Journal List > J Korean Acad Prosthodont > v.49(1) > 1034688

Jang, Kim, Yun, Jeong, and Jeon: The effect of repeated firings on the color of zirconia-based all-ceramic system

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of repeated firings on the color of zirconia restoration with different shading method.

Materials and methods

Three different types of zirconia frameworks (adding metallic pigments to the initial zirconia powder before sintering (Group NM), dipping the milled frameworks in dissolved coloring agents (Group KI), or application of liner material to the sintered white frameworks (Group KW) were used to support A3 shade dentin porcelain. Repeated firings (3, 5, or 7) were performed, color differences among ceramic specimens were measured using a colorimeter. Repeated measurements analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyze the data for significant difference. The Tukey Honestly Significant Different (HSD) test was used to perform multiple comparisons (α= .05).

Results

1. L∗a∗b∗ values of the ceramic systems were affected by the number of firings (1, 3, 5 or 7 firings) (P < .001) and shading methods (P < .001). 2. As the number of firings increased, the L∗ (for all groups) and a∗ value (for KW and NM groups) decreased and the b∗ value(for all groups) increased. 3. The mean color differences caused by repeated firings were perceptible (ΔE > 1) for group KW and KI fired after 3 times, except for group NM fired after 7 times. 4. In order of decreasing ΔE value fired after 7 times, the values were group KI(ΔE = 2.26) > group KW (ΔE = 1.47) > group NM (ΔE = 1.08) (P < .001).

Conclusion

Repeated firings influenced the color of the zirconium-oxide all-ceramic specimens with different shading methods.

REFERENCES

1.Daniel C., Drummond J., Giordano RA. Improving Flexural Strength of Dental Restorative Ceramics Using Laser Interference Direct Structuring. J Am Ceram Soc. 2008. 91:3455–7.
crossref
2.Rosenblum MA., Schulman A. A review of all-ceramic restorations. J Am Dent Assoc. 1997. 128:297–307.
crossref
3.Guazzato M., Albakry M., Ringer SP., Swain MV. Strength, fracture toughness and microstructure of a selection of all-ceramic materials. Part II. Zirconia-based dental ceramics. Dent Mater. 2004. 20:449–56.
crossref
4.Guazzato M., Albakry M., Swain MV., Ironside J. Mechanical properties of In-Ceram Alumina and In-Ceram Zirconia. Int J Prosthodont. 2002. 15:339–46.
5.Jeong HC. Fracture strength of zirconia monolithic crowns. J Korean Acad Prosthodont. 2006. 44:157–64.
6.Aboushelib MN., Kleverlaan CJ., Feilzer AJ. Effect of zirconia type on its bond strength with different veneer ceramics. J Prosthodont. 2008. 17:401–8.
crossref
7.Shah K., Holloway JA., Denry IL. Effect of coloring with various metal oxides on the microstructure, color, and flexural strength of 3Y-TZP. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2008. 87:329–37.
crossref
8.Yilmaz B., Ozçelik TB., Wee AG. Effect of repeated firings on the color of opaque porcelain applied on different dental alloys. J Prosthet Dent. 2009. 101:395–404.
crossref
9.Ozturk O., Uludag B., Usumez A., Sahin V., Celik G. The effect of ceramic thickness and number of firings on the color of two all-ceramic systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2008. 100:99–106.
crossref
10.Celik G., Uludag B., Usumez A., Sahin V., Ozturk O., Goktug G. The effect of repeated firings on the color of an all-ceramic system with two different veneering porcelain shades. J Prosthet Dent. 2008. 99:203–8.
crossref
11.Devigus A., Lombardi G. Shading Vita YZ substructures: influence on value and chroma, part I. Int J Comput Dent. 2004. 7:293–301.
12.Heffernan MJ., Aquilino SA., Diaz-Arnold AM., Haselton DR., Stanford CM., Vargas MA. Relative translucency of six all-ceramic systems. Part I: core materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2002. 88:4–9.
crossref
13.Antonson SA., Anusavice KJ. Contrast ratio of veneering and core ceramics as a function of thickness. Int J Prosthodont. 2001. 14:316–20.
14.Lee YK., Cha HS., Ahn JS. Layered color of all-ceramic core and veneer ceramics. J Prosthet Dent. 2007. 97:279–86.
crossref
15.O'Brien WJ., Kay KS., Boenke KM., Groh CL. Sources of color variation on firing porcelain. Dent Mater. 1991. 7:170–3.
16.Uludag B., Usumez A., Sahin V., Eser K., Ercoban E. The effect of ceramic thickness and number of firings on the color of ceramic systems: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2007. 97:25–31.
crossref
17.Crispin BJ., Hewlett E., Seghi R. Relative color stability of ceramic stains subjected to glazing temperatures. J Prosthet Dent. 1991. 66:20–3.
crossref
18.Lund PS., Piotrowski TJ. Color changes of porcelain surface colorants resulting from firing. Int J Prosthodont. 1992. 5:22–7.
19.O' Brien WJ., Groh CL., Boenke KM. A new, small-color-difference equation for dental shades. J Dent Res. 1990. 69:1762–4.
20.American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. Dental shade guides-acceptance program guidelines. Chicago: American Dental Association;2001. p. 4.
21.Johnston WM., Kao EC. Assessment of appearance match by visual observation and clinical colorimetry. J Dent Res. 1989. 68:819–22.
crossref

