Journal List > J Korean Soc Spine Surg > v.15(1) > 1035799

Ahn, Kim, Kim, Cho, Jung, and Suk: Posterior Hemivertebra Excision in Congenital Scoliosis

Abstract

Study Design

Retrospective study

Objectives

To evaluate the surgical outcome of congenital scoliosis with a hemivertebra treated by posterior hemivertebra excision and pedicle screw instrumentation. Summary of Literature

Review

Posterior hemivertebra excision can be accomplished through a single posterior approach, and excellent correction and outcome may be achieved.

Materials and Methods

Forty patients with one fully segmented hemivertebra treated by posterior hemivertebra excision with pedicle screw instrumentation were retrospectively analyzed after a minimum follow-up of 2 years (range 2~7.7 years). The mean age at surgery was 15.9 years (range 2.6~37.9 years). Preoperative and postoperative standing radiographs were used to assess radiographic parameters.

Results

The average number of vertebrae in the major curve was 4.2 (range 3~8), and the average flexibility was 29% (range 8~59%). The average length of fusion was 3.5 segments (range 1~6). The number of fused vertebrae had a positive correlation with age at the index surgery (r=0.345, p®0.05). Mean preoperative scoliosis of 48±12。was corrected to a mean of 17±10。 (65% correction), and mean preoperative kyphosis of 46±18。was corrected to a mean of 12±12。at the most recent follow-up. The compensatory curve had a mean of 25±10。preoperatively and spontaneously corrected to a mean of 8±8。(70% correction) at the most recent follow-up. The mean operating time was 233±81 min, with an average blood loss of 2904 ml. There was neither crankshaft phenomenon nor iatrogenic spinal stenosis in 6 patients under the age of 5 years after an average follow-up of 6 years.

Conclusions

Posterior hemivertebra excision using pedicle screw instrumentation in congenital scoliosis due to a hemivertebra is a safe and effective procedure. Posterior hemivertebra excision at an early age may reduce the fusion length while avoiding the induction of iatrogenic spinal stenosis during follow-up.

REFERENCES

1). Leatherman KD, Dickson RA. Two-stage corrective surgery for congenital deformities of the spine. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1979; 61:324–328.
crossref
2). Bradford DS, Boachie-Adjei O. One-stage anterior and posterior hemivertebra resection and arthrodesis for congenital scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990; 72:536–540.
3). Nakamura H, Matsuda H, Konishi S, Yamano Y. Single-stage excision of hemivertebra via the posterior approach alone for congenital spinal deformity: follow-up period longer than ten years. Spine. 2002; 27:110–115.
4). Roaf R. The treatment of progressive scoliosis by unilateral growth arrest. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1963; 4:637–651.
5). Royle ND. The operative removal of an accessory vertebra. Med J Aust. 1928; 1:467–468.
crossref
6). Suk SI, Chung ER, Kim JH, Kim SS, Lee JS, Choi WK. Posterior vertebral column resection for severe rigid scoliosis. Spine. 2005; 30:1682–1687.
crossref
7). McMaster MJ, Ohtsuka K. The natural history of congenital scoliosis: a study of two hundred and fifty-one patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982; 64:1128–1147.
crossref
8). Winter RB. Congenital spinal deformity in the Moe’s textbook of scoliosis and other spinal deformities. 3rd ed.Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co;p. 257–294. 1995.
9). Slabaugh PB, Winter RB, Lonstein JE, Moe JH. Lumbosacral hemivertebra: a review of twenty-four patients, with excision in eight. Spine. 1980; 5:234–244.
10). Ruf M, Harms J. Hemivertebra resection by a posterior approach: innovative operative technique and first results. Spine. 2002; 27:1116–1123.
11). Ruf M, Harms J. Posterior hemivertebra resection with transpedicular instrumentation: early correction in children aged 1 to 6 years. Spine. 2003; 28:2132–2138.
crossref
12). Papp T, Porter RW, Aspden RM. The growth of the lumbar vertebral canal. Spine. 1994; 19:2770–2773.
crossref
13). Porter RW, Pavitt D. The vertebral canal: I. Nutrition and development, an archaeological study. Spine. 1987; 12:901–906.
14). Jeffrey JE, Campbell DM, Golden MH, Smith FW, Porter RW. Antenatal factors in the development of the lumbar vertebral canal: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Spine. 2003; 28:1418–1423.
15). Ferree BA. Morphometric characteristics of pedicles of the immature spine. Spine. 1992; 17:887–891.
crossref
16). Zindrick MR, Knight GW, Sartori MJ, Camevale TJ, Patwardhan AG, Lorenz MA. Pedicle morphology of the immature thoracolumbar spine. Spine. 2000; 25:2726–2735.
crossref

