Journal List > Immune Netw > v.16(1) > 1033535

Han, Na, Ham, Choi, Sohn, Ryu, In, Hwang, and Park: TCF4-Targeting miR-124 is Differentially Expressed amongst Dendritic Cell Subsets

Abstract

Dendritic cells (DCs) are professional antigen-presenting cells that sample their environment and present antigens to naïve T lymphocytes for the subsequent antigen-specific immune responses. DCs exist in a range of distinct subpopulations including plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs) and classical DCs (cDCs), with the latter consisting of the cDC1 and cDC2 lineages. Although the roles of DC-specific transcription factors across the DC subsets have become understood, the posttranscriptional mechanisms that regulate DC development are yet to be elucidated. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are pivotal posttranscriptional regulators of gene expression in a myriad of biological processes, but their contribution to the immune system is just beginning to surface. In this study, our in-house probe collection was screened to identify miRNAs possibly involved in DC development and function by targeting the transcripts of relevant mouse transcription factors. Examination of DC subsets from the culture of mouse bone marrow with Flt3 ligand identified high expression of miR-124 which was able to target the transcript of TCF4, a transcription factor critical for the development and homeostasis of pDCs. Further expression profiling of mouse DC subsets isolated from in vitro culture as well as via ex vivo purification demonstrated that miR-124 was outstandingly expressed in CD24+ cDC1 cells compared to in pDCs and CD172α+ cDC2 cells. These results imply that miR-124 is likely involved in the processes of DC subset development by posttranscriptional regulation of a transcription factor(s).

Abbreviations

BM

bone marrow

cDCs

classical DCs

CDP

common DC progenitor

CHO cells

Chinese hamster ovary cells

DCs

dendritic cells

EGFP

enhanced green fluorescence protein

Flt3L

Flt3 ligand

IRES

internal ribosomal entry site

Lin

lineage

MCS

multiple cloning site

MDP

macrophage-DC progenitor

miRNA

microRNA

pDCs

plasmacytoid DCs

pri-miRNA

primary miRNA

UTR

untranslated region

INTRODUCTION

Dendritic cells (DCs) are antigen-presenting cells found in lymphoid as well as non-lymphoid tissues and organs. They principally act as specialized sentinel cells that sample their local environment for antigens, migrate to lymph nodes, and present antigens to naïve T lymphocytes, which is essential for the subsequent antigen-specific T-cell activation and induction of immune responses (1). Many varieties of DCs have been described in both humans and mice with each characterized by particular locations, phenotypic morphologies, and functions. In essence, DCs consist of a range of functionally distinct subsets that can be identified by their differential expression of particular surface markers (12). The DC subsets prevalent in lymphoid tissues include antigen-presenting classical DCs (cDCs) and type 1 interferon-producing plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs). The lymphoid tissue-resident cDCs are further divided into different subtypes including CD8α+ CD24+ cDCs (cDC1), which efficiently cross-present antigens to CD8+ T cells and principally produce IL-12; and CD8α CD172α+ cDCs (cDC2), which present MHC Class II restricted antigens to CD4+ T cells. Also, more DC subtypes develop upon infection or inflammation such as the monocyte-derived inflammatory DCs.
The development of DCs to their respective subset counterparts arise through a multistage process. Like all other immune cells, DCs develop from hematopoietic stem cells in the bone marrow (BM). Hematopoietic stem cells differentiate into the myeloid progenitors, which subsequently differentiate into the macrophage-DC progenitor (MDP) cells and then into the common-DC progenitor (CDP) cells (3). CDPs develop into pre-DCs and then egress from the BM to the periphery, which seed peripheral secondary lymphoid tissues and non-hematopoietic tissues and ultimately mature into either cDCs or pDCs. Development of DC subsets from their progenitor cells can be replicated in vitro with various culture conditions. Culture of DC progenitors in BM with the growth factor Flt3 ligand (Flt3L) produces a heterogeneous population containing both cDCs and pDCs, which are equivalent to their in situ counterparts with respect to cell surface marker expression, transcription factor reliance, cytokine production, receptor molecule expression, and antigen-presenting ability to T cells (45). Principally, DC subsets originated from Flt3L-cultured BM cells correspond to those of steady-state cDC populations. Beyond these mature DC subsets, relevant progenitor and precursor populations can also be identified and isolated from BM cells in steady state as well in culture with Flt3L (67).
In light of these investigatory advances, the roles of transcription factors in DC development and their dynamic profiles across the subsets have become well understood (8910). For example, the transcription factor PU.1 has been described to play a role in the development of all DCs. Meanwhile, STAT5 is known to drive the development of cDCs over pDCs through the inhibition of transcription factor interferon regulatory factor 8 (Irf8), whereas immunoglobin transcription factor 2 (TCF4) is known to drive pDC development over cDCs by directly activating Irf8 and other pro-pDC transcription factors such as SpiB (91011). As such, a comprehensive group of transcription factors and their involvement in the particular stages of DC development have been mapped. In contrast to these transcriptional mechanisms, posttranscriptional mechanisms that regulate DC development are less well understood. With the heterogeneity of subsets and wide-ranging function of DCs, the natural question arises on how DC differentiation and development is regulated besides the orchestration of growth factors and transcription factors. Recently, increasing evidence has shown that microRNAs (miRNAs) play an important role in fine-tuning DC development and function.
miRNAs are an evolutionarily conserved class of short, endogenous, non-coding RNAs about 19~23 nucleotides long that regulate protein synthesis by targeting the complementary 3' untranslated region (UTR) of mRNAs for translational repression and degradation (12). miRNA biogenesis begins with the transcription of a miRNA gene to generate a primary miRNA (pri-miRNA) transcript, which is ultimately processed into a mature 19~23 bp miRNA and incorporated into an RNA-induced silencing complex (13) for the translational repression or degradation of target mRNAs. A key characteristic of miRNAs is that each has the ability to inhibit a myriad of mRNAs, and each mRNA can be targeted by many miRNAs. This is suggestive of a complex network of miRNAs surrounding DC development.
miRNAs have been shown to be vital in controlling many processes within the immune system. Their involvement in regulating T- and B-lymphocyte development has been established of late and their wide-ranging roles in cell differentiation, homeostasis, cytokine responses, and interactions with pathogens and tolerance induction among others have been described (14). More recent progressions have attempted to describe the role of miRNAs in DC development (15). Several miRNAs have been specifically attributed to the direct regulation of certain DC functions. More have been identified by the comprehensive mapping of dynamic miRNA profiles across the subsets and tested to confirm their necessity in DC lineage commitment (15161718192021). In the present study, to identify miRNAs possibly involved in DC development and function, we screened for the expression of candidate miRNAs that target the 3'UTR of relevant transcriptional factors using our in-house probe collection. Our screening results indicated that miR-124, able to target the 3'UTR of TCF4 transcript, was highly detected in mouse DC subsets. Further expression profiling of mouse DC subsets demonstrated that miR-124 was outstandingly expressed in CD24+ cDC1 cells compared to in pDCs and CD172α+ cDC2 cells. Our findings imply that miR-124 is likely involved in the processes of DC subset development by posttranscriptional regulation of a transcription factor(s).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals

