along with fruity scent, is also known to be effective in the treatment of dry and itchy skin [23]. Historically, GC oil has been used for the treatment of skin disorders such as eczema, as it contains three major sesquiterpene constituents (azulene, bisabolol, farnesene) with anti-inflammatory or anti-histaminic effects [6,32]. Particularly, it is known that these effects of GC oil come from α-bisabolol, a substance that has strong anti- inflammatory effects of all. However, there have been no scientific studies to date on the possible effects of GC oil on alleviating atopic dermatitis. Therefore, this study tested the application of GC oil on BALB/c mice demonstrating atopic dermatitis-like immune alteration and skin lesions. The 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB) skin application model was adopted to induce atopic dermatitis-like phenomena in mice, which has been reported as a reliable model demonstrating similar immunologic and skin alteration as human atopic dermatitis [24].

Materials and Methods

Composition of GC oil

For the experiment, this study used GC oil (Sanoflore, France) as 100% pure and natural essential oil tested by organic product certification organization (ECOCERT, France) as well as jojoba oil (Desert Whale, USA). Jojoba oil was used as a control due to its clinical application.

Animals

Forty BALB/c mice (SPF male, 7 weeks old) were purchased from Daehan Biolink (Korea). Both animal care and protocol for this study were in accordance with Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (USA) and OECD guideline. Animals fed on unlimited amount of water and feed throughout whole experiment duration. The animals were divided into four groups (ten mice each) and were housed separately in plastic cages per each group. The normal group was applied with saline throughout atopic dermatitis induction stage and oil treatment period. The control group was applied with saline following induction of atopic dermatitis. The vehicle group was applied with jojoba oil and the experimental group with 3% GC oil following atopic dermatitis induction (Fig. 1). Three % GC oil was selected in accordance to the clinical application.

Induction of atopic dermatitis-like immunologic and skin disorders

For induction of atopic dermatitis-like immunologic and skin disorders, DNCB was applied onto mice skin. After complete removal of dorsal hairs in area of approximately 8 cm², 100 µL of 1% DNCB was applied on their dorsal skin twice every 3 days for sensitization. In the next week, 100 µL of 0.2% DNCB was applied on their dorsal skin twice every 3 days for challenge. DNCB was dissolved in a 4 : 1 mixture of acetone and olive oil. As soon as the challenge was completed, 3% GC oil (diluted in jojoba oil) was applied once a day (70 µL, 6 times week) on the dorsal skin for 4 weeks. Saline or jojoba oil was applied onto skin of the control mice. Three hundreds µL of blood was sampled at the completion of second challenge and 2 weeks after initiating oil application via periorbital sinus. After the 4-week oil application period, under ether anesthesia blood sampled from posterior vena cava was used for immunologic or hematologic analysis, and skin tissue was sampled and fixed with 10% neutral buffered formalin solution for histopathologic examinations, splenic cells were sampled by separation from the extracted spleen and stored in a freezer after freezing in liquid nitrogen for cytokine analysis.

Immunologic observation

Measurement of serologic parameters

Serum IgE levels were determined using a sandwich ELISA method, as previously described [15]. The levels of serum IgG1 and IgG2a were also determined using a sandwich ELISA method, using goat anti-mouse IgG1 and IgG2a capture antibodies and a peroxidase conjugated anti-mouse IgG detection antibody [16]. In addition, serum histamine levels were determined using the IBL histamine ELISA kit (IBL, Germany) according to the quantification methodology of Duda et al. [10].

Measurement of IL-4 in splenic cell culture solution

Splenic cells (5 × 10⁵ cells) were stimulated with immobilized anti-CD3 mAb (5 µg) for 48 h in a CO₂ incubator. The level of IL-4 in culture supernatants was determined using a sandwich ELISA method prepared by BD Pharmingen (BD, USA) [15]. The lower limit of detection was 5 pg/mL for IL-4.

Behavioral observation

Behaviors of mice were monitored according to observation methodology of Kobayashi et al. [20]. The frequency of scratching occurring on facial or dorsal skins was counted with a 30-min visual observation on the first day and on the 21st day after GC oil application.

Data analysis

All data collected in this study were statistically processed via SPSS WIN (SPSS, USA). ANOVA was used to test for differences among the groups. Post-hoc analysis was carried out using the Duncan's multiple range test to test for significant difference among the means (p < 0.05).

