Abstract
Purpose
There has been much reported data showing that breast reconstruction surgery does not result in reduced patient survival if the accepted principles of cancer surgery are closely followed. The proper reconstructive technique can be selected according to diverse factors, but breast size and the site of tumor are mostly important. The latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap (LDMCF) is one of the most commonly used techniques for early breast cancer patients who have small breasts. But, it has difficulties for supplying enough tissues to the widely excised tumor site. Especially for ptosis patients, reduction mammoplasty by itself is not enough to achieve symmetry of the breast. We suggest that the pectoralis major myomammary flap (PMMF) is a useful technique for the patients with ptosis.
Methods
Seventeen patients with ptosis were treated with breast conserving surgery with PMMF reconstruction. A quadrantectomy rather than lumpectomy was performed through a planned skin incision, and axillary lymph node dissection was performed according to the results of sentinel lymph node biopsy. The PMMF is carefully harvested without perforating branch injury to the internal thoracic artery. Reconstruction was done via the PMMF through the medial tunnel between both breasts.
Figures and Tables
References
1. Newman LA, Kuerer HM, McNeese MD, Hunt KK, Gurtner GC, Robb G, et al. Reduction mammoplasty improves breast conservation therapy in patients with macromastia. Am J Surg. 2001. 181:215–220.
2. Slavin SA, Halperin T. Reconstruction of the breast conservation deformity. Seminars Plast Surg. 2004. 18:89–96.
3. Jobsen JJ, van der Palen J, Ong F. Effect of external boost volume in breast-conserving therapy on local control with long-term follow-up. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008. 71:115–122.
5. Ariyan S. The pectoralis major myocutaneous flap: a versatile flap for reconstruction in the head and neck. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979. 63:73–81.
6. Denewer AT. Myomammary flap of pectoralis major muscle for breast reconstruction:new technique. World J Surg. 1997. 21:57–61.
8. Morrow M, Storm EA, Bassett LW, Dershaw DD, Fowble B, Giuliano A, et al. Standard for breast conservation therapy in the management of invasive breast carcinoma. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005. 52:277–300.
9. Park HD, Min YS, Kwak HH, Youn KH, Lee EW, Kim HJ. Anatomical study concerning the origin and course of the pectoral branch of the thoracoacromial trunk for the pectoralis major flap. Surg Radiol Anat. 2004. 26:428–432.
10. Kroll SS, Baldwin B. A comparison of outcome using three different methods of breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992. 90:455–462.
11. Denewer A, Setit A, Farouk O. Outcome of pectoralis major myomammary flap for post-mastectomy breast reconstruction: extended experience. World J Surg. 2007. 31:1382–1386.
12. Hoch J, Stahlenbrecher A, Elsner T. The contralateral pectoralis muscle flap: a valuable alternative to cover chest wall tissue defects. Eur J Plast Surg. 2006. 29:85–88.
13. Smith BK, Cohen BE, Biggs TM, Suber J. Simultaneous bilateral breast reconstruction using latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flaps: a retrospective review of an institutional experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001. 108:1174–1183.
14. Daltrey I, Thomson H, Hussien M, Krishna K, Rayter Z, Winters ZE. Randomized clinical trial of the effect of quilting latissimus dorsi flap donor site on seroma formation. Br J Surg. 2006. 93:825–830.
15. Menke H, Erkens M, Olbrisch RR. Evolving concepts in breast reconstruction with latissimus dorsi flaps: results and follow-up of 121 consecutive patients. Ann Plast Surg. 2001. 47:107–114.