Journal List > J Korean Soc Spine Surg > v.16(2) > 1035883

Kim, Kang, Kim, Sung, Park, Park, Seo, Choy, and Lee: Change of Pelvic Tilt before and after Gait in Patients with Lumbar Degenerative Kyphosis

Abstract

Study Design

This is a retrospective study.

Objectives

We wanted to verify the value of radiography and gait analysis to analyze the changes of the pelvic tilt before and after gait in the patients with LDK.

Summary of Literature Review

Patients with lumbar degenerative kyphosis show dynamic changes that are closely associated with the motion of pelvis.

Materials and Methods

We analyzed 18 lumbar degenerative kyphosis patients who didn't have multiple vertebral compressio fractures, a past history of spinal surgery or surgery for degenerative arthritis of the knee or hip, and obesity which causes marker errors on the gait analysis. Pelvic tilt was statistically evaluated by utilizing radiographs and dynamically utilizing the gait analysis. The linear parameters of the gait cycle and the kinematic data were obtained from the gait analysis.

Results

The LDK patients’ mean walking velocity was 80.7 cm/s, and it was largely decreased to 65% of the normal value. The cause of the decreased walking velocity was a decrease of stride length, and not a decrease of cadence. The mean static pelvic tilt in the gait analysis was -1.3±8.0。, and there were 8 cases of anterior tilt and 10 cases of posterior tilt. The mean pelvic tilt during gait was 12.5±8.2。, and there were 17 cases of anterior tilt and 1 case of posterior tilt. It was statistically significant difference (p<0.05) between the mean static pelvic tilt in gait analysis and the mean pelvic tilt during gait and the Pearson's correlation coefficient was -0.88.

Conclusions

Though there was no statistical significance, we observed anterior pelvic rotation after gait on the radiographs. As fatigue of the pelvic extensor muscles increases during gait, anterior pelvis tilt increases with statistical significance on the gait analysis. Therefore, we feel gait analysis is useful for evaluating the dynamic change of the pelvic tilt in patients with LDK.

REFERENCES

1). Takemitsu Y, Harada Y, Iwahara T, Miyamoto M, Miyatake Y. Lumbar Degenerative Kyphosis: Clinical, radiological and epidemiological studies. Spine. 1988; 13:1317–1326.
2). Takemitsu Y, Harada Y, Iwahara T. Low back pain and aging change of spine in Japanese farmers aged more than 40 years. Nippon Seikeigeka Gakkai. 1984; 58:551–552.
3). Andersson BJ, Ortengren R. Myoelectric back muscle activity during sitting. Scand J Rehab Med. 1974; 3:73–90.
4). Lee CS, Kim YT, Kim EG. Clinical study of Lumbar Degenerative Kyphosis. J Korean Spine Surg. 1997; 4:27–35.
5). Lee CS, Chung SS, Chung KH, Kim SR. Significance of Pelvic Incidence in the Development of Abnormal Sagittal Alignment. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 2006; 41:274–280.
crossref
6). Legaye J, Duval-Beaupe�re G, Hecquet J, Marty C. Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur Spine J. 1998; 7(2):99–103.
crossref
7). Murray MP, Drought AB, Kory RC. Walking patterns of normal men. J Bone Joint Surg. 1964; 46:335–360.
crossref
8). Sutherland DH, Olshen R, Cooper L, Woo SL. The development of mature gait. J Bone Joint Surg. 1980; 62:336–353.
crossref
9). Chung CY, Park MS, Choi IH, Cho TJ, Yoo WJ, Kim JY. Three dimensional gait analysis in normal Korean -A Preliminary Report. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 2005; 40:83–88.
crossref
10). Lee CS, Lee CK, Kim YT, Hong YM, Yoo JH. Dynamic sagittal imbalance of the spine in degenerative flat back: significance of pelvic tilt in surgical treatment. Spine. 2001; 26:2029–2035.

