Journal List > J Korean Fract Soc > v.30(2) > 1038092

Lee and Kim: Bone Substitutes and the Advancement for Enhancing Bone Healing

Abstract

With an aging population and the development of surgical techniques, there is a growing demand for bone reconstruction in areas of trauma, arthroplasty, and spinal fusion Although autogenous bone grafting may be the best method for stimulating bone repair and regeneration, there are still problems and complications, including morbidity related to bone harvesting and limitation of harvest amount. Allogeneic bone grafts have a limited supply and risk of transmission of infectious diseases. Over the past several decades, the use of bone substitutes, such as calcium phosphate, has increased; however, they have limited indications. Biomedical research has suggested a possibility of stimulating the self-healing mechanism by locally transmitting the external growth factors or stimulating local production through a gene transfer. In this review, we evaluate recent advances, including bone graft, bone substitutes, and tissue engineering.

Notes

Financial support None.

Conflict of interests None.

References

1. Goulet JA, Senunas LE, DeSilva GL, Greenfield ML. Autogenous iliac crest bone graft. Complications and functional assessment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997; (339):76–81.
crossref
2. Greenwald AS, Boden SD, Goldberg VM, et al. Bone-graft substitutes: facts, fictions, and applications. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001; 83:Suppl 2 Pt 2. 98–103.
crossref
3. Campana V, Milano G, Pagano E, et al. Bone substitutes in orthopaedic surgery: from basic science to clinical practice. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2014; 25:2445–2461.
crossref
4. Moshiri A, Oryan A. Role of tissue engineering in tendon reconstructive surgery and regenerative medicine: current concepts, approaches and concerns. Hard Tissue. 2012; 1:11.
crossref
5. Garg NK, Gaur S, Sharma S. Percutaneous autogenous bone marrow grafting in 20 cases of ununited fracture. Acta Orthop Scand. 1993; 64:671–672.
crossref
6. Connolly J, Guse R, Lippiello L, Dehne R. Development of an osteogenic bone-marrow preparation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989; 71:684–691.
crossref
7. Connolly JF. Injectable bone marrow preparations to stimulate osteogenic repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995; (313):8–18.
8. Ross R, Raines EW, Bowen-Pope DF. The biology of plateletderived growth factor. Cell. 1986; 46:155–169.
crossref
9. Kitoh H, Kawasumi M, Kaneko H, Ishiguro N. Differential effects of culture-expanded bone marrow cells on the regeneration of bone between the femoral and the tibial lengthenings. J Pediatr Orthop. 2009; 29:643–649.
crossref
10. Manyalich M, Navarro A, Koller J, et al. European quality system for tissue banking. Transplant Proc. 2009; 41:2035–2043.
crossref
11. Shigeyama Y, D'Errico JA, Stone R, Somerman MJ. Commercially-prepared allograft material has biological activity in vitro. J Periodontol. 1995; 66:478–487.
crossref
12. Tomford WW. Transmission of disease through transplantation of musculoskeletal allografts. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995; 77:1742–1754.
crossref
13. Lohmann CH, Andreacchio D, Köster G, et al. Tissue response and osteoinduction of human bone grafts in vivo. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2001; 121:583–590.
crossref
14. Hamer AJ, Strachan JR, Black MM, Ibbotson CJ, Stockley I, Elson RA. Biomechanical properties of cortical allograft bone using a new method of bone strength measurement. A comparison of fresh, fresh-frozen and irradiated bone. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996; 78:363–368.
15. Stevenson S, Emery SE, Goldberg VM. Factors affecting bone graft incorporation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996; (324):66–74.
crossref
16. Sandhu HS, Grewal HS, Parvataneni H. Bone grafting for spinal fusion. Orthop Clin North Am. 1999; 30:685–698.
crossref
17. Enneking WF, Campanacci DA. Retrieved human allografts: a clinicopathological study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001; 83:971–986.
18. Finkemeier CG. Bone-grafting and bone-graft substitutes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002; 84:454–464.
