Journal List > J Korean Soc Transplant > v.25(2) > 1034362

J Korean Soc Transplant. 2011 Jun;25(2):87-94. Korean.
Published online June 30, 2011.  https://doi.org/10.4285/jkstn.2011.25.2.87
Copyright © 2011 The Korean Society for Transplantation
Liver Regeneration and Factors Influencing Liver Regeneration in Donors and Recipients of Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Using Right Lobe Graft
Young Chul Yoon, M.D., Jung Hyun Park, M.D., Tae Ho Hong, M.D., Young Kyoung You, M.D. and Dong Goo Kim, M.D.
Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Corresponding author (Email: kimdg@catholic.ac.kr )
Received April 04, 2011; Revised June 11, 2011; Accepted June 17, 2011.

Abstract

Background

To balance between the appropriate remnant liver volume in the donors and sufficient graft volume in the recipients is very important in adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). The aim of this study is to evaluate the liver regeneration rate and the factors associated with the regenerative process in the donors and recipients.

Methods

Between May 1999 and March 2010, 197 donors and 98 recipients out of the 450 patients who underwent adult LDLT were evaluated retrospectively. We reviewed the clinical characteristics of the patients, liver regeneration using computerized tomography (CT)-assisted volumetry technique and the factors associated with liver regeneration in the donors and recipients.

Results

Using CT-assisted volumetry, the mean proportion of remnant right liver lobe was 62.4%±4.7%, ranging from 50.1% to 77.4%. The ratio of the graft weight to volume by CT-assisted volumetry was 89.8%±12.9% and we created a formula that graft volume (g)= [CT volume (mL)×0.933]+137.97. The liver regeneration rate in donors during the first postoperative week was higher if the remnant liver volume was below 35% than if the remnant liver volume above 35% (p<0.001). After 6 months, the remnant liver grew up to 81.2% of the original liver volume. Liver regeneration in recipients during the first postoperative week was faster if the graft-to-recipient body weight ratio (GRWR) was below 1% than if the GRWR was above 1% (p<0.001). Also, GRWR (p<0.001), portal vein (PV) velocity (cm/sec) (P=0.007) and PV flow volume per 100 g of graft tissue (mL/min) (P=0.002) were associated with liver regeneration in recipients during the early postoperative period by univariate analysis.

Conclusions

The process of liver regeneration was most active during the first postoperative week in both the donors and recipients. The proportion of remnant liver in donors, GRWR and portal blood flow in recipients appeared to be the significant factors associated with liver regeneration.

Keywords: Liver transplantation; Living donors; Liver regeneration

Figures


Fig. 1
Positive correlation between the estimated graft volume (ml) and actural graft weight (g).
Click for larger image

Tables


Table 1
Partial liver regeneration of donor and recipient after living donor LT
Click for larger image


Table 2
Peak liver enzymes difference according to risk factors after right lobectomy in donor
Click for larger image


Table 3
Remnant liver regeneration difference according to risk factors after right hepatectomy in donor
Click for larger image


Table 4
Correlation between graft regeneration and clinical variables
Click for larger image


Table 5
Graft regeneration difference according to various risk factors after living donor liver transplantation
Click for larger image

References
1. Yamanaka N, Okamoto E, Kawamura E, Kato T, Oriyama T, Fujimoto J, et al. Dynamics of normal and injured human liver regeneration after hepatectomy as assessed on the basis of computed tomography and liver function. Hepatology 1993;18:79–85.
2. Pachówka M, Zegarska J, Ciecierski R, Korczak-Kowalska G. The role of IL-6 during the late phase of liver regeneration. Ann Transplant 2008;13:15–19.
3. Stone HH, Long WD, Smith RB 3rd, Haynes CD. Physiologic consideration in major hepatic resection. Am J Surg 1969;117:78–84.
4. Haga J, Shimazu M, Wakabayashi G, Tanabe M, Kawachi S, Fuchimoto Y, et al. Liver regeneration in donors and adult recipients after living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2008;14:1718–1724.
5. Ikegami T, Nishizaki T, Yanaga K, Shimada M, Kishikawa K, Nomoto K, et al. The impact of donor age on living donor liver transplantation. Transplantation 2000;70:1703–1707.
6. Jin MB, Shimamura T, Taniguchi M, Nagasako Y, Suzuki T, Kamiyama T, et al. Liver regeneration in living donor liver transplantation. Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi 2004;105:674–679.
7. Kim SJ, Kim DG, Chung ES, Lee YJ, Moon IS, Lee MD. Adult living donor liver transplantation using the right lobe. Transplant Proc 2006;38:2117–2120.
8. Jiang SM, Zhou GW, Zhang R, Peng CH, Yan JQ, Wan L, et al. Role of splanchnic hemodynamics in liver regeneration after living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2009;15:1043–1049.
9. Bolognesi M, Sacerdoti D, Bombonato G, Merkel C, Sartori G, Merenda R, et al. Change in portal flow after liver transplantation: effort on hepatic arterial resistance indices and role of spleen size. Hepatology 2002;35:601–608.
10. Park MY, Lee YJ, Rha SE, Oh SN, Byun JY, Kim DG. Correlation of portal venous velocity and portal venous flow with short term graft regeneration in recipients of living donor liver transplants. Transplant Proc 2008;40:1488–1491.
11. Cheng YF, Huang TL, Chen TY, Tsang LL, Ou HY, Yu CY, et al. Liver graft regeneration in right lobe adult living donor liver transplantation. Am J Transplant 2009;9:1382–1388.
12. Ohira M, Ishifuro M, Ide K, Irei T, Tashiro H, Itamoto T, et al. Significant correlation between spleen volume and thrombocytopenia in liver transplant patients; a concept for predicting persistent thrombocytopenia. Liver Transpl 2009;15:208–215.
13. Chen HL, Chen CL, Huang TL, Chen TY, Tsang LL, Ou HY, et al. Regeneration rate of left liver grafts in adult living donor liver transplant. Transplant Proc 2010;42:699–700.
14. Kim J, Yi NJ, Shin WY, Kim T, Lee KU, Suh KS. Platelet transfusion can be related to liver regeneration after living donor liver transplant. World J Surg 2010;34:1052–1058.
15. Fukuhara T, Umeda K, Toshima T, Takeishi K, Morita K, Nagata S, et al. Congestion of the donor remnant right liver after extended left lobe donation. Transpl Int 2009;22:837–844.
16. Akamatsu N, Sugawara Y, Kaneko J, Sano K, Imamura H, Kokudo N, et al. Effects of middle hepatic vein reconstruction on right liver graft regeneration. Transplantation 2003;76:832–837.
17. Akamatsu N, Sugawara Y, Tamura S, Kaneko J, Matsui Y, Togashi J, et al. Impact of live donor age (>or=50)on liver transplantation. Transplant Proc 2007;39:3189–3189.
18. Lodewijk L, Mall A, Spearman CW, Kahn D. Effect of liver regeneration on the pharmacokinetics of immunosuppressive drugs. Transplant Proc 2009;41:379–381.
TOOLS
Similar articles

Regeneration of graft liver in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation using a left lobe graft

Postoperative Liver Regeneration and Complication In Live Liver Donor after Partial Hepatectomy for Living Donor Liver Transplantation

The Feasibility of Right Posterior Sector Graft in the Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation

Current Status and Perspectives of Living Donor Liver Transplantation

Liver retransplantation for adult recipients