1. Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese RG, Deutsch M, Fisher ER, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002. 347:1233–1241.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
2. Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, Greco M, Saccozzi R, Luini A, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002. 347:1227–1232.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
3. Ahn SH, Yoo KY. Korean Breast Cancer Society. Chronological changes of clinical characteristics in 31,115 new breast cancer patients among Koreans during 1996-2004. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006. 99:209–214.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
4. Kang E, Han SA, Kim S, Kim SM, Jang M, Lee HE, et al. Five-years of breast cancer management in a new hospital: analysis using clinical data warehouse. J Breast Cancer. 2010. 13:96–103.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
5. Singletary SE. Surgical margins in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy. Am J Surg. 2002. 184:383–393.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
6. Borger J, Kemperman H, Hart A, Peterse H, van Dongen J, Bartelink H. Risk factors in breast-conservation therapy. J Clin Oncol. 1994. 12:653–660.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
7. Schiller DE, Le LW, Cho BC, Youngson BJ, McCready DR. Factors associated with negative margins of lumpectomy specimen: potential use in selecting patients for intraoperative radiotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008. 15:833–842.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
8. Waljee JF, Hu ES, Newman LA, Alderman AK. Predictors of re-excision among women undergoing breast-conserving surgery for cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008. 15:1297–1303.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
9. Kurniawan ED, Wong MH, Windle I, Rose A, Mou A, Buchanan M, et al. Predictors of surgical margin status in breast-conserving surgery within a breast screening program. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008. 15:2542–2549.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
10. Aziz D, Rawlinson E, Narod SA, Sun P, Lickley HL, McCready DR, et al. The role of reexcision for positive margins in optimizing local disease control after breast-conserving surgery for cancer. Breast J. 2006. 12:331–337.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
11. Miller AR, Brandao G, Prihoda TJ, Hill C, Cruz AB Jr, Yeh IT. Positive margins following surgical resection of breast carcinoma: analysis of pathologic correlates. J Surg Oncol. 2004. 86:134–140.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
12. Chagpar AB, Martin RC 2nd, Hagendoorn LJ, Chao C, McMasters KM. Lumpectomy margins are affected by tumor size and histologic subtype but not by biopsy technique. Am J Surg. 2004. 188:399–402.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
13. Cabioglu N, Hunt KK, Sahin AA, Kuerer HM, Babiera GV, Singletary SE, et al. Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007. 14:1458–1471.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
14. Dillon MF, Hill AD, Quinn CM, McDermott EW, O'Higgins N. A pathologic assessment of adequate margin status in breast-conserving therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006. 13:333–339.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
15. Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 2010. 7th ed. New York: Springer;347–377.
16. Weber WP, Engelberger S, Viehl CT, Zanetti-Dallenbach R, Kuster S, Dirnhofer S, et al. Accuracy of frozen section analysis versus specimen radiography during breast-conserving surgery for nonpalpable lesions. World J Surg. 2008. 32:2599–2606.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
17. Olson TP, Harter J, Muñoz A, Mahvi DM, Breslin T. Frozen section analysis for intraoperative margin assessment during breast-conserving surgery results in low rates of re-excision and local recurrence. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007. 14:2953–2960.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
18. Coopey S, Smith BL, Hanson S, Buckley J, Hughes KS, Gadd M, et al. The safety of multiple re-excisions after lumpectomy for breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011. 18:3797–3801.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
19. O'Sullivan MJ, Li T, Freedman G, Morrow M. The effect of multiple re-excisions on the risk of local recurrence after breast conserving surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007. 14:3133–3140.
20. Ramanah R, Pivot X, Sautiere JL, Maillet R, Riethmuller D. Predictors of re-excision for positive or close margins in breast-conservation therapy for pT1 tumors. Am J Surg. 2008. 195:770–774.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
21. Lovrics PJ, Cornacchi SD, Farrokhyar F, Garnett A, Chen V, Franic S, et al. The relationship between surgical factors and margin status after breast-conservation surgery for early stage breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2009. 197:740–746.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
22. Kuhl C. The current status of breast MR imaging. Part I. Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer to clinical practice. Radiology. 2007. 244:356–378.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
23. Agrawal G, Su MY, Nalcioglu O, Feig SA, Chen JH. Significance of breast lesion descriptors in the ACR BI-RADS MRI lexicon. Cancer. 2009. 115:1363–1380.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
24. Mahoney MC, Gatsonis C, Hanna L, DeMartini WB, Lehman C. Positive predictive value of BI-RADS MR imaging. Radiology. 2012. 264:51–58.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
25. Baltzer PA, Benndorf M, Dietzel M, Gajda M, Runnebaum IB, Kaiser WA. False-positive findings at contrast-enhanced breast MRI: a BI-RADS descriptor study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010. 194:1658–1663.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
26. Vicini FA, Kestin LL, Goldstein NS, Chen PY, Pettinga J, Frazier RC, et al. Impact of young age on outcome in patients with ductal carcinoma-in-situ treated with breast-conserving therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2000. 18:296–306.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
27. Lovrics PJ, Cornacchi SD, Farrokhyar F, Garnett A, Chen V, Franic S, et al. Technical factors, surgeon case volume and positive margin rates after breast conservation surgery for early-stage breast cancer. Can J Surg. 2010. 53:305–312.
28. Atkins J, Al Mushawah F, Appleton CM, Cyr AE, Gillanders WE, Aft RL, et al. Positive margin rates following breast-conserving surgery for stage I-III breast cancer: palpable versus nonpalpable tumors. J Surg Res. 2012. 177:109–115.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
29. Krekel NM, Zonderhuis BM, Stockmann HB, Schreurs WH, van der Veen H, de Lange de Klerk ES, et al. A comparison of three methods for nonpalpable breast cancer excision. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011. 37:109–115.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
30. Dua SM, Gray RJ, Keshtgar M. Strategies for localisation of impalpable breast lesions. Breast. 2011. 20:246–253.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)