Abstract
In patients with fully edentulous maxilla, fabrication of implant-supported overdenture can be a viable treatment option, when a minimum of six implants were strategically placed. Among several attachment systems used for implant-supported overdentures, milled-bars prevent rotational movement of denture, thus showing great stability, and have the advantage of splinting multiple implants with each other. In this case report, a milled-bar supported overdenture was fabricated for a patient suffering from condition of fully edentulous maxilla with severe ridge resorption in the anterior residual ridge. Seven implants composed of three different systems were effectively utilized by CAD/CAM customized abutment and cement-retained milled bar. (J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2016;54:146-51)
Go to : 

REFERENCES
1.Doundoulakis JH., Eckert SE., Lindquist CC., Jeffcoat MK. The implant-supported overdenture as an alternative to the complete mandibular denture. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003. 134:1455–8.


2.van Kampen F., Cune M., van der Bilt A., Bosman F. Retention and postinsertion maintenance of bar-clip, ball and magnet attachments in mandibular implant overdenture treatment: an in vivo comparison after 3 months of function. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003. 14:720–6.


3.Petropoulos VC., Smith W., Kousvelari E. Comparison of retention and release periods for implant overdenture attachments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997. 12:176–85.
4.Trakas T., Michalakis K., Kang K., Hirayama H. Attachment systems for implant retained overdentures: a literature review. Implant Dent. 2006. 15:24–34.


5.Krennmair G., Krainhöfner M., Piehslinger E. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with a milled bar: a retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007. 22:987–94.
6.Zarb GA., Bolender CL., Eckert SE., Fenton AH., Jacob RF., Mericske-Stern R. Prosthodontic treatment for edentulous patients: Complete dentures and implant-supported prestheses. 12th ed.Mosby;2004.
Go to : 

![]() | Fig. 1.Panoramic radiograph (A) and intraoral photo (B) after uncovery surgery. Implant on i26 was removed due to failure of osseointegration. |
![]() | Fig. 2.Final impression taking with individual tray and poly vinyl-siloxane (A), Definitive cast fabrication (B), Mounting of definitive cast after jaw relation record taking (C), Artificial tooth arrangement (D). |
![]() | Fig. 3.Digital image of master cast and wax denture (A, B). CAD/CAM abutment designing considering enough space for bar, framework and denture tooth (B, C). |
![]() | Fig. 4.CAD/CAM abutment and acrylic resin bar pattern. Cast and finished milled bar, Right (A, B, C), Left (D, E, F). |