crossref
19. Ullmark G, Obrant KJ. Histology of impacted bone-graft incorporation. J Arthroplasty. 2002; 17:150–157.
crossref
20. Lane JM. Bone morphogenic protein science and studies. J Orthop Trauma. 2005; 19:S17–S22.
crossref
21. Grabowski G, Cornett CA. Bone graft and bone graft substitutes in spine surgery: current concepts and controversies. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2013; 21:51–60.
crossref
22. Wildemann B, Kadow-Romacker A, Pruss A, Haas NP, Schmidmaier G. Quantification of growth factors in allogenic bone grafts extracted with three different methods. Cell Tissue Bank. 2007; 8:107–114.
crossref
23. Niederauer GG, Lee DR, Sankaran S. Bone grafting in arthroscopy and sports medicine. Sports Med Arthrosc. 2006; 14:163–168.
crossref
24. Kinney RC, Ziran BH, Hirshorn K, Schlatterer D, Ganey T. Demineralized bone matrix for fracture healing: fact or fiction? J Orthop Trauma. 2010; 24:Suppl 1. S52–S55.
crossref
25. Blokhuis TJ, Arts JJ. Bioactive and osteoinductive bone graft substitutes: definitions, facts and myths. Injury. 2011; 42:Suppl 2. S26–S29.
crossref
26. Parikh SN. Bone graft substitutes in modern orthopedics. Orthopedics. 2002; 25:1301–1309. quiz 1310-1311.
crossref
27. Moore DC, Chapman MW, Manske D. The evaluation of a biphasic calcium phosphate ceramic for use in grafting long-bone diaphyseal defects. J Orthop Res. 1987; 5:356–365.
28. Zwingenberger S, Nich C, Valladares RD, Yao Z, Stiehler M, Goodman SB. Recommendations and considerations for the use of biologics in orthopedic surgery. BioDrugs. 2012; 26:245–256.
crossref
29. Tay BK, Patel VV, Bradford DS. Calcium sulfate- and calcium phosphate-based bone substitutes. Mimicry of the mineral phase of bone. Orthop Clin North Am. 1999; 30:615–623.
30. Urist MR. Bone: formation by autoinduction. Science. 1965; 150:893–899.
crossref
31. Bishop GB, Einhorn TA. Current and future clinical applications of bone morphogenetic proteins in orthopaedic trauma surgery. Int Orthop. 2007; 31:721–727.
crossref
32. Slosar PJ, Josey R, Reynolds J. Accelerating lumbar fusions by combining rhBMP-2 with allograft bone: a prospective analysis of interbody fusion rates and clinical outcomes. Spine J. 2007; 7:301–307.
crossref
33. Govender S, Csimma C, Genant HK, et al. Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 for treatment of open tibial fractures: a prospective, controlled, randomized study of four hundred and fifty patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002; 84:2123–2134.
crossref
34. Friedlaender GE, Perry CR, Cole JD, et al. Osteogenic protein-1 (bone morphogenetic protein-7) in the treatment of tibial nonunions. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001; 83:Suppl 1. S151–S158.
crossref
35. Baas J, Elmengaard B, Jensen TB, Jakobsen T, Andersen NT, Soballe K. The effect of pretreating morselized allograft bone with rhBMP-2 and/or pamidronate on the fixation of porous Ti and HA-coated implants. Biomaterials. 2008; 29:2915–2922.
36. Shields LB, Raque GH, Glassman SD, et al. Adverse effects associated with high-dose recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 use in anterior cervical spine fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006; 31:542–547.
crossref
37. Holland TA, Mikos AG. Biodegradable polymeric scaffolds. Improvements in bone tissue engineering through controlled drug delivery. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. 2006; 102:161–185.
38. Doll B, Sfeir C, Winn S, Huard J, Hollinger J. Critical aspects of tissue-engineered therapy for bone regeneration. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr. 2001; 11:173–198.
39. Rezwan K, Chen QZ, Blaker JJ, Boccaccini AR. Biodegradable and bioactive porous polymer/inorganic composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2006; 27:3413–3431.
crossref
40. Nie H, Wang CH. Fabrication and characterization of PLGA/HAp composite scaffolds for delivery of BMP-2 plasmid DNA. J Control Release. 2007; 120:111–121.
crossref
41. Lattanzi W, Parrilla C, Fetoni A, et al. Ex vivo-transduced autologous skin fibroblasts expressing human Lim mineralization protein-3 efficiently form new bone in animal models. Gene Ther. 2008; 15:1330–1343.