Fig. 1.
Samples of all groups: Left, After sintering zirconia. Right, After veneering porcelain.
jkap-49-73f1.tif
Fig. 2.
ShadeEye-NCC® dental chroma meter (Shofu Dental, Kyoto, Japan).
jkap-49-73f2.tif
Fig. 3.
Means of L∗ for different number of firings.
jkap-49-73f3.tif
Fig. 4.
Means of a∗ for different number of firings.
jkap-49-73f4.tif
Fig. 5.
Means of b∗ for different number of firings.
jkap-49-73f5.tif
Table 1.
Zirconia core material used in this study
Group Coloring method Zirconia material Manufacture
KW KI Masking liner Infiltration with solution KaVo Everest KaVo Dental GmbH, Germany
NM Mixed with metal oxides Katana Zirconia Noritake Dental Supply Co. Ltd, Japan
Table 2.
Multivariate test results based on 2-factor repeated measures ANOVA for change in color coordinates after repeated firings
  Group Mean (SD) Numerator df Denominator df F P
ΔL∗1-7 KW -1.37 (0.35)a 2 147 14.687 < .001
KI -1.25 (1.10)a
NM -0.67 (0.30)b
KW -0.15 (0.12)a
Δa∗1-7 KI 0.02 (0.32)b 2 147 8.725 < .001
NM -0.07 (0.11)c
KW 0.19 (0.44)a
Δb∗1-7 KI 1.68 (1.19)b 2 147 51.003 < .001
NM 0.63 (0.36)c

Within same column, means with same lowercase letters do not significantly differ (P > .05).

Table 3.
Mean ΔEab values of all-ceramic specimens after repeated firings
Comparison Number of firings ΔE
KW KI NM
1, 3 1.21 (0.34)aA 1.89 (1.50)aB 0.80 (0.34)aA
1, 5 1.45 (0.33)bcA 2.04 (1.47)abB 0.99 (0.30)bcA
1, 7 1.47 (0.34)cA 2.26 (1.42)cB 1.08 (0.39)cC
3, 5 0.54 (0.25)A 0.86 (0.53)B 0.55 (0.28)A
3, 7 0.61 (0.26)A 0.82 (0.52)B 0.48 (0.24)A
5, 7 0.55 (0.24)A 0.92 (0.55)B 0.49 (0.37)A

Values followed with same lowercase letters in column do not significantly differ (P > .05). Values followed with same uppercase letters in row do not significantly differ (P > .05).

TOOLS
Similar articles