Abstract
Several evidences suggested that Toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9) plays an important role in atherosclerosis and neuroprotection but the association between the TLR9 and risk for stroke or outcomes after stroke has not been investigated. The aim of the present study was to investigate the association between TLR9 polymorphisms and the risk for ischemic stroke using a case-control study design. We also explored the correlation between the polymorphisms and outcomes after stroke. We enrolled consecutive Korean stroke patients and controls without history of stroke. Four polymorphisms, namely c.-1486T>C, c.-1237C>T, c.1174A>G, and c.2848G>A were examined using polymerase chain reaction followed by direct sequencing. Initially we examined 193 stroke patients and the same number of healthy adults who had no history of stroke as controls. Due to deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium of initial controls, we performed genetic analysis of two polymorphisms (c.1174A>G and c.2848G>A) for additional 165 controls. The genotype frequency of four polymorphisms did not differ significantly between stroke patients and controls in unadjusted analysis. The variant allele (C) in c.-1486 locus was associated with significantly increased chance of favorable functional outcome at three month after stroke (OR 2.32, 95% CI 1.02~5.26, p = 0.043).
REFERENCES
1). Petty GW, Brown RD Jr, Whisnant JP, Sicks JD, O'Fallon WM, Wiebers DO. Ischemic stroke subtypes: a population-based study of incidence and risk factors. Stroke. 1999; 30:2513–6.
3). Ross R. Atherosclerosis–an inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med. 1999; 340:115–26.
4). Akira S, Takeda K, Kaisho T. Toll-like receptors: critical proteins linking innate and acquired immunity. Nat Immunol. 2001; 2:675–80.
5). Frantz S, Ertl G, Bauersachs J. Mechanisms of disease: Toll-like receptors in cardiovascular disease. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2007; 4:444–54.
6). Schröder NW, Schumann RR. Single nucleotide polymorphisms of Toll-like receptors and susceptibility to infectious disease. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005; 5:156–64.
7). Hemmi H, Takeuchi O, Kawai T, Kaisho T, Sato S, Sanjo H, et al. A Toll-like receptor recognizes bacterial DNA. Nature. 2000; 408:740–5.
8). Sorrentino R, Morello S, Chen S, Bonavita E, Pinto A. The activation of liver X receptors inhibits toll-like receptor-9-induced foam cell formation. J Cell Physiol. 2010; 223:158–67.
9). Niessner A, Sato K, Chaikof EL, Colmegna I, Goronzy JJ, Weyand CM. Pathogen-sensing plasmacytoid dendritic cells stimulate cytotoxic T-cell function in the atherosclerotic plaque through interferon-alpha. Circulation. 2006; 114:2482–9.
10). Stevens SL, Ciesielski TM, Marsh BJ, Yang T, Homen DS, Boule JL, et al. Toll-like receptor 9: a new target of ischemic preconditioning in the brain. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2008; 28:1040–7.
11). Packard AE, Leung PY, Vartanian KB, Stevens SL, Bahjat FR, Stenzel-Poore MP. TLR9 bone marrow chimeric mice define a role for cerebral TNF in neuroprotection induced by CpG preconditioning. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2012; 32:2193–200.
12). Adams HP Jr, Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ, Biller J, Love BB, Gordon DL, et al. Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment. Stroke. 1993; 24:35–41.
13). Adams HP Jr, Davis PH, Leira EC, Chang KC, Bendixen BH, Clarke WR, et al. Baseline NIH Stroke Scale score strongly predicts outcome after stroke: A report of the Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST). Neurology. 1999; 53:126–31.
14). Wolfe CD, Taub NA, Woodrow EJ, Burney PG. Assessment of scales of disability and handicap for stroke patients. Stroke. 1991; 22:1242–4.
15). Lazarus R, Klimecki WT, Raby BA, Vercelli D, Palmer LJ, Kwiatkowski DJ, et al. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the Toll-like receptor 9 gene (TLR9): frequencies, pairwise linkage disequilibrium, and haplotypes in three U.S. ethnic groups and exploratory case-control disease association studies. Genomics. 2003; 81:85–91.
16). Choi JC, Lee KH, Song SK, Lee JS, Kang SY, Kang JH. Screening for NOTCH3 gene mutations among 151 consecutive Korean patients with acute ischemic stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013; 22:608–14.
17). Rodriguez S, Gaunt TR, Day IN. Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium testing of biological ascertainment for Mendelian randomization studies. Am J Epidemiol. 2009; 169:505–14.
18). Hur JW, Shin HD, Park BL, Kim LH, Kim SY, Bae SC. Association study of Toll-like receptor 9 gene polymorphism in Korean patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Tissue Antigens. 2005; 65:266–70.
19). Liu F, Lu W, Qian Q, Qi W, Hu J, Feng B. Frequency of TLR 2, 4, and 9 gene polymorphisms in Chinese population and their susceptibility to type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2012; 2012:373945.
20). Tao K, Fujii M, Tsukumo S, Maekawa Y, Kishihara K, Kimoto Y, et al. Genetic variations of Toll-like receptor 9 predispose to systemic lupus erythematosus in Japanese population. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007; 66:905–9.
