PDF
ePub
Citation
Print
INTRODUCTION
Chimerism analysis is an important tool used to assess the origin of hematopoietic cells after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). After allo-SCT, both donor and recipient hematopoietic cells can coexist in the recipient, and this state is called mixed chimerism (MC). In patients with MC, the percentage of recipient cells could remain stable, increase, or spontaneously decrease over time [1-8]. The presence of recipient cells in the peripheral blood (PB) or bone marrow (BM) of patients during the posttransplant period is an important prognostic indicator of transplant rejection, disease relapse, and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) [9-12].
Several methods have been developed to assess the level of donor engraftment after allo-SCT. Fluorescent in situ hybridization of sex chromosomes (XY-FISH) and PCR-based analysis of polymorphic DNA sequences are the most widely used techniques, and real-time PCR techniques based on analysis of the Y chromosome or on single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are being evaluated. Currently, fluorescence-based PCR amplification of short tandem repeats (STRs) is the gold standard for analyzing post-transplant chimerism and has been used in most studies [13-15].
PB or BM is most often used for chimerism analysis, with or without further manipulation of different cell subpopulations. It is important to realize that patients could show complete chimerism (CC) in one cell type, for example, T cells, whereas others could be totally or in part recipient-derived. This is called split chimerism [3, 8].
Many studies have investigated nonmyeloablative conditioning regimens for split chimerism. We compared donor-recipient chimerism levels in nucleated cells (NCs) and lineage-specific cell subtypes, namely, T cells and natural killer (NK) cells, after myeloablative allo-SCT by using multiplex STR-PCR in order to determine the sensitivity and specificity for the detection of minimal residual disease. Moreover, we analyzed the correlation between chimerism status and clinical outcome, including cumulative incidence of GVHD and relapse. There have been few studies in Korea about chimerism or discrepant results among various cell lineages.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
1. Patients and specimens
This study included 24 patients who underwent allo-SCT between December 2001 and September 2008 in our institution; patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)-treated PB samples were obtained from both the donor and recipient before transplantation. After allo-SCT, recipient PB samples were drawn every month for the first 3 months and then every 3 months for 2 years or until the recipient's death. NCs were isolated by density gradient centrifugation by using Ficoll-Paque (d=1.077 g/mL; Pharmacia, Sweden). T cells (CD3+) and NK cells (CD56+) cells were separated using the RosetteSep antibody cocktail (Stem Cell Technologies; Vancouver, BC, Canada) according to the manufacturer's instructions, with minor modifications. Genomic DNA was extracted from NCs and from CD3+ and CD56+ cells by using the QIAamp Blood Kit (Qiagen; Chatsworth, CA, USA).
2. Chimerism analysis
Chimerism studies were performed using the AmpF/STR Identifiler PCR Amplification Kit (Applied Biosystems; Norwalk, CT, USA), which simultaneously amplifies 15 STR loci and the gender-determination marker Amelogenin. The PCR products were analyzed using ABI 3100 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). Fluorescence was quantified, and the precise size of the DNA fragments was calculated with the Genotyper software (Applied Biosystems). The percentages of donor and recipient DNA were calculated from each pair of informative STR markers on the basis of individual proportions of donor (D) and recipient (R) peak areas in relation to the summation of all signals, for example, recipient's DNA (%)=(R1+R2)/(D1+D2+R1+R2)×100.
3. Definition of MC
CC was defined as the presence of >95% donor-type hematopoietic cells after allo-SCT. Patients with CC at a certain time point after transplantation can develop a state of MC. MC is defined as the presence of 5-95% donor-type hematopoietic cells. Split chimerism was defined as CC in one cell type and the presence of recipient-derived cells (totally or in-part) in others.
RESULTS
1. Clinical outcome of patients
The characteristics and clinical data of 24 patients are presented in Table 1. Allo-SCT was performed with a median of 3.8×106 CD34+ cells/kg (range, [0.16-7.58]×106 CD34+ cells/kg). The median follow-up period after transplantation was 19 months (range, 1-59 months). The median periods required for recovering the absolute counts of neutrophils (>500/µL) and platelets (>20,000/µL) were 16 days (range, 11-40 days) and 25 days (range, 17-60 days), respectively. The number of informative STR markers in donor-recipient pairs ranged from 4 to 15 (median, 9). The markers were from a set of 16 polymorphic loci, including D18S51, D8S1179, D16S539, D2S1338 and FGA, which were the most informative loci, and the loci were amplified in 16 or 17 donor-recipient pairs.