Mice were maintained and bred in specific pathogen-free facilities of the Department of Laboratory Animal Resources at the Yonsei University College of Medicine. C57BL/6 mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME, USA) and Orient Bio (Seongnam, Republic of Korea). Animal care and experiments were conducted according to the guidelines and protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Yonsei University College of Medicine. Only healthy male mice at 6 to 12 weeks of age were used throughout this study.

Cells, antibodies, and reagents

Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells (CHO-S cells; Gibco, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) were cultured in DMC7 medium composed of DMEM containing L-glutamine, high glucose, and pyruvate (HyClone, Logan, UT, USA) and 7% fetal calf serum (FCS; HyClone) supplemented with 1× solutions of non-essential amino acids and antibiotic-antimycotic (HyClone). The following conjugated antibodies were purchased from BioLegend (San Diego, CA, USA): APC-Cy™7-conjugated anti-I-A/I-E, anti-CD11c, anti-B220/CD45R, anti-CD45, anti-Rat IgG2b κ Isotype Control; Alexa Fluor® 647-conjugated anti-CD117; APC-conjugated anti-B220/CD45R, anti-PDCA-1 (BST2, CD317), anti-CD135; PE-Cy™7-conjugated anti-Ly6G, anti-CD3, anti-CD11c, anti-CD19, anti-Ter119, anti-DX5, anti-I-A/I-E, anti-NK1.1, anti-Gr-1, anti-Sca-1; PerCP-Cy™5.5-conjugated anti-Ly6C, anti-CD11c, anti-CD24, anti-CD117, anti-CD172α (Sirpα); PE-conjugated anti-SiglecH, anti-CD11c, anti-CD115, anti-CD117, anti-CD135, anti-Armenian Hamster (AH) IgG Isotype Control; FITC-conjugated anti-CD172α; Alexa Fluor® 488-conjugated anti-Ly6C, anti-CD172α, anti-PDCA-1, anti-CD24, anti-CD45.2; Brilliant Violet™ 421 (BV421)-conjugated anti-CD11c, anti-CD45.1, anti-CD45.2, anti-CD115, anti-AH IgG Isotype Control; biotin-conjugated anti-NK1.1, anti-DX5, anti Ter119, anti-Ly6G, anti-CD3, anti-CD19, anti-CD135. LIVE/DEAD® fixable dead cell stain kit (Life Technologies) and propidium iodide (Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA) were purchased and used according to the manufacturers' instructions.

Production of mouse Flt3L from CHO cells

The cDNA of mouse Flt3L was cloned by RT-PCR of total splenic RNA from C57BL/6 mice, and was used to generate a construct encoding soluble FLAG and OLLAS tagged Flt3L, internal ribosomal entry site (IRES), and enhanced green fluorescence protein (EGFP), i.e., SFO.Flt3L-IRES-EGFP. The GenBank accession number for the sequence including the extracellular domain of mouse Flt3L is GU168042, and the IRES-EGFP sequence is from pIRES-EGFP plasmid (Clontech, Mountain View, CA, USA). CHO cells were then transfected using Lipofectamine 2000 (Life Technologies), with a mammalian expression vector plasmid encoding SFO.Flt3L-IRES-EGFP under CMV promoter and a neomycin resistance gene, constructed with the backbone of pEGFP-N1 (Clontech). CHO/Flt3L cells stably expressing the SFO.Flt3L-IRES-EGFP were produced by the following steps: (i) treatment of transfected CHO cells with G418 (1.5 mg/ml) for 1 week; (ii) enrichment of EGFP-positive CHO cells with FACSAria II cell sorter (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA); (iii) generation of clonal cells by limiting dilutions of FACS-sorted EGFP-high CHO/Flt3L cells; and (iv) selection of CHO/Flt3L clones after evaluating both levels of EGFP expression by FACS analysis and Flt3L secretion by anti-OLLAS Western blot analysis (22). Chosen CHO/Flt3L cells were cultured in cell culture flasks with DMC7 to produce CHO/Flt3L-conditioned medium.

