Journal List > J Korean Acad Prosthodont > v.50(2) > 1034732

Lee, Song, and Lee: Effect of various casting alloys and abutment composition on the marginal accuracy of bar-type retainer

Abstract

Purpose

The object of this study was to determine if the low-priced alloy and metal UCLA abutment could be available for manufacturing bar-retained framework of implant prosthesis.

Materials and methods

Bar structure was classified into 4 groups, The specimen of group 1 and 2 were based on casting high noble metal alloys and noble metal alloys with gold UCLA abutment. The specimen of group 3 and 4 were based on casting noble metal alloys and base metal alloys with metal UCLA abutment. Cast bar structure was installed in an acrylic resin model and only the screw on the hexed abutment side was tightened to 20 Ncm. On the opposite side, vertical discrepancy was measured with stereo microscope from front, back, and lateral side of the implant-abutment interface. One-way ANOVA was performed to analyze the marginal fit discrepancy.

Results

One-way ANOVA test showed significant differences among all groups (P<.05) except for Group 1 and 3. Among them, difference between Group 1 and 2 was noticeable. Measured vertical discrepancies were all below 70 µm except to Group 2.

Conclusion

Base metal alloy and metal UCLA abutment could be used as an alternative to high-priced gold alloy for implant bar-retained framework.

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1
A: Gap measurement points on resin model, B: Marginal gap analysis (a: vertical gap).
jkap-50-85-g001
Fig. 2
Microscopic features of specimen in group 2.
jkap-50-85-g002
Fig. 3
The bar graph of mean vertical discrepancies among the groups.
jkap-50-85-g003
Table 1
Casting alloys used in this study
jkap-50-85-i001
Table 2
Mechanical properties of the casting alloys
jkap-50-85-i002
Table 3
UCLA abutments used in this study
jkap-50-85-i003
Table 4
Classification of experimental groups and number of specimens
jkap-50-85-i004
Table 5
Results of Scheffe's test according to groups
jkap-50-85-i005

☆ denotes significant difference at level 0.05 with Scheffe's test.

References

1. Brånemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, Breine U, Lindström J, Hallén O, Ohman A. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl. 1977. 16:1–132.
2. Spiekermann H, Jansen UK, Richter EJ. A 10-year follow-up study of IMZ and TPS implants in the edentulous mandible using bar-retained overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1995. 10:231–243.
3. Fanuscu MI, Caputo AA. Influence of attachment systems on load transfer of an implant-assisted maxillary overdenture. J Prosthodont. 2004. 13:214–220.
crossref
4. Freeman C, Brook I, Joshi R. Long term follow-up of implant stabilized overdentures. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2001. 9:147–150.
5. Karabuda C, Tosun T, Ermis E, Ozdemir T. Comparison of 2 retentive systems for implant-supported overdentures: soft tissue management and evaluation of patient satisfaction. J Periodontol. 2002. 73:1067–1070.
crossref
6. Lewis SG, Beumer J III, Hornburg W, Moy P. The UCLA abutment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1988. 3:183–189.
7. Lewis SG. An overview of Brånemark System restorative options. J Esthet Dent. 1996. 8:3–44.
crossref
8. Lewis SG, Avera S, Engleman M, Beumer J III. The restoration of improperly inclined osseointegrated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1989. 4:147–152.
9. Lewis SG, Llamas D, Avera S. The UCLA abutment: a four-year review. J Prosthet Dent. 1992. 67:509–515.
crossref
10. O'Brien WJ. O'Brien WJ, editor. Base metal casting alloys. Dental material and their selection. 1997. Carol Stream: Quintessence;259–268.
11. Kano SC, Bonfante G, Hussne R, Siqueira AF. Use of base metal casting alloys for implant framework : Marginal accuracy analysis. J Appl Oral Sci. 2004. 12:337–343.
crossref
12. White GE. Osseointegrated dental technology. 1993. London: Quintessence;82–83.
13. Kano SC, Valle AL, Pegoraro LF, Campos A Jr. Disadjustment of prosthetic components using different alloys. J Dent Res. 1995. 74:806.
14. Tan KB, Rubenstein JE, Nicholls JI, Yuodelis RA. Three-dimensional analysis of the casting accuracy of one-piece, osseointegrated implant-retained prostheses. Int J Prosthodont. 1993. 6:346–363.
15. Mitha T, Owen CP, Howes DG. The three-dimensional casting distortion of five implant-supported frameworks. Int J Prosthodont. 2009. 22:248–250.
16. Jemt T. Failures, complications in 391 consecutively inserted fixed prostheses supported by Brånemark implants in edentulous jaws: A study of treatment from the time of prosthesis placement to the first annual checkup. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991. 6:270–276.
17. Michelinakis G, Barclay CW, Smith PW. The influence of interimplant distance and attachment type on the retention characteristics of mandibular overdentures on 2 implants: Initial retention values. Int J Prosthodont. 2006. 19:507–512.
18. Zarb GA, Symington JM. Osseointegrated dental implants: Preliminary report on a replication study. J Prosthet Dent. 1983. 50:271–276.
crossref
19. Sones AD. Complications with osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent. 1989. 62:581–585.
crossref
20. Skalak R. Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 1983. 49:843–848.
crossref
21. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rocker B, Brånemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg. 1981. 10:387–416.
crossref
22. Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, Brånemark PI, Jemt T. A long-term follow-up of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990. 5:347–359.
23. Carr AB, Stewart RB. Full-arch implant framework casting accuracy: Preliminary in vitro observation for in vivo testing. J Prosthodont. 1993. 2:2–8.
crossref
24. Carr AB. Comparison of impression techniques for a five-implant mandibular model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991. 6:448–455.
25. Linke BA, Nicholls JI, Faucher RR. Distortion analysis of stone casts made from impression materials. J Prosthet Dent. 1985. 54:794–802.
crossref
26. Inturregui J, Aquilino SA, Ryther JS, Lund PS. Evaluation of three impression techniques for osseointegrated oral implants. J Prosthet Dent. 1993. 69:503–509.
crossref
27. Assif D, Marshak B, Schmidt A. Accuracy of implant impression techniques. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996. 11:216–222.
crossref
28. Humphries RM, Yaman P, Bloem T. The accuracy of implant master casts constructed from transfer impressions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990. 5:331–336.
29. Gettleman L, Ryge G. Accuracy of stone, metal and plastic die material. J Calif Dent Assoc. 1970. 46:28–31.
30. Romero GG, Engelmeier R, Powers JM, Canterbury AA. Accuracy of three corrective techniques for implant bar fabrication. J Prosthet Dent. 2000. 84:602–607.
crossref
31. Oh KT, Kim KN. Electrochemical properties of suprastructures galvanically coupled to a titanium implant. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2004. 70:318–331.
crossref
32. Wataha JC. Biocompatibility of dental casting alloys: A review. J Prosthet Dent. 2000. 83:223–234.
crossref
33. Hero H, Valderhaug J. Tarnishing in vivo and in vitro of a low-gold alloy related to its structure. J Dent Res. 1985. 64:139–143.
crossref
TOOLS
Similar articles