Journal List > Infect Chemother > v.43(3) > 1035084

Kim, Park, Kim, Kim, Rim, Choi, Pai, and Kang: Clinical Efficacy Evaluation of Multi-parameter Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction for the Central Venous Catheter-related Blood Stream Infection

Abstract

Background

The study evaluated the clinical efficacy of a multi-parameter real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for patients with central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI).

Materials and Methods

Thirty five patients suspected to have CRBSI were enrolled. The SeptiFast™ (SF) multi-parameter real-time PCR test (Roche Diagnostics, Germany) and blood culture were performed and results were compared.

Results

The turn-around time for the SF test and blood culture was 32.6±28.9 hours and 115.8±23.5 hours, respectively. Among the 70 blood samples, the positive rates of SF test and blood culture were 34.3% and 27.1%, respectively, and the agreement rate was 62.9%. Gram-positive bacteria were detected in 10 patients with blood culture and 11 patients with SF test. Gram-negative bacteria were detected in one patient with a blood culture and in seven patients with SF test. Candida was not detected in blood culture but was detected in two patients by the SF test.

Conclusions

SF test was faster and more sensitive for the detection of blood pathogens than blood culture. It provides a more sensitive detection of gram-negative and Candida in blood than does blood culture testing.

Figures and Tables

Table 1
Master list of the SeptiFast Test for the Detection and Identification of 25 Bacterial and Fungal Pathogens Responsible for the Majority of Sepsis Cases
ic-43-240-i001

acoagulase negative staphylococci.

Table 2
Interpretation of the Discordant Cases between the SeptiFast Test and Blood Culture
ic-43-240-i002

BC, blood culture; SF, SeptiFast.

Table 3
Comparison of Detected Number of Bacterial or Fungal Pathogens between SeptiFast Test and Blood Culturea
ic-43-240-i003

BC, blood culture; SF, SeptiFast.

aIn five cases, multiple pathogens were detected in the SeptiFast test.

bIncludes discordant case number 13 (SF false identification).

References

1. Angus DC, Linde-Zwirble WT, Lidicker J, Clermont G, Carcillo J, Pinsky MR. Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care. Crit Care Med. 2001. 29:1303–1310.
crossref
2. Richards MJ, Edwards JR, Culver DH, Gaynes RP. Nosocomial infections in medical intensive care units in the United States. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. Crit Care Med. 1999. 27:887–892.
crossref
3. Maki DG, Kluger DM, Crnich CJ. The risk of bloodstream infection in adults with different intravascular devices: a systematic review of 200 published prospective studies. Mayo Clin Proc. 2006. 81:1159–1171.
crossref
4. Dimopoulos G, Falagas ME. Approach to the febrile patient in the ICU. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2009. 23:471–484.
crossref
5. McGee DC, Gould MK. Preventing complications of central venous catheterization. N Engl J Med. 2003. 348:1123–1133.
crossref
6. Pittet D, Tarara D, Wenzel RP. Nosocomial bloodstream infection in critically ill patients. Excess length of stay, extra costs, and attributable mortality. JAMA. 1994. 271:1598–1601.
crossref
7. Renaud B, Brun-Buisson C. ICU-Bacteremia Study Group. Outcomes of primary and catheter-related bacteremia. A cohort and case-control study in critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001. 163:1584–1590.
8. Marschall J. Catheter-associated bloodstream infections: looking outside of the ICU. Am J Infect Control. 2008. 36:S172.e5–S172.e8.
crossref
9. Mermel LA, Allon M, Bouza E, Craven DE, Flynn P, O'Grady NP, Raad II, Rijnders BJ, Sherertz RJ, Warren DK. Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intravascular catheter-related infection: 2009 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2009. 49:1–45.
crossref
10. Schrenzel J. Clinical relevance of new diagnostic methods for bloodstream infections. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2007. 30:Suppl 1. S2–S6.
crossref
11. Sleigh J, Cursons R, La Pine M. Detection of bacteraemia in critically ill patients using 16S rDNA polymerase chain reaction and DNA sequencing. Intensive Care Med. 2001. 27:1269–1273.
crossref
12. Lehmann LE, Hunfeld KP, Emrich T, Haberhausen G, Wissing H, Hoeft A, Stüber F. A multiplex real-time PCR assay for rapid detection and differentiation of 25 bacterial and fungal pathogens from whole blood samples. Med Microbiol Immunol. 2008. 197:313–324.
crossref
13. Kim BN. Blood cultures: principles and practices. Infect Chemother. 2007. 39:111–116.
14. Murray PR, Witebsky FG. Mandell GL, Bennett JF, Dolin R, editors. The clinician and the microbiology laboratory. Principles and practice of infectious diseases. 2009. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone;236–238.
crossref
15. Safdar N, Fine JP, Maki DG. Meta-analysis: methods for diagnosing intravascular device-related bloodstream infection. Ann Intern Med. 2005. 142:451–466.
crossref
16. Raad I, Hanna HA, Alakech B, Chatzinikolaou I, Johnson MM, Tarrand J. Differential time to positivity: a useful method for diagnosing catheter-related bloodstream infections. Ann Intern Med. 2004. 140:18–25.
crossref
17. Klaerner HG, Eschenbach U, Kamereck K, Lehn N, Wagner H, Miethke T. Failure of an automated blood culture system to detect nonfermentative gram-negative bacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 2000. 38:1036–1041.
crossref
TOOLS
ORCID iDs

Jungoak Kang
https://orcid.org/http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9181-6819

Similar articles