Western blot analysis

Different amounts of supernatant from CHO/Flt3L cell culture were mixed with an equal volume of 2×SDS PAGE sample buffer and boiled at 95℃ for 5 min. The samples were then separated in 12% SDS-PAGE and transferred onto PVDF membranes (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA) before being incubated with anti-OLLAS monoclonal antibody (22). Anti-OLLAS antibody-reactive bands on the blots were examined after incubation with peroxidase-conjugated anti-rat IgG antibody (Southern-Biotech, Birmingham, AL, USA) and subsequent visualization with SuperSignal™ West Pico Chemiluminescent Substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and ImageQuant™ LAS 4000 mini (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Pittsburgh, PA, USA). Graded quantities (0~160 ng) of purified OLLAS-tagged Gag p41 protein (2) were evaluated in parallel for quantification of OLLAS-tagged Flt3L bands.

Preparation and culture of primary cells

Mice were sacrificed by asphyxiation in a CO2 chamber. Whole splenocyte suspension was prepared by cutting and mincing extracted spleens followed by grinding with frosted glasses and cell strainers (BD Biosciences). Whole BM cell suspension was prepared by flushing out femurs and tibias excised from the hind legs of mice in sterile conditions as described previously (23). Then, the single cell suspension was cultured in either 48- or 24-well tissue culture plates at 1×106 or 2×106 cells per well, respectively, with DMC7 containing different doses of Flt3L, i.e., CHO/Flt3L conditioned medium described above. During the culture, half of the medium in each well was carefully removed and replenished with fresh DMC7 containing Flt3L every 2 days until harvest for use in subsequent experiments.

Flow cytometry

Single cell suspensions from the harvest of mouse organ tissues or cultures thereof were incubated with 2.4G2 (Fc blocker) hybridoma supernatant and washed with FACS buffer (2% FCS, 2 mM EDTA, 0.1% sodium azide). Then, each sample was incubated with the appropriate mixture of fluorochrome-conjugated monoclonal antibodies and live/dead staining dye for 30 min at 4℃ and washed twice with FACS buffer. The samples were then analyzed with FACSVerse flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) or sorting with FACSAria II cell sorter (BD Biosciences). As for sorting, the isolated cells with 90% or higher purity were utilized for subsequent experiments. Gating criteria for respective precursor and DC populations were as follows. With the lineage (Lin) markers of CD3, CD19, Ly6G, NK1.1, DX5, Ter119: for pDCs, Lin CD11c+ B220+ PDCA-1+ SiglecH+; for cDC1, Lin CD11c+ MHCII+ B220 CD24highCD172α; for cDC2, Lin CD11c+ MHCII+ B220 CD24intCD172α+. With the lineage markers of CD3, CD19, Ly6G, NK1.1, DX5, Ter119, MHCII, B220: for MDP, Lin CD11c CD115+ CD135+ CD117high; for CDP, Lin CD11c CD115+ CD135+ CD117int. Flow cytometric data were analyzed using FlowJo software (FlowJo, Ashland, OR, USA).

Isolation of RNA

Total RNA was isolated from sorted cells from cultured or uncultured mouse primary cells using TRIzol® Reagent (Life Technologies) following the manufacturer's instructions.

Real-time RT-PCR of miRNA

For miRNA expression profiling, 100 ng of purified total RNA was used for reverse transcription using Taqman® MicroRNA Reverse Transcriptase Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The resultant cDNA was used in combination with Taqman® MicroRNA Assays (Applied Biosystems) for respective miRNA and U6 control transcripts and Taqman® Universal Master Mix II (Applied Biosystems) for PCR according to the manufacturer's instructions. The amplification and detection of products were performed in a Light Cycler 480 II (Roche) with an initial denaturation at 95℃ for 10 min, followed by 40~60 cycles of amplification at 95℃ for 15 sec and 60℃ for 60 sec, before cooling. The threshold cycle (Ct) of miR-124 expression was automatically defined, located in the linear amplification phase of the PCR, and normalized to the control U6 (ΔCt value). The relative difference in expression levels of miR-124 in the sorted cells (ΔΔCt) was calculated and presented as the fold induction (2 −ΔΔCt).

Real-time RT-PCR of transcription factors and primiR-124

For pri-miR-124 profiling, 100 ng of purified total RNA was used for reverse transcription using PrimeScript™ RT Reagent Kit (TaKaRa Bio Inc., Ohtsu, Japan). The resultant cDNA was used in combination with primer oligonucleotides designed for DC-related transcription factors (5) and pri-mmu-miR-124-1/-2/-3 (24) and SYBR® Premix Ex Taq II (TaKaRa) for PCR according to the manufacturer's instructions. Sequences for the primer oligonucleotides, synthesized by Cosmo Genetech (Seoul, Korea), are as follows: TCF4, 5'-TGAGATCAAATCCGACGA-3' forward, 5'-CGTTATTGCTAGATCTTGACCT-3' reverse; Batf3, 5'-AGACCCAGAAGGCTGACAA-3' forward, 5'-CTGCACAAAGTTCATAGGACAC-3' reverse; Irf8, 5'-AAGGGCGTGTTCGTGAAG-3' forward, 5'-GGTGGCG TAGAATTGCTG-3' reverse; pri-miR-124-1, 5'-GCCTCT CTCTCCGTGT-3' forward, 5'-CCATTCTTGGCATTCA-3' reverse; pri-miR-124-2, 5'-AGAGACTCTGCTCTCCG TGT-3' forward, 5'-CTCCGCTCTTGGCATTC-3' reverse; pri-miR-124-3, 5'-GGCTGCGTGTTCACAG-3' forward, 5'-ATCCCGCGTGCCTTA-3' reverse; GAPDH, 5'-ACA GTCCATGCCATCACTGCC-3' forward, 5'-GCCTGCTT CACCACCTTCTTG-3' reverse. The amplification and detection of products were performed in a Light Cycler 480 II (Roche) with an initial denaturation at 95℃ for 5 min, followed by 40~60 cycles of PCR at 95℃ for 5 sec and 50℃ for 30 sec, before melting and cooling. The relative difference in expression levels for pri-miR-124-1/-2/-3 in the sorted cells was calculated and presented as described above but with normalization to the control GAPDH.