Results

GC oil-mediated suppression of IgE hyperproduction

Mice at the completion of 0.2% DNCB second challenge demonstrated significantly higher levels of serum IgE (approximately 4.4 times) than the normal group (Fig. 2), implying a successful induction of atopic dermatitis-like immune alteration. Serum IgE levels were significantly downregulated in the experimental group after application of GC oil for 4-weeks, while the saline-applied control or the jojoba oil-applied vehicle groups still demonstrated significantly upregulated IgE levels compared to the normal mice.

Modulation of serum IgG1 level following GC oil application

Levels of IgG1 and IgG2a were substantially increased following DNCB sensitization and challenge compared to the normal mice (Table 1). Application of GC oil for 4 weeks resulted in a reduction of approximately 31% (13.75 mg/mL) in IgG1 levels compared to 19.80 mg/mL after 2-weeks of GC oil application. There were no significant differences in the levels of IgG1 in saline-applied control or jojoba oil-applied vehicle groups between at 2 week and at 4 week following atopic dermatitis induction. Meanwhile, persistent application of GC or jojoba oil did not lead to any changes in IgG2a levels when compared between 2 and 4 weeks following the induction of atopic dermatitis.

Effect of GC oil application on modulation of serum histamine level

Histamine levels were significantly higher in all mice groups exposed to DNCB compared to the normal mice (Fig. 3), indicating a successful induction of atopic dermatitis-like alterations of the immune system. Two weeks after GC oil application, the GC oil group (18.45 ng/mL) showed significantly lower (approximately 51%) serum histamine level than the saline-applied control (37.43 ng/mL), and also lower (approximately 40%) than the jojoba oil-applied vehicle (30.60 ng/mL) group. However, no further downregulation of histamine levels was found 4 weeks after the start of treatment.

Effect of GC oil application on production of IL-4 from splenic T cells

Four weeks of GC oil application (10.4 pg/mL) resulted in lower (approximately 50%) IL-4 production with no statistical significance (p > 0.05) in splenic cell culture supernatants compared to the saline treated control mice (20.7 pg/mL) (Fig. 4). These findings imply that GC oil controls the production of IL-4 from Th2 cells, contributing to controlling IgE and IgG1 generation from B cells.

Decreased scratching frequency in GC oil-applied mice

The frequency of scratching on facial and back skin was observed for 30-min on one day after the second DNCB challenge (day 1) and on the 21st day after initiating GC oil application (day 21). It was found that the GC oil group (44 times) and jojoba oil group (65 times) showed significantly lower (approximately 45% and 19%, respectively) scratching frequency than the saline treated control group (80 times) at day 21 (Fig. 5). Furthermore, scratching frequency of the GC oil group was significantly lower (approximately 32%) than the jojoba oil vehicle group.

Decreased inflammatory cell infiltration in GC oil-applied mice skin

Numerous leukocytes were infiltrated into the dermis and epidermis was thickened in the control mouse skin compared to the normal mouse skin, while inflammatory cell infiltration, such as neutrophils and lymphocytes, and hyperplasia of the epidermis were significantly (p < 0.05) reduced in the experimental mouse skin (Table 2 and Fig. 6). In this study, it was found that application of GC oil for 4 weeks resulted in significantly lower leukocytes in the peripheral blood than the saline treated control mice, and showed similar values to the normal mice (Table 3). The number of neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils and basophils of GC oil application for 4 weeks showed significantly (p < 0.05) lower levels than the saline treated control mice by 31, 33, 42, 50 and 50%, respectively (Table 3).

Discussion

The present study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of GC oil alleviating atopic dermatitis-like immune alterations in mice. Even though GC oil has been historically used for the treatment of pruritic skin disorder [2,6,12,32], there has been no scientific study investigating GC oil on the treatment or prevention of atopic dermatitis. Our study is the first to demonstrate GC oil's immunoregulatory potential for alleviating atopic dermatitis through influencing of Th2 cell activation. Overall, we found that GC oil possessed an ability to influence Th2 cell activation involved with the onset or progression of atopic dermatitis, in that dermal application of GC oil resulted in the suppression of IgE or IgG1 over-production, downregulation of IL-4 production from Th2 cells, and demonstrated a reduction in histamine release. In addition, frequent scratching due to itchy sensations was alleviated following GC oil application onto the damaged skin involved with the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis.

