PDF
ePub
Citation
Print
Abstract
Background
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a major nasocomial pathogen. The active surveillance of MRSA is essential to limit its transmission. The BD GeneOhm MRSA realtime PCR assay (Becton Dickinson Diagnostics, San Diego, USA) has been recently developed and used for same-day MRSA detection directly from nasal swab specimens. The authors of the present study compared GeneOhm MRSA PCR with culture methods to evaluate its diagnostic performance for MRSA active surveillance.
Methods
The present study was conducted on patients admitted to the ICU for six months. A total of 371 nasal swab specimens were obtained from patients at admission day and at the seven-day follow-up. The swab was streaked onto culture media, and presumptive S. aureus colonies were confirmed as MRSA using the BD Phoenix automated microbiology system (Becton Dickinson Diagnostic Systems, Sparks, USA). In addition, GeneOhm MRSA PCR was performed. For discrepant results between GeneOhm MRSA PCR and culture, the enrichment broth culture method was performed.
Results
There were 34 samples with discrepant results between the GeneOhm MRSA PCR and culture. The overall agreement was 90.7%. For the detection of MRSA, the GeneOhm MRSA PCR was 96.8% sensitive and 86.3% specific, with positive and negative predictive values of 83.9% and 97.3%, respectively.
Conclusion
Identification of MRSA-colonized patients was achieved in as little as two hours, and the high negative predictive value of GeneOhm MRSA PCR suggests that the assay is a rapid method for the identification of persons who are not colonized with MRSA. However, due to the low positive predictive value, GeneOhm MRSA PCR combined with enrichment culture in cases of positive GeneOhm MRSA PCR is potentially useful for active MRSA surveillance activities.
REFERENCES
1. von Eiff C, Becker K, Machka K, Stammer H, Peters G. Nasal carriage as a source of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Study Group. N Engl J Med. 2001; 344:11–6.
2. Wertheim HF, Vos MC, Boelens HA, Voss A, Vandenbroucke-Grauls CM, Meester MH, et al. Low prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) at hospital admission in the Netherlands: the value of search and destroy and restrictive antibiotic use. J Hosp Infect. 2004; 56:321–5.
3. Cosgrove SE, Qi Y, Kaye KS, Harbarth S, Karchmer AW, Carmeli Y. The impact of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia on patient outcomes: mortality, length of stay, and hospital charges. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2005; 26:166–74.
4. Safdar N, Narans L, Gordon B, Maki DG. Comparison of culture screening methods for detection of nasal carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a prospective study comparing 32 methods. J Clin Microbiol. 2003; 41:3163–6.
5. Farley JE, Stamper PD, Ross T, Cai M, Speser S, Carroll KC. Comparison of the BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) PCR assay to culture by use of BBL CHROMagar MRSA for detection of MRSA in nasal surveillance cultures from an at-risk community population. J Clin Microbiol. 2008; 46:743–6.
6. Stamper PD, Cai M, Howard T, Speser S, Carroll KC. Clinical validation of the molecular BD GeneOhm StaphSR assay for direct detection of Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in positive blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol. 2007; 45:2191–6.
7. Kim OS, Yoon SW, Kang YJ, Kim YK, Lee NY, Lee JH, et al. Rate of nasal colonization of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus at admission to a medical intensive care unit. Korean J Nosocomial Infect Control. 2007; 12:42–9.
8. Brown DF, Edwards DI, Hawkey PM, Morrison D, Ridgway GL, Towner KJ, et al. Joint Working Party of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy; Hospital Infection Society; Infection Control Nurses Association Guidelines for the laboratory diagnosis and susceptibility testing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005; 56:1000–18.
9. Paule SM, Hacek DM, Kufner B, Truchon K, Thomson RB Jr, Kaul KL, et al. Performance of the BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus test before and during high-volume clinical use. J Clin Microbiol. 2007; 45:2993–8.
10. de San N, Denis O, Gasasira MF, De Mendonça R, Nonhoff C, Struelens MJ. Controlled evaluation of the IDI-MRSA assay for detection of colonization by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in diverse mucocutaneous specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 2007; 45:1098–101.
11. Cunningham R, Jenks P, Northwood J, Wallis M, Ferguson S, Hunt S. Effect on MRSA transmission of rapid PCR testing of patients admitted to critical care. J Hosp Infect. 2007; 65:24–8.
12. Park SH, Jang YH, Sung H, Kim MN, Kim JS, Park YJ. Performance evaluation of BD GeneOhm MRSA PCR assay for detection of nasal colonization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at endemic intensive care units. Korean J Lab Med. 2009; 29:439–47.
13. Boyce JM and Havill NL. Comparison of BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) PCR versus the CHROMagar MRSA assay for screening patients for the presence of MRSA strains. J Clin Microbiol. 2008; 46:350–1.
14. Huletsky A, Giroux R, Rossbach V, Gagnon M, Vaillancourt M, Bernier M, et al. New realtime PCR assay for rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus directly from specimens containing a mixture of staphylococci. J Clin Microbiol. 2004; 42:1875–84.
15. Donnio PY, Oliveira DC, Faria NA, Wilhelm N, Le Coustumier A, de Lencastre H. Partial excision of the chromosomal cassette containing the methicillin resistance determinant results in methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 2005; 43:4191–3.
16. Bischof LJ, Lapsley L, Fontecchio K, Jacosalem D, Young C, Hankerd R, et al. Comparison of chromogenic media to BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) PCR for detection of MRSA in nasal swabs. J Clin Microbiol. 2009; 47:2281–3.
Table 1.
Comparison of GeneOhm MRSA PCR and culture
XML Download