Journal List > J Bacteriol Virol > v.39(4) > 1033951

Cho, Shin, Yoon, Yoon, Lee, Song, and Han: Seroepidemiological Studies of Aino Virus Infection in Korean Cattle

Abstract

Aino virus infection is characterized by abortion, stillbirth, and congenital abnormalities such as arthropgryposis-hydranencephaly syndrome in calves. In Korea, Aino virus infection was first reported in 1997 by researchers who were investigating the cause of newborn calf deformities. Given the incidence of Aino-related deformities, the need for a study of the Aino virus infection status in Korea was recognized. In this study, we investigated the nationwide seroepidemiological status of Aino virus infection. A total of 9,921 serum samples collected between 1993 and 2001, and 23,760 serum samples between 2002 and 2007 were tested using a virus neutralization assay. The seroprevalence of Aino virus was 73.1, 63.8, 44.9, 56.0, 38.5, 28.4 18.3, 19.6, and 23.2%, respectively, between 1993 and 2001, and 43.8, 42.9, 50.7, 55.3, 31.4, and 25.4%, respectively, between 2002 and 2007. Aino virus infection does not pose a major threat to the bovine industry in Korea till now. The future prospects for Aino virus infection in cattle, however, may change with the global warming phenomena. The results of this study may serve as a basis for future epidemiological studies on Aino virus infection.

REFERENCES

1). Coverdale OR., Cybinski DH., St George TD. Congenital abnormalities in calves associated with Akabane virus and Aino virus. Aust Vet J. 1978. 54:151–2.
crossref
2). Ishibashi K., Shirakawa H., Uchinuno Y., Ogawa T. Seroprevalence survey of Aino virus infection in dairy cattle of Fukuoka, Japan in 1990. J Vet Med Sci. 1995. 57:1–4.
crossref
3). Miura Y., Inaba Y., Tsuda T., Tokuhisa S., Sato K., Akashi Hatumoto M. A survey of antibodies to arthropod-borne viruses in Indonesian cattle. Nippon Juigaku Zasshi. 1982. 44:857–63.
crossref
4). Tsuda T., Yoshida K., Ohashi S., Yanase T., Sueyoshi M., Kamimura S, et al. Arthrogryposis, hydranencephaly and cerebellar hypoplasia syndrome in neonatal calves resulting from intrauterine infection with Aino virus. Vet Res. 2004. 35:531–8.
crossref
5). Weir R. Aino virus. Australia and New Zealand Standard Diagnostic Procedures. 2003.
6). Kurogi H., Inaba Y., Takahashi E., Sato K., Satoda K. Congenital abnormalities in newborn calves after inoculation of pregnant cows with Akabane virus. Infect Immun. 1977. 17:338–43.
crossref
7). Uchinuno Y., Noda Y., Ishibashi K., Nagasue S., Shirakawa H., Nagano M., Ohe R. Isolation of Aino virus from an aborted bovine fetus. J Vet Med Sci. 1998. 60:1139–40.
crossref
8). Miura Y., Kubo M., Goto Y., Kono Y. Hydranencephaly-cerebellar hypoplasia in a newborn calf after infection of its dam with Chuzan virus. Nippon Juigaku Zasshi. 1990. Aug;. 52(4):689–94.
crossref
9). Schmaljohn C., Nichol ST. Bunyaviridae. Fields Virology. 2007. (5th).
crossref
10). Takahashi K., Oya A., Okazda T., Matsuo R., Kuma M. Aino virus, a new a new member of simbu group of arbovirus from mosquitoes in Japan. Jpn J Med Sci Biol. 1968. 21:95–101.
11). Doherty RL., Carley JG., Standfast HA., Dyce AL., Snowdon WA. Virus strains isolated from arthropods during an epizootic of bovine ephemeral fever in Queensland. Aust Vet J. 1972. 48:81–6.
crossref
12). Yeon Hee Kim SIL., Kwon Chang Hee., Yang Dong Kun. Development of inactivated vaccine for Akabane, Aino and Chuzan Disease. NVRQS Annual Research Report. 2005. 962–75.
13). Yamakawa M., Yanase T., Kato T., Tsuda T. Chronological and geographical variations in the small RNA segment of the teratogenic Akabane virus. Virus Res. 2006. 121:84–92.
crossref
14). Tsutsui T., Hamaya Y. Monitoring system and epidemiology on arbovirus infections of cattle in Japan. International Workshop on Arboviral Diseases of Livestock in East Asia. 2009.
15). Akashi H., Onuma S., Nagano H., Ohta M., Fukutomi T. Detection and differentiation of Aino and Akabane Simbu serogroup bunyaviruses by nested polymerase chain reaction. Arch Virol. 1999. 144:2101–9.
crossref
16). Fukuyoshi S., Takehara Y., Takahashi K., Mori R. The incidence of antibody to Aino virus in animals and humans in Fukuoka. Jpn J Med Sci Biol. 1981. 34:41–3.
crossref
17). Jusa ER., Inaba Y., Ishibashi K., Noda M. Effect of heparin on hemagglutination by Akabane and Aino viruses belonging to the Simbu group of bunyaviruses. Vet Microbiol. 1995. 45:251–8.
crossref
18). Kitano Y., Ohzono H., Shimizu T. Proliferation and teratogenicity of Aino virus in chick embryos. Microbiol Immunol. 1996. 40:85–8.
crossref
19). Kitano Y., Ohzono H., Yasuda N., Shimizu T. Hydranencephaly, cerebellar hypoplasia, and myopathy in chick embryos infected with aino virus. Vet Pathol. 1996. 33:672–81.
crossref
20). Moriwaki M., Miura Y., Hayashi S., Ishitani R. Histopathological findings of calves infected experimentally with Aino virus. Natl Inst Anim Health Q (Tokyo). 1977. 17:95–106.
21). Noda Y., Uchinuno Y., Shirakawa H., Nagasue S., Nagano N., Ohe R, et al. Aino virus antigen in brain lesions of a naturally aborted bovine fetus. Vet Pathol. 1998. 35:409–11.
crossref
22). Yamakawa M., Yanase T., Kato T., Tsuda T. Molecular epidemiological analyses of the teratogenic Aino virus based on the sequences of a small RNA segment. Vet Microbiol. 2008. 129:40–7.
crossref
23). Yanase T., Yoshida K., Ohashi S., Kato T., Tsuda T. Sequence analysis of the medium RNA segment of three Simbu serogroup viruses, Akabane, Aino, and Peaton viruses. Virus Res. 2003. 93:63–9.
crossref
24). Reed M. A simple method of estimating fifty per cent endpoints. Am J Hyg. 1938. 27:493–7.
25). Cho HC., Chong CS. Notes on biting midges of the genus culicoides from South Korea: with special reference to unrecorded species and distribution. Kisaengchunghak Chapchi. 1974. 2:45–75.
26). Miura Y., Inaba Y., Hayashi S. A survey of neutralizing antibody against aino virus in bovine serum in Kagoshima, Japan. Natl Inst Anim Health Q (Tokyo). 1980. 20:34–5.