Luciferase activity assay

The predicted target genes of miR-124 were identified using a public database (miRWalk2.0, http://www.umm.uniheidelberg.de/apps/zmf/mirwalk). Sections containing the miR-124 binding site of the 3'UTR of TCF4 and Zbtb46 were cloned into pmirGLO Dual-Luciferase miRNA Target Expression Vector (Promega, Fitchburg, WI, USA) independently. HeLa cells were seeded at 2.5×104 cells per well in a 24-well plate. After 48 hrs, the pmirGLO vector containing the target mRNA binding site for the miR-124 was co-transfected with mmu-miR-124 mimic (Applied Biosystems) or the negative control using Lipofectamine 2000 (Life Technologies). Luciferase activity was measured after 48 hrs using Dual Luciferase Assay System (Promega) according to the manufacturer's instructions on a luminometer (Promega). Renilla luciferase activity was used to normalize the transfection efficiency. Each assay was repeated at least 3 times.

Statistical analysis

Experiments with multiplicated samples were presented as mean±SEM from at least three independent experiments. Statistical comparisons between different groups were analyzed using unpaired Student's t-test using SigmaPlot (Systat Software, San Jose, CA). Statistical significance is denoted by the p values equal or below 0.05 (*), 0.01 (**), and 0.001 (***). Data were plotted for graphs with SigmaPlot.

RESULTS

Production of Flt3L and culture of bone marrow

We generated the extracellular domain sequence of mouse Flt3L fused with the sequences of signal peptide, FLAG tag, and OLLAS tag. This soluble FLAG and OLLAS tagged Flt3L (SFO.Flt3L) sequence was devised to express with IRES and EGFP under CMV promoter (Fig. 1A) following transfection into CHO cells. CHO cells expressing high levels of Flt3L were enriched by sorting for EGFP, cloned, and named CHO/Flt3L cells (Fig. 1B). The conditioned medium from CHO/Flt3L cells was produced in large volume, sterilized by filtration, and blotted with anti-OLLAS antibody for the determination of Flt3L concentration before being added into the culture of BM cells. According to the anti-OLLAS Western blot analysis, the CHO/Flt3L conditioned medium was evaluated to contain approximately 10 µg/ml of Flt3L (Fig. 1C). To verify the efficacy of Flt3L produced, graded doses of CHO/Flt3L conditioned medium were used to culture BM for the generation of DCs in vitro. Higher concentrations of Flt3L in BM culture induced DC differentiation more efficiently (Fig. 1D). Especially, when the culture media were composed of 10% or higher amount of the Flt3L conditioned medium (up to 50%), the increase in number of DCs in BM culture became conspicuous (data not shown for BM cultures in media with 25% or 50% of the Flt3L conditioned medium). As estimated by Western blot analysis above, 10% content of the Flt3L conditioned medium corresponds to 1 µg/ml of Flt3L in culture medium. The efficacy to induce DCs in vivo by this Flt3L protein has also been demonstrated previously (2526).

Candidate miRNAs with potential to regulate DC development

To identify miRNAs possibly involved in DC development, a Web-based miRNA-target interaction database miRWalk2.0 (27), which amalgamates data from a collection of miRNA-target prediction programs, was used. Ten gene targets that are prominent transcription factors known to have a pivotal role in DC development – TCF4, Bcl6, Irf2, Irf4, Irf8, Id2, SpiB, Batf3, Notch2, Zbtb46 – were picked for the prediction software to identify miRNAs that possibly regulate these genes by binding to their 3'UTR. From the provided list of miRNAs that have a high potential to bind to the 3'UTR of these transcription factors, candidate miRNAs were selected dependent upon availability of detection reagents in our in-house miRNA probe collection. Overall, 20 candidate miRNAs were specified according to the analyses of 3'UTR sequences from the 10 transcription factors (Supplemental Fig. 1).

Screening of candidate miRNA expression in DCs from BM cultured with Flt3L

In preliminary efforts to reveal miRNAs that may play a role in DC development, expression profiles of the candidate miRNAs were assessed in Flt3L culture system of mouse BM cells. Using our in-house probe collection, the expressions of 20 candidate miRNAs were screened in CD11c+ DCs derived from BM culture with Flt3L, which were further assorted into B220 cDCs and B220+ pDCs (Fig. 2A). Total RNAs isolated from these two subsets of cultured DCs were subjected to analysis of miRNA expression profile by real-time RT-PCR. When the expression of candidate miRNAs was normalized and their relative levels were compared, an exceedingly high expression of miR-124 was observed in the B220 cDC population from BM culture with Flt3L (Fig. 2B). In the case of each individual candidate miRNA profile, all were expressed more in B220 cDCs than in B220+ pDCs except for miR-17 (Fig. 2C). Exceptionally high expression of miR-124 in cDCs and its contrasting expression between cDCs and pDCs in BM-derived DCs cultured with Flt3L suggest that miR-124 may also be differentially expressed during ontogeny of DCs in vivo and may play a role in their development.

