Abstract
Purpose
This study is a retrospective analysis of patients who had undergone surgical treatment for non-union of distal humerus fracture. We evaluated them in terms of causes of injury, radiologic findings, and clinical outcomes such as prognosis.
Materials and Methods
Seven consecutive radiologic patients who were confirmed to have nonunion of a distal humerus fracture underwent reoperations. These patients had already undergone operations for distal humerus fractures. This survey was held from 2005 to 2010. The average period up to diagnosis of non-union after the first operation was 7.4 months (4 to 16 months). The mean follow-up period was 24.6 months (12 to 65 months). Each patient was graded functionally according to the Mayo Elbow Performance Score and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score.
Results
Osteosynthesis was performed by internal fixation with plates and screws and then a bone graft for non-union of the distal humerus fracture. The average range of motion within the elbow joints was found to be a flexion contracture of 18.8 degrees (0~30 degrees) and further flexion of 120.2 degrees (102~140 degrees). Among postoperative complications, three cases of medium-degree stiffness, two cases of medial column nonunion, and one case of dissociation of the internal fixator were reported.
Figures and Tables
Fig. 1
(A) A 70-year-old woman who had a closed AO type-C2 fracture.
(B) The patient was treated with internal fixation with two plates and screws and allogenous bone graft.
(C) Follow-up at 6 months after an initial treatment by open reduction and internal fixation using two Acumed® plates with allo bone graft. The anteroposterior and lateral radiographs reveal a nonunion of the medial condyle with a slight callus (arrows).
(D) Radiographs made 10 months after treatment of the non-union by internal fixation with additional double Acumed® plates and autologous iliac bone-grafting. The anteroposterior and flexion-extension radiographs show good healing and the functional results were good.
![jkfs-25-310-g001](/upload/SynapseData/ArticleImage/0104jkfs/jkfs-25-310-g001.jpg)
Fig. 2
(A) A 69-year-old woman sustained a closed AO type C3 fracture.
(B) The patient was treated with open reduction and internal fixation with plates and allogenous bone-grafting.
(C) Follow-up at 6 months after initial treatment. The anteroposterior and lateral radiographs showing the nonunion of the medial condyle and breakage of the plate (arrows).
(D) The patient was treated with total elbow arthroplasty.
![jkfs-25-310-g002](/upload/SynapseData/ArticleImage/0104jkfs/jkfs-25-310-g002.jpg)
References
1. Ackerman G, Jupiter JB. Non-union of fractures of the distal end of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988. 70:75–83.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
2. Brown RF, Morgan RG. Intercondylar T-shaped fractures of the humerus. Results in ten cases treated by early mobilisation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1971. 53:425–428.
4. Caja VL, Moroni A, Vendemia V, Sàbato C, Zinghi G. Surgical treatment of bicondylar fractures of the distal humerus. Injury. 1994. 25:433–438.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
5. Cassebaum WH. Operative treatment of T and Y fractures of the lower end of the humerus. Am J Surg. 1952. 83:265–270.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
7. Helfet DL, Kloen P, Anand N, Rosen HS. Open reduction and internal fixation of delayed unions and nonunions of fractures of the distal part of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003. 85-A:33–40.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
8. Helfet DL, Schmeling GJ. Bicondylar intraarticular fractures of the distal humerus in adults. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993. (292):26–36.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
9. Henley MB, Bone LB, Parker B. Operative management of intra-articular fractures of the distal humerus. J Orthop Trauma. 1987. 1:24–35.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
10. Hoppenfeld S, deBoer P. Surgical exposures in orthopaedics: the anatomic approach. 2009. 4nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott;73–110.
12. Jupiter JB. Complex fractures of the distal part of the humerus and associated complications. Instr Course Lect. 1995. 44:187–198.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
13. Jupiter JB, Neff U, Holzach P, Allgöwer M. Intercondylar fractures of the humerus. An operative approach. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985. 67:226–239.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
14. Kinik H, Atalar H, Mergen E. Management of distal humerus fractures in adults. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1999. 119:467–469.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
15. Kundel K, Braun W, Wieberneit J, Rüter A. Intraarticular distal humerus fractures. Factors affecting functional outcome. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996. (332):200–208.
16. Lob G, Burri C, Feil J. Operative treatment of distal intra-articular humerus fractures; results of 412 follow-up cases (AO-collected statistics). Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1984. 364:359–361.
17. Mitsunaga MM, Bryan RS, Linscheid RL. Condylar nonunions of the elbow. J Trauma. 1982. 22:787–791.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
18. Morrey BF, Bryan RS, Dobyns JH, Linscheid RL. Total elbow arthroplasty. A five-year experience at the Mayo Clinic. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981. 63:1050–1063.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
19. Otsuka NY, McKee MD, Liew A, et al. The effect of comorbidity and duration of nonunion on outcome after surgical treatment for nonunion of the humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1998. 7:127–133.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
20. Papaioannou N, Babis GC, Kalavritinos J, Pantazopoulos T. Operative treatment of type C intra-articular fractures of the distal humerus: the role of stability achieved at surgery on final outcome. Injury. 1995. 26:169–173.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
21. Regel G, Seekamp A, Blauth M, Zuleger A, Tscherne H. Elbow para-articular pseudarthrosis. Etiology and treatment. Unfallchirurg. 1998. 101:193–200.
22. Ring D, Jupiter JB. Complex fractures of the distal humerus and their complications. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999. 8:85–97.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
23. Sanders RA, Sackett JR. Open reduction and internal fixation of delayed union and nonunion of the distal humerus. J Orthop Trauma. 1990. 4:254–259.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
25. Södergård J, Sandelin J, Böstman O. Postoperative complications of distal humeral fractures. 27/96 adults followed up for 6 (2-10) years. Acta Orthop Scand. 1992. 63:85–89.