Journal List > Korean J Androl > v.29(1) > 1033095

Lee, Han, Ahn, Ju, So, and Lee: Medical Profession's Awareness and Attitude Toward the Sexuality of Cancer Patients in South Korea

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the practice and attitude of healthcare professionals toward the sexuality of cancer patients.

Materials and Methods

The subjects were comprised of doctors and nurses who served at two medical centers. Questionnaires consisted of five domains and fourteen questions were disseminated via emails in March 2009. The first domain (3 questions) pertained the recognition of sexual dysfunction in cancer patients, the second (2 questions) pertained cancer patients’ experience of sexual dysfunction, the third (3 questions) pertained the attitude to cancer patients with sexual dysfunction, the fourth (3 questions) pertained capacity for sexual dysfunction treatment, and the fifth (3 questions) pertained problems or difficulties encountered when facing cancer patients’ sexual dysfunction.

Results

Three hundred and twenty-six men and women completed the questionnaires, giving a response rate of 85.4%. The mean age was 33.6 years. The proportion of doctors and nurses were respectively 48.2% and 51.8%. The proportion of males and females were 29.8%, and 70.2%, respectively. Ninety point five per cent (90.5%) of respondents answered that cancer patients’ sexual dysfunction is important to quality of life. However, fewer medical professionals (27.4%) give an affirmative answer that patients requested sexual dysfunction therapy. The occurred particularly less frequently in physicians (13.2%) than in surgeons (55.6%). Fifty-four point six (54.6%) percent of respondents said that they tried to resolve the problem when patients asking for treatment of sexual dysfunction. Only 38.3% of respondents experienced little or no difficulty in behaving naturally when counseling cancer patients about their sexual dysfunction. Female doctors and nurses more often experience embarrassment when addressing sexuality with patients. In addition, most respondents (84.0%) felt that theoretical knowledge on cancer patients’ problems is needed.

Conclusions

Most healthcare professionals agreed that sexual problems of cancer patients were important for quality of life. However, they frequently felt a lack of communicating skills and theoretical knowledge. Education programs on this issue and an appropriate contact system with specialists should be established.