Direct regulation of transcript containing 3'UTR of TCF4 by miR-124

According to the analysis of miRNA-target interactions above, miR-124 is predicted to bind to the 3'UTR of TCF4 (Supplemental Fig. 1A). miR-124 is also expected to bind to Zbtb46 although the probability is low (i.e., the sum of prediction algorithms with significant scores is 1; Supplemental Fig. 1J). To see whether miR-124 actually binds to these genes and regulates their expression, a dual luciferase reporter assay was performed using a pmirGLO vector (Fig. 3A). A section, 342 bps, of the 3'UTR of TCF4 containing the predicted binding site of miR-124 was inserted into the multiple cloning site (MCS) of a pmirGLO vector (Fig. 3B). A 480 bp section of the 3'UTR of Zbtb46 was cloned likewise into a pmirGLO vector (Fig. 3C). The cloned vectors were co-transfected with miR-124 mimic or the negative control into HeLa cells and the luciferase activity was measured. The assay showed that the overexpression of miR-124 was able to down-regulate luciferase activity of the pmirGLO-TCF4 vector by ~30% while not those of the pmirGLO-control or pmirGLO-Zbtb46 (Fig. 3D). Besides, the sequences of miR-124 binding site found in 3'UTRs of both mouse and human TCF4 transcripts are highly conserved (Fig. 3E). Therefore, it appears that miR-124 might directly bind to both 3'UTRs of mouse and human TCF4 and thus posttranscriptionally regulate their activity.

Higher expression of miR-124 in cDC1 cells from BM culture with Flt3L

TCF4 is a critical transcription factor in the development and homeostasis of pDCs and is expressed at higher levels in pDCs and pDC precursors than in other DCs and progenitors (528). Therefore, it seems developmentally relevant that lower expression of miR-124 in pDCs than in cDCs was observed amongst BM-derived DCs cultured with Flt3L in our preliminary screening (Fig. 2). As previously demonstrated by others (72930), we were able to culture BM cells in vitro with Flt3L for 6 to 12 days to efficiently produce three major DC subsets that respectively correspond to pDC, cDC1, and cDC2 lineage cells in lymphoid tissues in vivo. These DC populations from Flt3L-cultured BM were identified and isolated as per their surface markers of CD11c+ B220+ for pDCs, CD11c+ B220 CD24+ CD172α for cDC1, and CD11c+ B220 CD172α+ CD24int for cDC2 (Fig. 4A). Then, these three DC populations purified from BM culture with Flt3L by flow cytometric sorting were subjected to RNA extraction and real-time RT-PCR. As mentioned above, the dynamic and differential expression of various transcription factors across the DC subsets is critical for DC development (10). Expressions of TCF4, Batf3, and Irf8 in the DC subsets isolated from BM culture with Flt3L (Fig. 4B) were parallel to those previously reported in the DC subsets isolated from lymphoid tissues (9), indicating that the isolated DC subsets were classified appropriately. Expression of miR-124, similar to the results of the preliminary screen (Fig. 2), was lower in pDCs than in cDCs, i.e., cDC1 and cDC2 cells (Fig. 4C). Moreover, cDC1 cells were shown to express significantly higher levels of miR-124 than both pDCs and cDC2 cells.

Expression of miR-124 is higher in cDC1 cells than in other DCs, DC precursors, and progenitors in BM and spleen

To further verify the expression profiles of miR-124 amongst DC subsets present in BM culture with Flt3L, we examined the expression of miR-124 from DC subsets and progenitors present in steady-state BM. MDP, CDP, pDC, cDC1, and cDC2 cells present in mouse BM were respectively purified ex vivo by flow cytometric sorting according to their surface makers (Fig. 5A-C). When the extracted RNAs of the respective DC subsets and progenitors isolated from BM were analyzed by real-time RT-PCR and compared, miR-124 expression was prominently found in cDC1 cells at a level much higher than those of MDP, CDP, and other DC subsets (Fig. 5D). In addition, we also had several BM populations of pre-DCs, including precDCs and pre-pDCs (6731), purified and analyzed for their expressions of miR-124, which were lower than that of cDC1 cells but similar to those of other DC subsets and progenitors (data not shown). Therefore, higher expression of miR-124 is consistently found in the cDC1 lineage from both BM cells and BM-derived cell cultures with Flt3L. Then, to observe the patterns of miR-124 expression in steady-state spleen, DC subsets and pre-DCs were sorted ex vivo from freshly prepared splenocytes according to their surface makers (Fig. 6A-C). Real-time RT-PCR of the extracted RNA from the sorted splenic cells also revealed a relatively high expression of miR-124 in cDC1 cells compared to other DC subsets and pre-DCs in spleen (Fig. 6D), therefore suggesting that the abundant expression of miR-124 might be important to the development of all cDC1 lineage cells in general.

All three miR-124 precursor transcripts contribute to miR-124 expression in cDC1 cells

As depicted in Fig. 7A, there are three primary miRNA genes for miR-124: pri-miR-124-1, pri-miR-124-2, and pri-miR-124-3 (3233). Three transcripts originate from these three different genes on separate chromosomes but all convert into the same mature miR-124 sequence. With oligonucleotide probes to distinguish and detect the three pri-miR-124 transcripts (24), real-time RT-PCR was performed to determine which miR-124 precursors were expressed more in the cDC1 lineage. Expression profiling of pri-miR-124 in the cDC1 cells from steady-state BM (Fig. 7B) and spleen (Fig. 7C) showed similar patterns of miR-124 precursor expression. In both tissues, cDC1 cells showed that pri-miR-124-1 was expressed the least and pri-miR-124-3 was expressed the most but all three precursors were expressed within the ranges of no significant statistical difference. In addition, expression of the three pri-miR-124 genes was measured in other DC subsets where transcripts of all three precursor genes were also detected significantly (data not shown). In other words, the definitive expression of all three pri-miR-124 transcripts indicates that they all contribute significantly to the generation of mature miR-124 in cDC1 lineage cells.

