Journal List > J Korean Fract Soc > v.22(3) > 1037695

Shin, Byun, Chang, Yun, Park, and Park: The Surgical Outcomes of Isolated Greater Tuberosity Fractures of the Proximal Humerus Fixed with the Spring Plate

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes of isolated greater tuberosity fractures of the proximal humerus fixed with the spring plates.

Materials and Methods

Fourteen patients who could be followed up at least 1 year after the surgical treatment of isolated greater tuberosity fracture were evaluated. Their mean age was 51 years (range, 25~73 years). The deltopectoral approach and fixation with the spring plate were performed in all cases. The spring plate was used in all cases. In some circumstances, sutures incorporating the rotator cuff, interfragmentary screw or tension band wire were added. We evaluated the clinical outcomes using UCLA scoring system and KSS (Korean Shoulder Score).

Results

The mean UCLA score was 29.8 and the mean KSS was 89.4. The average time of bony union was 10.2 weeks (range, 7~14 weeks) after the surgery, including 1 case that was performed the secondary operation due to metal failure. The shoulder stiffness were observed in 4 cases and one case of infection was treated well without operation.

Conclusion

In the treatment of isolated greater tuberosity fractures of the proximal humerus, the spring plates fixation can be a good surgical option providing reliable functional results.

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1
(A~D) These photographs show the manufacturing process of spring plate. A appropriate-sized 1/3 tubular plate was selected, and cut at the end of screw hole.
jkfs-22-159-g001
Fig. 2
A 49-years-old male sustained a isolated greater tuberosity fracture of the proximal humerus by a fall on the ground.
(A) Preoperative radiograph shows a displaced greater tuberosity fracture of the proximal humerus.
(B) Postoperative immediate radiograph shows good reduction and fixation of the fracture with a spring plate.
(C) Postoperative 7 weeks radiograph shows solid union without implant loosening and loss of reduction.
(D~G) Photographs show near symmetric full forward flexion and internal rotation at final follow-up (postoperative 12 months).
jkfs-22-159-g002
Fig. 3
A 44-years-old male sustained multiple extremity fractures and subdural hemorrhage by a fall from a height. He lost his consciousness for several weeks.
(A) Eight weeks after trauma, a displaced greater tuberosity fracture of the proximal humerus was noticed on radiograph.
(B, C) Reconstructed three-dimensional computerized tomography scans show marked displacement of fracture fragment impinging into subacromial space.
(D) Postoperative immediate radiograph shows good reduction and fixation of the fracture with a spring plate.
(E) Postoperative 13 weeks radiograph shows solid union without implant loosening and loss of reduction.
jkfs-22-159-g003
Table 1
Patient demographics
jkfs-22-159-i001

M: Male, F: Female, DM: Diabetus mellitus, RA: Rheumatoid arthritis, HTN: Hypertension, MF: Multiple fracture, SD: Shoulder dislocation, SDH: Subdural hemorrhage, BPI: Brachial plexus injury, TBW: Tension band wire.

References

1. Bono CM, Reonard R, Levine RG, Levy AS. Effect of displacement of fractures of the greater tuberosity on the mechanics of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001; 83:1056–1062.
crossref
2. Brien WW, Gellman H, Becker V, Garland DE, Waters RL, Wiss DA. Management of fractures of the humerus in patients who have an injury of the ipsilateral brachial plexus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990; 72:1208–1210.
crossref
3. Chun JM, Kim SY, Oh SK, Kim JH, Choi JH. Deltopectoral approach for the operative treatment of fracture of the greater tuberosity of the proximal humerus. J Korean Soc Surg Hand. 2003; 8:28–32.
4. Constant CR, Murley AH. A Clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987; 214:160–164.
crossref
5. Flatow EL, Cuomo F, Maday MG, Miller SR, Mcllveen SJ, Bigliani LU. Open reduction and internal fixation of two-part displaced fractures of the greater tuberosity of the proximal part of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991; 73:1213–1218.
crossref
6. Green A, Izzi J. Isolated fractures of the greater tuberosity of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003; 12:641–649.
crossref
7. Han SB, Park SW, Lee SH, Chung JW, Choi GW. The use of spring plates in management of acetabular posterior wall fractures. J Korean Hip Soc. 2005; 17:217–222.
8. Haryman DT II. Common surgical approaches to the shoulder In instructional course lectures. The America academy of orthopaedic surgeons. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Harper Row;1982. p. 309.
9. Iannotti JP, Garbriel JP, Schneck SL, Evans BG, Misra S. The normal glenohumeral relationships. An anatoimical study of on hundred and forty shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992; 74:491–500.
crossref
10. Ihn JC, Kim PT, Shin DK. Hooked spring plate: its uses in posterior wall acetabular fracture fixation. J Korean Soc Fract. 1994; 7:606–615.
crossref
11. Ji JH, Kim YY, Kim WY, Park SE, Ra KH, Do JH. Arthroscopic treatment of greater tuberosity fracture-Preliminary Report-. J Korean Orthop Soc Sports Med. 2007; 6:57–65.
12. Kim E, Shin HK, Kim CH. Characteristics of an isolated greater tuberosity fracture of the humerus. J Orthop Sci. 2005; 10:441–444.
crossref
13. Keen WW. I. Fracture of the greater tuberosity of the humerus, with dislocation of the humerus into the axilla. Immediate reduction of dislocation. On seventh day nailing of fragment of tuberosity in place. Ann Surg. 1907; 45:938–944.
crossref
14. Lee KJ, Choi CH, Kim JM, et al. The Shoulder and elbow. 1st ed. Seoul, Korea: Young-Chang;2007. p. 676–679.
15. Lee KJ, Choi CH, Kim JM, et al. The Shoulder and elbow. 1st ed. Seoul, Korea: Young-Chang;2007. p. 290–291.
16. McLaughlin HL. Dislocation of the shoulder with tuberosity fracture. Surg Clin North Am. 1963; 43:1615–1620.
crossref
17. Moon ES, Kim MS, Kim YJ. The surgical outcomes for isolated greater tuberosity fracture of proximal humerus. J Korean Fract Soc. 2007; 20:239–245.
crossref
18. Neer CS 2nd. Displaced humeral fractures. II. Treatment of three-part and four-part displacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970; 52:1090–1103.
19. Neer CS 2nd. Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I Classification and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970; 52:1077–1089.
20. Olivier H, Dupare G, Romain F. Fractures of the greater tuberosity of the humerus. Orthop Trans. 1986; 10:223.
21. Park MC, Murthi AM, Roth NS, Blaine TA, Levine WN, Bigliani LU. Two-part and three-part fractures of the proximal humerus treated with suture fixation. J Orthop Trauma. 2003; 17:319–325.
crossref
22. Park TS, Choi IY, Kim YH, Park MR, Shon JH, Kim SI. A new suggestion for the treatment of minimally displaced fractures of the greater tuberosity of the proximal humerus. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 1997; 56:171–176.
23. Park TS, Kim TS, Park YS, Kim DH, Kang CN, Whang KS. The treatment of one-part fractures of the greater tuberosity of the proximal humerus. J Korean Shoulder Elbow Soc. 1999; 2:21–27.
24. Crichlow RJ, Andres PL, Morrison SM, Haley SM, Vrahas MS. Depression in orthopaedic trauma patients. Prevalence and severity. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006; 88:1927–1933.
crossref
25. Santee HE. Fractrues about the upper end of humerus. Ann Surg. 1924; 80:103–114.
TOOLS
Similar articles