Journal List > J Korean Soc Spine Surg > v.12(3) > 1035661

Lee, Kim, Yoon, Kang, Jo, Park, Song, Yeom, Chang, Lee, and Lee: The Usefulness of Selective Nerve Root Block as a Predictor of Prognosis of Lumbar Disc Herniation

Abstract

Study Design

A prospective study.

Objectives

To investigate the usefulness of selective nerve root block (SNRB) as a prognosis predictor of a lumbar disc herniation.

Summary of Literature Review

The biochemical factors of radiculopathy, as opposed to the biomechanical factors, are more reversible and responsive to a corticosteroid injection.

Materials and Methods

Fifty patients underwent SNRB for the radiculopathy caused by a herniated lumbar disc and were followed for at least 1 year. The straight leg raising (SLR) angle, visual analog scale (VA S) and the patients' subjective satisfaction, using the Weber criteria, were initially investigated, and again at 1 week and 1 month after the procedure, and finally at the final follow- up. The patients were divided into two groups according to the final satisfaction. Group 1 (satisfactory prognosis, N=32) had Excellent/Good results at the final follow- up, whereas Group 2(unsatisfactory prognosis, N=18) had Fair/Poor final results, or underwent surgical treatment. The improvements in the SLR and V A S at 1 week and 1month were compared between two groups. The subjective satisfaction each time was compared to the final outcome; the relative risks were also calculated.

Results

The improvements in the SLR and VA S for Group 1 were significantly better than those for Group 2 at both 1 week and 1 month (P<0.05). Those patients with Excellent/Good results at 1 week and 1month manifested satisfactory final outcomes (P<0.05). The risks of the patients with Fair/Poor results at 1 week and 1 month manifesting unsatisfactory final outcomes were 6.8 and 15.2 times higher than those with Excellent/Good results.

Conclusion

Selective nerve root block could be a useful method, not only to relieve acute leg pain, but also to predict the long-term prognosis of a herniated lumbar disc. Early surgical treatment could be considered for the patients not manifesting significant improvement until 1 month after SNRB.

