Journal List > J Korean Acad Prosthodont > v.54(3) > 1034884

Yoon, Han, Kim, and Kim: Clinical application of implant assisted removable partial denture to patient who underwent mandibular resection with oral cancer: A case report

Abstract

Mandible defects could be caused by congenital malformations, trauma, osteomyelitis, tumor resection. If large areas are included for reconstruction, those are primarily due to tumor resection defects. The large jaw defect results in a problem about mastication, swallowing, occlusion and phonetics, and poor esthetics causes a lot of inconvenience in daily life. It is almost impossible to be a part underwent mandibular resection completely reproduced, should be rebuilt artificially. This case is of a patient who was diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma pT1N0M0, stage I in February 2004 and received surgery (combined mandibulectomy and neck dissection operation (COMMANDO) in oromaxillofacial surgery) in March 2004, by implant assisted removable partial denture. We could obtain good retention and stability through sufficient coverage and implant holding. Follow up period was about four years. Mandibular left third molar regions have been observed to have resorption of surrounding bone, and periodic check-ups are necessary conditions. (J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2016;54:280-5)

REFERENCES

1.Garrett N., Roumanas ED., Blackwell KE., Freymiller E., Abemayor E., Wong WK., Gerratt B., Berke G., Beumer J 3rd., Kapur KK. Efficacy of conventional and implant-supported mandibular resection prostheses: study overview and treatment outcomes. J Prosthet Dent. 2006. 96:13–24.
crossref
2.Teoh KH., Huryn JM., Patel S., Halpern J., Tunick S., Wong HB., Zlotolow IM. Implant prosthodontic rehabilitation of fibula free-flap reconstructed mandibles: a Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center review of prognostic factors and implant outcomes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005. 20:738–46.
3.Hupp JR. Tucker MR, Ellis E. Contemporary oral and maxillofacial surgery. 5th ed.St. Louis: CV Mosby;2005. p. 605–16.
4.Raoul G., Ruhin B., Briki S., Lauwers L., Haurou Patou G., Capet JP., Maes JM., Ferri J. Microsurgical reconstruction of the jaw with fibular grafts and implants. J Craniofac Surg. 2009. 20:2105–17.
crossref
5.Hotz G. Reconstruction of mandibular discontinuity defects with delayed nonvascularized free iliac crest bone grafts and endosseous implants: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 1996. 76:350–5.
crossref
6.Disa JJ., Cordeiro PG. Mandible reconstruction with microvascular surgery. Semin Surg Oncol. 2000. 19:226–34.
crossref
7.Pogrel MA., Podlesh S., Anthony JP., Alexander J. A comparison of vascularized and nonvascularized bone grafts for reconstruction of mandibular continuity defects. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997. 55:1200–6.
crossref
8.Leong EW., Cheng AC., Tee-Khin N., Wee AG. Management of acquired mandibular defects-prosthodontic considerations. Singapore Dent J. 2006. 28:22–33.
9.Baker A., McMahon J., Parmar S. Immediate reconstruction of continuity defects of the mandible after tumor surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001. 59:1333–9.
10.Adell R., Svensson B., Bågenholm T. Dental rehabilitation in 101 primarily reconstructed jaws after segmental resections-possibilities and problems. An 18-year study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2008. 36:395–402.
11.Salinas TJ., Desa VP., Katsnelson A., Miloro M. Clinical evaluation of implants in radiated fibula flaps. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010. 68:524–9.
crossref
12.Cordeiro PG., Disa JJ., Hidalgo DA., Hu QY. Reconstruction of the mandible with osseous free flaps: a 10-year experience with 150 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999. 104:1314–20.
crossref
13.Holmgren EP., Seckinger RJ., Kilgren LM., Mante F. Evaluating parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis-a two-dimensional comparative study examining the effects of implant diameter, implant shape, and load direction. J Oral Implantol. 1998. 24:80–8.
crossref

Fig. 1.
Panoramic radiograph at first visit and after marginal mandibulectomy. (A) radiograph at first visit on February 11, 2004, (B) radiograph after surgery on March 24, 2004.
jkap-54-280f1.tif
Fig. 2.
Panoramic radiograph at bone graft and after removal of necrotic bone. (A) radiograph after iliac bone graft surgery on September 12, 2008, (B) radiograph after surgical removal of necrotic graft material.
jkap-54-280f2.tif
Fig. 3.
Radiograph after (A) extraction and (B) implant surgery.
jkap-54-280f3.tif
Fig. 4.
Laboratory process (A), (B) occlusal intraoral photo, the mandible left edentulous area covered with transplanted forearm flap (C) final impression, (D) working model, (E) metal framework fabrication, (F) final prosthesis.
jkap-54-280f4.tif
Fig. 5.
Try in. #38 area is convex protruding form due to lack of space.
jkap-54-280f5.tif
Fig. 6.
#38 marginal bone loss. (A) radiograph after six months follow up after prosthesis placement on December 18, 2012 (B) radiograph three years later in June, 2014.
jkap-54-280f6.tif
TOOLS
Similar articles