Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/HTML-CSS/fonts/TeX/fontdata.js

Journal List > Korean J Clin Microbiol > v.12(4) > 1038174

TOOLS
Kim, Kang, Park, and Choi: Evaluation of ChromID MRSA for the Detection of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Original Article

Korean J Clin Microbiol 2009;12(4):169-173.

Published online: 22 December 2009

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5145/KJCM.2009.12.4.169

Evaluation of ChromID MRSA for the Detection of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Min Jung Kim, Dae Hyuk Kang, Jae Im Park, Tae Yeal Choi

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Hanyang University Hospital, Seoul, Korea

Correspondence: Tae Yeal Choi, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Hanyang University Hospital, 17, Haegdang-dong, Seongdong-gu, Seoul 133-792, Korea. (Tel) 82-2-2290-8974, (Fax) 82-2-2298-1735, (E-mail) tychoi@hanyang.ac.kr

Received 22 June 200926 October 2009       Accepted 20 November 2009

Copyright © 2009 Korean Journal of Clinical Microbiology

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a significant pathogen in both nosocomial and community settings, and screening for a carrier is an important infection control practice in many hospitals. We evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of the ChromID MRSA assay (bioMérieux, Marcy I'Etoile, France).

Methods

A total of 190 clinical samples were collected from the anterior nares of premature infants in a newborn intensive care unit (N-ICU). Equal volumes (100μL) of the samples were inoculated on mannitol salt agar with oxacillin 6 mg/L (MSAO) and ChromID MRSA after emulsifying the screening swab in brain-heart Infusion broth with oxacillin 6 mg/L (BE). The specimens in BE were subcultured on ChromID MRSA after an overnight incubation.

Results

Twenty-one of 190 samples (11%) was positive for MRSA by BE. After a 24 h incubation, the sensitivity/specificity of MSAO was 52%/98% and that of ChromID MRSA was 62%/100%, and at 48 h, the sensitivity/specificity of MSAO was 62%/92% and that of ChromID MRSA was 81%/99%.

Conclusion

ChromID MRSA is a useful selective medium for the rapid isolation and identification of MRSA.

Go to : Goto

Keywords: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Detection, Performance, Culture medium