Histamine release from activated mast cells or basophils is a hallmark of the occurrence of allergic diseases such as atopic dermatitis, and cause itching, increased vascular permeability, and the wheal and flare response of immediate hypersensitivity [1]. Pruritus is a symptom found in a variety of skin disorders like atopic dermatitis and contact allergic dermatitis. For atopic dermatitis cases, it has been reported that scratching due to itchy sensations causes skin damage, promotes inflammation and thereby further aggravates pruritus [1,4,21,34,35]. Therefore, it is important to reduce itchy sensations and scratching frequency to prevent aggravation of skin lesions due to pruritic disorders and improving quality of life.

Kobayashi et al. [19,20] reported that the oral administration of GC extract combined with histamine receptor antagonists was more effective for the suppression of scratching behavior in mice than administration of histamine receptor antagonists alone. GC oil may inhibit the binding of histamine to its receptor, which will eventually control histamine mediated clinico-pathologic effects such as itching [20]. Concerning our results showing the downregulation of serum histamine levels 2 weeks after the start of GC oil application following atopic dermatitis induction, this compound may also exhibit its anti-histamine effect by directly suppressing histamine release from mast cells through downregulation of IL-4 production from Th2 cells and following by suppression of IgE or IgG1 over-production.

The most important aspect to be discussed is GC oil's systemic effect on the modulation of the in vivo type-2 response. The type-2 response becomes predominant when differentiation or activation of Th2 cells is preferred, but development or stimulation of Th1 cells is suppressed [13,14]. Considering that the skewedness toward type-2 responses is a background mechanism for the occurrence of atopic dermatitis [1,4,25], dermal application of GC oil could systematically block the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis through correcting the immune homeostasis skewed in favor of Th2. Considering our experimental results, it could be concluded that the application of GC oil on the skin of atopic dermatitis cases could alter production of IL-4 from Th2 cells and also alter IgE, IgG1 and histamine production, performing a series of immunoregulatory functions to alleviate the occurrence or progression of atopic dermatitis. Hence, it is believed that the application of GC oil on atopic dermatitis cases will be significantly meaningful for public health and alternative medicine.

Although it is known that α-bisabolol has the strongest anti-inflammatory effects of all the constituents of GC oil, it is not clear which constituent(s) of GC oil contribute to the GC oil-mediated alleviation of atopic dermatitis-like immunologic and skin alterations in mice at the moment. Future studies will be directed towards identifying which components of GC oil are responsible for its immunomodulatory effects. Furthermore, whether GC oil exerts its immunomodulatory effects independently, sequentially, or concomitantly on each of the immune component cells involved in the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis such as Th, B, and mast cells needs to be answered. Further investigations are necessary to identify target immune cells for GC oil-mediated alleviation of atopic dermatitis-like immunologic and skin alterations.

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1

Macroscopic photograph of atopic dermatitis mouse skin just after induction by the application of 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB) (A). Saline application after atopic dermatitis induction as the control (B), jojoba oil application after atopic dermatitis induction as the vehicle (C), and German chamomile (GC) oil application after atopic dermatitis induction as the experiment (D). B, C and D are macroscopic photographs at 4 week after various application.

Fig. 2

GC oil-mediated suppression of IgE hyperproduction. Serum IgE levels were measured at the completion of second DNCB challenge, 2 and 4 weeks after initiating dermal application of test compounds. The results are expressed as means ± SE. ^a,b,cValues with different superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05).

Fig. 3

Changes in serum histamine levels of the mice sensitized and challenged with DNCB followed by 4-week dermal application of test compounds. The results are expressed as means ± SE. ^a,bValues with different superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05).

Fig. 4

Effect of GC oil application on production of interleukin-4 (IL-4) from splenic T cells. Splenocytes were stimulated with immobilized anti-CD3 mAb for 48 h. Culture supernatants were collected for measurement of IL-4. The results are expressed as means ± SE.

Fig. 5

Decreased scratching frequency in GC oil-treated mice. Frequency of scratching on facial and back skin was measured for 30 min one day after the second DNCB challenge (day 1) and the 21st day after initiating GC oil application (day 21). The results are expressed as means ± SE. ^a,b,cValues with different superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05).

Fig. 6

Histophatological findings at 4-week after various application following atopic dermatitis induction. No atopic dermatitis induction as normal mice (A), saline application following atopic dermatitis induction as control mice (B), jojoba oil application following atopic dermatitis induction as vehicle mice (C), and GC oil application following atopic dermatitis induction as experimental mice (D). H&E stain, ×100.

