Journal List > Korean J Phys Anthropol > v.31(1) > 1039257

Woo, Kim, Jeon, and Pak: Paleopathological Studies of Infectious Disease: Examination of the Osteoarchaeological Research

Abstract

Reconstructing the impact of infectious disease on past populations is one of the main fields in paleopathological studies. The initial phase of paleopathology was descriptive, focusing on the identification and presence of disease in the past. However, currently paleopathological studies are moving toward probing questions about the larger picture of origin and transmission of disease agents. In this study, paleopathological studies of major infectious disease (i.e., tubuerculosis, treponemal disease and leprosy) were reviewed through osteoarcheological work published in American Journal of Physical Anthropology, International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, Journal of Archaeological Science and International Journal of Paleopathology from 1981 to 2017. A basic objective of this research was to examine many types of research in paleopathology and to characterize research trend in this field. As paleopathological studies becomes more abundant, the approaches to infectious disease have been increasingly specialized and interdisciplinary from 1980. Also, methodology used in paleopathology continues to evolve through the holistic approaches of molecular analysis, radiology and histopathology. Ultimately, this study reinforces the importance for retention of large-scale skeletal collections for paleopathological study in population perspective. In the near future, Korean paleopathology can contribute in the reconstructions of the history of disease and its effect on past human populations.

