PDF
ePub
Citation
Print
Abstract
Introduction
Mini-implant system is applicable to areas of narrow space and area requiring temporary loading support. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of a mini-implant system as well as the application of mini-implant system in the dental clinical field.
Materials and Methods
The patients who had been operated from Jan 2007 to Dec 2007 in the four dental facility including Seoul National University Bundang Hospital were enrolled. To evaluate the factors associated with the clinical outcome, the patients were classified according to gender, age, area of surgery, type of implant, diameter and length of the implant, and the purpose of the mini-implant system application.
References
1. An SH, Ahn KM, Lee KW, Jang BY, Ahn MR, Sohn DS. Clinical application of provisional implant. J Korean Assoc Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003; 25:83–7.
2. Seo M, Yoo CK, Lee EK, Jung DU, Suh JD, Chung IH. Mini-implants to restore missing teeth in severe ridge deficiency and small interdental space. J Korean Assoc Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 31:67–70.
3. Ostman PO, Hellman M, Nilson H, Ericsson I. Provisional implants: a clinical prospective study in 45 patients, from implant placement to delivery of the final bridge. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2004; 6:142–9.
4. Krennmair G, Weinla ¨ nder M, Schmidinger S. Provisional implants for anchoring removable interim prostheses in edentulous jaws: a clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003; 18:582–8.
5. Leshem D, Mazor Z, Leshem R, Rosen D. A simple technique for fabrication of immediate interim removable prosthesis supported by transitional implants. Implant Dent. 2003; 12:227–31.
6. Jang BY, Ahn MR, Ahn KM, Lee WH, Shon DS. Functional recovery of mandibular high condylar fracture patient with immediate provisional implant: case report. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005; 31:82–8.
7. Machado C, Chacon G, Sa ′ nchez E. Palatal mini-implants to increase retention and stability of implant-retained maxillary overdentures: a case report. Implant Dent. 2008; 17:402–7.
8. Bohsali K, Simon H, Kan JY, Redd M. Modular transitional implants to support the interim maxillary overdenture. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1999; 20:975–83.
9. Choquet V, Hermans M, Adriaenssens P, Daelemans P, Tarnow DP, Malevez C. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of the papilla level adjacent to single-tooth dental implants. A retrospective study in the maxillary anterior region. J Periodontol. 2001; 72:1364–71.
10. Froum SJ, Simon H, Cho SC, Elian N, Rohrer MD, Tarnow DP. Histologic evaluation of bone-implant contact of immediately loaded transitional implants after 6 to 27 months. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005; 20:54–60.
11. Proussaefs P. Histologic evaluation of an immediately loaded titanium provisional implant retrieved after functioning for 18 months: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2003; 89:331–4.
12. Simon H, Caputo AA. Removal torque of immediately loaded transitional endosseous implants in human subjects. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002; 17:839–45.
13. Reddy MS, O'Neal SJ, Haigh S, Aponte-Wesson R, Geurs NC. Initial clinical efficacy of 3-mm implants immediately placed into function in conditions of limited spacing. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008; 23:281–8.
14. Froum SJ, Cho SC, Cho YS, Elian N, Tarnow D. Narrow-diameter implants: a restorative option for limited interdental space. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2007; 27:449–55.
15. Polizzi G, Fabbro S, Furri M, Herrmann I, Squarzoni S. Clinical application of narrow Bra � nemark System implants for single-tooth restorations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999; 14:496–503.
16. Vigolo P, Givani A, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G. Clinical evaluation of small-diameter implants in single-tooth and multiple-implant restorations: a 7-year retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004; 19:703–9.
Table 1.
Patients’ characteristics (n=69)
Table 2.
Implant oriented data summary (n=147)
Table 3.
The use of narrow ridge type implants (n=60)
Table 4.
The use of provisional type implants (n=67)
Table 5.
The use of denture type implants (n=20)
XML Download