DISCUSSION

MicroRNA-124 is known as the most abundant microRNA expressed in neuronal cells (3435). Although many miRNAs are starting to be linked to immunological processes, miR-124 remains unmentioned. Therefore, our finding of the outstanding and differential expression of miR-124 in BM-derived DCs cultured with Flt3L is intriguing as they are paralleled with DC development in vivo. Since homeostasis of DCs in vivo is critically dependent on Flt3L, we aimed to critically define the dynamic profile of miR-124 in the DC subpopulations and delineate its interplay with relevant transcription factors that influence the development and function of particular DC subsets. Analyzing the prediction algorithm software, TCF4 was shown to be a probable target of miR-124 while Zbtb46 was shown to be a less likely target. Although it would be important to show the levels of TCF4 or Zbtb46 proteins following treatment with miR-124 mimic in naturally TCF4- or Zbtb46-expressing cells, we could not carry out those experiments in such cells as pDCs and pre-DCs but performed dual luciferase assays in HeLa cells instead. Symmetrical to the prediction software, the luciferase activity assay showed that miR-124 mimic can bind and regulate the transcript carrying a 3'UTR section of TCF4.
Since TCF4 has been established to be a critical gene in the development and homeostasis of pDCs, this data suggested that miR-124 may play a role in this process. This led us to hypothesize that miR-124 would be least expressed in pDCs, as its high expression would more effectively target TCF4 mRNA for degradation and thus inhibit pDC development and function. The miR-124 expression profiles of Flt3L-cultured DC subsets correlated with this hypothesis so that miR-124 was least expressed in the pDC subset. Further expression profiling in steady-state BM and spleen, however, showed that miR-124 expression was conspicuously higher only in the cDC1 lineage but lower in both pDCs and cDC2 cells as well as in precursors and progenitors. This hints that miR-124, like most other miRNAs, does not act on DC development one-dimensionally through single miRNA to single target/transcription factor mechanism, but instead acts through single miRNA to multiple targets/transcription factors mechanism. Therefore, we speculate that the differential expression of miR-124 in different subsets may influence DC development broadly and profoundly.
Vital role of several miRNAs in development of specific DC subsets has been characterized in the mice genetically deficient of such miRNA genes (1619). Unlike those miRNAs, miR-124 has three precursor genes. Moreover, all three pri-miR-124 genes located on different chromosomes appear to significantly contribute to the expression of mature miR-124 in DC subsets. It would be quite difficult and unlikely that the triple knockout mice deficient of all three pri-miR-124 genes become available in the near future. Therefore, it is not currently possible to demonstrate the in vivo role of miR-124. Although the effect is transient and limited, transfection of its mimicking or inhibiting molecules into DC precursors and progenitors followed by culture with Flt3L will be able to validate the role of miR-124. All in all, the dynamic profiles of miR-124 expression are consistent within the in vitro-generated DC subsets and their in situ counterparts in lymphoid tissues. Highly dynamic activity of miR-124 during DC development requires elucidation of its purpose for such fluctuation.

Figures and Tables

Figure 1

Culture of BM cells with CHO/Flt3L-conditioned medium produces DCs in vitro. (A) Diagram for the expression construct that encodes soluble FLAG and OLLAS tagged mouse Flt3L gene with IRES and EGFP (SFO.Flt3L-IRES-EGFP). (B) CHO cells stably transfected with SFO.Flt3L-IRES-EGFP (CHO/Flt3L cells) were selected and cloned for the high expression of EGFP. (C) Concentration of mouse Flt3L protein in the supernatant from CHO/Flt3L cell culture was titrated using anti-OLLAS monoclonal antibody. (D) Time-course quantification of CD11c+ DCs per well for each culture condition containing 0.1~10% of Flt3L conditioned medium.

in-16-61-g001
Figure 2

Preliminary expression profiles of candidate miRNAs in Flt3L-cultured DC subsets. (A) Gating strategies for pDCs and cDCs present in BM culture with Flt3L for 8 days. (B) Normalized expression levels of candidate miRNAs in DC subsets isolated from BM culture with Flt3L. (C) Relative expression of individual candidate miRNAs between pDCs and cDCs isolated from BM culture with Flt3L.

in-16-61-g002
Figure 3

Regulation of gene expression by miR-124 via direct binding to 3'UTR of target transcript. Diagrams of the luciferase reporter vector pmirGLO constructs encoding (A) no insert, i.e., control, or 3'UTR from (B) TCF4 and (C) Zbtb46. (D) Histogram of normalized luciferase activities obtained from HeLa cells co-transfected with the respective reporter constructs and miR-124 mimic or negative control. Representative results are shown from 3 independent experiments. (E) Predicted binding site of miR-124 in the 3'UTRs of mouse and human TCF4.

in-16-61-g003
Figure 4

High expression of miR-124 in cDC1 cells from BM culture with Flt3L. (A) Gating and sorting strategies for pDC, cDC1, and cDC2 cells from BM culture with Flt3L. (B) Relative expression of 3 transcription factors critical to DC development is determined amongst different DC subsets by real-time RT-PCR. Representative results are shown from 2 independent experiments. (C) Relative expression of miR-124 is assessed amongst different DC subsets by real-time RT-PCR. Data from 3 independent experiments are presented in histogram. Error bars indicate mean±SEM across all samples from 3 independent experiments. *p≤0.05; **p≤0.01; ***p≤0.001.

in-16-61-g004
Figure 5

Prominent expression of miR-124 in cDC1 cells in BM. Gating strategies for (A) MDP, CDP, (B) pDC, (C) cDC1, and cDC2 cells in BM. (D) Relative expression of miR-124 is assessed amongst different progenitors and DC subsets by real-time RT-PCR. Representative results are shown from 3 independent experiments. ***p≤0.001.

in-16-61-g005
Figure 6

Elevated expression of miR-124 in cDC1 cells in spleen. Gating strategies for (A) pre-DC, (B) pDC, (C) cDC1, and cDC2 cells in spleen. (D) Relative expression of miR-124 is evaluated amongst different DC precursor and subsets by real-time RT-PCR. Representative results are shown from 3 independent experiments. ***p≤0.001.