REFERENCES

1. Emori TG, Gaynes RP. An overview of nosocomial infections, including the role of the microbiology laboratory. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1993; 6:428–42.
crossref
2. Smith PW, Bennett G, Bradley S, Drinka P, Lautenbach E, Marx J, et al. SHEA/APIC guideline: Infection prevention and control in the longterm care facility, July 2008. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008; 29:785–814.
3. Muto CA, Jernigan JA, Ostrowsky BE, Richet HM, Jarvis WR, Boyce JM, et al. SHEA guideline for preventing nosocomial transmission of multidrug-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2003; 24:362–86.
4. Coia JE, Duckworth GJ, Edwards DI, Farrington M, Fry C, Humphreys H, et al. Guidelines for the control and prevention of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in healthcare facilities. J Hosp Infect. 2006; 63(Suppl 1):S1–44.
5. Malhotra-Kumar S, Haccuria K, Micheils M, Ieven M, Poyart C, Hryniewicz W, et al. Current trends in rapid diagnostic for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and glycopeptides-resistant enterococcus species. J Clin Microbiol. 2008; 46:1577–87.
6. Lee HM, Yong DE, Lee KW, Hong SG, Kim EC, Jeong SH, et al. Antimicrobial resistance of clinically important bacteria isolated from 12 hospitals in Korea in 2004. Korean J Clin Microbiol. 2005; 8:66–73.
7. Lee SO, Kim SD, Lee JS, Kim KM, Kim BH, Kim ES, et al. Korean nosocomial infections surveillance system (KONIS) report: data summary from July through September 2006. Korean J Nosocomial Infect Control. 2006; 11:113–28.
8. Compernolle V, Verschraegen G, Claeys G. Combined use of Pastorex Staph-Plus and either of two new chromgenic agar, MRSA ID and CHROMagar MRSA, for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 2007; 45:154–8.
9. Perry JD, Davies A, Butterworth LA, Hopley ALJ, Nicholson A, Gould FK. Development and evaluation of a chromogenic agar medium for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 2004; 42:4519–23.
10. Nahimana I, Francioli P, Blanc DS. Evaluation of three chromogenic media (MRSA-ID, MRSA-Select and CHROMagar MRSA) and ORSAB for surveillance cultures of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2006; 12:1168–74.
11. Diederen BM, van Leest ML, van Duijn I, Willemse P, van Keulen PH, Kluytmans JA. Performance of MRSA ID, a new chromogenic medium for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 2006; 44:586–8.
12. Blanc DS, Wenger A, Bille J. Evaluation of a novel medium for screening specimens from hospitalized patients to detect methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 2003; 41:3499–502.
13. van Loo IHM, van Dijk S, Verbakel-Schelle I, Buiting AGM. Evaluation of a chromogenic agar (MRSASelect) for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with clinical samples on the Netherlands. J Med Microbiol. 2007; 56:491–4.
14. Louie L, Matsumura SO, Choi E, Louie M, Simor AE. Evaluation of three rapid methods for detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 2000; 38:2170–3.
15. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; Nineteenth informational supplement. CLSI M100-S19. Wayne, PA; CLSI,. 2009.
16. Murakami K, Minamide W, Wada K, Nakamura E, Teraoka H, Watanabe S. Identification of methicillin-resistant strains of staphylococci by polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol. 1991; 29:2240–4.
crossref
17. van Hal SJ, Stark D, Lockwood B, Marriott D, Harkness J. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) detection: comparison of two molecular methods (IDI-MRSA PCR assay and Genotype MRSA direct PCR assay) with three selective MRSA agars (MRSA ID, MRSASelect, and CHROMagar MRSA) for use with infection-control swabs. J Clin Microbiol. 2007; 45:2486–90.
18. Warren DK, Liao RS, Merz LR, Eveland M, Dunne WM Jr. Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus directly from nasal swab specimens by a realtime PCR assay. J Clin Microbiol. 2004; 42:5578–81.
19. Boyce JM, Havill NL. Comparison of BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) PCR versus the CHROMagar MRSA assay for screening patients for the presence of MRSA strains. J Clin Microbiol. 2008; 46:350–1.
20. Wolk DM, Picton E, Johnson D, Davis T, Pancholi P, Ginocchio CC, et al. Multicenter evaluation of the Cepheid Xpert methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) test as a rapid screening method for detection of MRSA in nares. J Clin Microbiol. 2009; 47:758–64.
21. Flayhart D, Hindler JF, Bruckner DA, Hall G, Shrestha RK, Vogel SA, et al. Multicenter evaluation of BBL CHROMagar MRSA medium for direct detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from surveillance culture of the anterior nares. J Clin Microbiol. 2005; 43:5536–40.
22. Velasco D, Tomas MM, Cartelle M, Beceiro A, Perez A, Molina F, et al. Evaluation of different methods for detecting methicillin (oxacillin) resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005; 55:379–82.
23. Kluytmans J, van Belkum A, Verbrugh H. Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus: epidemiology, underlying mechanisms, and associated risks. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1997; 10:505–20.
24. Noble WC, Williams RE, Jevons MP, Shooter RA. Some aspects of nasal carriage of staphylococci. J Clin Pathol. 1964; 17:79–83.
crossref
25. Stoakes L, Reyes R, Daniel J, Lennox G, John MA, Lannigan R, et al. Prospective comparison of a new chromogenic medium, MRSASelect, to CHROMagar MRSA and mannitol-salt medium supplemented with oxacillin or cefoxitin for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 2006; 44:637–9.
26. Lally RT, Ederer MN, Woolfrey BF. Evaluation of mannitol salt agar with oxacillin as a screening medium for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 1985; 22:501–4.
27. Lagacé-Wiens PR, Alfa MJ, Manickam K, Harding GK. Reductions in workload and reporting time by use of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus screening with MRSASelect medium compared to mannitol-salt medium supplemented with oxacillin. J Clin Microbiol. 2008; 46:1174–7.
28. Carson J, Lui B, Rosmus L, Rennick H, Fuller J. Interpretation of MRSASelect screening agar at 24 hours of incubation. J Clin Microbiol. 2009; 47:566–8.
29. Krishna BV, Smith M, Mcindeor A, Gibb AP, Dave J. Evaluation of chromogenic MRSA medium, MRSASelect and oxacillin resistance screening agar for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Pathol. 2008; 61:841–3.
Go to : Goto

Table 1.
Sensitivity and specificity of mannitol salt agar containing oxacillin 6 mg/mL (MSAO) and ChromID MRSA (ChromID) for detection of MRSA from anterior nare of patients in a newborn intensive care unit (N=190)
Incubation Medium TP∗ FP† TN‡ FN§ Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) PPV (%) NPV (%)
24 h MSAO 11 4 165 10 52 98 73 94
ChromID 13 0 169 8 62 100 100 95
48 h MSAO 13 14 155 8 62 92 48 95
ChromID 17 1 168 4 81 99 94 98

∗ A true positive (TP) is defined as a green colony on ChromID or yellow change of medium on MSAO that was identified as MRSA by identification;

† A false positive (FP) is defined as an isolate that exhibited green color on ChromID or yellow change of medium on MSAO but was not identified as MRSA;

‡ A true negative (TN) is defined as the lack of MRSA on solid medium and broth enrichment;

§ A false negative (FN) is defined as an isolates that was confirmed as a MRSA on broth enrichment but did not grown on solid medium.

TOOLS
Similar articles