Fig. 1.
A 17-year-old male with a congenital kyphoscoliosis due to hemivertebra at T12. (A, B) He had a thoracolumbar scoliosis of 50。and a kyphosis of 60。. He was treated by posterior hemivertebra excision and fusion from T9 to L2 with pedicle screw instrumentation. (C, D) The preoperative 3D CT showed a fully segmented hemivertbra at T12. (E, F) The radiographs taken 3 years after surgery. His deformities were corrected to 11。 and 3。, respectively.
jkss-15-1f1.tif
Fig. 2.
A 3.7-year-old boy with a congenital scoliosis due to hemivertebra at T12. (A, B) He had a thoracolumbar scoliosis of 39。. He was treated by posterior hemivertebra excision with monosegment fusion. (C, D) The preoperative 3D CT showed a fully segmented hemivertbra at T12. (E, F) The radiographs taken 8 years after surgery. His deformity was corrected to 13。. (G, H) CT scans taken 3 and 7 years after surgery showed a normal growth of the instrumented vertebrae compared with the adjacent vertebrae. There is no iatrogenic spinal stenosis.
jkss-15-1f2.tif
Table 1.
The level of hemivertebra and age at surgery of patients
Hemivertebra level No. of patients Age at surgery No. of patients
T10 18 2.6~10 11
T11 3 10~20 18
T12 11 20~30 15
L1 19 30~37.9 16
L2 3    
L3 3    
L4 1    
L5 2    
Table 2.
Radiographic Data of Patients
  Preop (range) IMPO (range) IM Corr Final Follow-up (range) Final Corr r LOC
Major curve            
Magnitude (®) 48.2±11.9 (22~74) 15.1±9.6 (2~45) -69% 16.7±9.7 (3~51) 65% 2.4%
Flexibility (%) 29.1±14.0 (8~59.2)          
AVT (mm) 39.8±15.2 (5~67) 13.3±9.6 (2~42) -63% 12.0±10.6 (1~52) 65%  
Compensatory curve            
Magnitude (®) 25.0±10.4 (6~52) 19.2±6.9 (0~25) -63% 18.3±7.8 (0~31) 70%  
AVT (mm) 10.0±9.4 (2~42) 17.8±7.3 (2~25) -22% 18.3±7.7 (1~30) 18%  
Coronal imbalance (mm) 12.7±8.8 (1~29) 16.0±16.8 (3~79) -16% 10.8±8.6 (1~42) 15%  
Sagittal imbalance (mm) 32.6±28.8 (0~155) 24.0±17.2 (7~58) -26% 20.2±16.7 (2~60) 38%  
Kyphosis (®) 45.5±18.0 (10~86) 10.5±12.6 (-22~34) -35® 12.0±11.9 (-16~33) 33® 1.3®

‘-’ = lordotic; ‘+’ = kyphotic; AVT = apical vertebral translation, Final Corr = correction rate of final follow-up; IM Corr = immediate postoperative correction rate; IMPO = immediate postoperative; LOC = loss of correction, Preop = preoperative

TOOLS
Similar articles