Journal List > Korean J Women Health Nurs > v.16(3) > 1037238

Ko: Predictors of Intention to Report Elder Abuse among Elderly Women

Abstract

Purpose

This study was designed to identify the predictors of elderly women's intention to report elder abuse.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey design was used. The participants were 204 elderly women aged over 60 living in Seoul. Data were collected using self-reported questionnaires by convenience sampling. Data were analyzed with frequencies, χ2 test, t-test and binary logistic regression.

Results

Logistic regression analyses showed perception of elderly welfare law, perception of seriousness of elder abuse, subjective economic status, and exposure to elder abuse information were significant predictors of elderly women's intention to report elder abuse.

Conclusion

The results of study suggest that the provision of information related to elder abuse including elderly welfare law is crucial toward elderly women in preventing elder abuse.

Figures and Tables

Table 1
Frequency of Intention to Report (N=204)
kjwhn-16-245-i001
Table 2
Differences in Intention to Report by Sociodemographic Characteristics of Participants (N=204)
kjwhn-16-245-i002

Note. % of valid n for each variable(missing excluded).

Table 3
Differences in Intention to Report by Elder Abuse-related Characteristics (N=204)
kjwhn-16-245-i003

Note. % of valid n for each variable(missing excluded).

Table 4
Predictive Factors of Intention to Report by Logistic Regression
kjwhn-16-245-i004

CI=confidence interval.

References

1. Allan M.A. Elder abuse: A challenge for home care nurses. Home Health Care Nurse. 2002. 20(5):323–330.
crossref
2. Choi H.K. A study of perceptions on elder abuse andhelp-seeking patterns. Jeonju University Studies. 1993. 22:273–286.
3. Cotten S.R. Marital status and mental health revisited. Family Relations. 1999. 48(3):225–233.
4. Feng J., Levin M. Factors associated with nurses' intention to report child abuse: A national survey of Taiwanese nurse. Child Abuse & Neglect. 2005. 29:783–795.
5. Han E.J. An ecological study on causes of elder abuse. 2000. Seoul: Sungshin Women's University;Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
6. Huh N.S. The factors that affect the reporting behavior of mandated reporter. Korean Journal of Social Welfare. 2003. 53:209–230.
7. Jang Y., Lee J., Yoon H., Kim S. Determinants of sense of control in later life. Journal of the Korean Gerontological Society. 2008. 28(4):1055–1068.
8. Jo A.J. Elderly abuse and what to do about it. Health and Welfare Policy Forum. 2008. 143:16–29.
9. Jung S.K. A research for reporter recognition level of elder abuse of responsible person and countermove behavior. 2007. Busan: Silla University;Unpublished master's thesis.
10. Kim H.J., Joh H.K., Kwon H.K., Do H.J., Oh S.W., Lym Y.L., et al. Concern in and utilization of the mass media health information in community-dwelling elderly. Korean Journal of Family Medicine. 2009. 30(6):426–439.
crossref
11. Kim M. Factors affecting on the depressive symptoms of older women in the USA: The comparison between married and widowed. Journal of the Korea Gerontological Society. 2004. 24(4):147–164.
12. King G., Reece R., Patel V. The effects of sociodemographic variables, training and attitudes on the lifetime reporting practices of mandated reporters. Child Maltreat. 1998. 3(3):276–283.
crossref
13. Ko C.M. A study of nurses' characteristics and their perception of seriousness of elder abuse. Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals Nursing. 2010. 17(1):109–118.
14. Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs. A study on elder abuse cases: Focused on elderlies utilizing elderly welfare center of six metropolitan area. 1999. Seoul: Korea: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs.
15. Population Projection for Korea. Korea National Statistical Office. 2006. Retrieved June 20, 2010. from Web site: http://www.kosis.kr/OLAP/Analysis/stat_OLAP.jsp.
16. Kosberg J.I. Preventing elder abuse identification of high risk factors prior to placement decisions. The Gerontologist. 1988. 28(1):43–50.
crossref
17. Lee Y.H. The impact of elder abuse risk factors and characteristics on the effects of elder abuse. Journal of the Korea Gerontological Society. 2003. 23(2):105–123.
18. Lee Y.H. Elder abuse, risk factors and consequences. 2005. Kyungi: Korean Studies Information Co. Ltd.
19. Ministry for Health, Welfare and Family Affairs. A report of elder abuse cases. 2009. Seoul: Korea: Korea Elder Protection Agency.
20. Moon A., Benton D. Tolerance of elder abuse and attitudes toward third-party intervention among African American, Korean American, and White elderly. Journal of Multicultural Social Work. 2000. 8(3):283–303.
crossref
21. Moon A., Williams O. Perceptions of elder abuse and help-seeking patterns among African-American, Caucasian American, and Korean-American elderly women. The Gerontologist. 1993. 33(3):386–395.
crossref
22. National Human Rights Commission of Korea. A study of elder abuse in communities. 2002. Seoul: National Human Rights Commission of Korea.
23. O'Toole A.W., O'Toole R., Webster S., Lucal B. Nurses' responses to child abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 1994. 9(2):194–206.
24. Park M.S. A study on the elder abuse fact in southwest Jeonlanamdo. Journal of Korean Regional Development. 2006. 6(1):209–235.
25. Seo Y. A study on the social workers' knowledge and the condition of elder abuse. Journal of Welfare for the Aged. 2000. 7:29–73.
26. Seo Y. Elder abuse in domestic setting and social welfare intervention. Korean Institute of Gerontology. 2004. 3(32):43–77.
27. Song M.S. Elderly abuse in domestic settings: Nursing perspective. Korean Journal of Nursing Query. 2007. 16(1):78–101.
28. Tilden V.P., Schmidt T.A., Limandri B.J., Chiodo G.T., Garland M.J., Loveless P.A. Factors that influence clinicians' assessment and management of family violence. American Journal of Public Health. 1994. 84(4):628–633.
crossref
29. Yoo S.H., Kim C.S. A study of old persons' perceptions on elder abuse. Korean Institute of Gerontology, A study of current state and countermeasure on elder abuse. 2004. Seoul: Korean Institute of Gerontology;9–39.
TOOLS
Similar articles