Journal List > J Korean Soc Spine Surg > v.13(2) > 1035754

Shin, Cho, Han, Kim, and Lee: Reconstruction of Iliac Crest Donor Site Using 1/3 Tubular Plate

Abstract

Study design

This is a prospective study Objectives: The purpose of this study is to describe the technique for reconstruction of the iliac crest graft donor site and to determine the clinical results of its application.

Summary of Literature Review

An iliac crest tricortical bone graft is frequently used for anterior interbody fusion of the spine. For preventing iliac crest graft donor site morbidity (pain, skin dimpling, etc), various graft materials have been used, for exam-ple, rib, cement, ceramic and so on. However, the rib needs another incision for lumbar or cervical fusion, the cement sometimes causes the wound infection, and the bioactive ceramic spacer has not had its long term results confirmed.

Materials and Methods

We prospectively analyzed 28 patients who underwent iliac crest reconstruction with a 1/3 tubular plate after bone harvesting between 1998 and 2004. Pain at postoperative 1 month, 6 months and 1 year was checked by the visual analogue scale (VAS). The cosmetic appearance, foreign body sense, overall satisfaction (according to the methods of Ito et al), complications and the radiologic evaluations were all analyzed as indicators of the outcome.

Results

The mean visual analogue scale was 3.5 and 0.1 at postoperative 1 and 12 months, respectively. For the cosmetic appearance, among the 28 patients, 24 patients felt a smooth and satisfactory outline (Excellent). 25 patients couldn't feel any foreign body sense. One patient experienced wound infection. No plate breakage or screw loosening were observed.

Conclusions

Reconstruction of the iliac crest with a one-third tubular plate after tricortical bone graft harvest could be a favor-able method. the screws during the consolidation of PMMA.

REFERENCES

01). Holmes Ralph E.., Lemperle Stefan M.., Calhoun Christopher J.Protected bone regen-eration,. Macropore;2001.
02). Cricchio G., Lundgren S. Donor site morbidity in two dif-ferent approaches to anterior iliac crest bone harvesting., Clin Implant Dent Relat Res (Canada),. 5(3):161–9. 2003.
03). Ito M., Abumi K., Moridaira H., Shono Y., Kotani Y., Minami A., Kaneda K. Iliac crest reconstruction with a bioactive ceramic spacer, Eur Spine J. 14:99–102. 2005.
04). Harris MB., Davis J., Gertzbein SD. Iliac crest reconstruction after tricortical graft harvesting, J Spinal Disor-der, 7-. 3:216–221. 1994.
05). Lubicky JP., DeWald RL. Methylmethacrylate reconstruction of large iliac crest bone graft donor sites., Clin Orthop.,. 164:252–6. 1982.
06). Hill NM., Geoffrey Horne J., Devane PA., Horne JG. Donor site morbidity in the iliac crest bone graft, Aust. N.Z. J. Surg.,. 69(10):726–728. (3). 1999.
07). Alleyne CH., Rodts GE., Haid RW. Iliac Crest Recon-struction Following Autologous Bone Graft: Harvesting-Technical Note, Neuro-Orthopedics,. 20(2):89–93. 1997.
08). Cornwall GB., Thomas KA., Turner AS., Wheeler DL., Taylor WR. Use of a resorbable sheet in iliac crest reconstruction in a sheep model., Orthopedics.,. 25(10 Suppl):s1167–71. 2002.
09). Arrington ED., Smith WJ., Chambers HG., Bucknell AL., Davino NA. Complications of iliac crest bone graft harvesting Clin Orthop,. 329:300–309. 1996.
10). Banwart JC., Asher MA., Hassanein RS. Iliac crest bone graft harvest donor site morbidity. Spine. 20(9):1055–1060. 1995.
crossref
11). Kurz LT., Samberg LC., Herkowitz HN. Techniques and complications of bone graft harvesting,. Herkowitz , editor. Rothman-Simeone The Spine. 4th ed. p. 1589–1600. WB Saunders;1999.
crossref
12). Tanishima T., Yoshimasu N., Ogai M. A technique for prevention of donor site pain associated with harvesting iliac bone grafts, Surg Neurol,. 44:131–132. 1995.
13). Park I. H.., Lee K. B.., Song K. B.., Lee J. Y.., Noh D. G. Donor Site Pain from the Ilium in Spinal Fusion. J Kor Soc Spine Surg,. 2:90–97. 1995.
14). Summers BN., Eisenstein SM. Donor site pain from the ilium, J Bone Joint Surg(Br),. 71:677–680. 1989.
15). Kim YM., Won JH., Choi ES., Seo JB., Lee HS. Bridge Reconstruction of Donor Iliac Crest with Resected Rib in Anterior Fusion of Thoracolumbar Spine, J Kor Spine Surg, 7-. 4:597–602. 2000.
16). Hardy JH. Iliac crest reconstruction following full-thick-ness graft: a preliminary note. Clin Orthop Relat Res. Mar-Apr. 123:32–3. 1977.
17). Defino HLA., Rodriguez-Fuentes AE. Reconstruction of anterior iliac crest bone graft donor sites: presentation of a surgical technique, Eur Spine J,. 491-494:1999. (8):
18). Asano S., Kaneda K., Satoh S., Abumi K., Hashimoto T., Fujiya M. Reconstruction of an iliac crest defect with a bioactive ceramic prosthesis., Eur Spine J.,. 3(1):39–44. 1994.
19). Epstein NE., Hollingsworth R. Does donor site recon-struction following anterior cervical surgery diminish postoperative pain?, J Spinal Disord Tech.,. 16(1):20–6. 2003.
20). Hochschuler SH., Guyer RD., Stith WJ., Ohnmeiss DD., Rashbaum RF., Johnson RG. Proplast reconstruction of iliac crest defects, Spine. 13(3):378–379. 1988.
21). Halsnad SM., Dhariwal DK., Bocca AP., Evans PL., Hod-der SC. Titanium plate reconstruction of the osseous defect after harvest of a composite free flap using the deep circumflex iliac artery, Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg,. 42(3):254–6. 2004.

Fig. 1.
L-spine MRI, 38-year old male patient. (A) In the axial view, infectious spondylitis and discitis with paravertebral abcess is shown. (B) In the sagittal view, the prevertebral abcess and infectious spondylitis at L2 and L3 is seen
jkss-13-87f1.tif
Fig. 2.
Postoperative X-ray shows the pedicle screw instrumentation and the anterior interbody fusion with auto iliac bone graft from L1 to L4. (A) Anterior posterior view (B) Lateral view
jkss-13-87f2.tif
Fig. 3.
The iliac crest donor site is reconstructed by the 1/3 tubular plate.
jkss-13-87f3.tif
Table 1.
Clinical result
  Excellent Good Poor
Cosmetic appearancea 24 4 0
Foreign body senseb 25 2 1
Overall satisfactionc 22 5 1

a Excellent: smooth and satisfactory outline; good: some alteration of outline but generally satisfactory; poor: obvious irregular outline

b Excellent: none; good: slight or occasional; poor: some or more than occasional

c Excellent: satisfied; good: almost satisfied; poor: dissatisfied

TOOLS
Similar articles