Journal List > J Korean Acad Prosthodont > v.53(2) > 1034822

Ko, Ahn, Lee, Park, and Lee: Oral rehabilitation with magnetic overdentures for an old patient with complex systemic diseases

Abstract

As dental implant treatment becomes popular for both partial and complete edentulous patients, old people with complex systemic diseases also tend to prefer implant-assisted-overdenture or implant-supported-fixed prostheses to conventional complete denture. In this case, 77-year-old female who was on medication for hypertension and osteoporosis and paralyzed on right side due to stroke visited for implant-assisted-overdenture on lower jaw. After oral and radiographic examination, root-assisted magnet overdenture on upper jaw and implant-assisted magnet overdenture on lower jaw are planned. Consequently, overdentures using self-adjusting magnetic attachment(SA) system on both jaws resulted in recovering satisfying function and retention, which is enable to insert and remove with only one hand.

REFERENCES

1. Kuoppala R, Nä pä nkangas R, Raustia A. Quality of Life of Patients Treated With Implant-Supported Mandibular Overdentures Evaluated With the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14): a Survey of 58 Patients. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2013; 4:e4.
crossref
2. Kim YK, Yun PY. Dental implant therapy in the geriatric and medically compromised patients: A study on the early complications. J Korean Dent Assoc. 2004; 42:798–806.
3. Song SI. Considerations for implants in the geriatric patient: review of the literature. J Dent Implant Res. 2014; 33:35–41.
4. Schimmel M, Leemann B, Herrmann FR, Kiliaridis S, Schnider A, Müller F. Masticatory function and bite force in stroke patients. J Dent Res. 2011; 90:230–4.
crossref
5. Mü ller F, Duvernay E, Loup A, Vazquez L, Herrmann FR, Schimmel M. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures in very old adults: a randomized controlled trial. J Dent Res. 2013; 92:154S–60S.
6. Fontijn-Tekamp FA, Slagter AP, Van Der Bilt A, Van 'T Hof MA, Witter DJ, Kalk W, Jansen JA. Biting and chewing in overdentures, full dentures, and natural dentitions. J Dent Res. 2000; 79:1519–24.
crossref
7. Feine JS, Carlsson GE, Awad MA, Chehade A, Duncan WJ, Gizani S, Head T, Lund JP, MacEntee M, Mericske-Stern R, Mojon P, Morais J, Naert I, Payne AG, Penrod J, Stoker GT Jr, Tawse-Smith A, Taylor TD, Thomason JM, Thomson WM, Wismeijer D. The McGill Consensus Statement on Overdentures. Montreal, Quebec, Canada. May 24-25, 2002. Int J Prosthodont. 2002; 15:413–4.
8. Thomason JM, Kelly SA, Bendkowski A, Ellis JS. Two implant retained overdentures-a review of the literature supporting the McGill and York consensus statements. J Dent. 2012; 40:22–34.
crossref
9. Carlsson GE. Implant and root supported overdentures - a literature review and some data on bone loss in edentulous jaws. J Adv Prosthodont. 2014; 6:245–52.
crossref
10. Chadha GK, Ahmadieh A, Kumar S, Sedghizadeh PP. Osseointegration of dental implants and osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients treated with bisphosphonate therapy: a systematic review. J Oral Implantol. 2013; 39:510–20.
crossref
11. Montoya-Carralero JM, Parra-Mino P, Ram l′rez-Ferna′ndez P, Morata-Murcia IM, Mompea′n-Gamb l′n Mdel C, Calvo-Guirado JL. Dental implants in patients treated with oral bisphosphonates: a bibliographic review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2010; 15:e65–9.
crossref
12. Yang TC, Maeda Y, Gonda T, Kotecha S. Attachment systems for implant overdenture: influence of implant inclination on retentive and lateral forces. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011; 22:1315–9.
crossref
13. Yang TC, Maeda Y, Gonda T. Clinical performance and satisfaction of removable prostheses with self-adjusting magnetic attachments. J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 111:131–5.
crossref

Fig. 1.
Panoramic radiograph on first visit.
jkap-53-150f1.tif
Fig. 2.
Intraoral photos on first visit. (A) Upper, (B) Front, (C) Lower.
jkap-53-150f2.tif
Fig. 3.
(A) Magnetic keepers on implants (Magden; Shinwon Dental., Inc, Seoul, Korea), (B) Root keepers (Magfit-RK; Aichi Steel Corp, Tokai-shi, Japan) on endodontically treated roots and resin build-up in dome shape.
jkap-53-150f3.tif
Fig. 4.
Metal frame with housing for magnet assembly space. (A) Upper, (B) Lower.
jkap-53-150f4.tif
Fig. 5.
Mounting on articulator, showing severe alveolar bone resorption and asymmetry.
jkap-53-150f5.tif
Fig. 6.
Wax-denture try-in.
jkap-53-150f6.tif
Fig. 7.
Radiographs on 3 months after implant placement and extraction. (A) Endodontically treated roots with Root Keepers (Magfit-RK; Aichi Steel Corp, Tokai-shi, Japan) on upper jaw, (B, C) Implants (Magden; Shinwon Dental., Inc, Seoul, Korea) with magnetic keepers on lower jaw.
jkap-53-150f7.tif
Fig. 8.
Final dentures with magnet assemblies. (A) Upper denture, (B) Lower denture.
jkap-53-150f8.tif
Fig. 9.
A patient was satisfied with both dentures with function and acceptable retention even when wide opening. (A) smiling, (B) wide opening.
jkap-53-150f9.tif
Fig.10.
Radiographs on 5 months after final prosthesis delivery. (A) Resin coping was built up again due to dental caries on residual roots. PDL space widening on #12 was reduced. (B, C) Implants are intact.
jkap-53-150f10.tif
Fig. 11.
Mechanics of self-adjusting magnetic attachment (Magfit-SX; Aichi Steel Corp, Tokai-shi, Japan) (A) Time of insertion. Vertical movement allowance of up to 0.4 mm, (B) In vertical dimension, (C) Rotation up to 8 degrees.13
jkap-53-150f11.tif
TOOLS
Similar articles