REFERENCES

1). Won YJ, Sung J, Jung KW, Kong HJ, Park S, Shin HR, et al. Nationwide cancer incidence in Korea, 2003-2005. Cancer Res Treat. 2009; 41:122–31.
crossref
2). Andersen BL. Sexual functioning morbidity among cancer survivors. Current status and future research directions. Cancer. 1985; 55:1835–42.
crossref
3). Catalona WJ, Carvalhal GF, Mager DE, Smith DS. Potency, continence and complication rates in 1,870 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies. J Urol. 1999; 162:433–8.
crossref
4). Fulmer BR, Bissonette EA, Petroni GR, Theodorescu D. Prospective assessment of voiding and sexual function after treatment for localized prostate carcinoma: comparison of radical prostatectomy to hor-monobrachytherapy with and without external beam radiotherapy. Cancer. 2001; 91:2046–55.
5). Guillonneau B, Cathelineau X, Doublet JD, Baumert H, Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 550 procedures. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2002; 43:123–33.
crossref
6). Katz R, Salomon L, Hoznek A, de la Taille A, Vordos D, Cicco A, et al. Patient reported sexual function following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2002; 168:2078–82.
crossref
7). Kundu SD, Roehl KA, Eggener SE, Antenor JA, Han M, Catalona WJ. Potency, continence and complications in 3,477 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies. J Urol. 2004; 172:2227–31.
crossref
8). Potosky AL, Davis WW, Hoffman RM, Stanford JL, Stephenson RA, Penson DF, et al. Five-year outcomes after prostatectomy or radiotherapy for prostate cancer: the prostate cancer outcomes study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004; 96:1358–67.
crossref
9). Schover LR, Evans R, von Eschenbach AC. Sexual rehabilitation and male radical cystectomy. J Urol. 1986; 136:1015–7.
crossref
10). Krouse R, Grant M, Ferrell B, Dean G, Nelson R, Chu D. Quality of life outcomes in 599 cancer and non-cancer patients with colostomies. J Surg Res. 2007; 138:79–87.
crossref
11). Jensen PT, Groenvold M, Klee MC, Thranov I, Petersen MA, Machin D. Early-stage cervical carcinoma, radical hysterectomy, and sexual function. A longitudinal study. Cancer. 2004; 100:97–106.
12). Robinson JW. Sexuality and cancer. Breaking the silence. Aust Fam Physician. 1998; 27:45–7.
13). Fobair P, Stewart SL, Chang S, D'Onofrio C, Banks PJ, Bloom JR. Body image and sexual problems in young women with breast cancer. Psychooncology. 2006; 15:579–94.
crossref
14). Barni S, Mondin R. Sexual dysfunction in treated breast cancer patients. Ann Oncol. 1997; 8:149–53.
crossref
15). Burwell SR, Case LD, Kaelin C, Avis NE. Sexual problems in younger women after breast cancer surgery. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24:2815–21.
crossref
16). Ganz PA, Rowland JH, Desmond K, Meyerowitz BE, Wyatt GE. Life after breast cancer: understanding women's health-related quality of life and sexual functioning. J Clin Oncol. 1998; 16:501–14.
crossref
17). Al-Ghazal SK, Fallowfield L, Blamey RW. Does cosmetic outcome from treatment of primary breast cancer influence psychosocial morbidity? Eur J Surg Oncol. 1999; 25:571–3.
crossref
18). Walsh PC. Defining sexual outcomes after treatment for localized prostate carcinoma. J Urol. 2003; 169:1594–5.
19). Carmack Taylor CL, Basen-Engquist K, Shinn EH, Bodurka DC. Predictors of sexual functioning in ovarian cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2004; 22:881–9.
crossref
20). Reese JB, Keefe FJ, Somers TJ, Abernethy AP. Coping with sexual concerns after cancer: the use of flexible coping. Support Care Cancer. 2010; 18:785–800.
crossref
21). Ganz PA, Kwan L, Stanton AL, Krupnick JL, Rowland JH, Meyerowitz BE, et al. Quality of life at the end of primary treatment of breast cancer: first results from the moving beyond cancer randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004; 96:376–87.
crossref
22). Schover LR. Sexual rehabilitation after treatment for prostate cancer. Cancer. 1993; 71(Suppl 3):1024–30.
crossref
23). Galbraith ME, Crighton F. Alterations of sexual function in men with cancer. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2008; 24:102–14.
crossref
24). Hughes MK. Alterations of sexual function in women with cancer. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2008; 24:91–101.
crossref
25). Schover LR. Sexuality and fertility after cancer. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2005. 523–7.
crossref
26). Tierney DK. Sexuality: a quality-of-life issue for cancer survivors. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2008; 24:71–9.
crossref
27). Sadovsky R, Basson R, Krychman M, Morales AM, Schover L, Wang R, et al. Cancer and sexual problems. J Sex Med. 2010; 7:349–73.
crossref
28). Moreira ED Jr, Brock G, Glasser DB, Nicolosi A, Laumann EO, Paik A, et al. Help-seeking behaviour for sexual problems: the global study of sexual attitudes and behaviors. Int J Clin Pract. 2005; 59:6–16.
crossref
29). Williams HA, Wilson ME, Hongladarom G, McDonell M. Nurses' attitudes toward sexuality in cancer patients. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1986; 13:39–43.
30). Williams HA, Wilson ME. Sexuality in children and adolescents with cancer: pediatric oncology nurses' attitudes and behaviors. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 1989; 6:127–32.
crossref
31). Stead ML, Brown JM, Fallowfield L, Selby P. Lack of communication between healthcare professionals and women with ovarian cancer about sexual issues. Br J Cancer. 2003; 88:666–71.
crossref

Fig. 1.
Awareness of cancer patient's sexual problems.
kja-29-53f1.tif
Fig. 2.
Expirences of cancer patients' sexual problem.
kja-29-53f2.tif
Fig. 3.
Expirence of cancer patients' problems among speciltities. ∗p<0.001.
kja-29-53f3.tif
Fig. 4.
Attitude toward cancer patient's sexual problems.
kja-29-53f4.tif
Fig. 5.
Treatment behavior.
kja-29-53f5.tif
Fig. 6.
Problem recognition.
kja-29-53f6.tif
Fig. 7.
Difficulties when facing sexual problem among gender and ocupation. ∗p<0.001.
kja-29-53f7.tif
Table 1.
Demographic characteristics of respondents
Characteristic No. of respondents (n=326) %
Overall
 Male 97 29.8
 Female 229 70.2
 Doctor 157 48.2
 Nurse 169 51.8
Doctors
 Surgeon 81 51.6
 Physician 76 48.4
 Specialist 101 64.3
 Residents 56 35.7
 Male doctor 93 59.2
 Female doctor 64 40.8
 Urologist 15 9.6
 Non-Urologist 142 90.4
TOOLS
Similar articles