Table 1

Serum level of IgG1 or IgG2a (mg/mL) in mice following atopic dermatitis induction and test compounds application

^*Normal: No atopic dermatitis induction, Control: Saline application after atopic dermatitis induction, Vehicle: Jojoba oil application after atopic dermatitis induction, Experiment: GC oil application after atopic dermatitis induction. ^†DNCB: 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene. ^‡The results are expressed as means ± SE (n = 10). ^a,b,cValues with different superscripts in the same column are significantly different (p < 0.05).

Table 2

Changes in number of inflammatory cells in GC oil-treated mice skin at 4 week after various application following atopic dermatitis induction

^*The results are expressed as means ± SE (n = 10) of microscopic observation at ×200 magnification. ^a,b,cValues with different superscripts in the same column are significantly different (p < 0.05). Normal: No atopic dermatitis induction, Control: Saline application after atopic dermatitis induction, Vehicle: jojoba oil application after atopic dermatitis induction, Experiment: GC oil application after atopic dermatitis induction.

Table 3

Changes in number of leukocytes at 4 week after various application following atopic dermatitis induction

The results are expressed as means ± SE (n = 10). ^a,bValues with different superscripts in the same row are significantly different (p < 0.05). Unit: ×10⁹/L.

Acknowledgments

This study was conducted with the support of the research fund of Howon University, Korea.

References

1. Abdel-Hamid KM. Jost BC, Friedman E, Abdel-Hamid KM, Jani AL, editors. Atopic dermatitis. The Washington Manual Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology Subspecialty Consult. 2003. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;66–73.

2. Akihisa T, Yasukawa K, Oinuma H, Kasahara Y, Yamanouchi S, Takido M, Kumaki K, Tamura T. Triterpene alcohols from the flowers of compositae and their anti-inflammatory effects. Phytochemistry. 1996. 43:1255–1260.

3. Bardana EJ Jr. Immunoglobulin E-(IgE) and non-IgE-mediated reactions in the pathogenesis of atopic eczema/dermatitis syndrome (AEDS). Allergy. 2004. 59:Suppl 78. 25–29.

4. Boguniewicz M, Beltrani VS. Adelman DC, Casale TB, Corren J, editors. Atopic dermatitis and contact dermatitis. Manual of Allergy and Immunology. 2002. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia;165–186.

5. Buckle J. The role of aromatherapy in nursing care. Nurs Clin North Am. 2001. 36:57–72.

6. Carle R, Gomaa K. The medicinal use of Matricaria flos. Br J Phytother. 1992. 2:147–153.

7. Cerrato P. Aromatherapy: Is it for real? Regist Nurse. 1998. 61:51–52.

8. Chan LS, Robinson N, Xu L. Expression of interleukin-4 in the epidermis of transgenic mice results in a pruritic inflammatory skin disease: an experimental animal model to study atopic dermatitis. J Invest Dermatol. 2001. 117:977–983.

9. Del Rosso J, Friedlander SF. Corticosteroids: options in the era of steroid-sparing therapy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005. 53:Suppl 1. S50–S58.

10. Duda D, Lorenz W, Dick W, Celik I, Black A, Healy MJR, Black JW. Can clinically relevant histamine release be accurately diagnosed in anaesthetised patients without plasma histamine measurements? Randomised study with nested sampling aimed to change paradigms. Inflamm Res. 1998. 47:Suppl 1. S73–S74.

11. Fiorentino DF, Bond MW, Mosmann TR. Two types of mouse T helper cell. IV. Th2 clones secrete a factor that inhibits cytokine production by Th1 clones. J Exp Med. 1989. 170:2081–2095.

12. Hartman D, Coetzee JC. Two US practitioners' experience of using essential oils for wound care. J Wound Care. 2002. 11:317–320.

13. Heo Y. In vitro model for modulation of helper T cell differentiation and activation. Curr Protoc Toxicol. 2005. Suppl 24:18.9.1–18.9.10.

14. Heo Y, Mondal TK, Gao D, Kasten-Jolly J, Kishikawa H, Lawrence DA. Posttranscriptional inhibition of interferon-gamma production by lead. Toxicol Sci. 2007. 96:92–100.

