Abstract
Purpose
To study clinical results and complications in the treatment of infected nonunion of the tibia according to location of nonunion and reconstruction for soft tissue defect.
Materials and Methods
36 cases of tibia infected nonunion which were treated with the llizarov included in this study. There were proximal 1/3 in 14, middle 1/3 in 10, and distal 1/3 in 11 cases. Coverage of the soft tissue were treated with the free flap in 8 cases as classified group A and non-free flap in 17 cases classified group B. We evaluated the healing index, complications and comparing the results of each treatment by the Paley method.
Results
Bone union was achieved in all cases. The proximal nonunion showed better results than those in the middle and distal area; average healing index: 35.6 days/cm (p=0.038), bone results: 92.9% (p=0.025), functional result: 90.5% (p=0.03). Group B showed significantly better results as it showed average healing index: 30.3 days/cm (p=0.015), bone results: 85.7% (p=0.025), functional results: 90.5% (p=0.015).
References
1. Alt V, Meeder PJ, Seligson D, Schad A, Atienza C Jr. The proximal tibia metaphysic: a reliable donor site for bone grafting? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003. 414:315–321.
2. Aronson J, Johnson E, Harp JH. Local bone transportation for treatment of intercalary defects by the Ilizarov technique. Biomechanical and clinical considerations. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989. 243:71–79.
3. Cattaneo R, Catagni M, Johnson EE. The treatment of infected nonunions and segmental defects of the tibia by the methods of Ilizarov. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992. 280:143–152.
4. DeCoster TA, Gehlert RJ, Mikola EA, Pirela-Cruz MA. Management of posttraumatic segmental bone defects. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2004. 12:28–38.
5. Dendrinos GK, Kontos S, Lyristsis E. Use of the Ilizarov technique for treatment of non-union of the tibia associated with infection. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995. 77:835–846.
6. Duman H, Sengezer M, Celikoz B, Turegun M, Isik S. Lower extremity salvage using a free flap associated with the Ilizarov method in patients with massive combat injuries. Ann Plast Surg. 2001. 46:108–112.
7. Freeland AE, Mutz SB. Posterior bone grafting for infected ununited fractures of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976. 58:653–657.
8. Gordon L, Chiu EJ. Treatment of infected nonunions and segmental defects of the tibia with staged microvascular muscle transplantation and bone-grafting. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988. 70:377–386.
9. Gustilo RB, Merkow RL, Templeman D. The management of open fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990. 72:299–304.
10. Hahn SB, Park YW, Park HW, Kim HW, Kim BH. Comparison of treating tibial nonunion with bone and soft tissue defect: Ilizarov only versus free flap and Ilizarov. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 2002. 37:754–758.
11. Ilizarov GA. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues. Part II. The influence of rate and frequency of distraction. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989. 239:263–285.
12. Jupiter JB, Kour AK, Palumbo MD, Yaremchuk MJ. Limb reconstruction by free-tissue transfer combined with the Ilizarov method. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991. 88:943–954.
13. Lowenberg DW, Feibel RJ, Louie KW, Eshima I. Combined muscle flap and Ilizarov reconstruction for bone and soft tissue defects. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996. 332:37–51.
14. Maini L, Chadha M, Vishwanath J, Kapoor S, Mehtani A, Dhaon BK. The Ilizarov method in infected nonunion of fractures. Injury. 2000. 31:509–517.
15. Paley D. Problems, obstacles and complication of limb lengthening by the ilizarov technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990. 250:81–104.
16. Paley D, Catagni MA, Argnani F, Villa A, Bennedetti GB, Cattaneo R. Ilizarov treatment of tibial nonunions with bone loss. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989. 241:146–165.
17. Schöttle PB, Werner CM, Dumount CR. Two-stage reconstruction with free vascularized soft tissue transfer and conventional bone graft for infected nonunions of the tibia: 6 patients followed for 1.5 to 5 years. Acta Orthop. 2005. 76:878–883.