Ridge split for implant placement in very thin alveolar ridge

Sin-Guen Kim; Hee-Sung Lee; Jong-Wook Park; Jong-Hoon Nam; Sung-Cheol Bok; Ki-Nam Park; Dong-Ju Choi

doi:10.5125/jkaoms.2011.37.3.229

Journal List > J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg > v.37(3) > 1032471

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

TOOLS

Kim, Lee, Park, Nam, Bok, Park, and Choi: Ridge split for implant placement in very thin alveolar ridge

Original Article

J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;37(3):229-233.

Published online: 10 January 2011

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2011.37.3.229

Ridge split for implant placement in very thin alveolar ridge

Sin-Guen Kim, Hee-Sung Lee, Jong-Wook Park, Jong-Hoon Nam, Sung-Cheol Bok, Ki-Nam Park, Dong-Ju Choi

Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Medicine, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Korea

Dong-Ju Choi Department of Oral & Maxillofacial surgery, Hallym university dental hospital 235-2, Cheongnyangri-dong, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, 130-867, Korea TEL: +82-2-3299-3400 FAX: +82-2-3299-3434 E-mail: djchoidavid@hanmail.net

Received 28 March 2011 Revised 26 May 2011 Accepted 7 June 2011

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

For implant treatment there must be sufficient bone to house the implant body. At least 5mm wide residual bone is needed and usually a 6mm width is preferred by clinicians. However, surgeons sometimes find patients with a narrow ridge, which makes it difficult to place an implant. Therefore, many clinicians perform bone graft or a ridge splitting technique to overcome these poor conditions. The time and cost can be reduced using the ridge splitting technique with immediate implant placement. Recently, many studies reported reliable consequences of ridge splitting technique. This paper reports a successful of implant placement with a ridge splitting technique in a very thin alveolar ridge.

Keywords: Ridge split expansion, Implant placement

References

1. Simion M, Baldoni M, Zaffe D. Jawbone enlargement using immediate implant placement associated with a split-crest technique and guided tissue regeneration. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1992; 12:462–73.

2. Scipioni A, Bruschi GB, Calesini G. The edentulous ridge expansion technique: a five-year study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1994; 14:451–9.

3. Sohn DS, Lee HJ, Heo JU, Moon JW, Park IS, Romanos GE. Immediate and delayed lateral ridge expansion technique in the atrophic posterior mandibular ridge. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010; 68:2283–90. Epub 2010 Jun 26.

4. Sethi A, Kaus T. Maxillary ridge expansion with simultaneous implant placement: 5-year results of an ongoing clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000; 15:491–9.

5. Qahash M, Susin C, Polimeni G, Hall J, Wikesjo ¨ UM. Bone healing dynamics at buccal peri-implant sites. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008; 19:166–72. Epub 2007 Nov 26.

6. Guirado JL, Yuguero MR, Carrio ′ n del Valle MJ, Zamora GP. A maxillary ridge-splitting technique followed by immediate placement of implants: a case report. Implant Dent. 2005; 14:14–20.

7. Jensen OT, Cullum DR, Baer D. Marginal bone stability using 3 different flap approaches for alveolar split expansion for dental implants: a 1-year clinical study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009; 67:1921–30.

8. Jensen OT, Ellis E. The book flap: a technical note. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008; 66:1010–4. PubMed PMID: 18423294.

9. Lustmann J, Lewinstein I. Interpositional bone grafting technique to widen narrow maxillary ridge. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1995; 10:568–77. PubMed PMID: 7591001.

10. Pikos MA. Block autografts for localized ridge augmentation: part II. The posterior mandible. Implant Dent. 2000; 9:67–75.

11. Danza M, Guidi R, Carinci F. Comparison between implants inserted into piezo split and unsplit alveolar crests. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009; 67:2460–5.

12. Dahlin C, Lekholm U, Becker W, Becker B, Higuchi K, Callens A, et al. Treatment of fenestration and dehiscence bone defects around oral implants using the guided tissue regeneration technique: a prospective multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1995; 10:312–8.

Fig. 1.

A: Pre-operation, B: Pre-operation; ridge width, C: Horizontal autobone gain, D: Aveolar ridge splitting by osteotome, E: Post-operation; ridge width, F: Post implants placement, G: Panorama: post prosthetic state.

Fig. 2.

A: Ridge splitting by osteotome, B: Post implant placement (maxilla), C: Bone graft, D: Absorbable membrane adoption, E: Ridge splitted state (mandible), F: Implant placement (mandible), G: Panorama: post prosthetic state, H: Final prosthesis.

Fig. 3.

A: Preoperation, B: Ridge splitted state, C: Implant placement, D: Preoperation periapical radiograph, E: Postoperation periapical radiograph.

TOOLS

Similar articles