Abstract
Purpose
The aim of this study is to decide the optimal level of fusion with comparing the results between the short segment fusion and long segment fusion treated with pedicle screw instrumentation, including fractured vertebra in thoracolumbar junctional fractures.
Materials and Methods
From February 2000 to November 2009, fifty three patients with junctional fracture of thoracolumbar spine were treated with pedicle screws and posterior fusion at our hospital. They were divided into two groups, the short segment group and long segment group. Preoperatively, immediate postoperative and last follow-up lateral radiological evaluation was done by measuring the correction and loss of segmental kyphosis, wedge angle, body compression rate and instrumented vertebra angle. In addition, operation time and amount of intraoperative bleeding were measured.
Results
There were no significant differences of statistical analysis regarding the radiological variables between the two groups, especially the loss of corrected segmental kyphosis, wedge angle, body compression rate and instrumented vertebra angle (p>0.05). However, operative time in the short segment group (234 minutes) was shorter than the long segment group (284 minutes), and there was statistical significance (p=0.002).
Figures and Tables
References
1. Been HD, Bouma GJ. Comparison of two types of surgery for thoraco-lumbar burst fractures: combined anterior and posterior stabilisation vs. posterior instrumentation only. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1999. 141:349–357.
2. Carl AL, Tromanhauser SG, Roger DJ. Pedicle screw instrumentation for thoracolumbar burst fractures and fracture-dislocations. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1992. 17:S317–S324.
3. Chung JY, Rhym IS. Short segment transpedicular cotrel-dubousset instrumentation including involved vertebra for fractures of thoracic and lumbar spine. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 1994. 29:940–948.
4. Cotrel Y, Dubousset J, Guillaumat M. New universal instrumentation in spinal surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988. 227:10–23.
5. Jeong ST, Cho SH, Song HR, Koo KH, Park HB, Chung UH. Comparison of short and long-segment fusion in thoracic and lumbar fractures. J Korean Soc Spine Surg. 1999. 6:73–80.
6. Krag MH. Biomechanics of thoracolumbar spinal fixation. A review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991. 16:S84–S99.
7. Lee CS, Chung SS, Jung HW, Kim ES. Decision of posterior fixation level by load-sharing classification in thoracolumbar and lumbar burst fracture. J Korean Soc Spine Surg. 2001. 8:27–38.
8. Mann KA, McGowan DP, Fredrickson BE, Falahee M, Yuan HA. A biomechanical investigation of short segment spinal fixation for burst fractures with varying degrees of posterior disruption. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990. 15:470–478.
9. McCormack T, Karaikovic E, Gaines RW. The load sharing classification of spine fractures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994. 19:1741–1744.
10. McLain RF, Sparling E, Benson DR. Early failure of short-segment pedicle instrumentation for thoracolumbar fractures. A preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993. 75:162–167.
11. Parker JW, Lane JR, Karaikovic EE, Gaines RW. Successful short-segment instrumentation and fusion for thoracolumbar spine fractures: a consecutive 41/2-year series. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000. 25:1157–1170.
12. Roy-Camille R, Saillant G, Mazel C. Internal fixation of the lumbar spine with pedicle screw plating. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986. (203):7–17.
13. Shono Y, McAfee PC, Cunningham BW. Experimental study of thoracolumbar burst fractures. A radiographic and biomechanical analysis of anterior and posterior instrumentation systems. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994. 19:1711–1722.