References

1. Inhorn MC, Brown PJ. The anthropology of infectious disease. Annu Rev Anthropol. 1990; 19:89–117.
crossref
2. Ortner DJ. Differential diagnosis of skeletal lesions in infectious disease. Pinhasi R, Mays S, editors. editors.Advances in human palaeopathology. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd;2008. p. 189–214.
crossref
3. Molnar E, Palfi G. Probable cases of skeletal infections in the 17th century anthropological series from Bácsalmás (Hungary). Acta Biol Szeged. 1994; 40:117–33.
4. Armelagos GJ, Brown PJ, Turner B. Evolutionary, historical and political economic perspectives on health and disease. Soc Sci Med. 2005; 61:755–65.
crossref
5. Harper KN, Zuckerman MK, Harper ML, Kingston JD, Armelagos GJ. The origin and antiquity of syphilis revisited: an appraisal of Old World pre-Columbian evidence for treponemal infection. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2011; 146(Suppl 53):S99–133.
crossref
6. Zuckerman MK, Harper KN. Paleoepidemiological and biocultural approaches to ancient disease: the origin and antiquity of syphilis. Zuckerman MK, Martin DL, editors. editors.New directions in biocultural anthropology. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons;2016. p. 317–35.
crossref
7. Monot M, Honore N, Garnier T, Araoz R, Coppee JY, Lacroix C, et al. On the origin of leprosy. Science. 2005; 308:1040–2.
crossref
8. Stone AC, Wilbur AK, Buikstra JE, Roberts CA. Tuberculosis and leprosy in perspective. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2009; 140(Suppl 49):S66–94.
crossref
9. Suzuki T, Fujita H, Choi JG. New evidence of tuberculosis from prehistoric Korea-Population movement and early evidence of tuberculosis in Far East Asia. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2008; 136:357–60.
10. Mays S. A perspective on human osteoarchaeology in Brit-ain. Int J Osteoarchaeol. 1997; 7:600–4.
crossref
11. Mays S. Human osteoarchaeology in the UK 2001–2007: a bibliometric perspective. Int J Osteoarchaeol. 2000; 20:192–204.
crossref
12. Ortner DJ, Putschar W. Identification of pathological conditions in human skeletal remains. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press;1985. p. 130.
13. Spigelman M, Lemma E. The use of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect mycobacterium tuberculosis in ancient skeletons. Int J Osteoarchaeol. 1993; 3:137–43.
14. Braun M, Pfeiffer S. DNA from mycobacterium tuberculosis complex identified in North American, Pre-Columbian human skeletal remains. J Archaeol Sci. 1998; 25:271–7.
15. Comas I, Coscolla M, Luo T, Borrell S, Holt KE, Kato-Maeda M, et al. Out-of-Africa migration and Neolithic coexpansion of mycobacterium tuberculosis with modern humans. Nat Genet. 2013; 45:1176–82.
crossref
16. Ortner DJ. Paleopathology: implications for the history and evolution of tuberculosis. Pálfi G, Dutour O, Deák J, Hutás IS, editors. editors.Tuberculosis: past and present. Hungary: Golden Book Publisher Ltd;1999. p. 255–61.
17. Morse D. Pre-historic tuberculosis in America. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1961; 83:489–504.
18. Morse D. On tuberculosis. Brothwell D, Sandison AT, editors. editors.Diseases in antiquity. Springfield: Charles C. Tho-mas;1967. p. 249–71.
19. Ritchie WA. Paleopathological evidence suggesting preColumbian tuberculosis in New York State. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1952; 10:305–11.
crossref
20. Lichtor J, Lichtor A. Paleopathological evidence suggesting pre-Columbian tuberculosis of the spine. J Bone Joint Surg. 1957; 39:1398–9.
crossref
21. Holloway KL, Henneberg R, de Barros Lopes M, Henneberg M. Evolution of human tuberculosis: a systematic review and metaanalysis of paleopathological evidence. HOMO-J Comp Hum Biol. 2011; 62:402–58.
crossref
22. Salo WL, Aufderheide AC, Buikstra J, Holcomb TA. Iden-tification of mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA in a preColumbian Peruvian mummy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1994; 91:2091–4.
crossref
23. Arriaza BT, Salo WL, Aufderheide AC, Holcomb TA. Pre-Columbian tuberculosis in Northern Chile: molecular and skeletal evidence. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1995; 98:37–45.
crossref
24. Bos KI, Harkins KM, Herbig A, Coscolla M, Weber N, Comas I, et al. Pre-Columbian mycobacterial genomes reveal seals as a source of New World human tuberculosis. Nature. 2014; 514:494–7.
crossref
25. Suzuki T. Paleopathological study on infectious disease in Japan. Ortner DJ, Aufderheide AC, editors. editors.Human paleo-pathology: current syntheses and future options. Washington DC: Smithsonian Institution Press;1991. p. 128–39.
26. Pechenkina EA, Benfer RA Jr, Ma X. Diet and health in the Neolithic of the Wei and Middle Yellow River Basins, Northern China. In: Cohen MN, Crane-Kramer GNM, edi-tors. Ancient health: skeletal indicators of agricultural and economic intensification. Gainesville: University of Florida Press;2007. p. 255–72.
27. Suzuki T, Inoue T. Earliest evidence of spinal tuberculosis from the aneolithic Yayoi period in Japan. Int J Osteoar-chaeol. 2007; 17:392–402.
crossref
28. Blau S, Yagodin V. Osteoarchaeological evidence for leprosy from Western Central Asia. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2005; 126:150–8.
crossref
29. Tayles N, Buckley HR. Leprosy and tuberculosis in Iron Age southeast Asia? Am J Phys Anthropol. 2004; 125:239–56.
crossref
30. Robbins G, Tripathy VM, Misra VN, Mohanty RK, Shinde VS, Gray KM, et al. Ancient skeletal evidence for leprosy in India (2000 BC). PLoS One. 2009; 4:e5669.
crossref
31. Taylor GM, Blau S, Mays S, Monot M, Lee OYC, Minnikin DE, et al. Mycobacterium leprae genotype amplified from an archaeological case of lepromatous leprosy in Central Asia. J Archaeol Sci. 2009; 36:2408–14.
crossref
32. Suzuki K, Takigawa W, Tanigawa K, Nakamura K, Ishido Y, Kawashima A, et al. Detection of Mycobacterium leprae DNA from archaeological skeletal remains in Japan using whole genome amplification and polymerase chain reaction. PLoS One. 2010; 5:e12422.
crossref
33. Barnes I, Thomas MG. Evaluating bacterial pathogen DNA preservation in museum osteological collections. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. 2006; 273:645–53.
crossref
34. Bouwman AS, Brown TA. The limits of biomolecular pal-aeopathology: ancient DNA cannot be used to study vene-real syphilis. J Archaeol Sci. 2005; 32:703–13.
crossref
35. Kolman CJ, Centurion-Lara A, Lukehart SA, Owsley DW, Tuross N. Identification of Treponema pallidum subspecies pallidum in a 200-year-old skeletal specimen. J Infect Dis. 1999; 180:2060–3.
36. Mark L, Gulyas-Fekete G, Marcsik A, Molnar E, Palfi G. Analysis of ancient mycolic acids by using MALDI TOF MS: response to “Essentials in the use of mycolic acid biomarkers for tuberculosis detection” by Minnikin et al., 2010. J Archaeol Sci. 2011; 38:1111–8.
37. Roberts CA, Millard AR, Nowell GM, Gröcke DR, Macpherson CG, Pearson DG, et al. Isotopic tracing of the impact of mobility on infectious disease: the origin of people with treponematosis buried in Hull, England, in the late medieval period. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2013; 150:273–85.
crossref
38. Guichón RA, Buikstra JE, Stone AC, Harkins KM, Suby JA, Massone M, et al. Pre-Columbian tuberculosis in Tierra del Fuego? Discussion of the paleopathological and molecular evidence. Int J Paleopathol. 2015; 11:92–101.
crossref
39. Crespo FA, Klaes CK, Switala AE, DeWitte SN. Do leprosy and tuberculosis generate a systemic inflammatory shift? Setting the ground for a new dialogue between experimental immunology and bioarchaeology. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2017; 162:143–56.
crossref

