Journal List > Korean J Hematol > v.43(2) > 1032811

Kim and You: The Value of Preoperative Coagulation Screening in Children Undergoing Surgery

Abstract

Background:

To evaluate the usefulness of preoperative screening for coagulation disorders in children who have undergone surgery.

Methods:

From January 2003 to December 2005, we prospectively evaluated laboratory and bleeding histories in 1,911 children between the ages of one year and 15 years. All of the patients had preoperative coagulation screening with a measurement of complete blood count, prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time. The sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values following a preoperative coagulation-screening test were evaluated by a comparison of the type of surgery and bleeding complications that occurred during and after surgery.

Results:

There were no patients with previously proven coagulopathies or suspicious medical histories. Among the 1,911 cases, a subset of 22 patients had persistent abnormalities detected after laboratory testing. In two of the 22 patients, lupus anticoagulant was detected and in one of the 22 patients, a factor VIII deficiency was discovered. There were 46 patients that had postoperative bleeding and required hospitalization extension or readmission for stanching. Among the 46 patients, 44 patients demonstrated normal coagulation after testing and two patients demonstrated abnormal coagulation after testing. Following a preoperative coagulation-screening test, a low sensitivity (0.04) and positive predictive value (0.09) were determined.

Conclusion:

For the prediction of perioperative bleeding, the use of a coagulation-screeningtest showed a very low positive predictive value. Many false positive laboratory tests coupled with the relative rarity of inherited and acquired coagulopathies raises doubt about the overall value of routine preoperative coagulation screening in children.

REFERENCES

1). Rapaport SI. Preoperative hemostatic evaluation: which tests, if any? Blood. 1983. 61:229–31.
crossref
2). Manning SC., Beste D., McBride T., Goldberg A. An assessment of preoperative coagulation screening for tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy. Int J Pediatr Oto-rhinolaryngol. 1987. 13:237–44.
crossref
3). Haberman RS 2nd., Shattuck TG., Dion NM. Is outpatient suction cautery tonsillectomy safe in a community hospital setting? Laryngoscope. 1990. 100:511–5.
crossref
4). Handler SD., Miller L., Richmond KH., Baranak CC. Post-tonsillectomy hemorrhage: incidence, prevention and management. Laryngoscope. 1986. 96:1243–7.
crossref
5). Schmidt JL., Yaremchuk KL., Mickelson SA. Abnormal coagulation profiles in tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy patients. Henry Ford Hosp Med J. 1990. 38:33–5.
6). Eisenberg JM., Clarke JR., Sussman SA. Prothrombin and partial thromboplastin times as preoperative screening tests. Arch Surg. 1982. 117:48–51.
crossref
7). Kaplan EB., Sheiner LB., Boeckmann AJ, et al. The usefulness of preoperative laboratory screening. JAMA. 1985. 253:3576–81.
crossref
8). Suchman AL., Mushlin AI. How well does the activated partial thromboplastin time predict postoperative hemorrhage? JAMA. 1986. 256:750–3.
crossref
9). Mozes B., Lubin D., Modan B., Ben-Bassat I., Gitel SN., Halkin H. Evaluation of an intervention aimed at reducing inappropriate use of preoperative blood coagulation tests. Arch Intern Med. 1989. 149:1836–8.
crossref
10). Burk CD., Miller L., Handler SD., Cohen AR. Preoperative history and coagulation screening in children undergoing tonsillectomy. Pediatrics. 1992. 89:691–5.
crossref
11). Acosta M., Edwards R., Jaffee IM., Yee DL., Mahoney DH., Teruya J. A practical approach to pediatric patients referred with an abnormal coagulation Profile. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005. 129:1011–6.
crossref
12). Brondeur GM., O'Neill PJ., Williams JA. Acquired inhibitors of coagulation in nonhemophiliac children. J Pediatr. 1980. 96:439–41.
13). Park SK. Clinical approach to the children with coagulation deficiencies. Korean J Pediatr. 2004. 47:1036–40.
14). Kitchens CS. Prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time of unknown etiology: a prospective study of 100 consecutive cases referred for consultation. Am J Hematol. 1988. 27:38–45.
crossref
15). Uthman IW., Gharavi AE. Viral infections and antiphospholipid antibodies. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2002. 31:256–63.
crossref
16). Frauenknecht K., Lackner K., von Landenberg P. Antiphospholipid antibodies in pediatric patients with prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time during infection. Immunobiology. 2005. 210:799–805.
crossref
17). Weisbrot IM. Statistics for the clinical laboratory. Philadelphia, PA: JB Lippincott Co;1985. p. 95–127.

