CAD/CAM fabricated complete denture using 3D face scan: A case report

Dae-Young Eom; Richard Leesungbok; Suk-Won Lee; Su-Jung Park; Su-Jin Ahn

doi:10.4047/jkap.2017.55.4.436

Journal List > J Korean Acad Prosthodont > v.55(4) > 1034953

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

TOOLS

Eom, Leesungbok, Lee, Park, and Ahn: CAD/CAM fabricated complete denture using 3D face scan: A case report

Case Report

J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2017;55(4):436-443.

Published online: NaN October 2017

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2017.55.4.436

CAD/CAM fabricated complete denture using 3D face scan: A case report

Dae-Young Eom, Richard Leesungbok, Suk-Won Lee, Su-Jung Park, Su-Jin Ahn^∗

Department of Biomaterials &Prosthodontics, Kyung Hee University Dental Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, Republic of Korea

∗Corresponding Author: Su-Jin Ahn Department of Biomaterials and Prosthodontics, Kyung-Hee University Dental School Hospital at Gangdong, Dongnam-ro 892, Gangdong-gu, Seoul 05278, Republic of Korea +82 (2)440 7518: e-mail, hswhsh@khu.ac.kr

This study was supported by research grants from Hanmi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

Received 31 May 201712 September 2017 Accepted 12 September 2017

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

In the past, computer-aided design / computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology was the closed system that users had to use the components of only one manufacturer. At present, it has changed to the open system with the flexibility to select and use the components of various manufacturers' components according to their needs. Despite the development of dental materials and prostheses manufacturing methods, denture manufacturing has followed conventional manufacturing methods for nearly 100 years. However, studies on CAD/CAM fabricated denture have been recently carried out to overcome the disadvantages of conventional denture manufacturing. Some commercialized products using milling or 3D printing have already been applied clinically. This case report confirms the possibility of CAD/CAM dentures using 3D face scan and compared them to conventionally fabricated dentures. (J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2017;55:436-43)

Go to :

Keywords: Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM), 3D face scan, Complete denture

REFERENCES

1.Miyazaki T1., Hotta Y., Kunii J., Kuriyama S., Tamaki Y. A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J. 2009. 28:44–56.

2.Bidra AS., Taylor TD., Agar JR. Computer-aided technology for fabricating complete dentures: systematic review of historical background, current status, and future perspectives. J Prosthet Dent. 2013. 109:361–6.

3.Maeda Y., Minoura M., Tsutsumi S., Okada M., Nokubi T. A CAD/CAM system for removable denture. Part I: Fabrication of complete dentures. Int J Prosthodont. 1994. 7:17–21.

4.Baba NZ., AlRumaih HS., Goodacre BJ., Goodacre CJ. Current techniques in CAD/CAM denture fabrication. Gen Dent. 2016. 64:23–8.

5.Stansbury JW., Idacavage MJ. 3D printing with polymers: Challenges among expanding options and opportunities. Dent Mater. 2016. 32:54–64.

6.van Noort R. The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater. 2012. 28:3–12.

7.Kattadiyil MT., Goodacre CJ., Baba NZ. CAD/CAM complete dentures: a review of two commercial fabrication systems. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2013. 41:407–16.

8.Abduo J., Lyons K., Bennamoun M. Trends in computer-aided manufacturing in prosthodontics: a review of the available streams. Int J Dent. 2014. 2014:783948.

9.Sabol JV., Grant GT., Liacouras P., Rouse S. Digital image capture and rapid prototyping of the maxillofacial defect. J Prosthodont. 2011. 20:310–4.

10.Park CJ. Current status and future perspectives of CAD/CAM fabricated complete denture. J Korean Dent Assoc. 2014. 52:347–53.

11.Goodacre BJ., Goodacre CJ., Baba NZ., Kattadiyil MT. Comparison of denture base adaptation between CAD-CAM and conventional fabrication techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 2016. 116:249–56.

12.Hajeer MY., Millett DT., Ayoub AF., Siebert JP. Applications of 3D imaging in orthodontics: part I. J Orthod. 2004. 31:62–70.

13.Moss JP., Ismail SF., Hennessy RJ. Three-dimensional assessment of treatment outcomes on the face. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2003. 6:126–31.

14.Hajeer MY., Ayoub AF., Millett DT. Three-dimensional assessment of facial soft-tissue asymmetry before and after orthognathic surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004. 42:396–404.

15.Schweiger J., Guth JF., Edelhoff D., Stumbaum J. Virtual evaluation for CAD-CAM-fabricated complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 2017. 117:28–33.

16.DENTCA web site. [Accessed 31 August, 2017]. Available from. https://www.dentca.com/products/dentca-3d.

17.Lee KY., Lee DJ. A comparative study of teeth and dental arch of Korean and Caucasian. Oral Biol Res. 1993. 71:1–15.

18.Kook YA., Nojima K., Moon HB., McLaughlin RP., Sinclair PM. Comparison of arch forms between Korean and North American white populations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004. 126:680–6.

Go to :

Fig. 1.

Intraoral view. (A) Right lateral view, (B) Frontal view, (C) Left lateral view.

undefined

Fig. 2.

Panoramic radiograph on first visit of patient. (A) Panoramic view, (B) Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) panoramic view.

undefined

Fig. 3.

Impression occlusal rim (IOR). (A) Combination of individual tray and wax rim, (B) IOR attached with Gothic arch tracer.

undefined

Fig. 4.

At the second visit of patient. (A) Border molding, (B) Final impression, (C) Jaw relation record using impression occlusal rim (IOR).

undefined

Fig. 5.

3D face scan. (A) Right lateral view, (B) Frontal view, (C) Left lateral view.

undefined

Fig. 6.

Stereolithography (STL) record. (A) Impression occlusal rim (IOR) with cast, (B) Maxilla cast, (C) Mandible cast.

undefined

Fig. 7.

Superimposition of stereolithography (STL) record. (A) Right lateral view, (B) Frontal view, (C) Left lateral view.

undefined

Fig. 8.

Virtual evaluation using 3D face scan. (A) Right lateral view, (B) Frontal view, (C) Left lateral view.

undefined

Fig. 9.

Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) panoramic view after delivery of final denture.

undefined

Fig. 10.

Comparison of dentures fabricated by two methods. The left is conventional denture and the right is CAD/CAM fabricated denture. Dentures show the difference in the shape of dental arch and canine width. (A) Conventional denture, (B) CAD/CAM fabricated denture.

undefined

Fig. 11.

Intraoral and extraoral view after delivery of dentures. Intraoral view differs from the transparency of denture base, but extraoral view shows similar appearance. (A) Conventional denture, (B) CAD/CAM fabricated denture.

undefined

TOOLS

Similar articles