Fig. 1.
Article categories published in AJPA and IJOA by period.
kjpa-31-27f1.tif
Table 1.
Journals included in this study
Journal Name (abbreviation) Publication Ranking (2016)
American Journal of Physical Anthropology (AJPA) Monthly [US] 1918∼ 10/82 (Anthropology)
International Journal of Osteoarchaeology (IJOA) Bimonthly [UK] 1991∼ 38/82 (Anthropology)
International Journal of Paleopathology (IJPP) Quarterly [US] 2011∼ 21/262 (Archaeology)
Journal of Archaeological Science (JAS) Monthly [UK] 1974∼ 3/262 (Archaeology)
Table 2.
Classification of articles examined in this study
Article categories Methodology
Case study Study of remains on an individual-by-individual basis, but several skeletons may be described Macroscopic analysis
Population study Study of one or more skeletal collections may be described Radiological analysis
Methodological study Innovations in paleopathological study Histological analysis
Review Literature reviews of existing publications Molecular analysis
Table 3.
Articles from major anthropological journals split by ar-ticle categories
Article categories
Journal/ Period Case study Population study Methodology Review Total
AJPA          
1981∼2000 5 8 2 1 16
2001∼2017 6 22 1 2 31
JAS          
1981∼2000 5 3 0 1 9
2001∼2017 4 8 1 2 15
IJOA          
1991∼2000 10 5 0 3 18
2001∼2017 17 8 1 1 27
IJPP          
2011∼2017 7 4 0 1 12
Total 54 58 5 11 128
Table 4.
Methodology used in the articles by journal and period
Journal/ Period M Methodology categories
Macroscopic Radiology Histology Molecula Other
AJPA          
1981∼2000 11 6 1 2 2
2000∼2017 17 5 2 7 4
JAS          
1981∼2000 4 3 0 4 1
2000∼2017 5 4 0 9 2
IJOA          
1991∼2000 13 8 1 2 3
2000∼2017 22 12 1 3 2
IJPP          
2011∼2017 10 2 0 3 1
Total 82 40 5 30 15
Table 5.
Methodology of the articles split by infectious disease
Infectious disease Methodology categories
Macroscopic Radiology Histology Molecular Other Total
Tuberculosis            
1981∼2000 6 3 1 7 1 18
2000∼2017 20 7 1 16 6 50
Syphilis            
1981∼2000 12 9 0 0 0 21
2000∼2017 20 10 2 1 2 35
Leprosy            
1991∼2000 8 6 1 1 3 19
2000∼2017 16 6 0 5 3 30
Total 82 41 5 30 15 173
TOOLS
Similar articles