PDF
ePub
Citation
Print
Abstract
Purpose
This study has been conducted in order to examine the oral health status and dental prostheses status, and the effects of dental prostheses to the oral health related quality of life among the elderly using social welfare centers.
Material and methods
For this purpose, the researcher conducted a questionnaire survey and oral examination of 275 samples of old persons using 7 social welfare centers located in Daejeon metropolitan city. The oral health related quality of life was measured by GOHAI (Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index).
Results
1. The less age and the more education and the more subjective economic status and living with spouse of family status, the higher GOHAI showed. 2. Mean age of first using of removable denture is 62.11 years old and average life cycle of removable denture is 10.76years. 57.5% of study subjects use removable denture and complete denture user of study subjects are 13.8%. 3. In the case that they use fixed prostheses rather than removable ones and in the complete denture they use both sides (upper and lower) rather than single side, showed higher GOHAI. 4. In the case that they showed higher degrees of satisfaction with dental prostheses and can use them always and showed no necessity for new dental prostheses and denture adaptation is good, GOHAI showed higher.
Conclusion
In order to improve oral health related quality of life among the elderly who have many missing teeth, it is required to restore their masticatory ability to the normal level by restoring the missing teeth which has lost its function through providing proper dental prostheses. (J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2010;48:101-10)
REFERENCES
1.Lee HK., Lee YK. The relationship between chewing ability and health status in the long-lived elderly of Kyungpook area. Yeungnam Univ J Med. 1999. 16:200–7.
2.Larson R. Thirty years of research on the subjective well-being of older Americans. J Gerontol. 1978. 33:109–25.
3.Richmond S., Chestnutt I., Brown B. The relationship of medical and dental factors to perceived oral and general health. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2007. 35:89–97.
4.Locker D., Matear D., Lawrence H. General health status and changes in chewing ability in older Canadians over seven years. J Public Health Dent. 2002. 62:70–7.
5.Naito M., Yuasa H., Nomura Y., Nakayama T., Hamajima N., Hanada N. Oral health status and health-related quality of life: a systematic review. J Oral Sci. 2006. 48:1–7.
6.Allen PF. Assessment of oral health related quality of life. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003. 1:40. Available at. http//www.hqlo.com/con-tent/1/1/40.
7.Atchison KA., Dolan TA. Development of the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index. J Dent Educ. 1990. 54:680–7.
8.Slade GD., Spencer AJ. Development and evaluation of the Oral Health Impact Profile. Community Dent Health. 1994. 11:3–11.
9.Locker D. Measuring oral health a conceptual framework. Community Dent Health. 1988. 5:3–18.
10.Kim SH., Lim SA., Park SJ., Kim DK. Assessment oral Health-related quality of life using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP). J Korean Acad Dent Health. 2004. 28:559–69.
11.Lee MS., Kim SH., Yang JS., Oh JS., Kim DK. Validity and reliability of the oral health impact profile in elderly Korean 65+. J Korean Acad Dent Health. 2005. 29:210–21.
12.Bae KH. Oral health related quality of life and development of oral health programs in Korean Elders. MD Thesis Department of Preventive and Public Health Dentistry, Graduate School, Seoul National University,. 2005.
13.Jang MS. The Relationship between periodontal health status and oral health related quality of life amoung elderly Koreans. MD Thesis Department of Periodontology, Graduate School, Seoul National University,. 2007.
14.Wong MCM., Liu JKS., Lo ECM. Translation and validation of the Chinese version of GOHAI. J Public Health Dent. 2002. 62:78–83.
15.Turbert-Jeannin S., Riordan PJ., Morel-Papernot A., Porcheray S., Saby-Collet S. Validation of an oral health quality of life index (GO-HAI) in France. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2003. 31:275–84.
16.Ha ¨gglin C., Berggren U., Lundgren J. A Swedish version of the GO-HAI index. Psychometric properties and validation Swed Dent J. 2005. 29:113–24.
17.Othman WNW., Muttalib KA., Bakri R., Doss JG., Jaafar N., Salleh NC., Chen S. Validation of the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) In the Malay language. J Public Health Dent. 2006. 66:199–204.
18.Naito M., Suzukano Y., Nakayama T., Hamajima N., Fukuhara S. Linguistic adaptation and validation of Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) in an elderly Japanese population. J Public Health Dent. 2006. 66:273–5.
19.Hirai T., Ishijima T., Koshino H., Anzai T. Age-related change of masticatory function in complete denture wearers: evaluation by a sieving method with peanuts and a food intake questionnaire method. Int J Prosthodont. 1994. 7:454–60.
20.Locker D., Matear D., Stephens M., Lawrence H., Payne B. Comparison of the GOHAI and OHIP-14 as measures of the oral health-related quality of life of the elderly. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2001. 29:373–81.
21.Ministry of Health and Welfare. The Korean National Oral Health Survey. 2006.
22.Wong MCM., McMillan AS. Tooth loss, denture wearing and oral health-related quality of life in elderly Chinese people. Community Dent Health. 2005. 22:156–61.
23.Locker D., Clarke M., Payne B. Self-perceived oral health status, psychological well-being, and life satisfaction in an older adult population. J Dent Res. 2000. 79:970–5.
24.Chen MS., Hunter P. Oral health and quality of life in New Zealand: a social perspective. Soc Sci Med. 1996. 43:1213–22.
25.Lee GR. The impact of DMFT index on oral health related quality of life in community-dwelling elederly. J Korean Acad Dent Health. 2008. 32:396–404.
26.Kim YN., Kwon HK., Chung WG., Cho YS., Choi YH. The association of perceived oral health with oral epidemiological indicators in Korean adults. J Korean Acad Dent Health. 2005. 29:250–60.
27.Heydecke G., Tedesco LA., Kowalski C., Inglehart MR. Complete dentures and oral health-related quality of life-do coping styles matter? Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2004. 32:297–306.
28.McGrath C., Bed: R. Can dentures improve the quality of life of those who have experienced considerable tooth loss? J Dent. 2001. 29:243–6.
29.Forgie AH., Scott BJJ., Davis DM. A study to compare the oral health impact profile and satisfaction before and after having replacement completed dentures in England and Scotland. Gerodontology. 2005. 22:137–42.
Table I.
General characteristics and GOHAI score
Table II.
Dental prostheses status of study subjects
Table III.
Dental prostheses status of study subjects by age group Unit: Number (%), Mean ± SD
Table IV.
The relations of dental prostheses status to self-rated oral health status Unit: Number (%)
Table V.
The relations of dental prostheses status to chewing discomfort Unit: Number (%)
Table VI.
The relations of dental prostheses status to speaking problem Unit: Number (%)
Table VII.
The relations of dental prostheses status to masticatory ability index
Table VIII.
The relations of dental prostheses status to GOHAI
Table IX.
The relations of perceived dental prostheses to GOHAI
XML Download