Journal List > J Korean Soc Transplant > v.27(3) > 1034400

Lee, Kim, Lee, Choi, Jung, Yhi, Hwang, Lee, Kwon, and Kang: Disseminated Cryptococcosis with Cutaneous Manifestation in a Renal Transplant Recipient: A Case Report

Abstract

Cryptococcosis commonly affects patients with immune dysfunction, as in the case of immunosuppression in organ transplant patients or as acquired immunodeficiency syndrome in patients afflicted with human immunodeficiency virus. The varied appearance of cryptococcal skin lesion makes clinical diagnosis of cutaneous cryptococcosis difficult. Cryptococcosis proves to be a fatal fungal infection in the immunocompromised patient. Therefore, diagnosis and early treatment of cryptococcosis become vital. A 56-year-old renal transplant recipient, with an ongoing immunosuppression regimen of cyclosporine, prednisolone, and mycophenolate mofetil, was admitted with a 2-week history of pain and edema of right arm without respiratory symptoms. Despite empiric antibiotic therapy, the patient continued to complain of severe tenderness of the involved arm and fever persisted as well. On the third day of hospital stay, a biopsy of the erythematous skin lesion was acquired. On the eighth day of hospital stay, results of both skin biopsy and blood cultures showed the presence of Cryptococcus neoformans. The treatment was begun with intravenous fluconazole (400 mg/day). After 4 days of antifungal treatment, the patient developed fever along with cough with purulent sputum. As the new developing symptoms were suggestive of pneumonia, especially of pulmonary cryptococcosis, the antifungal agent was changed from fluconazole to amphotericin B treatment (0.8 mg/kg, 50 mg/day). Chest computer tomography showed improvement in the pneumonic infiltration and consolidation after 4 weeks of amphotericin B treatment. In conclusion, cellulitis in immunocompromised patients should be suspected in case of highly atypical infectious etiology, and skin biopsy should not be delayed if empiric antibiotic therapy does not control the inflammatory response. Additionally, the patient should be treated with intravenous amphotericin B treatment in case of severe cryptococcosis.

REFERENCES

1). Chuang YM, Ho YC, Chang HT, Yu CJ, Yang PC, Hsueh PR. Disseminated cryptococcosis in HIV-unin-fected patients. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2008; 27:307–10.
crossref
2). Silveira FP, Husain S. Fungal infections in solid organ transplantation. Med Mycol. 2007; 45:305–20.
crossref
3). Singh N, Alexander BD, Lortholary O, Dromer F, Gupta KL, John GT, et al. Cryptococcus neoformans in organ transplant recipients: impact of calcineurin-inhibitor agents on mortality. J Infect Dis. 2007; 195:756–64.
4). Probst C, Pongratz G, Capellino S, Szeimies RM, Schölmerich J, Fleck M, et al. Cryptococcosis mimicking cutaneous cellulitis in a patient suffering from rheuma-toid arthritis: a case report. BMC Infect Dis. 2010; 10:239.
crossref
5). Singh N, Dromer F, Perfect JR, Lortholary O. Cryptococcosis in solid organ transplant recipients: current state of the science. Clin Infect Dis. 2008; 47:1321–7.
6). Husain S, Wagener MM, Singh N. Cryptococcus neoformans infection in organ transplant recipients: variables influencing clinical characteristics and outcome. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001; 7:375–81.
7). Prevost-Smith E, Hutton N. Improved detection of Cryptococcus neoformans in the BACTEC NR 660 blood culture system. Am J Clin Pathol. 1994; 102:741–5.
8). Ruiz V, Barnadas MA, Matas L, Bagué S, Alomar A. Disseminated cryptococcosis presenting as skin nodules resembling erythema nodosum. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2011; 102:221–3.
crossref
9). Neuville S, Dromer F, Morin O, Dupont B, Ronin O, Lortholary O. French Cryptococcosis Study Group. Pri-mary cutaneous cryptococcosis: a distinct clinical entity. Clin Infect Dis. 2003; 36:337–47.
crossref
10). Baer S, Baddley JW, Gnann JW, Pappas PG. Cryptoco-ccal disease presenting as necrotizing cellulitis in transplant recipients. Transpl Infect Dis. 2009; 11:353–8.
crossref
11). Sun HY, Alexander BD, Lortholary O, Dromer F, Forrest GN, Lyon GM, et al. Cutaneous cryptococcosis in solid organ transplant recipients. Med Mycol. 2010; 48:785–91.
crossref
12). Perfect JR, Dismukes WE, Dromer F, Goldman DL, Graybill JR, Hamill RJ, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of cryptococcal disease: 2010 update by the infectious diseases society of america. Clin Infect Dis. 2010; 50:291–322.
crossref
13). Dromer F, Mathoulin S, Dupont B, Brugiere O, Leten-neur L. Comparison of the efficacy of amphotericin B and fluconazole in the treatment of cryptococcosis in human immunodeficiency virus-negative patients: retro-spective analysis of 83 cases. French Cryptococcosis Study Group. Clin Infect Dis. 1996; 22(Suppl 2):S154–60.
14). Singh N, Lortholary O, Alexander BD, Gupta KL, John GT, Pursell KJ, et al. Antifungal management practices and evolution of infection in organ transplant recipients with cryptococcus neoformans infection. Transplantation. 2005; 80:1033–9.
crossref
15). Pfaller MA, Castanheira M, Diekema DJ, Messer SA, Jones RN. Wild-type MIC distributions and epidemio-logic cutoff values for fluconazole, posaconazole, and voriconazole when testing Cryptococcus neoformans as determined by the CLSI broth microdilution method. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011; 71:252–9.
crossref
16). Cheong JW, McCormack J. Fluconazole resistance in cryptococcal disease: emerging or intrinsic? Med Mycol. 2013; 51:261–9.
crossref

Fig. 1.
(A) Multiple erythematous plaque of right forearm. (B, C) Multiple erythematous plaque of left thigh, right sole.
jkstn-27-132f1.tif
Fig. 2.
(A) PAS stain of skin biopsy (×400). (B) Alcian blue stain of skin biopsy (×400). There are nu-merous encapsulated yeast in sub-cutaneous layer. Some of the organisms have a well-defined halo (arrows) due to the mucopoly-saccharide coat which surrounds them.
jkstn-27-132f2.tif
Fig. 3.
(A) Chest computer tomography. There are ill-defined cen-trilobular ground-glass opacity in right upper lung and pneumonic infiltration before antifungal treatment at 11th hospital day. (B) Chest computer tomography. After the 4 weeks of intravenous amphotericin B treatement, the pneumonic infiltration disappeared and this suggested improved state of pneumonia, especially pulmonary manifestation of disseminated cryptococcal infection.
jkstn-27-132f3.tif
TOOLS
Similar articles