15. Heo Y, Parsons PJ, Lawrence DA. Lead differentially modifies cytokine production in vitro and in vivo. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1996. 138:149–157.

16. Heo Y, Saxon A, Hankinson O. Effect of diesel exhaust particles and their components on the allergen-specific IgE and IgG1 response in mice. Toxicology. 2001. 159:143–158.

17. Kapp A. The role of eosinophils in the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis - eosinophil granule proteins as markers of disease activity. Allergy. 1993. 48:1–5.

18. Kepron MR, Chen YW, Uhr JW, Vitetta ES. IL-4 induces the specific rearrangement of gamma 1 genes on the expressed and unexpressed chromosomes of lipopolysaccharide-activated normal murine B cells. J Immunol. 1989. 143:334–339.

19. Kobayashi Y, Nakano Y, Inayama K, Sakai A, Kamiya T. Dietary intake of the flower extracts of German chamomile (Matricaria recutita L.) inhibited compound 48/80-induced itch-scratch responses in mice. Phytomedicine. 2003. 10:657–664.

20. Kobayashi Y, Takahashi R, Ogino F. Antipruritic effect of the single oral administration of German chamomile flower extract and its combined effect with antiallergic agents in ddY mice. J Ethnopharmacol. 2005. 101:308–312.

21. Koblenzer CS. Itching and the atopic skin. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999. 104:S109–S113.

22. Kurt-Jones EA, Hamberg S, Ohara J, Paul WE, Abbas AK. Heterogeneity of helper/inducer T lymphocytes. I. Lymphokine production and lymphokine responsiveness. J Exp Med. 1987. 166:1774–1787.

23. Lawrence BM. Progress in essential oil. Perfumer & Flavorist. 1996. 21:55–68.

24. Lee SH, Baek SJ, Kim HA, Heo Y. 2,4-Dinitrochlorobenzene-induced atopic dermatitis like immune alteration in mice. J Toxicol Public Health. 2006. 22:357–364.

25. Lester MR, Hofer MF, Gately M, Trumble A, Leung DYM. Down-regulating effects of IL-4 and IL-10 on the IFN-gamma response in atopic dermatitis. J Immunol. 1995. 154:6174–6181.

26. Matsumoto M, Ra C, Kawamoto K, Sato H, Itakura A, Sawada J, Ushio H, Suto H, Mitsuishi K, Hikasa Y, Matsuda H. IgE hyperproduction through enhanced tyrosine phosphorylation of Janus kinase 3 in NC/Nga mice, a model for human atopic dermatitis. J Immunol. 1999. 162:1056–1063.

27. Moss M, Cook J, Wesnes K, Duckett P. Aromas of rosemary and lavender essential oils differentially affect cognition and mood in healthy adults. Int J Neurosci. 2003. 113:15–38.

28. Norris DA. Mechanisms of action of topical therapies and the rationale for combination therapy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005. 53:Suppl 1. S17–S25.

29. Sanderson CJ, Strath M, Warren DJ, O'garra A, Kirkwood TB. The production of lymphokines by primary alloreactive T-cell clones: a co-ordinate analysis of 233 clones in seven lymphokine assays. Immunology. 1985. 56:575–584.

30. Simon D, Braathen LR, Simon HU. Eosinophils and atopic dermatitis. Allergy. 2004. 59:561–570.

31. Snapper CM, Paul WE. Interferon-γ and B cell stimulatory factor-1 reciprocally regulate Ig isotype production. Science. 1987. 236:944–947.

32. Standen MD, Myers SP. The roles of essential oils in the modulation of immune function and inflammation: survey of aromatherapy educators. Int J Aromather. 2004. 14:150–161.

33. Takakura M, Takeshita F, Aihara M, Xin KQ, Ichino M, Okuda K, Ikezawa Z. Hyperproduction of IFN-γ by CpG oligodeoxynucleotide-induce exacerbation of atopic dermatitis-like skin lesion in some NC/Nga mice. J Invest Dermatol. 2005. 125:1156–1162.

34. Tamura T, Amano T, Ohmori K, Manabe H. The effects of olopatadine hydrochloride on the number of scratching induced by repeated application of oxazolone in mice. Eur J pharmacol. 2005. 524:149–154.

35. Wahlgren CF. Itch and atopic dermatitis: an overview. J Dermatol. 1999. 26:770–779.

TOOLS

Similar articles