PDF
ePub
Citation
Print
Abstract
Objectives
The purpose of this study is to decrease the frequency of the postoperative complications and to improve the postoperative clinical outcomes for the elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Summery of Literature Review: Many controversies exist about postoperative complication and its influencing factors in the elderly patients suffering with lumbar spinal stenosis.
Materials and Methods
We reviewed the hospital records of 213 patients who underwent decompression and posterolateral fusion between February 1, 1998 and December 31, 2003 to treat their degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. This study was per-formed, to assess and compare the postoperative complications and clinical outcomes of surgical management for the patients over 65 years (Group A) and the patients between 50-64 years (Group B). All the patients had at least a 1-year follow-up evaluation. The factors that could have influenced the complications that resulted within 12 weeks after the operation were evaluated and statistically analyzed.
Results
Postoperative complications occurred in 62 patients of Group A and in 40 patients of Group B, of which the major complications occurred in 10 patients of Group A and in 1 patient of Group B and minor complications occurred in 52 patients of Group A and in 39 patients of Group B. A statistical relationship between diabetes and major complications was observed in Group A (p=0.005). While any relationship between age and the frequency of complication in each group was not found, Group A had a higher frequency of major complication than did Group B (p=0.004).
Go to : 
REFERENCES
01). Deyo RA., Cherkin DC., Loeser JD., Bigos SJ., Ciol MA. Morbidity and mortality in association with operation on the lumbar spine: The influence of age, diagnosis, and procedure. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992. 74:536–543.
02). Katz JN., Lipson SJ., Brick GW, et al. Clinical correlates of patient satisfaction after laminectomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine. 1995. 20:1155–1160.
03). Katz JN., Lipson SJ., Larson MG., McInnnes JM., Fossel AH., Liang MH. The outcome of decompressive laminec- tomy for degenerative lumbar stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991. 73:809–816.
04). Johnsson KE., Rosen I., Uden A. The natural course of lumbar spinal stenosis. Clin Orthop. 1992. 279:82–86.
05). Sanderson PL., Wood PL. Surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in old people. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993. 75:393–397.
06). Silver HR., Lewis PJ., Asch HL. Decompressive lumbar laminectomy for spinal stenosis. J Neurosurg. 1993. 78:695–701.
07). Ragab AA., Fye MA., Bohlman HH. Surgery of the lumbar spine for spinal stenosis in 118 patients 70 years of age or older. Spine. 2003. 28:348–353.
08). Airaksinen O., Herno A., Turunen V., Saari T., Suom-lainen O. Surgical outcome of 438 patients treated surgi-cally for lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine. 1997. 22:2278–2282.
09). Amundsen T., Weber H., Nordal HJ., Magnaes B., Abdel-noor M., Lilleas F. Lumbar spinal stenosis: conservative or surgical management? A prospective 10-year study. Spine. 2000. 25:1424–1436.
10). Carreon LY., Puno RM., Dimar II Jr., Glassman SD., Johnson JR. Perioperative complications of posterior lumbar decompression and arthrodesis in older adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003. 85:2089–2092.
11). Arinzon ZH., Fredman B., Zohar E, et al. Surgical management of spinal stenosis: a comparison of immediate and long term outcome in two geriatric patient populations. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2003. 36:273–279.
12). Benz RJ., Ibrahim ZG., Afshar P., Garfin SR. Predicting complications in elderly patients undergoing lumbar decompression. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001. 384:116–121.
13). Oldridge NB., Yuan Z., Stoll JE., Rimm AR. Lumbar spine surgery and mortality among medicare beneficia-ries,1986. Am J Public Health. 1994. 84:1292–1298.
14). Furnary AP., Zerr KJ., Grunkemeier GL., Starr A. Con-tinuous intravenous insulin infusion reduces the incidence of deep sternal wound infection in diabetic patients after cardiac surgical procedures. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999. 67:352–362.
15). Zerr KJ., Furnary AP., Grunkemeier GL., Bookin S., Kanhere V., Starr A. Glucose control lowers the risk of wound infection in diabetics after open heart operation. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997. 63:356–361.
16). Rodier M., Andary M., Richard JL., Mirouze J., Clot J. Peripheral blood T-cell subsets studied by monoclonal antibodies in Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes: effect of blood glucose control. Diabetologia. 1984. 27:136–138.
17). Berghe GVD., Wouters P., Weekers F, et al. Intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2001. 345:1359–1367.
18). Dellinger RP., Carlet JM., Masur H, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2004. 32:858–873.
Go to :
Table 1.
Clinical Outcome Measurement
| Group | Back Pain | Leg Pain | Activity | Medication |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Excellent | Occasional | None | Normal | None |
| Good | Mild | Mild | Normal | NSAIDs |
| Fair | Moderate | Moderate | Restricted | NSAIDs |
| Poor | Severe | Severe | Restricted | Narcotics |
Table 2.
Complications
Table 3.
Complications
XML Download