Journal List > J Korean Acad Prosthodont > v.48(2) > 1034648

TOOLS
Yoon, Choi, and Lee: The effect of denture adhesives on the retention of complete denture
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2010;48(2):87-93.

Published online: 18 December 2010

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2010.48.2.87

The effect of denture adhesives on the retention of complete denture

Yu-Mi Yoon, DDS, Yu-Sung Choi, MSD, DDS, Joon-Seok Lee, MSD, DDS, PhD∗

Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University, Cheonan, Korea

Corresponding Author: Joon-Seok Lee Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University, San 7-1, Shinboo-Dong, Cheonan, Choongnam, 330-716, Korea +82 41 550 1971: e-mail, jseok2@hanmail.net

Received 18 December 200917 January 2010       Accepted 23 March 2010

Copyright © 2010 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to compare the retention of the two denture adhesives with a silicone edentulous model and a resin denture base in vitro study.

Material and methods

The experimental groups were used two denture adhesives and classified into 5 subgroups each. Subgroups were divided by the number of times the saliva sprayed. The control group was used synthetic saliva only. Dislodging tensile strengths were applied to the resin denture base using Instron in 3 directions : vertical, lateral, and anterior-posterior.

Results

The retention of two denture adhesives was increased significantly than saliva alone (P < .05). In each denture adhesives, the retention of saliva sprayed first was decreased than denture adhesive alone, but it didn't have significant differences. Whenever saliva sprayed repeated, the retention was decreased significantly than saliva sprayed first (P < .05). In each denture adhesives, vertical retentive force was highest than lateral and anterior-posterior retentive forces, and anterior-posterior retentive force was higher than lateral retentive force. This results were significantly different (P < .05). Significant differences of the retentive ability among two denture adhesives were not observed.

Conclusion

From the results, use of the denture adhesives resulted in improved retentive ability of denture. Especially retentive force was highest in vertical direction. (J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2010;48:87-93)

Keywords: Denture adhesives, Complete denture, Retention, Tensile strength

REFERENCES

1.Grasso JE. Denture adhesives. Dent Clin North Am. 2004. 48:721–33.
crossref
2.Ozcan M., Kulak Y., Arikan A., Silahtar E. The attitude of complete denture wearers towards denture adhesives in Istanbul. J Oral Rehabil. 2004. 31:131–4.
3.Grasso JE. Denture adhesives: changing attitudes. J Am Dent Assoc. 1996. 127:90–6.
crossref
4.Coates AJ. Usage of denture adhesives. J Dent. 2000. 28:137–40.
crossref
5.Chew CL. Retention of denture adhesives-an in vitro study. J Oral Rehabil. 1990. 17:425–34.
6.Zarb GA., Bolender CL., Carlsson GE., Boucher CO. Boucher' s Prosthodontic treatment for edentulous patients. 11th ed.St. Louis: CV Mosby;1997. p. 400–11.
7.Tarbet WJ., Silverman G., Schmidt NF. Maximum incisal biting force in denture wearers as influenced by adequacy of denture-bearing tissues and the use of an adhesive. J Dent Res. 1981. 60:115–9.
crossref
8.Tarbet WJ., Boone M., Schmidt NF. Effect of a denture adhesive on complete denture dislodgement during mastication. J Prosthet Dent. 1980. 44:374–8.
crossref
9.Ozcan M., Kulak Y., de Baat C., Arikan A., Ucankale M. The effect of a new denture adhesive on bite force until denture dislodgement. J Prosthodont. 2005. 14:122–6.
crossref
10.Kelsey CC., Lang BR., Wang RF. Examining patients' responses about the effectiveness of five denture adhesive pastes. J Am Dent Assoc. 1997. 128:1532–8.
11.Uysal H., Altay OT., Alparslan N., Bilge A. Comparison of four different denture cushion adhesives-a subjective study. J Oral Rehabil. 1998. 25:209–13.
12.Kapur KK. A clinical evaluation of denture adhesives. J Prosthet Dent. 1967. 18:550–8.
crossref
13.de Baat C., van' t Hof M., van Zeghbroeck L., Ozcan M., Kalk W. An international multicenter study on the effectiveness of a denture adhesive in maxillary dentures using disposable gnathometers. Clin Oral Investig. 2007. 11:237–43.
crossref
14.Zhao K., Cheng XR., Chao YL., Li ZA., Han GL. Laboratory evaluation of a new denture adhesive. Dent Mater. 2004. 20:419–24.
crossref
15.Panagiotouni E., Pissiotis A., Kapari D., Kaloyannides A. Retentive ability of various denture adhesive materials: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 1995. 73:578–85.
16.Kulak Y., Ozcan M., Arikan A. Subjective assessment by patients of the efficiency of two denture adhesive pastes. J Prosthodont. 2005. 14:248–52.
crossref
17.Koppang R., Berg E., Dahm S., Real C., Fl � ystrand F. A method for testing denture adhesives. J Prosthet Dent. 1995. 73:486–91.
crossref
18.Grasso JE., Rendell J., Gay T. Effect of denture adhesive on the retention and stability of maxillary dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1994. 72:399–405.
19.Grasso J., Gay T., Rendell J., Baker R., Knippenberg S., Finkeldey J., Zhou X., Winston JL. Effect of denture adhesive on retention of the mandibular and maxillary dentures during function. J Clin Dent. 2000. 11:98–103.
20.Rendell JK., Gay T., Grasso JE., Baker RA., Winston JL. The effect of denture adhesive on mandibular movement during chewing. J Am Dent Assoc. 2000. 131:981–6.
21.Psillakis JJ., Wright RF., Grbic JT., Lamster IB. In practice evaluation of a denture adhesive using a gnathometer. J Prosthodont. 2004. 13:244–50.
crossref
22.Fujimori T., Hirano S., Hayakawa I. Effects of a denture adhesive on masticatory functions for complete denture wearers-consideration for the condition of denture-bearing tissues-. J Med Dent Sci. 2002. 49:151–6.
23.Hasegawa S., Sekita T., Hayakawa I. Effect of denture adhesive on stability of complete dentures and the masticatory function. J Med Dent Sci. 2003. 50:239–47.