REFERENCES

1). Deyo RA, Loeser J, Bigos S. Herniated lumbar intervertebral disc. Ann Intern Med. 1990; 112:598–603.
2). Hakelius A. Prognosis in sciatica: A clinical follow-up of surgical and non-surgical treatment. Acta Orthop Scand. 1970; 129(suppl):1–76.
crossref
3). Saal JA, Saal JS. Nonoperative treatment of herniated lumbar intervertebral disc with radiculopathy: An outcome study. Spine. 1989; 14:431–437.
4). Weber H. Lumbar disc herniation: A controlled, prospective study with ten years of observation. Spine. 1983; 8:131–140.
crossref
5). Ahn SH, Park HW, Byun WM, et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes and natural morphologic changes between sequestered and large central extruded disc herniations. Yonsei Med J. 2002; 43:283–290.
crossref
6). Komori H, Shinomiya K, Nakai O, Yamaura I, Takeda S, Furuya K. The natural history of herniated nucleus pulposus with radiculopathy. Spine. 1996; 21:225–229.
crossref
7). Komori H, Okawa A, Haro H, Shinomiya K. Factors predicting the prognosis of lumbar radiculopathy due to disc herniation. J Orthop Sci. 2002; 7:56–61.
crossref
8). Ito T, Takano Y, Yuasa N. Types of lumbar herniated disc and clinical course. Spine. 2001; 26:648–651.
crossref
9). Pedwitz RA, Garfin SR, Massie JB, et al. Effects of magnitude and duration of compression on spinal nerve roots conduction. Spine. 1992; 17:194–199.
10). Rydevik B, Brown MD, Lundborg G. Pathoan ato my and pathophysiology of nerve root compression. Spine. 1984; 9:7–15.
11). Rydevik BL, Myers RR, Powell HC. Pressure increase in the dorsal root ganglion following mechanical compression: closed compartment syndrome in nerve roots. Spine. 1989; 14:574–579.
12). Takahashi N, Yabuki S, Aoki Y, Kikuchi S. Pathomech -anisms of nerve root injury caused by disc herniation: an experimental study of mechanical compression and chemi -cal irritation. Spine. 2003; 28:435–441.
13). Gronblad M, Virri J, Tolonen J, et al. A controlled immunohistochemical study of inflammatory cells in disc herniation tissue. Spine. 1994; 19:2744–2751.
crossref
14). Kang JD, Georgescu Hi, McIntyre-Larkin L, Ste-fanovic-Racic M, Donaldson WF 3rd, Evans CH. Herniated lumbar intervertebral discs spontaneously produce matrix metalloproteninases, nitric oxide, interleukin-6, and prostaglandin E2. Spine. 1996; 21:271–277.
15). Kayama S, Konno S, Olmarker K, Yabuki , Kikuchi S. Incision of the anulus fibrosus induces nerve root morphologic, vascular, and functional changes. An experimental study. Spine. 1996; 21:2539–2543.
16). Olmarker K, Rydevik B, Nordborg C. A u t o l o gous nucleus pulposus induces neurophysiologic and histologic changes in porcine cauda equina nerve roots. Spine. 1993; 18:1425–1432.
17). Olmarker K, Nordborg C, Larsson K, Rydevik B. Ultrastructural changes in spinal nerve roots induced by autologous nucleus pulposus. Spine. 1996; 21:411–414.
crossref
18). Otani K, Arai I, Mao GP, Konno S, Olmarker K, Kikuchi S. Nucleus pulposus-induced nerve root injury: relationship between blood flow and motor nerve conduction velocity. Neurosurgery. 1999; 45:614–619.
crossref
19). Yabuki S, Igarashi T, Kikuchi S. Application of nucleus pulposus to the nerve root simultaneously reduces blood flow in dorsal root ganglion and corresponding hindpaw in the rat. Spine. 2000; 25:1471–1476.
crossref
20). Bokduk N. Epidural steroids. Spine. 1995; 20:845–848.
21). Buchner M, Zeifang F, Brocai DR, Schiltenwolf M. Epidural corticosteroid injection in the conservative management of sciatica. Clin Orthop. 2000; 375:149–156.
crossref
22). Buttermann GR. Lumbar disc herniation regression after successful epidural steroid injection. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2002; 15:469–476.
crossref
23). Cuckler JM, Bernini PA, Wiesel SW, Booth RE, Rothman RH, Pickens GT. The use of epidural steroids in the treatment of lumbar radicular pain. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study. J Bone Joint Surg. 1985; 67-A:63–66.
crossref
24). Delaney TJ, Rowlingson JC, Carron H, Butler A. Epidural steroid effects on nerves and meninges. Anesth Analg. 1980; 58:610–614.
crossref
25). Derby R, Kine G, Saal JA, et al. Response to steroid and duration of raducular pain as predictors of surgical outcome. Spine. 1992; 17(suppl):176–183.
26). Johansson A, Hao J, Sjolun B. Local corticosteroid application blocks transmission in normal nociceptive C-fibers. Acta Anaestheiol Scand. 1990; 34:335–338.
27). Hong YG, Sa SJ, Kim JD. Selective spinal nerve root block for the treatment of Sciatica. J Kor Orthop Assoc. 1997; 32(4):1056–1062.
crossref
28). Krempen JF, Smith BS. Nerve root injection. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974; 56:1435–1444.
29). Lee DH, Hahn SH, Yang BK, Yi SR, Chung SW, Kim MS. The short term results of selective nerve root block in herniated lumbar disc patients. J Kor Spine Surg. 2004; 11:216–222.
crossref
30). Pelz DM. Percutaneous lumbar nerve root blocks. Am J Roentgenol. 1992; 158:1412–1413.
crossref
31). Riew KD, Yin Y, Gilula L, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG. The effect of nerve-root injection on the need for operative treatment of lumbar radicular pain. A prospective, randomized, controlled, double blind study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000; 82:1589–1593.
32). Shim DM, Kim TK, Chae SU, Kim SS, Kim YJ, Jeung UO. Long term results of the selective spinal nerve root block for the herniated lumbar intervertebral disc. J Kor Spine Surg. 2003; 10:30–35.
crossref
33). Shim DM, Kim TK, Song HH, You SS, Cho JD. The usefulness of selective spinal nerve root block. J Kor Spine Surg. 2004; 11:48–54.
crossref
34). Dooley J, McBroom R, Taguchi T. Nerve root infiltration in the diagnosis of radicular pain. Spine. 1988; 13:79–83.
crossref
35). Shim DM, Kim SS, Han HJ, Lee BC, Shin JH. Selective spinal root block method used for testing lumbar spinal disease. J Kor Spine Surg. 1994; 1:293–299.
36). Shim DM, Song HH, Kim TK, et al. The selective spinal nerve root block as predictors of outcome of operative treatment in the lumbar spine. J Kor Spine Surg. 2001; 8:527–533.
crossref
37). Tajima T, Furukawa K, Kuramochi E. Selective lumbosacral radiculography and block. Spine. 1980; 5:68–77.
crossref
38). Slipman CW, Chow DW. Therapeutic spinal corticosteroid injections for the management of radiculopathes. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2002; 13:697–711.
39). Kikuchi S, Hasue M, Nishiyama K, Ito T. Anatomic and clinical studies of radicular symptoms. Spine. 1990; 9:23–30.
crossref
40). Jacobs S, Pullan PT, Potter JM, Shenfield GM. Adrenal suppression following extradural steroids. Anesthesia. 1983; 38:953–956.
crossref

Table 1.
Criteria of subjective satisfaction
  Criteria
Excellent Completely satisfied
Good Satisfied, lesser complaints
Fair Not satisfied, partly incapacitated
Poor Completely incapacitated for work due to chronic back pain or sciatica
Table 2.
Improvement of SLR (straight leg raising) angle and VAS (visual analogue scale)
    1W 1M
Increase of SLR Group 1 29.4± 13.9° 27.3± 13.1°
  Group 2 ∗∗12.5± 13.7°∗∗ ∗∗11.4± 13.5°∗∗
Improvement of VAS Group 1 65.7± 22.9%# 64.3± 22.6%#
  Group 2 .27.7± 28.3%## .26.8± 29.9%##

1W: 1 week after procedure 1M: 1 month after procedure

Vs.

∗∗ P < 0.05

# Vs.

## : P < 0.05

Table 3.
Results of subjective satisfaction
  Subjective satisfaction Results at final follow-up
  Excellent / Good Fair / Poor Total
1 Week Excellent/Good 27 8 35
  Fair/Poor 5 10 15
  Total 32 18 50
1 Month Excellent/Good 26 4 30
  Fair/Poor 6 14 20
  Total 32 18 50
TOOLS
Similar articles