Journal List > J Korean Soc Spine Surg > v.9(1) > 1036044

Kang, Jeon, and Lee: Clinical Symptoms of Internal Disc Disruption of the Cervical Spine

Abstract

Study Design

This study reviewed 20 patients who were diagnosed as internal disc disruption (IDD) of the cervical spine. Clinical symptoms were analyzed retrospectively.

Objectives

To assess the various symptoms of IDD of the cervical spine.

Summary of Literature Review

Several studies have demonstrated the symptoms of lumbar spine IDD. No studies have attempted to show the symptoms of cervical spine IDD.

Materials and Methods

A group of patients, who showed chronic neck pain and referred pain to upper limbs after a certain trauma, was materials of this study. All these patients were examined with simple X - ray, flexion-extension views, magnetic resonance image (MRI). When intractable pain was prolonged over 6months in spite of conservative treatment, patient was admitted and performed discogram and computed tomograpy (CT) for a definite diagnosis. There were 20 patients who were diagnosed as IDD from July 1996 to June 2001, and clinical symptoms were analyzed retrospectively.

Results

The various symptoms of the IDD of the cervical spine were chronic neck pain (100%), shoulder pain (95%), headache (90%), interscapular pain (80%), arm pain and paresthesia (75%), insomnia (75%), hand pain and paresthesia (60%), periocular pain (60%), forearm pain and paresthesia (50%), chin pain (50%), subjective weakness of upper extremity (45%), periauricular pain (40%) and tinnitus (30%).

Conclusion

We are led to believe that patients who have chronic neck pain, shoulder pain, interscapluar pain, and other symptoms after a certain trauma of cervical spine are clinically diagnosed as IDD of the cervical spine, although X - ray and MRI are normal. Definite diagnosis of these patients would be made by a discogram, if similar or identical pain is provocated.

REFERENCES

1). Bogduk N, Aprill C. On the nature of neck pain, discography and cervical zygopophysial joint blocks. Pain. 54:213–217. 1993.
2). Bogduk N, Windsor M, Inglis A. The innervation of the cervical intervertebral discs. Spine. 13(11):2–8. 1988.
crossref
3). Crock HV. A reappraisal of intervertebral disc lesions. Med J Aust. 1:983–989. 1970.
crossref
4). Crock HV. Internal disc disruption. A challenge to disc prolapse fifty years on. Spine. 11(6):650–653. 1986.
5). Kang CH, Chun JH. Disc excision and posterior lumbar interbody fusion for internal disc derangement. J Korean Spine Surg. 8(1):62–67. 2001.
crossref
6). Kang CH, Pyun YS, Song KS, Min BW, Kim DG. Diagnosis of internal disc derangement. J Korean Spine Surg. 2(2):209–218. 1995.
7). Kurt P, Michael D, Cooper R, Steven R. Cervical discogenic pain. Prospective correlation of magnetic resonance imaging and discography in asymptomatic subjects and pain suffers. Spine. 21(3):300–312. 1996.
8). Lee CK, Vessa P, Lee JK. Chronic disabling low back pain syndrome caused by internal disc derangements. Spine. 20(3):356–361. 1995.
crossref
9). Richard D, William J, Donna D, Stephen H, Ralph F, John J. Discitis after discography. Spine. 13(12):1352–1354. 1988.
crossref
10). Robert G, Szpalski M. Whiplash injuries. Current concepts in prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of the cervical whiplash syndrome. 1st ed. Philadelpia: Lippincott-Raven Co;p. 33–60. 1998.
11). Siebenrock KA, Aebi M. Cervical discography in discogenic pain syndrome and its predictive value for cervical fusion. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 113:199–203. 1994.
crossref
12). Tomas A, Michael E. A correlation of cervical magnetic resonance imaging and discography/computed tomo -graphic discograms. Spine. 19(24):2819–2825. 1994.
13). Thomas S, Randall A. Cervical discogenic syndrome. Results of operative intervention in patients with positive discography. Spine. 12(4):313–316. 1987.
14). Weinstein J, Claverie W, Gibson S. The pain of discography. Spine. 13(12):1344–1348. 1988.
crossref
15). Zucherman J, Derby R, Hsu K, et al. Normal magnetic resonance imaging with abnormal discography. Spine. 13(12):1355–1359. 1988.
crossref

Figures and Tables%

Fig. 1.
Anteroposterior and lateral roentgenograms of patient without cervical spine fracture and dislocation.
jkss-9-48f1.tif
Fig. 2.
Lateral flexion-extension roentogenograms of patient without cervical spine instability.
jkss-9-48f2.tif
Fig. 3.
The MRI of the cervical spine shows normal findings without herniated disc and spinal cord compression. A. T2 weighted sagittal MRI. B. T2 weighted axial MRI at C4-5. C. T2 weighted axial MRI at C5-6.
jkss-9-48f3.tif
Fig. 4.
Appearance of the discogram at C5-6 is leakage.
jkss-9-48f4.tif
Fig. 5.
The CT discograms at C4-5 and C5-6 reveal circumferential tear and dye leakage.
jkss-9-48f5.tif
Fig. 6.
Anteroposterior and lateral roentgenograms of C4-5 and C5-6 fusion with autogenous bone graft.
jkss-9-48f6.tif
Table 1.
Clinical symptoms of cervical IDD.
Clinical symptoms Number of patien nts %
Chronic neck pain 20 100
Shoulder pain 19 95
Headache 18 90
Interscapular area pain 16 80
Arm pain and paresthesia 15 75
Insomnia 15 75
Hand pain and paresthesia 12 60
Periocular pain 12 60
Forearm pain and paresthesia 10 50
Chin pain 10 50
Subjective weakness of upper extremity 9 45
Periauricular pain 8 40
Tinnitus 6 30

Internal disc disruption

Table 2.
Level of Symptomatic Disc(s)
Number of Painful discs
C 3-4 2
C 4-5 10
C 5-6 18
C 6-7 8
Table 3.
Number of Painful Discs
Number of painful Discs Number of cases
1 disc 5
2 disc 13
3 disc or more 2
TOOLS
Similar articles