Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Plate Osteosynthesis Using Periarticular Plate for Distal Tibial Fractures

Young Mo Kim; Jae Hoon Yang; Dong Kyu Kim

doi:10.12671/jkfs.2007.20.4.315

Journal List > J Korean Fract Soc > v.20(4) > 1037604

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

TOOLS

Kim, Yang, and Kim: Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Plate Osteosynthesis Using Periarticular Plate for Distal Tibial Fractures

Original Article

Journal of the Korean Fracture Society 2007; 20(4): 315-322.

Published online: 14 June 2016

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2007.20.4.315

Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Plate Osteosynthesis Using Periarticular Plate for Distal Tibial Fractures

Young Mo Kim, M.D., Jae Hoon Yang, M.D., Dong Kyu Kim, M.D.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea.

Address reprint requests to: Young-Mo Kim, M.D. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, 640, Daesa-dong, Jung-gu, Daejeon 301-721, Korea. Tel: 82-42-280-7352, Fax: 82-42-252-7098, osdr69@cnu.ac.kr

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the clinical results of minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis using a periarticular plate (Zimmer, Warsaw, IN, USA) for distal tibia fractures.

Materials and Methods

27 patients with distal tibia fractures were treated operatively by minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis. The patients were followed for at least 1 year. The duration for bone union, complications after the surgery, the amount of skin irritation at the site of plate insertion was evaluated using the VAS score and the Olerud and Molander ankle score. The average age of the patients was 56 years old (range, 30~81 years) with an average follow up period of 21 months (range, 12~30 months).

Results

The average time from trauma to surgery was 6 days (range, 2~19 days). 10 cases showed an associated distal fibular fracture. The average time for bone fusion was 14 weeks (range, 8~40 weeks) with 1 case of angular deformity with more than 5 degrees. The amount of skin irritation due to the periarticular plate resulted in a VAS score of 2.2 points. Evaluation of the ankle function test showed an average of 90.2 points, resulting in satisfactory.

Conclusion

The periarticular plate used in minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis for distal tibia fractures was concluded to give a firm fixation of the fracture site as bony fusion could be acquired without any callus formation, and few skin irritation due to plate has seem to be an advantage.

Keywords: Distal tibia, Fracture, Minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO), Periarticular plate

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1

A 81 year old woman sustained a fracture of right distal tibia after slip down injury.

(A) A periarticular plate which has at least 4 holes to insert screws above the fractured surface was used.

(B) The plate was inserted between the periosteum and subcutaneous tissue anteromedially started from the medial malleolus of distal tibia.

(C) The location and size of plate, and the reduced fracture site was verified by C-arm.

(D) Percutaneous screw fixation through the medial malleolus of distal tibia region was performed.

(E) Postoperative radiograph shows satisfactory position of screws.

Fig. 2

A 56 year old woman sustained a fracture of right distal tibia after slip down injury.

(A) Preoperative radiograph show right distal tibia fracture.

(B) Postoperative radiograph show the periarticular plate fixed on the fracture site.

(C) Thirty-two week postoperative radiograph after metal removal shows 6° varus angulation deformity.

Fig. 3

A 70 year old man sustained a fracture of left distal tibia after traffic accident.

(A) Preoperative radiograph show left distal tibia fracture.

(B) Postoperative radiograph after minimally invasive percutaneous internal fixation with periarticular plate.

(C) The ninety week postoperative radiograph after metal removal shows stable bony union without any callus formation.

Table 1

Dermographic data of the patients

^*SD: Slip down, ^†TA: Traffic accident, ^‡VAST: Visual Analogue Score (Touch), ^§VASD: Visual Analogue Score (Daily living), ^∥G: Good, ^¶S: Satisfying, ^**U: Unsatisfying

References

1. Asche G. Result of the treatment of femoral and tibial fractures following interlocking nailing and plate osteosynthesis. A comparative retrospective study. Zentralbl Chir. 1989; 114:1146–1154.

2. Baumgaertel F, Buhl M, Rahn BA. Fracture healing in biological plate osteosynthesis. Injury. 1998; 29:Suppl 3. C3–6.

3. Bolhofner BR, Carmen B, Clifford P. The results of open reduction and internal fixation of distal femur fractures using a biological (indirect) reduction technique. J Orthop Trauma. 1996; 10:372–377.

4. Bostman O, Hanninen A. The fibular reciprocal fracture in tibial shaft fractures caused by indirect violence. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1982; 100:115–121.

5. Bradley GW, Mckenna GB, Dunn HK, Daniels AU, Statton WO. Effects of flexural rigidity of plates on bone healing. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979; 61:866–872.

6. Brumback RJ, McGarvey WC. Fractures of the tibial plafond. Orthop Clin North Am. 1995; 26:273–285.

7. Chang SA, Ahn HS, Byun YS, Kim JH, Bang HH, Kwon DY. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in unstable fractures of the distal tibia. J Korean Fract Soc. 2005; 18:155–159.

8. Chrisovitsinos JP, Xenakis T, Papakostides KG, Skaltsoyannis N, Grestas A, Soucacos PN. Bridge plating osteosynthesis of 20 comminuted fractures of the femur. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1997; 275:72–76.

9. Claes L, Heitemeyer U, Krischak G, Braun H, Hierholzer G. Fixation technique influence osteogenesis of comminuted fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999; 365:221–229.

10. Farouk O, Krettek C, Miclau T, Schandelmaier P, Tscherne H. The topography of the perforating vessels of the deep femoral artery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999; 368:255–259.

11. Farouk O, Krettek C, Miclau T, Schandelmaier P, Guy P, Tscherne H. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis: Dose percutaneous plating disrupt femoral blood supply less then the traditional technique. J Orthop Trauma. 1999; 13:401–406.

12. Gerber C, Mast JW, Ganz R. Biological internal fixation of fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1990; 109:295–303.

13. Johner R, Wruhs O. Classification of tibial shaft fractures and correlation with results after internal fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983; 178:7–25.

14. Khoury A, Liebergall M, Mosheiff R, London E. Percutaneous plating of distal tibia fracture. Foot Ankle Int. 2002; 23:818–824.

15. Krettek C, Schandelmaier P, Miclau T, Tscherne H. Minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis(MIPPO) using the DCS in proximal and distal femoral fractures. Injury. 1997; 28:Suppl 1. A20–30.

16. McFerran MA, Smith SW, Boulas HJ, Schwartz HS. Complications encountered in the treatment of pilon fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 1992; 6:195–200.

17. Mckibbin B. The biology of fracture healing in long bones. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1978; 60:150–162.

18. Melis GC, Sotgiu F, Lepori M, Guido P. Intramedullary nailing in segmental tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981; 63:1310–1318.

19. Olerud C, Molander H. A scoring scale for symptoms evaluation after ankle fracture. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1984; 103:190–194.

20. Park KC, Park YS. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for distal tibial metaphyseal fracture. J Korean Fract Soc. 2005; 18:264–268.

21. Phieffer LS, Goulet JA. Delayed unions of the Tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006; 88:206–216.

22. Puno RM, Teynor JT, Nagano J, Gustilo RB. Critical analysis of result of 201 tibial shaft fracture. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986; 212:113–121.

23. Rozbruch SR, Muller U, Gautier E, Ganz R. The evolution of femoral shaft plating technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998; 354:195–208.

24. Wenda K, Runkel M, Degrief J, Rudig L. Minimally invasive plate fixation in femoral shaft fractures. Injury. 1997; 28:Suppl 1. A13–A19.

TOOLS

Similar articles