in-16-61-g006
Figure 7

All three primary miR-124 genes are actively transcribed in DCs. (A) Genomic map of three pri-miR-124 genes on three different chromosomal locations are illustrated with their sequence information of GenBank accession numbers. (B) Relative expression of three pri-miR-124 genes is determined from cDC1 cells in BM by real-time RT-PCR. Results combined from 2 independent experiments are shown. (C) Relative expression of three pri-miR-124 genes is assessed from cDC1 cells in spleen by real-time RT-PCR.

in-16-61-g007

Abbreviations

BM

bone marrow

cDCs

classical DCs

CDP

common DC progenitor

CHO cells

Chinese hamster ovary cells

DCs

dendritic cells

EGFP

enhanced green fluorescence protein

Flt3L

Flt3 ligand

IRES

internal ribosomal entry site

Lin

lineage

MCS

multiple cloning site

MDP

macrophage-DC progenitor

miRNA

microRNA

pDCs

plasmacytoid DCs

pri-miRNA

primary miRNA

UTR

untranslated region

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Young Hee Nam for her help with flow cytometry at the Flow Cytometry Core of the Yonsei Biomedical Research Institute in the Yonsei University College of Medicine. We were supported by grants from the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2013R1A1A2058427, NRF-2014R1A4A1008625) and a faculty research grant of Yonsei University College of Medicine for 2014 (6-2014-0062) to CGP, and the Brain Korea 21 PLUS Project for Medical Science, Yonsei University.

Notes

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST The authors have no financial conflict of interest.

