Functional and esthetical full mouth rehabilitation with implant supported prostheses: A case report

Jae-Woong Yeon; Young-Jun Lim; Ho-Beom Kwon; Myung-Joo Kim

doi:10.4047/jkap.2015.53.1.81

Journal List > J Korean Acad Prosthodont > v.53(1) > 1034856

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

TOOLS

Yeon, Lim, Kwon, and Kim: Functional and esthetical full mouth rehabilitation with implant supported prostheses: A case report

Case Report

J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2015;53(1):81-85.

Published online: 9 February 2015

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2015.53.1.81

Functional and esthetical full mouth rehabilitation with implant supported prostheses: A case report

Jae-Woong Yeon, Young-Jun Lim, Ho-Beom Kwon, Myung-Joo Kim^∗

Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

^∗Corresponding Author: Myung-Joo Kim Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 110-744, Republic of Korea +82 2 2072 0815: e-mail, silk1@snu.ac.kr

Received 10 December 201422 December 2014 Accepted 5 January 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

This report describes the prosthetic treatment of a patient with multiple missing teeth. Installation of five fixtures on maxilla with sinus lift and six fixtures on mandible with ramal bone graft were performed. With implant supported all-ceramic with zirconia core using CAD/CAM technology and porcelain-fused-to-gold prosthesis, treatment with positive outcome which satisfies both functional and esthetical aspect was obtained.

Keywords: Dental implants, CAD-CAM, Full mouth rehabilitation

REFERENCES

1. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Bra�nemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg. 1981; 10:387–416.

2. van Steenberghe D, Lekholm U, Bolender C, Folmer T, Henry P, Herrmann I, Higuchi K, Laney W, Linden U, Astrand P. Applicability of osseointegrated oral implants in the rehabilitation of partial edentulism: a prospective multicenter study on 558 fixtures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990; 5:272–81.

3. Pjetursson BE, Karoussis I, Bu¨rgin W, Bra¨gger U, Lang NP. Patients' satisfaction following implant therapy. A 10-year prospective cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005; 16:185–93.

4. Budtz-Jo¨rgensen E. Restoration of the partially edentulous mouth-a comparison of overdentures, removable partial dentures, fixed partial dentures and implant treatment. J Dent. 1996; 24:237–44.

5. Raigrodski AJ. Contemporary materials and technologies for all-ceramic fixed partial dentures: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent. 2004; 92:557–62.

6. Conrad HJ, Seong WJ, Pesun IJ. Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2007; 98:389–404.

7. Pjetursson BE, Tan K, Lang NP, Bra¨gger U, Egger M, Zwahlen M. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004; 15:625–42.

8. Bozini T, Petridis H, Garefis K, Garefis P. A meta-analysis of prosthodontic complication rates of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses in edentulous patients after an observation period of at least 5 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011; 26:304–18.

9. Triwatana P, Nagaviroj N, Tulapornchai C. Clinical perfor-mance and failures of zirconia-based fixed partial dentures: a review literature. J Adv Prosthodont. 2012; 4:76–83.

Fig. 1.

(A) Pretreatment intraoral view, (B) Pretreatment panoramic radiograph.

Fig. 2.

Postoperative intraoral view. (A) Frontal view, (B, C) Occlusal view, (D, E) Buccal view.

Fig. 3.

Panoramic radiograph 18 months after placement of definitive prosthesis.

Table 1.

Implant placement data

Implant location		Type of implant	Implant diameter (mm)	Implant length (mm)
Maxilla	right lateral incisor	Straumann^® Bone level NC	3.3	10
	right first molar	Straumann^® Tapered Effect RN	4.1	8
	left lateral incisor	Straumann^® Bone level NC	3.3	8
	left second premolar	Straumann^® Tapered Effect RN	4.1	10
	left first molar	Straumann^® Tapered Effect RN	4.1	8
Mandible	right canine	Straumann^® Bone level NC	3.3	10
	right first premolar	Straumann^® Bone level NC	3.3	8
	right first molar	Straumann^® Standard Plus RN	4.1	8
	left canine	Straumann^® Bone level NC	3.3	10
	left first premolar	Straumann^® Bone level NC	3.3	8
	left first molar	Straumann^® Standard Plus RN	4.1	8

NC: Narrow CrossFit^®, RN: Regular Neck.

TOOLS

Similar articles