PDF
ePub
Citation
Print
Seong Ho Yoo, M.D.
, Suk Woong Kang, M.D., Moo Ho Song, M.D, Young Jun Kim, M.D., Hyuck Bae, M.D.
, Suk Woong Kang, M.D., Moo Ho Song, M.D, Young Jun Kim, M.D., Hyuck Bae, M.D.
Abstract
Materials and Methods
This study analyzed 20 early patients, who received surgical management of distal humerus type-C fractures, and could be followed-ups for more than one year between March of 2013 and May of 2015. The operative time, bone union time, and elbow range of motion were analyzed. The Mayo's functional score was used to evaluate their postoperative function. The primary and secondary complications of each patient immediately after each of their surgery were also reviewed.
Results
All patient groups achieved bone union within an average period of 16.4 weeks. Based on the Mayo functional score, 6, 10, and 4 patients scored excellent, good, and fair, respectively. The average range of motion was a flexion contracture of 14.5° with a follow-up improvement averaging 120.7°. Six patients received nine revision operations due to major and minor complications. Two patients received revision fixation from an inadequate fixating power, and another patient received an ulnar nerve transposition. Other complications included olecranon osteotomy site displacement, superficial operational site infection, and pin loosening.
Conclusion
Distal humerus fractures of the AO-C type can cause a range of complications and has a very high rate of revision due to its difficult nature of surgical manageability. Therefore, it is imperative for a surgeon to expect various complications beforehand and a careful approach to their postoperative rehabilitation is essential.
Figures and Tables
Fig. 1
Patient suffered fixation loss 3 days after surgery and underwent revision open reduction and internal fixation. Anteroposterior (AP) (A) and lateral (B) radiography 1 day after surgery displays no immediate abnormality. AP (C) and lateral (D) radiography 3 days after surgery shows metal failure at its fixation site. After revision operation, the authors could achieve sound fixation, as shown in AP (E) and lateral (F) radiography.
Fig. 2
Patient experienced pin migration 3 months after surgery and underwent ulna nerve anterior transposition. Anteroposterior (AP) (A) and lateral (B) radiography 1 day after surgery displays no immediate abnormality. (C) AP radiography 3 months after surgery displays pin migration.
Fig. 3
Patient suffered screw breakage and underwent revision open reduction and internal fixation. Anteroposterior (AP) (A) and lateral (B) radiography 1 day after surgery displays no immediate abnormality. (C) AP radiography 6 weeks after surgery shows screw breakage at its lateral condylar plate fixation site. After revision surgery, authors achieved sound fixation, as seen in AP (D) and lateral (E) radiography. (F) One week after the revision operation, there was an olecranon fracture as observed on the lateral radiograph.
Fig. 4
Patient had severe swelling and required temporary external fixation before surgery. (A) Anteroposterior (AP) radiography of temporary fixated humerus before surgery. AP (B) and lateral (C) radiography 1 day after surgery displays no immediate abnormality. Two weeks after the operation, olecranon plate irritation caused wound dehiscence, as observed on the photograph (D) and required exchange to tension band wiring, as shown on the lateral radiograph of Fig. 4E.
References
1. Eralp L, Kocaoglu M, Sar C, Atalar AC. Surgical treatment of distal intraarticular humeral fractures in adults. Int Orthop. 2001; 25:46–50.
2. Helfet DL, Hotchkiss RN. Internal fixation of the distal humerus: a biomechanical comparison of methods. J Orthop Trauma. 1990; 4:260–264.
3. Gupta R. Intercondylar fractures of the distal humerus in adults. Injury. 1996; 27:569–572.
4. Gupta R, Khanchandani P. Intercondylar fractures of the distal humerus in adults: a critical analysis of 55 cases. Injury. 2002; 33:511–515.
5. Jupiter JB, Neff U, Holzach P, Allgöwer M. Interchondylar fractures of the humerus. An operative approach. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001; 25:46–50.
6. Yoon YC, Oh JK. Treatment of distal humeral fractures. J Korean Fract Soc. 2012; 25:223–232.
7. O'Driscoll SW. Parallel plate fixation of bicolumn distal humeral fractures. Instr Course Lect. 2009; 58:521–528.
8. Jupiter JB, David R. Orthopaedic knowledge update shoulder and elbow. Philadelpia. AAOS:1997; 397–404.
9. Aitken GK, Rorabeck CH. Distal humeral fractures in the adult. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986; 207:191–197.
10. Vazquez O, Rutgers M, Ring DC, Walsh M, Egol KA. Fate of the ulnar nerve after operative fixation of distal humerus fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2010; 24:395–399.
11. Wang KC, Shih HN, Hsu KY, Shih CH. Intercondylar fractures of the distal humerus: routine anterior subcutaneous transposition of the ulnar nerve in a posterior operative approach. J Trauma. 1994; 36:770–773.
12. Nauth A, McKee MD, Ristevski B, Hall J, Schemitsch EH. Distal humeral fractures in adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011; 93:686–700.
13. Cheon SJ, Lee DH, Goh TS. Double tension band osteosynthesis in intra-articular fractures of the distal humerus (AO type C) in elderly osteoporotic patients. Clin Shoulder Elbow. 2013; 16:33–39.
14. Riedel BB, Mildren ME, Jobe CM, Wongworawat MD, Phipatanakul WP. Evaluation of the learning curve for reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2010; DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20100225-09. [epub].
15. Kempton LB, Ankerson E, Wiater JM. A complication-based learning curve from 200 reverse shoulder arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011; 469:2496–2504.
16. Liu RW, Roocroft J, Bastrom T, Yaszay B. Surgeon learning curve for pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures. J Pediatr Orthop. 2011; 31:818–824.
XML Download