Figures and Tables%

Fig. 1.
Modified Helen-Hayes Method. Reflective markers are placed each points.
jkss-16-95f1.tif
Fig. 2.
Method of Pelvic Tilt Measurement. Pelvic tilt obtained in gait analysis means slope for horizontal line (A), but in standing lateral X-ray means slope for plumb line (B). So, β value is used for analysis of correlation between pelvic tilt in gait analysis and in standing lateral X-ray.
jkss-16-95f2.tif
Fig. 3.
Classification of Lumbar Degenerative Kyphosis by Takemitsu. It is classified into 4 types by degree of lumbar kyphosis in radiographic findings.
jkss-16-95f3.tif
Fig. 4.
Pelvic Tilt in Gait Analysis. It shows that pelvis tilts anteriorly with statistical significance in gait analysis.
jkss-16-95f4.tif
Fig. 5.
Radiographic Pelvic Tilt. There is no statistical significance in radiographic pelvic tilt before and after gait.
jkss-16-95f5.tif
Fig. 6.
Trunk and Pelvic kinematics.
jkss-16-95f6.tif
Fig. 7.
Difference between radiographic static posture and static posture in gait analysis. This difference may be one of causes that have no correlateion between radiographic examination and gait analysis.
jkss-16-95f7.tif
Table 1.
Demographics of the patients and radiographic and kinematic results
No Age Sex Diagnosis TT RS (β) RD (β) GS GD
11 56 F LDK, SS L4-5 c instability 1 43 (47) 40 (50) 1-4.2 13.7
12 67 F LDK, SS L4-5, SL L4 on L5 2 46 (44) -10.1 18.0
13 58 F LDK 2 57 (33) 54 (36) 1-1.6 12.0
14 66 F LDK 3 37 (53) 30 (60) 1-1.8 12.4
15 61 F LDK, SS L3-4,4-5 2 36 (54) 20 (70) 1-2.9 19.9
16 64 M LDK, SS L2-3, 3-4 3 31 (59) 31 (59) -21.0 24.0
17 63 F LDK 2 29 (61) 42 (48) 1-0.6 14.4
18 68 F LDK, DLS, SS L3-4, 4-5 3 50 (40) 30 (60) 1-9.3 14.1
19 67 F LDK 1 36 (54) 47 (43) 1-2.7 10.0
10 65 F LDK, SS L4-5, SL L4 on L5 2 65 (25) 56 (34) 1-8.9 13.3
11 56 F LDK 2 29 (61) 36 (54) -10.7 10.5
12 64 F LDK 3 39 (51) 33 (57) 1-6.4 29.1
13 66 F LDK 4 52 (38) 54 (36) 1-0.9 12.5
14 67 F LDK 3 57 (33) 50 (40) 1-4.7 12.5
15 72 F LDK 3 34 (56) 34 (56) 1-7.0 22.7
16 62 F LDK 4 51 (39) 47 (43) 1-8.0 15.9
17 64 M LDK 4 44 (46) 41 (49) 1-8.1 12.2
18 68 F LDK 2 48 (42) 37 (53) 1-5.4 -2.9
M 64 43.6 (46.4) 40.1 (49.9) -1.3 12.5

No, number; TT, Takemitsu type; RS, radiographic static pelvic tilt, RD, radiographic pelvic tilt after gait; GS, static pelvic tilt in gait analysis, GD, pelvic tilt during gait in gait analysis; LDK, Lumbar degenerative kyphosis, SS, spinal stenosis; SL, spondylolisthesis; DLS, Degenerative lumbar scoliosis; M, mean

Table 2.
Results of linear parameters during gait
Subject Normal Percentage (%) p-value
Velocity (cm/s) 180.7 124.6 165% 0.000
Cadence (steps/min) 108.7 103.0 106% 0.034
Stride Length (cm) 189.3 145.2 161% 0.000
Step Width (cm) 111.2 112.0 194% 0.135
Right
Step Length (cm) 144.5 165.2 168% 0.000
Weight Accept (% cycle) 112.3 110.2 120% 0.000
Single Support (% cycle) 137.5 139.5 195% 0.001
Weight Release (% cycle) 113.2 110.2 129% 0.003
Stance (% cycle) 161.9 160.5 102% 0.042
Swing (% cycle) 138.1 139.5 196% 0.042
Left
Step Length (cm) 144.4 165.2 168% 0.000
Weight Accept (% cycle) 113.2 110.2 129% 0.003
Single Support (% cycle) 138.1 139.5 196% 0.042
Weight Release (% cycle) 112.3 110.2 120% 0.000
Stance (% cycle) 162.5 160.5 103% 0.001
Swing (% cycle) 137.5 139.5 195% 0.001

(One-sample t-test)

Table 3.
p-value of pelvic tilt in each group
Group A (Type I, II) Group B (Type III, IV)
RS 44.8±12.43 42.0±7.92 P=0.570
RD 41.7±11.7 38.4±8.45 P=0.514
P=0.457 P=0.024
GS 0.71±6.95 -3.71±9.12 P=0.277
GD 10.83±5.3 14.4±10.94 P=0.408
P=0.048 P=0.030

RS, radiographic static pelvic tilt; RD, radiographic pelvic tilt after gait GS, static pelvic tilt in gait analysis; GD, pelvic tilt during gait in gait analysis

TOOLS
Similar articles