References

1. Steinman RM. Decisions about dendritic cells: past, present, and future. Annu Rev Immunol. 2012; 30:1–22.
crossref
2. Park CG. Vaccine strategies utilizing C-type lectin receptors on dendritic cells in vivo. Clin Exp Vaccine Res. 2014; 3:149–154.
crossref
3. Steinman RM, Idoyaga J. Features of the dendritic cell lineage. Immunol Rev. 2010; 234:5–17.
crossref
4. Kingston D, Schmid MA, Onai N, Obata-Onai A, Baumjohann D, Manz MG. The concerted action of GM-CSF and Flt3-ligand on in vivo dendritic cell homeostasis. Blood. 2009; 114:835–843.
crossref
5. Onai N, Kurabayashi K, Hosoi-Amaike M, Toyama-Sorimachi N, Matsushima K, Inaba K, Ohteki T. A clonogenic progenitor with prominent plasmacytoid dendritic cell developmental potential. Immunity. 2013; 38:943–957.
crossref
6. Grajales-Reyes GE, Iwata A, Albring J, Wu X, Tussiwand R, Kc W, Kretzer NM, Briseno CG, Durai V, Bagadia P, Haldar M, Schonheit J, Rosenbauer F, Murphy TL, Murphy KM. Batf3 maintains autoactivation of Irf8 for commitment of a CD8alpha(+) conventional DC clonogenic progenitor. Nat Immunol. 2015; 16:708–717.
crossref
7. Schlitzer A, Sivakamasundari V, Chen J, Sumatoh HR, Schreuder J, Lum J, Malleret B, Zhang S, Larbi A, Zolezzi F, Renia L, Poidinger M, Naik S, Newell EW, Robson P, Ginhoux F. Identification of cDC1- and cDC2-committed DC progenitors reveals early lineage priming at the common DC progenitor stage in the bone marrow. Nat Immunol. 2015; 16:718–728.
crossref
8. Geissmann F, Manz MG, Jung S, Sieweke MH, Merad M, Ley K. Development of monocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells. Science. 2010; 327:656–661.
crossref
9. Satpathy AT, Wu X, Albring JC, Murphy KM. Re(de)fining the dendritic cell lineage. Nat Immunol. 2012; 13:1145–1154.
crossref
10. Murphy KM. Transcriptional control of dendritic cell development. Adv Immunol. 2013; 120:239–267.
crossref
11. Esashi E, Wang YH, Perng O, Qin XF, Liu YJ, Watowich SS. The signal transducer STAT5 inhibits plasmacytoid dendritic cell development by suppressing transcription factor IRF8. Immunity. 2008; 28:509–520.
crossref
12. Li Z, Rana TM. Therapeutic targeting of micro-RNAs: current status and future challenges. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2014; 13:622–638.
crossref
13. Ha M, Kim VN. Regulation of microRNA biogenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014; 15:509–524.
crossref
14. Johanson TM, Skinner JP, Kumar A, Zhan Y, Lew AM, Chong MM. The role of microRNAs in lymphopoiesis. Int J Hematol. 2014; 100:246–253.
crossref
15. Smyth LA, Boardman DA, Tung SL, Lechler R, Lombardi G. MicroRNAs affect dendritic cell function and phenotype. Immunology. 2015; 144:197–205.
crossref
16. Mildner A, Chapnik E, Manor O, Yona S, Kim KW, Aychek T, Varol D, Beck G, Itzhaki ZB, Feldmesser E, Amit I, Hornstein E, Jung S. Mononuclear phagocyte miRNome analysis identifies miR-142 as critical regulator of murine dendritic cell homeostasis. Blood. 2013; 121:1016–1027.
crossref
17. Karrich JJ, Jachimowski LC, Libouban M, Iyer A, Brandwijk K, Taanman-Kueter EW, Nagasawa M, de Jong EC, Uittenbogaart CH, Blom B. MicroRNA-146a regulates survival and maturation of human plasmacytoid dendritic cells. Blood. 2013; 122:3001–3009.
crossref
18. Su X, Qian C, Zhang Q, Hou J, Gu Y, Han Y, Chen Y, Jiang M, Cao X. miRNomes of haematopoietic stem cells and dendritic cells identify miR-30b as a regulator of Notch1. Nat Commun. 2013; 4:2903.
crossref
19. Agudo J, Ruzo A, Tung N, Salmon H, Leboeuf M, Hashimoto D, Becker C, Garrett-Sinha LA, Baccarini A, Merad M, Brown BD. The miR-126-VEGFR2 axis controls the innate response to pathogen-associated nucleic acids. Nat Immunol. 2014; 15:54–62.
crossref
20. Park H, Huang X, Lu C, Cairo MS, Zhou X. MicroRNA-146a and microRNA-146b regulate human dendritic cell apoptosis and cytokine production by targeting TRAF6 and IRAK1 proteins. J Biol Chem. 2015; 290:2831–2841.
crossref
21. Johanson TM, Cmero M, Wettenhall J, Lew AM, Zhan Y, Chong MM. A microRNA expression atlas of mouse dendritic cell development. Immunol Cell Biol. 2015; 93:480–485.
crossref
22. Park SH, Cheong C, Idoyaga J, Kim JY, Choi JH, Do Y, Lee H, Jo JH, Oh YS, Im W, Steinman RM, Park CG. Generation and application of new rat monoclonal antibodies against synthetic FLAG and OLLAS tags for improved immunodetection. J Immunol Methods. 2008; 331:27–38.
crossref
23. Inaba K, Swiggard WJ, Steinman RM, Romani N, Schuler G, Brinster C. Isolation of dendritic cells. Curr Protoc Immunol. 2009; Chapter 3:Unit 3.7.
crossref
24. Real FM, Sekido R, Lupianez DG, Lovell-Badge R, Jimenez R, Burgos M. A microRNA (mmu-miR-124) prevents Sox9 expression in developing mouse ovarian cells. Biol Reprod. 2013; 89:78.
25. Darrasse-Jeze G, Deroubaix S, Mouquet H, Victora GD, Eisenreich T, Yao KH, Masilamani RF, Dustin ML, Rudensky A, Liu K, Nussenzweig MC. Feedback control of regulatory T cell homeostasis by dendritic cells in vivo. J Exp Med. 2009; 206:1853–1862.
26. Choi JH, Cheong C, Dandamudi DB, Park CG, Rodriguez A, Mehandru S, Velinzon K, Jung IH, Yoo JY, Oh GT, Steinman RM. Flt3 signaling-dependent dendritic cells protect against atherosclerosis. Immunity. 2011; 35:819–831.
crossref
27. Dweep H, Gretz N. miRWalk2.0: a comprehensive atlas of microRNA-target interactions. Nat Methods. 2015; 12:697.
crossref
28. Cisse B, Caton ML, Lehner M, Maeda T, Scheu S, Locksley R, Holmberg D, Zweier C, den Hollander NS, Kant SG, Holter W, Rauch A, Zhuang Y, Reizis B. Transcription factor E2-2 is an essential and specific regulator of plasmacytoid dendritic cell development. Cell. 2008; 135:37–48.
crossref
29. Naik SH, Proietto AI, Wilson NS, Dakic A, Schnorrer P, Fuchsberger M, Lahoud MH, O'Keeffe M, Shao QX, Chen WF, Villadangos JA, Shortman K, Wu L. Cutting edge: generation of splenic CD8+ and CD8 dendritic cell equivalents in Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 ligand bone marrow cultures. J Immunol. 2005; 174:6592–6597.
crossref
30. Naik SH, Sathe P, Park HY, Metcalf D, Proietto AI, Dakic A, Carotta S, O'Keeffe M, Bahlo M, Papenfuss A, Kwak JY, Wu L, Shortman K. Development of plasmacytoid and conventional dendritic cell subtypes from single precursor cells derived in vitro and in vivo. Nat Immunol. 2007; 8:1217–1226.
crossref
31. Liu K, Victora GD, Schwickert TA, Guermonprez P, Meredith MM, Yao K, Chu FF, Randolph GJ, Rudensky AY, Nussenzweig M. In vivo analysis of dendritic cell development and homeostasis. Science. 2009; 324:392–397.
crossref
32. Kozomara A, Griffiths-Jones S. miRBase: annotating high confidence microRNAs using deep sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014; 42:D68–D73.
crossref
33. Qiu S, Feng Y, LeSage G, Zhang Y, Stuart C, He L, Li Y, Caudle Y, Peng Y, Yin D. Chronic morphine-induced microRNA-124 promotes microglial immunosuppression by modulating P65 and TRAF6. J Immunol. 2015; 194:1021–1030.
crossref
34. Baudet ML, Zivraj KH, breu-Goodger C, Muldal A, Armisen J, Blenkiron C, Goldstein LD, Miska EA, Holt CE. miR-124 acts through CoREST to control onset of Sema3A sensitivity in navigating retinal growth cones. Nat Neurosci. 2012; 15:29–38.
crossref
35. Sonntag KC, Woo TU, Krichevsky AM. Converging miRNA functions in diverse brain disorders: a case for miR-124 and miR-126. Exp Neurol. 2012; 235:427–435.
crossref

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Figure 1

Identification of candidate miRNAs that potentially target the transcript of transcription factors in DC development. miRWalk2.0 was used to identify miRNAs with high probability to bind to the 3'UTR of the listed transcription factors. miRanda, miRWalk, miRDB, PITA, RNA22, and TargetScan prediction algorithms were used and miRNAs with significant scores from at least 3 of the algorithms were listed (SUM ≥ 3). (A) Candidate list of miRNAs that target TCF4 and the map of 3'UTR diagram for TCF4 with the predicted binding sites of the candidates. The same is shown for (B) Bcl6, (C) Irf2, (D) Irf4, (E) Irf8, (F) Id2, (G) SpiB, (H) Batf3, (I) Notch2, and (J) Zbtb46.
TOOLS
Similar articles