crossref
42. Caplan AI. Mesenchymal stem cells and gene therapy. Clin Orthop. 2000; 379 Suppl. S67–S70.
crossref
43. Evans C. Gene therapy for the regeneration of bone. Injury. 2011; 42:599–604.
crossref
44. Prockop DJ, Oh JY. Medical therapies with adult stem/progenitor cells (MSCs): a backward journey from dramatic results in vivo to the cellular and molecular explanations. J Cell Biochem. 2012; 113:1460–1469.
crossref
45. Parrilla C, Saulnier N, Bernardini C, et al. Undifferentiated human adipose tissue-derived stromal cells induce mandibular bone healing in rats. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011; 137:463–470.
crossref
46. Barba M, Cicione C, Bernardini C, et al. Spinal fusion in the next generation: gene and cell therapy approaches. ScientificWorldJournal. 2014; 2014:406159.
crossref
47. Murray TM, Rao LG, Divieti P, Bringhurst FR. Parathyroid hormone secretion and action: evidence for discrete receptors for the carboxyl-terminal region and related biological actions of carboxyl-terminal ligands. Endocr Rev. 2005; 26:78–113.
crossref
48. Neer RM, Arnaud CD, Zanchetta JR, et al. Effect of parathyroid hormone (1-34) on fractures and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2001; 344:1434–1441.
crossref
49. Aspenberg P, Genant HK, Johansson T, et al. Teriparatide for acceleration of fracture repair in humans: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study of 102 postmenopausal women with distal radial fractures. J Bone Miner Res. 2010; 25:404–414.
crossref
50. Aspenberg P, Malouf J, Tarantino U, et al. Effects of Teriparatide compared with Risedronate on recovery after Pertrochanteric hip fracture: results of a randomized, active-controlled, double-blind clinical trial at 26 weeks. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016; 98:1868–1878.
crossref
51. Bhandari M, Jin L, See K, et al. Does Teriparatide improve femoral neck fracture healing: results from a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016; 474:1234–1244.
crossref
52. Ha YC, Park YG, Nam KW, Kim SR. Trend in hip fracture incidence and mortality in Korea: a prospective cohort study from 2002 to 2011. J Korean Med Sci. 2015; 30:483–488.
crossref
53. Hadji P, Zanchetta JR, Russo L, et al. The effect of teriparatide compared with risedronate on reduction of back pain in postmenopausal women with osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2012; 23:2141–2150.
crossref
54. Huang TW, Chuang PY, Lin SJ, et al. Teriparatide improves fracture healing and early functional recovery in treatment of osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016; 95:e3626.
crossref
55. Johansson T. PTH 1-34 (teriparatide) may not improve healing in proximal humerus fractures: a randomized, controlled study of 40 patients. Acta Orthop. 2016; 87:79–82.
crossref
56. Peichl P, Holzer LA, Maier R, Holzer G. Parathyroid hormone 1-84 accelerates fracture-healing in pubic bones of elderly osteoporotic women. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011; 93:1583–1587.
crossref
57. Song HK, Kim SJ, Lee JH, Yang KH. Intermittent parathyroid hormone treatment for stimulation of callus formation in elderly patients. J Korean Fract Soc. 2012; 25:295–299.
crossref
58. Tsuchie H, Miyakoshi N, Kasukawa Y, et al. The effect of teriparatide to alleviate pain and to prevent vertebral collapse after fresh osteoporotic vertebral fracture. J Bone Miner Metab. 2016; 34:86–91.
crossref
59. Romano CL, Romano D, Logoluso N. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound for the treatment of bone delayed union or nonunion: a review. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2009; 35:529–536.
crossref
60. Rutten S, Nolte PA, Korstjens CM, van Duin MA, Klein-Nulend J. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound increases bone volume, osteoid thickness and mineral apposition rate in the area of fracture healing in patients with a delayed union of the osteotomized fibula. Bone. 2008; 43:348–354.
crossref
61. Brydone AS, Meek D, Maclaine S. Bone grafting, orthopaedic biomaterials, and the clinical need for bone engineering. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2010; 224:1329–1343.
crossref
TOOLS
Similar articles