Journal List > Korean J Clin Microbiol > v.13(4) > 1038201

Cho, Noh, Kim, and Kim: Direct Application of Multiplex PCR on Stool Specimens for Detection of Enteropathogenic Bacteria

Abstract

Background

Causative bacterial agents of infectious diarrheal disease were traditionally diagnosed by stool cultures. Stool culture, however, has a problem because of relatively low sensitivity and long turnaround time. In this study, we evaluated multiplex PCR applied on stool specimens directly to diagnose enteropathogenic bacteria.

Methods

From June to September 2009, 173 diarrheal stools submitted for stool cultures were tested by Seeplex Diarrhea ACE Detection kit (Seegene, Korea) to detect 10 enteropathogenic bacteria. Specimens were cultured for Salmonella, Shigella, Vibrio, and Yersinia. Late 50 specimens were also cultured for Campylobacter. The specimens positive for verotoxin-producing Escherichia coli (VTEC) were further subcultured for detecting enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7. Electronic medical records were reviewed for clinical and laboratory findings.

Results

Of 173 specimens, multiplex PCR and cultures identified enteropathogens in 36 (20.8%) and 8 specimens (4.6%), respectively. While multiplex PCR detected 5 Salmonella, 15 Campylobacter, 1 Vibrio, 4 Clostridium difficiles toxin B, 5 Clostridium perfringens, 1 Yersinia enterocolitica, 5 Aeromonas, and 2 VTEC, cultures detected 5 Salmonella, 1 Vibrio, 1 Y. enterocolitica, 1 Aeromonas, and 2 E. coli O157:H7.

Conclusion

Multiplex PCR would be useful to detect Campylobacter, VTEC and C. perfringens, as well as have equivalent sensitivity to conventional culture for ordinary enteropathogens such as Salmonella, Shigella, Vibrio, Y. enterocolitica. Direct application of multiplex PCR combined with conventional cultures on stool warrants remarkable improvement of sensitivity to diagnose enteropathogenic bacteria.

REFERENCES

1. Baldi F, Bianco MA, Nardone G, Pilotto A, Zamparo E. Focus on acute diarrhoeal disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2009; 15:3341–8.
crossref
2. Vernacchio L, Vezina RM, Mitchell AA, Lesko SM, Plaut AG, Acheson DW. Diarrhea in American infants and young children in the community setting: incidence, clinical presentation and microbiology. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2006; 25:2–7.
3. Farthing MJ. Diarrhoea: a significant worldwide problem. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2000; 14:65–9.
crossref
4. Tarr PI, Gordon CA, Chandler WL. Shiga-toxin-producing Escherichia coli and haemolytic uraemic syndrome. Lancet. 2005; 365:1073–86.
crossref
5. Thielman NM and Guerrant RL. Clinical practice. Acute infectious diarrhea. N Engl J Med. 2004; 350:38–47.
6. Guerrant RL, Van Gilder T, Steiner TS, Thielman NM, Slutsker L, Tauxe RV, et al. Practice guidelines for the management of infectious diarrhea. Clin Infect Dis. 2001; 32:331–51.
crossref
7. Cheng AC, McDonald JR, Thielman NM. Infectious diarrhea in developed and developing countries. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2005; 39:757–73.
crossref
8. Thapar N and Sanderson IR. Diarrhoea in children: an interface between developing and developed countries. Lancet. 2004; 363:641–53.
9. Gadewar S and Fasano A. Current concepts in the evaluation, diagnosis and management of acute infectious diarrhea. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2005; 5:559–65.
10. Shin HB, Jeong SH, Kim M, Kim WH, Lee K, Chong Y. Isolation trend of enteropathogenic bacteria in 1969-1998. Korean J Clin Microbiol. 2001; 4:87–95.
11. Korea Center for Disease Control & Prevention. The prevalence and characteristics of bacteria causing acute diarrhea in Korea. 2008. http://www.cdc.go.kr/contents/information/had/b/9918_view.html.
12. Iijima Y, Asako NT, Aihara M, Hayashi K. Improvement in the detection rate of diarrhoeagenic bacteria in human stool specimens by a rapid realtime PCR assay. J Med Microbiol. 2004; 53:617–22.
crossref
13. Reller ME, Lema CA, Perl TM, Cai M, Ross TL, Speck KA, et al. Yield of stool culture with isolate toxin testing versus a two-step algorithm including stool toxin testing for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile. J Clin Microbiol. 2007; 45:3601–5.
14. Chapela MJ, Fajardo P, Garrido A, Cabado AG, Ferreira M, Lago J, et al. Comparison between a TaqMan polymerase chain reaction assay and a culture method for ctx-positive Vibrio cholerae detection. J Agric Food Chem. 2010; 58:4051–5.
crossref
15. Nhung PH, Ohkusu K, Miyasaka J, Sun XS, Ezaki T. Rapid and specific identification of 5 human pathogenic vibrio species by multiplex polymerase chain reaction targeted to dnaJ gene. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007; 59:271–5.
crossref
16. Daube G, Simon P, Limbourg B, Manteca C, Mainil J, Kaecken-beeck A. Hybridization of 2,659 Clostridium perfringens isolates with gene probes for seven toxins (alpha, beta, epsilon, iota, theta, mu, and enterotoxin) and for sialidase. Am J Vet Res. 1996; 57:496–501.
17. Jang YH, Chung J, Baek S, Park S, Sung H, Kim MN. Implementation of multiplex PCR for species identification and toxin typing in toxigenic Clostridium difficile culture. Korean J Clin Microbiol. 2009; 12:11–6.
18. Paton AW and Paton JC. Multiplex PCR for direct detection of Shiga toxigenic Escherichia coli strains producing the novel sub-tilase cytotoxin. J Clin Microbiol. 2005; 43:2944–7.
19. Kim JS, Lee GG, Park JS, Jung YH, Kwak HS, Kim SB, et al. A novel multiplex PCR assay for rapid and simultaneous detection of five pathogenic bacteria: Escherichia coli O157: H7, Salmonella, Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria monocytogenes, and Vibrio parahaemolyticus. J Food Prot. 2007; 70:1656–62.
20. O'Leary J, Corcoran D, Lucey B. Comparison of the EntericBio multiplex PCR system with routine culture for detection of bacterial enteric pathogens. J Clin Microbiol. 2009; 47:3449–53.
21. Butzler JP. Campylobacter, from obscurity to celebrity. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2004; 10:868–76.
crossref
22. Thorney JP, Shaw JG, Gryllos IA, Eley A. Virulence properties of clinically significant Aeromonas species: evidence for pathogenicity. Rev Med Microbiol. 1997; 8:61–72.
23. Choi JP, Lee SO, Kwon HH, Kwak YG, Choi SH, Lim SK, et al. Clinical significance of spontaneous Aeromonas bacterial peritonitis in cirrhotic patients: a matched case-control study. Clin Infect Dis. 2008; 47:66–72.
24. Kang JM, Kim BN, Choi SH, Kim NJ, Woo JH, Ryu J, et al. Clinical features and prognostic factors of Aeromonas bacteremia. Infect Chemother. 2005; 37:161–6.
25. Labbe R. Clostridium perfringens. In: Doyle MP, ed. Foodborne Bacterial Pathogens. New York; Marcel Dekker, Inc. 2006. 191–234.
26. Kokai-Kun JF, Songer JG, Czeczulin JR, Chen F, McClane BA. Comparison of western immunoblots and gene detection assays for identification of potentially enterotoxigenic isolates of Clostridium perfringens. J Clin Microbiol. 1994; 32:2533–9.
crossref
27. Lee SW, Lee BK, Lee YJ, Lee HS, Jung SC, Sun KH, et al. A study on epidemiological characteristics and control methods of EHEC infection in Korea. Korean J Epidemiol. 2005; 27:37–52.
28. Oh YH and Kim YB. Use of polymerase chain reaction and serum antibodies for diagnosis of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli. J Korean Soc Microbiol. 1998; 33:99–110.