Table 1.
Number of serum samples used in the study
Area 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
Kyonggi 50 50 50 50 50 50 360 365 300
Kangwon 50 50 50 50 50 50 300 304 243
Chungbuk 50 50 50 50 50 50 311 346 285
Chungnam 50 50 50 50 50 50 360 367 296
Jeonbuk 50 50 50 50 50 50 300 300 214
Joennam 50 50 NT 50 50 50 240 240 200
Gyeongbuk NT∗ 50 50 50 50 50 300 300 250
Gyeongnam 50 50 50 50 50 30 300 300 250
Jeju 50 50 40 50 NTa 30 60 180 150
Total 400 450 390 450 400 410 2,531 2,702 2,188

a NT: not tested

Table 2.
Seroprevalence of neutralizing antibodies against Aino virus from 1993 to 2001
Area Percent positive (%)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
(400)a (450) (390) (450) (400) (410) (2,531) (2,702) (2,188)
Kyonggi 76.0 70.0 64.0 76.0 32.0 18.0 11.1 7.7 9.0
Kangwon 50.0 32.0 24.0 14.0 26.0 6.0 3.0 6.6 2.5
Chungbuk 98.0 76.0 40.0 38.0 18.0 6.0 11.6 18.8 15.1
Chungnam 86.0 94.0 48.0 74.0 80.0 46.0 30.8 52.0 68.1
Jeonbuk 76.0 88.0 70.0 68.0 20.0 64.0 28.7 34.7 50.5
Joennam 89.0 46.0 NT 74.0 74.0 68.0 41.3 26.7 44.0
Gyeongbuk NT2) 44.0 50.0 38.0 14.0 8.0 16.3 5.3 9.2
Gyeongnam 62.0 88.0 46.0 80.0 44.0 23.3 20.0 17.3 3.2
Jeju 48.0 36.0 17.5 42.0 NTb 16.7 1.7 7.2 7.3
Total 73.1 63.8 44.9 56.0 38.5 28.4 18.3 19.6 23.2

a Total number of samples tested.

b NT: not tested

Table 3.
Seroprevalence against Aino virus in cows from 1999 to 2001
Year 1999 2000 2001
≤2 years 19.3%a 667b (129)c 14.3% 916 (131) 15.4% 794 (122)
3~4 years 21.1% 1,435 (303) 24.0% 1,452 (348) 26.9% 1,029 (277)
5~6 years 28.9% 512 (148) 27.6% 439 (121) 37.9% 369 (140)
≥7 years 46.3% 54 (25) 46.3% 80 (37) 19.2% 52 (10)
Total 22.6% 2,668 (604) 22.1% 2,887 (638) 24.5% 2,244 (549)

a Positive rate (%) = (number positive / number tested) × 100,

b Number of samples tested,

c Number of positive samples

Table 4.
Seroprevalence percentage among cattle in Jeonnam province before and after the vector season
Year First half of the year (Before vector mosquito season, January to June) Second half of the year (After vector mosquito season, July to December) Incidence rates (%)
Number of samples tested Number of positive samples Prevalence (%) Number of samples tested Number of positive samples Prevalence (%)
1995~1996 198 79 39.9 198 123 62.1 22.2a
1999~2000 600 106 17.7 600 208 34.7 17.0b
Total 798 185 23.2 798 331 41.5 18.3

a Chi-square value = 19.6, d.f. = 1, p-value < 0.001,

b Chi-square value = 44.9, d.f. = 1, p-value < 0.001

Table 5.
Seroprevalence of neutralizing antibodies against Aino virus from 2002 to 2007
Year 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Sample numbers 5,280 5,280 5,280 2,640 2,640 2,640
Percent positive (%) 43.8 42.9 50.7 55.3 31.4 25.4
TOOLS
Similar articles