Fig. 1.
The silicone model.
jkap-48-87f1.tif
Fig. 2.
The resin base.
jkap-48-87f2.tif
Fig. 3.
The vertically directed dislodging force applied to the resin base sample.
jkap-48-87f3.tif
Table I.
Denture adhesives used in this study
Name Company Composition
POLIDENT® Stafford Miller Wexford, Ireland Poly (Methylvinylether/Maleic acid) Sodium-Calcium Mixed Partial Salt Carboxymethylcellulose, Petrolatum, Mineral oil, Spray Dried Spearmint, Propyl Hydroxybenzoate, Erythrosine
COREGA® Stafford Miller Wexford, Ireland Poly (Methylvinylether/Maleic acid) Sodium-/Magnesium-/Zinc-Mixed Salt, Carboxymethylcellulose Sodium-salt, White Petrolatum,Paraffin, Silicondioxide Poly (Methylvinylether/Maleic acid
Table II.
Classification of the tested group
Abbr. Interface medium Dislodging force
Control Saliva  
Px POLIDENT®  
P1 POLIDENT®+ Saliva 1st sprayed  
P2 POLIDENT®+ Saliva 2nd sprayed  
P3 POLIDENT®+ Saliva 3rd sprayed Vertical/
P4 POLIDENT®+ Saliva 4th sprayed Lateral/
Cx COREGA® Anterior-posterior
C1 COREGA®+ Saliva 1st sprayed  
C2 COREGA®+ Saliva 2nd sprayed  
C3 COREGA®+ Saliva 3rd sprayed  
C4 COREGA®+ Saliva 4th sprayed  
Table III.
Mean values of retentive forces on vertical direction (Unit: N/cm2)
Abbr. Mean SD Scheffe Grouping∗
Control 0.30 0.02 C
Px 0.87 0.11 A
P1 0.71 0.16 B, A
P2 0.45 0.12 B, C
P3 0.33 0.10 C
P4 0.27 0.06 C
Cx 0.93 0.14 A
C1 0.55 0.10 B, C
C2 0.45 0.09 B, C
C3 0.40 0.05 C
C4 0.42 0.05 C

∗ Different alphabet denotes significant difference between groups (P < .05).

Table IV.
Mean values of retentive forces on lateral direction (Unit: N/cm2)
Abbr. Mean SD Scheffe Grouping∗
Control 0.15 0.02 D
Px 0.35 0.05 A
P1 0.28 0.03 B, A, C
P2 0.20 0.04 B, D, C
P3 0.18 0.04 B, D, C
P4 0.18 0.04 D, C
Cx 0.28 0.02 B, A
C1 0.27 0.05 B, A, C
C2 0.23 0.01 B, D, C
C3 0.23 0.03 B, D, C
C4 0.20 0.05 B, D, C

∗ Different alphabet denotes significant difference between groups (P < .05).

Table V.
Mean values of retentive forces on anterior-posterior direction (Unit: N/cm2)
Abbr. Mean SD Scheffe Grouping∗
Control 0.19 0.05 A
Px 0.35 0.06 A
P1 0.30 0.08 A
P2 0.22 0.10 A
P3 0.21 0.08 A
P4 0.20 0.09 A
Cx 0.33 0.07 A
C1 0.37 0.06 A
C2 0.38 0.11 A
C3 0.32 0.10 A
C4 0.30 0.07 A

∗ Different alphabet denotes significant difference between groups (P < .05).

Table VI.
Results of Scheffe's test on adhesives
Adhesive Significant at the 0.05 level
  Cx C1 C2 C3 C4 Px P1 P2 P3 P4
Cx   ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗     ∗ ∗ ∗
C1           ∗     ∗ ∗
C2 ∗         ∗       ∗
C3 ∗         ∗        
C4 ∗         ∗        
Px   ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗     ∗ ∗ ∗
P1               ∗ ∗ ∗
P2 ∗         ∗ ∗      
P3 ∗ ∗       ∗ ∗      
P4 ∗ ∗ ∗     ∗ ∗      

∗ Represents significant difference according to Scheffe's test (P < .05).

Table VII.
Results of Scheffe's test on directions
Direction Significant at the 0.05 level
Vertical Lateral Anterior-Posterior
Vertical   ∗ ∗
Lateral ∗   ∗
Anterior-Posterior ∗ ∗  

∗ Represents significant difference according to Scheffe's test (P < .05).

TOOLS
Similar articles