Table 1.
Distributions in 1,911 patients preoperatively screened for coagulopathy
Department No. of patients Abnormalities∗
Orthopedics 515 19
Otorhinolaryngology 466 26
General surgery 455 37
Urology 209 11
Plastic surgery Ophthalmology 157 41 8 9
Chest surgery 26 0
Neurosurgery 24 3
Obstetrics & Gynecology 12 3
Dentistry 6 0
Total 1,911 119

∗Abnormalities: Laboratory abnormalities of preoperative coagulation screening.

Table 2.
Laboratory abnormalities in 1,911 patients preoperatively screened for coagulopathy
Abnormalities Initial∗ Persistent∗
Prolonged aPTT only 109 (91.6%) 18 (81.8%)
Prolonged aPTT and PT 9 (7.6%) 3 (13.6%)
Prolonged PT only 1 (0.8%) 1 (4.6%)
Total 119 (100%) 22 (100%)

∗Number of patients. Abbreviations: time;

PT, prothrombin time.

aPTT, activated partial thromboplastin

Table 3.
The Values of abnormal coagulation screening test
Abnormalities Initial∗ Persistent∗
Prolonged aPTT only Prolonged aPTT and PT 50.9±4.3 53.2±4.1
Prolonged aPTT and PT
  aPTT 61.9±11.3 61.1±13.8
  PT 21.9±7.5 18.5±0.5
Prolonged PT only 17 17

∗The values of abnormal coagulation screening test(mean±SD). Abbreviations:

aPTT, activated partial thromboplastin time;

PT, prothrombin time.

Table 4.
Diagnosis associated with persistent coagulationscreening test abnormalities
Abnormalities Diagnosis No. of patients
Prolonged aPTT∗ only Lupus anticoagulant 1
  VIII deficiency 1
  Undefined 16
Prolonged PT and Lupus anticoagulant 1
  aPTT Undefined 2
Prolonged PT only Undefined 1
Total   22

Abbreviations: ∗aPTT, activated partial thromboplastin time;

PT, prothrombin time.

Table 5.
Surgeries in 46 patients with perioperative bleeding complication
Name of surgeries Laboratory abnormalities∗
Normal Abnormal
Otorhinolaryngology
  Tonsillectomy with adenoidectomy 24 1
  Tonsillectomy 3 0
General surgery
  Appendectomy 1 1
  Repair of inguinal hernia 2 0
  Intra-abdominal manipulation of intestine 1 0
Orthopedics
  Open reduction of fracture 3 0
  Closed reduction of fracture 2 0
  Suture of tendon 1 0
Urology
  Excision of lesion 2 0
  Cystostomy 1 0
Plastic surgery
  Excision of lesion 2 0
  Closed reduction of nasal fracture 1 0
Chest surgery
  Plication of the diaphragm 1 0
  Total 44 2

∗Laboratory abnormalities: Laboratory abnormalities of preoperative coagulation screening.

Table 6.
Prediction of bleeding by preoperative coagulationscreening∗
Preoperative coagulation screening No. of patients of perioperative bleeding complications
Present Absent
Normal Abnormal 44 2 1,845 20

∗Sensitivity=0.04; Specificity=0.99; Positive predictive value =0.09; Negative predictive value=0.98.

TOOLS
Similar articles