Table 1.
Target genes and their product size of multiplex PCR
Primer set Pathogens Target gene Product size (bp)
Diarrhea-B1 ACE Campylobacter spp. Campylobacter jejuni hip 227
  Campylobacter coli asp  
  Shigella spp. vif, ipaH 330
  Salmonella spp. sopB 395
  Clostridium difficile Toxin B tcdB 476
  Vibrio spp. Vibrio cholerae hly 651
  Vibrio parahaemolyticus tlh  
  Vibrio vulnificus vvh  
  Aeromonas spp. Diarrhea-B2 hly, ela 217
  VTEC ACE VT1, VT2 2 291
  Escherichia O157 rfb 476
  Escherichia H7 fliC 370
  Yersinia enterocolitica inv 580
  Clostridium perfringens cpa 700
Table 2.
Distribution of diarrhea pathogens confirmed by multiplex PCR and culture results
Pathogenic organism No. (%) of positive specimens
Multiplex PCR Conventional culture
Salmonella 5 (13.2) 5, Salmonella B, C, D, E
Campylobacter 15 (39.5) 0
Vibrio 1 (2.6) 1, V. parahemolyticus
CDB 4 (10.5) Not tested
Clostridium perfr ringens 5 (13.2) Not tested
Yersinia enteroco olitica 1 (2.6) 1
Aeromonas 5 (13.2) 1, A. sobria
E. coli O157:H7 , VTEC 2 (5.2) Not tested
Total 36 (100) 8

Only 50 specimens of late period were cultured

No. of specimen was corrected, since two Aeromonas were detected together with Campylobacter or Vibrio. Abbreviations: CDB, Clostridium difficile Toxin B; VTEC, verotoxin-producing E. coli.

Table 3.
Clinical characteristics of PCR-positive patients
Pathogenic organism No. of patients Age Sex No. of NI Fever Abdominal pain No. positive/No. tested
Stool Peripheral blood
≤15 >15 M: F OB WBC ↑WBC ↑CRP
Campylobacter 15 5 10 2.8: 1 0 12 13 5/13 6/6 5/15 13/13
Salmonella 5 3 2 2:: 3 0 5 5 0/5 0/5 1/5 5/5
Aeromonas 5 0 5 4: 1 0 4 4 1/2 1/5 2/5 4/5
VTEC 2 1 1 1: 1 0 2 2 1/2 1/2 1/2 2/2
CDB 4 2 2 1: 1 3 2 2 1/4 0/3 0/4 2/4
C. perfringens 5 4 1 1: 4 0 0 5 0/4 0/4 0/5 0/5
Vibro 1 0 1 0: 1 0 0 1 0/1 0/1 1/1 1/1
Y. enterocolitica 1 1 0 0: 1 0 1 1 0/1 0/1 0/1 0/1
Total 36 16 22 1.2: 1 3 25 33 8/32 8/27 11/38 29/38

>10×103

>0.6 mg/dL;

No. of patient was corrected, since Aeromonas was detected together in each one patient of Campylobacter and Vibrio, total 2 patients. Abbreviations: NI, nosocomial infection; OB, occult blood; WBC, white blood cell; CRP, C-reactive protein; VTEC, verotoxin-producing E. coli; CDB, C. difficile Toxin B.

TOOLS
Similar articles