PDF
ePub
Citation
Print
Abstract
Objectives
To assess the clinical importance of MRI for the diagnosis of posterior spinal ligament complex injuries in thoracolumbar fractures.
Summary of Literature Review
Evaluation of spinal instability is important in thoracolumbar fractures. When simple radiography and CT alone are performed, spinal instability may be missed, especially that involving the posterior spinal ligament complex.
Materials and Methods
Eighty-seven patients who were evaluated using simple radiography, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) between March 1994 and March 2003 were included in the study. The local kyphotic angle was measured on lateral radiography, and it was then compared to the fracture pattern on MRI. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA.
Results
There was no correlation between the local kyphotic angle on radiography and fracture involvement on MRI (p=0.106). In 41 patients who were found to have involvement of the anterior column on CT, 25 had anterior column involvement, 4 had middle column involvement, and 12 had posterior column involvement on MRI. In 36 patients who were found to have involvement of the middle column on CT, 17 had involvement of the middle column and 19 had involvement of the posterior column on MRI. The fractures of the ten patients who were found to have posterior column involvement on CT were all seen on MRI. The coincidence of fracture patterns between CT and MRI, which was evaluated using Cohen's Kappa analysis, was 0.434. The sensitivity of CT compared with MRI was 0.741 in the middle column and 0.243 in the posterior column.
REFERENCES
1). Holdsworth FW. Fractures, dislocations, and fracture-dislocations of the spine. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1963; 45:6–20.
2). Brant-Zawadzki M, Miller EM, Federle MP. CT in the evaluation of spine trauma. AJR. 1982; 136:369–375.
3). McAfee PC, Yuan HA, Fredrickson BE, Lubicky JP. The value of computed tomography in thoracolumbar fractures. An analysis of one hundred consecutive cases and a new classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983; 65:461–473.
4). Daffiner RH, Deeb ZL, Rothfus WE. The posterior vertebral body line: importance in the detection of burst fracture. AJR. 1987; 148:93–96.
5). Denis F. The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute spinal injuries. Spine. 1983; 8:817–831.
6). Jelsma RK, Kirsch PT, Rice JF, Jelsma LF. The radiographic description of thoracolumbar fractures. Surg Neurol. 1982; 18:230–236.
7). Ferguson RL, Allen BL Jr. A mechanistic classification of thoracolumbar spine fracture. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984; 189:77–88.
8). Gehweilier JA, Daffiner RH, Osborne RL Jr. Relevant signs of stable and unstable thoracolumbar vertebral trauma. Skeletal Radiol. 1983; 7:179–183.
9). Dong-Jun Kim, Hwan-Mo Lee, Hak-Sun Kim, Kyung-Soo Suk, Nam-Hyun Kim, Si-Young Park. Reliability of MRI to Detect Posterior Ligament Complex Injury in Thoracolumbar Spinal Fractures. J Kor Soc Spine Surg. 2000; 7:70–76.
10). Qaiyum M, Tyrrell PNM, McCall IW, Cassar-Pullicino VN. MRI detection of unsuspected vertebral injury in acute spinal trauma: incidence and significance. Skeletal Radiol. 2001; 30:299–304.
11). Green RA, Saifuddin A. Whole spine MRI in the assessment of acute vertebral body trauma. Skeletal Radiol. 2004; 33:129–135. Epub 2004 Jan 23.
12). Hackney DB, Asato R, Joseph PM, et al. Hemorrhage and edema in acute spinal cord compression: demonstrated by MRI imaging. Radiology. 1986; 161:387–390.
13). Goldberg AL, Rothfus WE, Vital JM, et al. The impact of magnetic resonance on the diagnostic evaluation of acute cervicothoracic spinal trauma. Skeletal Radiol. 1988; 17:89–95.
14). Grenier N, Gresselle JF, Vital JM, et al. Normal and disrupted lumbar longitudinal ligaments: correlative MR and anatomic study. Radiology. 1989; 171:197–205.
15). Kliewer MA, Gray L, Paver J, et al. Acute spinal ligament disruption: MR imaging with anatomic correlation. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1993; 3:855–861.
16). Atlas SW, Regenbogen V, Rogers LF, Kim KS. The radiologic characterization of burst fractures of the spine. AJR. 1986; 147:575–582.
17). Henkelman RM, Hardy PA, Bishop JE, Poon CS, Plewes DB. Why fat is bright in RARE and fast spin-echo imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1992; 2:533–540.
18). Georgy BA, Hesselink JR. MR imaging of the spine: recent advances in pulse sequences and special techniques. AJR. 1994; 162:923–934.
19). Emery SE, Pathria MN, Wilber G, Massary T, Bohlman HH. Magnetic resonance imaging of post traumatic spinal injury. J Spinal Disord. 1989; 2:229–233.
20). Persilge CA, Pathria MN, Emery SE, Masaryk TJ. Thoracolumbar burst fractures: evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology. 1995; 194:49–54.
21). Cassar-Pullicino VN. Spinal injury: optimizing the imaging options. Eur J Radiol. 2002; 42:85–91.
22). Terk MR, Hume-Neal M, Fraipoint M, Ahmadi J, Col-letti PM. Injury of the posterior ligament complex in patients with acute spinal trauma: Evaluation by MR imaging. AJR. 1997; 168:1481–1486.
Table 1.
Comparison of Fracture Classification by Local Kyphotic Angle and MRI
Table 2.
Cohen’s Kappa Analysis between Each Fracture Pattern Evaluated By Computed Tomography and MRI
| Number of Case | MRI | Total (Number) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group I | Group II | Group III | |||
| CT | GroupII | 25 | I4 | 12 | 41 |
| Group II | I0 | 17 | 19 | 36 | |
| Group III | I0 | I0 | 10 | 10 | |
| Total (Number) | 25 | 21 | 41 | 87 | |
XML Download