2. Chimerism analysis of patients
Among the 24 patients, 23 achieved engraftment and only 1 patient (unique patient number [UPN] 7) did not. Twenty-two patients achieved CC in NCs after a median of 23 days (range, 12-39 days), and 1 patient (UPN 17) achieved CC after 103 days. One patient (UPN 2) underwent transplantation before the assessment of chimerism by multiplex STR-PCR. NC chimerism was analyzed more than 4 times in all patients (except UPN 2), and the results in T cells and NK cells during the early engraftment period (≤30 days after transplantation) could not be confirmed because of low cell numbers.
1) Correlation between chimerism status and relapse
Nine, 6, and 5 patients had 100% recipient-derived NCs, T cells, and NK cells or MC in these cells, respectively. Among these 9, 6, and 5 patients, relapse occurred in 8, 3, and 3 patients, respectively. Further, 3 patients (UPNs 3, 7, and 10) with relapse had 100% recipient-derived NK cells; NCs and T cells comprised various percentages of recipient-derived cells (Table 2). Patients with relapse had MC or 100% recipient-derived cells in a part cell type and/or all cell types. In two patients (UPNs 5 and 11), MC in NCs was detected after relapse was clinically diagnosed. MC in NCs (P=0.000), but not in T cells and NK cells (P>0.05), was significantly correlated with disease relapse (Table 3).
2) Correlation between chimerism status and mortality
Among the 24 patients, 8 died between days 80 and 571 (median, 307 days). Five patients died because of a relapse or progressive disease (AML, 2; CML, 1; ALL, 1; and myelodysplastic syndrome [MDS], 1) and 3 patients died because of transplant-related complications such as pneumonia. These dead patients included 6 out of the 9 patients with MC in NCs or 100% recipient-derived NCs (P=0.007).
Patients (4/6) with MC in T cells or 100% recipient-derived T cells (P=0.046) and 4/5 patients with MC in NK cells or 100% recipient-derived NK cells (P=0.013) died. The results of all lineage-specific chimerism analyses were significantly correlated with mortality (Table 3). Of the 8 relapsed patients who had MC in NCs or 100% recipient-derived NCs, 4 received donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) at a median of 252 days (range, 104-457 days); among these, 1 patient (UPN 11) maintained complete remission during 867 days and 3 patients (UPNs, 1, 5, and 7) died because of secondary relapse (Fig. 1).
3) Correlation between chimerism status and acute/chronic GVHD
Of the total of 24 patients, 9 (37.5%) developed acute GVHD, and 3 of them developed the condition after DLI. Of the 9 patients with acute GVHD, 4, 2, and 2 patients had 100% recipient-derived NCs, T cells, and NK cells or MC in these cells, respectively. MC in all cell types was not significantly correlated with the incidence of acute GVHD (P>0.05). Of the 24 patients, 10 (41.6%) had extensive chronic GVHD. Among these patients, 6, 3, and 1 patients had 100% recipient-derived NCs, T cells, and NK cells or MC in these cells, respectively. Six patients had MC in T cells, and 3 of them had chronic GVHD. In UPN 19, T cells consisted of 29.0%, 19.5%, and 18.5% recipient cells on days 32, 93, and 119, respectively, and chronic GVHD was observed continuously from days 130 to 220 (Table 4). UPNs 3 and 6 had MC in T cells around the onset of chronic GVHD. Two patients (UPNs 7 and 10) with MC in T cells had acute GVHD. Another patient (UPN 24) did not have acute/chronic GVHD. Four of the 10 patients with chronic GVHD showed CC in all cell types. MC in all cell types was not correlated with the incidence of acute and chronic GVHD (P>0.05; Table 3).
DISCUSSION
Chimerism analyses are routinely performed to monitor engraftment [1-4]. The persistence or reappearance of autologous cells has often been observed after SCT. Several studies performed during the last 20 years have reported that MC is associated with graft rejection [11, 16-20]. Chimerism analysis is still controversial because some studies did not find a correlation between chimerism and disease relapse [21, 22].