21). Hamann L, Glaeser C, Hamprecht A, Gross M, Gomma A, Schumann RR. Toll-like receptor (TLR)-9 promotor polymorphisms and atherosclerosis. Clin Chim Acta. 2006; 364:303–7.
22). Lange NE, Zhou X, Lasky-Su J, Himes BE, Lazarus R, Soto-Quirós M, et al. Comprehensive genetic assessment of a functional TLR9 promoter polymorphism: no replicable association with asthma or asthma-related phenotypes. BMC Med Genet. 2011; 12:26.
23). Roszak A, Lianeri M, Sowińska A, Jagodziński PP. Involvement of Toll-like Receptor 9 polymorphism in cervical cancer development. Mol Biol Rep. 2012; 39:8425–30.
24). Brea D, Blanco M, Ramos-Cabrer P, Moldes O, Arias S, Pérez-Mato M, et al. Toll-like receptors 2 and 4 in ischemic stroke: outcome and therapeutic values. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2011; 31:1424–31.
Table 1.
Table 2.
Table 3.
Locus | Genotype | Control (%) (n=193) | Stroke (%) (n=193) | Odd ratio (95% CI) | p | Adjusted OR∗ (95% CI) | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
c.-1486T>C | TT | 62 (32.1) | 76 (39.4) | Reference | - | Reference | - |
TC | 107 (55.4) | 87 (45.1) | 0.66 (0.42~1.05) | 0.066 | 0.85 (0.46~1.55) | 0.594 | |
CC | 24 (12.4) | 30 (15.5) | 1.02 (0.52~2.02) | 0.952 | 1.28 (0.85~1.92) | 0.242 | |
TC+CC | 131 (67.9) | 117 (60.6) | 0.73 (0.47~1.13) | 0.137 | 1.01 (0.58~1.76) | 0.966 | |
Minor allele frequency | 77 (40.0) | 73 (38.0) | 0.92 (0.60~1.41) | 0.676 | |||
c.-1237T>C | TT | 187 (96.9) | 185 (95.9) | Reference | - | Reference | - |
TC | 6 (3.1) | 8 (4.1) | 1.35 (0.40~4.81) | 0.586 | 2.19 (0.53~9.09) | 0.279 | |
CC | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
TC+CC | 6 | 8 | 1.35 (0.40~4.81) | 0.586 | 2.19 (0.53~9.09) | 0.279 | |
Minor allele frequency | 4 (2.0) | 4 (2.0) | 1.00 (0.18~5.45) | 1.000 |
Table 4.
Locus | Genotype | Control (n=358) | Stroke (n=193) | Odd ratio (95% CI) | p | Adjusted OR∗ (95% CI) | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
c.1174A>G | AA | 118 (33.0) | 71 (36.8) | Reference | - | Reference | - |
AG | 187 (52.2) | 89 (46.1) | 0.79 (0.53~1.19) | 0.236 | 1.00 (0.60~1.67) | 0.999 | |
GG | 53 (14.8) | 33 (17.1) | 1.03 (0.59~1.80) | 0.898 | 1.18 (0.84~1.66) | 0.339 | |
AG+GG | 240 (67.0) | 122 (63.2) | 0.84 (0.58~1.24) | 0.367 | 1.08 (0.67~1.73) | 0.761 | |
Minor allele frequency | 147 (40.0) | 77 (40.0) | 0.95 (0.66~1.38) | 0.790 | |||
c.2848C>T | CC | 115 (32.1) | 75 (38.9) | Reference | - | Reference | - |
CT | 186 (52.0) | 86 (44.6) | 0.71 (0.47~1.06) | 0.081 | 1.04 (0.62~1.73) | 0.881 | |
TT | 57 (15.9) | 32 (16.6) | 0.86 (0.49~1.49) | 0.573 | 1.13 (0.81~1.57) | 0.474 | |
CT+TT | 243 (67.9) | 118 (61.1) | 0.74 (0.51~1.09) | 0.113 | 1.09 (0.68~1.74) | 0.730 | |
Minor allele frequency | 150 (42.0) | 75 (39.0) | 0.74 (0.51~1.09) | 0.113 |
Table 5.
Unadjusted analysis | Adjusted analysis∗ | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymorphism | Wild | Variant | p | Wild | Variant | p |
c.-1486T>C | 5.1 (3.7~6.5) | 4.4 (3.5~5.3) | 0.283 | 4.3 (2.0~6.5) | 3.4 (1.3~5.6) | 0.269 |
c.-1237T>C | 4.6 (3.8~5.4) | 6.4 (1.8~11.0) | 0.236 | 3.9 (1.8~6.0) | 5.5 (0.7~10.2) | 0.441 |
c.1174A>G | 4.8 (3.9~5.6) | 4.2 (2.5~6.0) | 0.390 | 4.0 (1.9~6.1) | 2.9 (0.3~5.5) | 0.281 |
c.2848C>T | 5.1 (3.7~6.5) | 4.4 (3.5~5.3) | 0.634 | 4.1 (1.8~6.3) | 3.5 (1.3~5.71) | 0.498 |