In this study, we analyzed the chimerism status of NCs, T cells, and NK cells from myeloablative allo-SCT patients by using multiplex STR-PCR and determined the correlation between these results and the clinical outcome. We found that among the patients observed, 9 had MC in NCs or 100% recipient-derived NCs, and the disease relapsed in all the patients, except UPN 19. In 2 patients, MC in NCs was detected after the clinical diagnosis of relapse. This may be explained by the long intervals between chimerism analysis and SCT, which increase the risk of overlooking a rapidly evolving MC before hematological relapse. MC in NCs was significantly correlated with disease relapse. Five patients had MC in NK cells or 100% recipient-derived NK cells, and 3 of these patients had 100% recipient-derived NK cells. NCs and T cells comprised recipient-derived cells in various proportions. NK cells were not significantly correlated with relapse despite MC in NK cells in patients with disease relapse. Baron et al. [17] found that in patients who had undergone non-myeloablative SCT, low donor T-cell and NK-cell chimerism levels on day 14 were associated with high probabilities of graft rejection and that an early establishment of donor NK-cell chimerism was associated with better progression-free survival. We found that the chimerism status differed among different cell lineages in 6 patients with myeloid malignancies (UPNs 3, 6, 10, 15, 19, and 24). Four out of the 6 cases were published previously [23]. Zeiser et al. [18] reported that conventional chimerism analysis had lower sensitivity (<3%) than lineage-specific chimerism analysis (0.1%). Patients with MC in NK cells or 100% recipient-derived NK cells were diagnosed with AML or MDS. One patient (UPN 15) with AML had 54.5% blasts in the BM and no blasts in the PB. Few studies have reported relapse in the BM without prior detection of recipient cells in the PB [24]. Myeloblasts were not CD56-positive at the time of diagnosis in any of the cases. However, we could not totally exclude the possibility that the blasts expressed low levels of CD56 from the onset or acquired the ectopic marker during treatment or relapse. The data supported the concept that persistence of MC in NK cells in patients with AML and MDS reduces the graft-versus-malignancy (GVM) effect and helps to promote relapse. Clausen et al. [25] found that a grafted NK cell dose was associated with a lower risk of relapse and improved survival.
We confirmed that the presence of 100% recipient-derived NCs, T cells, and NK cells or MC in these cells was correlated with mortality. This observation indicated the importance of short interval chimerism analysis; immediate therapeutic intervention is needed if an increase in the level of MC is noted. The role of DLI in patients with relapse is unclear [18, 26]. In this study, 4 patients with MC and relapse received DLI, and all, except UPN 11, had secondary relapse. In the present study, patients who had developed increased MC and, therefore, received additional DLI did not have enhanced GVM effect, and autologous hematopoiesis could not be eliminated. McSweeney et al. [27] recommended consider DLI for declining donor chimerism, but a higher than 20% of donor T cells chimerism, stable MC of >2 weeks, or progressive disease. Further evidence of reduced alloreactivity in patients with MC is provided by a lower incidence of severe acute GVHD and a higher incidence of relapse in patients with MC after SCT than in patients with CC [28, 29]. Michallet et al. [28] showed a significant correlation between chimerism status and overall survival as well as between chimerism status and the incidences of acute and chronic GVHD. Mattsson et al. [29] reported that about 82% of patients had MC for donor/host T cells at the onset of acute GVHD. In this study, MC in all cell types was not correlated with the incidence of acute and chronic GVHD. However, 6 patients showed MC in T cells, and 3 (UPNs 3, 6, 19) of these patients had chronic GVHD. UPNs 7 and 10 with MC in T cells had acute GVHD. Although no clear conclusion could be made because of the lack of statistically significant correlation, MC in T cells may influence GVHD.
In the case of high-risk patients or when other suitable disease markers are not available, sequential chimerism analysis in leukocyte subsets permits early detection of relapse and facilitates the monitoring of therapeutic interventions. Furthermore, prospective clinical studies should include large numbers of patients with the same disease. Despite the above-mentioned drawbacks; we believe that these chimerism data could be used as the fundamental basis for monitoring the outcome of myeloablative SCT, which is commonly performed in Korea.
XML Download